Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

kickoff-doc(启动文档)

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

kickoff-doc 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 46,073。

总安装 808周安装 34GitHub Stars 1,024下载 283核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:kickoff-doc(启动文档)
来源仓库:https://github.com/rjs/shaping-skills
仓库路径:skills/kickoff-doc
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/rjs/shaping-skills --skill kickoff-doc
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/rjs/shaping-skills --skill kickoff-doc

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

kickoff-doc 用于辅助文档、README 和 Markdown 的整理与改写,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中提炼结构或统一术语。适用于内容稿件和说明文的结构化整理场景。通过 npx skills add 命令安装,需确认权限范围和联网行为。

建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法,注意维护状态和文件读写限制。使用时需保留项目事实,避免将未确认信息写成确定结论。

来源仓库内路径:skills/kickoff-doc

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/rjs/shaping-skills --skill kickoff-doc;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

kickoff-doc 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/rjs/shaping-skills --skill kickoff-doc。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

kickoff-doc 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

kickoff-doc 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

kickoff-doc 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

kickoff-doc 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 808 次,近一周安装 34 次,下载 283 次,GitHub 1,024 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

kickoff-doc 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 1,024 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
kickoff-doc

启动文档 · 本页

8081,024操作浏览器未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Kickoff Document from Transcript

Turn a kickoff call transcript into a builder-facing reference document for a shaped project.


Before You Start

Ask the user:

  1. Who is the primary audience? (Usually the builder who will implement the work.)
  2. What other inputs are there? (Visuals, screenshots, mockups, breadboards from the session.)

The transcript is your source material. The document is NOT a summary of the call — it's a map of the territory that was shaped.


Organizing Principle: Territory, Not Timeline

A kickoff transcript is sequential — people talk through things in the order they come up, circle back, go on tangents, get sidetracked by browser issues. Your job is to reconstruct the territory they were describing, not replay the conversation.

Organize by the thing being built. Each section should describe one area of the system fully — so the builder can look up "how does the Criteria tab work?" and find everything in one place.

Do NOT organize by build sequence. If the team identified slices (a sequence of vertical slices to build in order), those are managed separately — not in this document.


Structure

The document has two top-level sections: Frame and Shape. Both are ## headings. Their subsections are ###.

1. Frame (## Frame)

The strategic context and boundary conditions. This is NOT fluff — the builder needs this to make judgment calls when they hit ambiguity.

  • ### Problem — Why this project, why now. What's broken or missing.
  • ### Outcome — The specific outcomes expected. What success looks like.

2. Shape (## Shape)

One ### section per area of the system. For each area, describe:

  • What it is and what's on the screen (affordances, components, data displayed)
  • How it relates to other areas
  • Design decisions that belong to THIS area — inline, not in a separate section
  • Edge cases or flags that were called out
  • What's temporary/placeholder vs. what's a real commitment

Do NOT include a Build Sequence section. Slices are tracked separately from this document.


Voice: Use Their Words

The document is a record of shared understanding from the kickoff call.

Do

  • Use the actual words and phrases people used on the call
  • Synthesize scattered discussion into clearer form (taking something said across several turns and stating it cleanly)
  • Capture the reasoning people gave for decisions ("we're doing X because Y")

Don't

  • Put new ideas or conclusions in people's mouths
  • Add motivational framing they didn't express ("each piece is a foundation, not a throwaway")
  • Editorialize about importance or quality beyond what was said

The Test

For every sentence, you should be able to point to a moment in the transcript where someone said it or clearly meant it. If you can't, either cut it or flag it as your own synthesis.

Exception: Editorializing that clarifies or synthesizes what was said IS fine. "The criteria screen is how filtering is expressed in the new world" — nobody said that exact sentence, but it accurately captures a point made across several turns. That's the job: make scattered discussion legible without adding your own conclusions.


Design Decisions: Vertical, Not Horizontal

Do NOT create a grab-bag "Design Decisions" section. Instead, put each decision inline in the section where it matters.

  • "Matches stored in DB not Redis" → goes in the section about matching
  • "Candidates must be materialized before attachment" → goes in the section about attaching
  • "Per-ICP match data as value objects" → goes in the section about match results

If a decision only matters when building one specific area, it belongs in that area's section. The builder shouldn't have to cross-reference a separate decisions list while working on a specific screen.


Process

  1. Read the full transcript. Don't start writing after reading part of it.
  2. Identify the areas of the system that were discussed — these become your ### sections under ## Shape.
  3. Draft the Frame (## Frame with ### Problem and ### Outcome) from the framing/outcomes discussion (usually near the start of the call).
  4. Write each Shape section (###...), pulling from wherever in the transcript that area was discussed. A single section may draw from moments scattered across the whole call.
  5. Place design decisions inline in the section they belong to.
  6. Review against the transcript — can you point to where each claim was said?

平台分布

Codex

38.69%
按下载量换算109

Claude

29.42%
按下载量换算83

Cursor

18.33%
按下载量换算52

Gemini CLI

9.17%
按下载量换算26

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills