Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

lean-canvas(精益画布)

lean-canvas 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

lean-canvas 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 67,721。

总安装 242周安装 10GitHub Stars 35下载 79核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:lean-canvas(精益画布)
来源仓库:https://github.com/kazdenc/builder-skills
仓库路径:skills/lean-canvas
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/kazdenc/builder-skills --skill lean-canvas
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/kazdenc/builder-skills --skill lean-canvas

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

lean-canvas 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,支持关键词和任务场景定位。适用于 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中的信息快速筛选需求。通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装,需结合原始 README 确认具体用法。

安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。该技能当前分类为研究检索,实际功能以来源仓库描述为准。

来源仓库内路径:skills/lean-canvas

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/kazdenc/builder-skills --skill lean-canvas;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

lean-canvas 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/kazdenc/builder-skills --skill lean-canvas。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

lean-canvas 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

lean-canvas 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

lean-canvas 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

lean-canvas 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 242 次,近一周安装 10 次,下载 79 次,GitHub 35 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

lean-canvas 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lean-canvas

精益画布 · 本页

24235需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Lean Canvas

When someone asks you to think through a business model, product strategy, or idea validation, use the lean canvas. Fill one page, not a slide deck. The constraint is the point — it forces clarity.

A lean canvas is a snapshot of a business model hypothesis. Every box is a bet. Treat it that way: state the bet, then figure out how to test it.

The Canvas Layout

┌───────────────┬───────────────┬───────────────┬───────────────┬───────────────┐
│               │               │               │               │               │
│   PROBLEM     │   SOLUTION    │   UNIQUE      │   UNFAIR      │   CUSTOMER    │
│               │               │   VALUE       │   ADVANTAGE   │   SEGMENTS    │
│   Top 3       │   Top 3       │   PROPOSITION │               │               │
│   problems    │   features    │               │   Can't be    │   Target      │
│               │               │   Single,     │   easily      │   customers   │
│               │               │   clear,      │   copied or   │               │
│               │               │   compelling  │   bought      │   Early       │
│               │               │   message     │               │   adopters    │
│               │               │               │               │               │
├───────────────┴───────┬───────┴───────────────┴───────┬───────┴───────────────┤
│                       │                               │                       │
│   KEY METRICS         │   CHANNELS                    │   REVENUE STREAMS     │
│                       │                               │                       │
│   Key activities      │   Path to                     │   Revenue model       │
│   you measure         │   customers                   │   Pricing             │
│                       │                               │                       │
├───────────────────────┴───────────────────────────────┴───────────────────────┤
│                               │                                               │
│   COST STRUCTURE              │   REVENUE STREAMS                             │
│                               │                                               │
│   Fixed and variable costs    │   (continued from above)                      │
│                               │                                               │
└───────────────────────────────┴───────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Simplified reading order — fill boxes in this sequence for the clearest thinking:

1. Customer Segments  →  2. Problem  →  3. Unique Value Proposition
4. Solution  →  5. Channels  →  6. Revenue Streams
7. Cost Structure  →  8. Key Metrics  →  9. Unfair Advantage

Start with the customer, not the solution. If someone hands you a solution first, work backward to the customer and problem before filling in anything else.

The Nine Boxes

1. Customer Segments

Put the specific group of people who have the problem. Not "everyone." Not "businesses." Name a narrow early-adopter segment you can reach first.

Fill with: One primary segment. Optionally one secondary. Describe them by behavior, not demographics. "Freelance designers who manage their own invoicing" beats "millennials aged 25-35."

Common mistakes:

  • Too broad ("SMBs," "developers"). Narrow it until you can picture where they hang out online.
  • Listing multiple unrelated segments. One canvas = one segment. Make separate canvases for different segments.
  • Confusing users with customers (the person who pays may differ from the person who uses).

Connects to: Problem (their problem, not yours), Channels (where you find them), Revenue (what they'll pay).

2. Problem

List the top 1-3 problems this segment actually has. Not problems you wish they had. Not problems your solution happens to solve.

Fill with: Concrete problems stated from the customer's perspective. "I spend 4 hours a week chasing late invoices" not "invoicing is inefficient." Also note existing alternatives — how they solve this problem today (even badly).

Common mistakes:

  • Listing problems only your solution solves (solution bias). Step back: what's the real problem?
  • Skipping existing alternatives. If you don't know how they cope today, you don't understand the problem.
  • Too abstract. "Communication is hard" is not a problem — "remote teams lose context when handoffs happen across time zones" is.

Connects to: Customer Segments (whose problem), Solution (your answer), UVP (why your answer is better than existing alternatives).

3. Unique Value Proposition

Write a single, clear sentence that says why this product deserves attention. This is the hardest box. Don't rush it.

Fill with: One sentence. Format: [End result customer wants] + [Specific time period or qualifier] + [Address the main objection]. Example: "Get paid on time, every time — without chasing clients."

Common mistakes:

  • Feature soup ("AI-powered, cloud-native, real-time collaboration platform"). Features go in Solution.
  • No differentiation. If you can swap in a competitor's name and it still works, it's not a UVP.
  • Too clever. Clarity beats cleverness. The reader should understand it in under 5 seconds.

Connects to: Problem (the pain it resolves), Solution (what delivers it), Customer Segments (who cares about this promise).

4. Solution

List the top 3 features or capabilities that deliver on the UVP. Keep it minimal — this is your MVP scope.

Fill with: Three bullet points max. Each should map directly to a problem from box 2. If a feature doesn't map to a stated problem, cut it.

Common mistakes:

  • Feature overload. More than 3 means you haven't prioritized.
  • Solutions that don't map back to stated problems.
  • Building before validating. The solution box is a hypothesis — test it before you commit.

Connects to: Problem (each solution maps to a problem), UVP (together they deliver the promise), Cost Structure (what it costs to build and run).

5. Channels

Describe how you reach and deliver value to customers. Split into two phases: how they find out about you, and how they get the product.

Fill with: Specific channels. "Content marketing" is vague. "SEO-driven blog targeting 'freelance invoice templates'" is specific. Prioritize free or low-cost channels for early stage.

Common mistakes:

  • Listing aspirational channels you can't actually execute ("viral growth," "partnerships with enterprise").
  • Ignoring the channel-segment fit. Your customers are somewhere specific — go there.
  • Forgetting delivery channels. How does the product actually reach them?

Connects to: Customer Segments (where they are), Cost Structure (channel costs), Revenue Streams (how they buy).

6. Revenue Streams

State how you make money and how much you expect to charge. Be specific about the model.

Fill with: Pricing model (subscription, one-time, freemium, transaction fee), price point or range, and who pays. Include a rough calculation: [number of customers] x [price] = [revenue target].

Common mistakes:

  • "We'll figure out pricing later." Price is part of the product. State a hypothesis now.
  • No connection to what the customer values. Price should relate to the problem's cost, not your costs.
  • Ignoring willingness to pay. What do they pay for existing alternatives?

Connects to: Customer Segments (who pays), Cost Structure (margin = revenue minus cost), Channels (how they purchase).

7. Cost Structure

List what it costs to operate this business. Include both building the product and reaching customers.

Fill with: Fixed costs (salaries, infrastructure, tools) and variable costs (per-customer costs, channel spend). Identify the biggest cost drivers.

Common mistakes:

  • Only listing product costs, forgetting acquisition costs.
  • Being too precise too early. Rough ranges are fine — the point is identifying cost drivers, not budgeting.
  • Missing hidden costs (support, compliance, payment processing).

Connects to: Revenue Streams (what margin looks like), Solution (build cost), Channels (acquisition cost).

8. Key Metrics

Define how you measure whether this model is working. Pick 3-5 metrics max.

Fill with: One metric per stage of the customer lifecycle. Use pirate metrics (AARRR) as a scaffold:

StageMeasuresExample
AcquisitionHow they find youVisitors, signups
ActivationFirst "aha" momentCompleted onboarding, first invoice sent
RetentionDo they come backWeekly active use, month-2 retention
RevenueDo they payConversion rate, ARPU
ReferralDo they tell othersNPS, referral rate

Common mistakes:

  • Vanity metrics (page views, total signups). Measure what predicts business health.
  • Too many metrics. If everything is a key metric, nothing is.
  • No leading indicators. Revenue is a lagging indicator — track what predicts it.

Connects to: All other boxes. Metrics validate every hypothesis on the canvas.

9. Unfair Advantage

Name something you have that can't be easily copied or bought. This is the moat. It's okay to leave this blank early — most startups don't have one yet.

Fill with: Insider knowledge, existing audience, network effects, community, proprietary data, personal authority, regulatory advantage, or team expertise. Not features — features can be copied.

Common mistakes:

  • Listing things that aren't actually hard to copy ("first mover advantage," "great UX," "passion").
  • Confusing competitive advantage with unfair advantage. A competitive advantage is temporary; an unfair advantage compounds over time.
  • Forcing it. If you don't have one, write "None yet — to be developed" and plan how to build one.

Connects to: UVP (amplifies it), Customer Segments (why they stay), Key Metrics (retention and referral).

When to Use Lean Canvas vs Other Frameworks

SituationUseWhy
Validating a new business ideaLean CanvasMaps the full business model in one page
Understanding what customers needJTBDGoes deeper on the job and unmet needs
Prioritizing features in a backlogJTBD opportunity scoringQuantifies importance vs satisfaction
Pitching to investorsLean Canvas as starting point, then expandForces you to articulate the core model
Evaluating a pivotLean Canvas side by sideCompare current model vs proposed model
Designing a specific featureJTBD job stories"When [situation], I want to [job], so I can [need]"
Competitive analysisBothLean Canvas maps their model; JTBD maps how well they satisfy needs
Planning a product launchNeither — use a launch planLean Canvas is strategy, not execution

Use lean canvas for breadth (whole business model). Use JTBD for depth (customer needs and jobs). They're complementary.

Lean Canvas to JTBD Mapping

When both frameworks are relevant, connect them:

Lean Canvas BoxJTBD ConceptHow They Connect
Customer SegmentsJob performerSame person — described by the job they're hiring a product to do
ProblemUnderserved needsProblems are clusters of unmet needs within a job
Existing AlternativesCurrent solutions being "fired"The push force — what's driving switching behavior
UVPWhy they'd "hire" your productThe pull force — the promise that attracts job performers
SolutionProduct capabilitiesFeatures that satisfy the most underserved needs
Customer Segments (early adopters)Most-constrained performersPeople whose needs are most underserved by current solutions
Key Metrics (Activation)Job completionThe moment the customer successfully gets the job done
Key Metrics (Retention)Recurring job frequencyHow often the job occurs determines natural usage cadence
Revenue StreamsWillingness to payCorrelates with importance of the job and pain of current alternatives
Unfair AdvantageSwitching costs (in your favor)What creates anxiety about leaving — network effects, data, habit
ChannelsCircumstances / contextWhere and when customers encounter the need to get the job done

Working With the Canvas

Fill it in 20 minutes, not 20 days. Speed matters. The first version is wrong — that's the point. You're making your assumptions explicit so you can test them.

One canvas per customer segment. If you have two distinct segments, make two canvases. Merging them hides critical differences.

Highlight the riskiest box. After filling it in, circle the box you're least confident about. That's what to test first. Usually it's Problem or Customer Segments, not Solution.

Revise weekly during early stage. The canvas is a living document. After each customer conversation, experiment, or data point, update it.

Read it as a story. A good canvas tells a coherent narrative: "[Customer] has [problem]. They currently [existing alternative]. We offer [UVP] through [solution], reaching them via [channels]. We charge [revenue model] and it costs us [cost structure]. We'll know it's working when [key metrics]. Over time, [unfair advantage] makes us hard to displace."

Use it to pressure-test ideas people bring you. When someone says "we should build X," put it on a canvas. The empty boxes reveal what they haven't thought through.

平台分布

Codex

37.84%
按下载量换算30

Claude

28.2%
按下载量换算22

Cursor

19.38%
按下载量换算15

Gemini CLI

8.76%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills