Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

new(新的)

new 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

new 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 19,141。

总安装 291周安装 12GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 95核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:new(新的)
来源仓库:https://github.com/kelvinz/cobb
仓库路径:skills/new
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/kelvinz/cobb --skill new
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/kelvinz/cobb --skill new

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

new 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。适用于需要跟踪和管理代码协作流程的场景。

通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装使用。安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否涉及联网或文件操作。new 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/new

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/kelvinz/cobb --skill new;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

new 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/kelvinz/cobb --skill new。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

new 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

new 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

new 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

new 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 291 次,近一周安装 12 次,下载 95 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

new 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
new

新的 · 本页

291—只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

new

Create or update tasks/todo.md as the source of truth for what the project is and what features will be built.


Guardrails

  • Do not implement code.
  • Do not write individual feature PRDs (use plan for that).
  • Keep features "PRD-sized": one feature = one PRD. If it spans >2 subsystems, >1 UI surface + backend, or >~1 day of work, split it.
  • Prefer a stable todo.md structure; edit in place rather than rewriting.
  • Write tasks/todo.md so a junior dev (or another AI) can pick it up without extra context.
  • Do not use Markdown tables (use checklists + bullets).
  • Do not check feature boxes unless the PRD actually exists (typically updated by plan).
  • Treat memory capture as built-in: if durable decisions are made, update tasks/memory.md in this step instead of deferring to a separate memory pass.

Workflow

  1. Determine intent:

- New project → initialise tasks/todo.md. - Add/update features → edit the existing tasks/todo.md.

  1. If tasks/memory.md exists, skim relevant sections (project, key decisions, notes / gotchas) so you don't conflict with prior decisions.
  2. Ask clarifying questions only when needed (use A/B/C/D options).
  3. Update tasks/todo.md using the template below:

- New project: write a crisp Project section + propose an initial prioritised feature list, ordered by priority (highest first). - Add/update: add, merge, re-scope, and/or re-order features. - If adding a new Type: fix item and the user didn't specify placement, explicitly ask if it should move up the list (priority is determined by list order).

  1. Ensure each feature has clear in-scope vs out-of-scope boundaries and dependencies (if any).
  2. Evaluate memory-worthy outcomes and update tasks/memory.md inline when needed:

- project definition changes - scope boundaries or constraints that affect future features - priority decisions with durable rationale

  1. Reply with updated file paths and a short change summary (what you added/changed).

Clarifying Questions (Only If Needed)

Ask up to ~7 high-value questions. Keep them answerable via 1A, 2C, 3B.

Focus on ambiguity around:

  • target user + primary use case
  • the problem + desired outcome
  • constraints (platforms, timeline, integrations)
  • success metrics / how we know it worked
  • scope boundaries (what's explicitly in vs out)
  • priority order (what should be done first)
  • whether an item should be Type: feat vs fix vs chore (and where it should sit in priority order)
  • dependencies between features (by ID)

Example question format

1. What are we doing right now?
   A. Start a brand new project
   B. Add new features to an existing plan
   C. Refine/re-scope existing planned features
   D. Other: [describe]

tasks/todo.md Template (Markdown)

If tasks/todo.md does not exist, create it with this structure (fill in details; keep it concise).

# TODO: <Project name>

## Project
- **One-liner**: …
- **Target users**: …
- **Problem**: …
- **Success metrics**: …
- **Constraints** (optional): …
- **Non-goals**: …

## Features

Checkbox meaning: unchecked = PRD not written yet; checked = PRD exists; checked + ~~strikethrough~~ = completed (PRD archived).
Leave unchecked until a PRD exists.
Feature completion is determined by PRDs being archived to `tasks/archive/` and recorded in `tasks/memory.md`; strikethrough here is a derived marker applied during `commit` finalise.

### Features (priority order)
- Higher in the list = higher priority.
- [ ] f-01: <feature name>
  - Type: feat | fix | chore
  - Outcome: <user-visible outcome>
  - In scope: <what ships>
  - Out of scope: <what does not ship>
  - Dependencies: <none> | f-02, f-10

- [ ] f-02: <feature name>
  - Type: feat | fix | chore
  - Outcome: <user-visible outcome>
  - In scope: <what ships>
  - Out of scope: <what does not ship>
  - Dependencies: <none> | f-01

## Open Questions (project-wide only; per-feature questions go under each feature entry)
- Q-1: …

Update Rules (When tasks/todo.md Exists)

  • Preserve existing content and wording unless the user asks to change it.
  • Avoid duplicates: if a new feature overlaps an existing one, merge or propose a rename instead of adding a second item.
  • Keep IDs stable; IDs must be globally unique within tasks/todo.md.
  • When adding a new feature, use the next ID as (max existing f-##) + 1 (never reuse old IDs).
  • If duplicate IDs already exist, resolve by renumbering the newer/less-referenced item(s) and updating any Dependencies: references.
  • Keep the list prioritised top-to-bottom; if placement is unclear, ask where to insert (or add to the bottom).
  • If a feature depends on another feature, ensure the dependency is listed above it (or explicitly confirm the ordering).
  • Keep checkbox meaning consistent: checked means "PRD exists".
  • Ensure each feature entry includes:

- a type (feat/fix/chore) - a clear user-visible outcome - in scope / out of scope boundaries - dependencies by ID (if any)


Feature Writing Guidelines

  • Prefer feature names as verb phrases (e.g., "Invite teammates", "Export CSV").
  • For fix items, name them clearly (e.g., "Fix ") and set Type: fix. Include minimal bug info:

- Current behaviour: … - Expected behaviour: … - Repro steps (if known): …

  • For chores, keep them crisp and outcome-oriented (e.g., "Chore: remove dead code") and set Type: chore.
  • Ensure each feature has a crisp outcome (what changes for the user).
  • Avoid implementation tasks ("refactor", "set up DB") unless they are truly user-facing requirements.
  • If a feature is too large, split by user goal or workflow step until each item could reasonably become a single PRD.

Output

  • Create or reuse tasks/.
  • Create or update tasks/todo.md.
  • After updating, suggest the next feature to spec with plan (by ID/name): highest priority unchecked feature (checked = PRD exists).
  • When a PRD is created via plan, ensure the matching feature checkbox is checked in tasks/todo.md.
  • If you made a durable project decision (scope boundary, constraint, key choice), update tasks/memory.md in the same run.
  • End with a short status block:

- Files changed: list of created/updated files - Key decisions: any assumptions or choices made (if any) - Next step: recommended next skill or action


Quality Checklist

Before finalising tasks/todo.md:

  • Project section explains what the project is and who it serves.
  • Feature list is prioritised and reasonably sized (avoid 30 "must-haves").
  • Feature IDs are unique and stable (no duplicates).
  • No feature is checked unless its PRD exists.
  • Each feature has a Type: (feat / fix / chore).
  • Each feature has a user-visible outcome and explicit scope boundaries.
  • Dependencies (if any) reference valid feature IDs.
  • Duplicates/overlaps are merged or clearly distinguished.

平台分布

Codex

36.16%
按下载量换算34

Claude

28.9%
按下载量换算27

Cursor

17.24%
按下载量换算16

Gemini CLI

8.92%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills