Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

distill(设计提炼)

distill 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

distill 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 67,721。

总安装 242周安装 10GitHub Stars 35下载 79核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:distill(设计提炼)
来源仓库:https://github.com/kazdenc/builder-skills
仓库路径:skills/distill
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/kazdenc/builder-skills --skill distill
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/kazdenc/builder-skills --skill distill

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

distill 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,支持关键词和任务场景定位。适用于 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中的信息快速筛选需求。通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装,需结合原始 README 确认具体用法。

安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。该技能当前分类为研究检索,实际功能以来源仓库描述为准。

来源仓库内路径:skills/distill

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/kazdenc/builder-skills --skill distill;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

distill 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/kazdenc/builder-skills --skill distill。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

distill 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

distill 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

distill 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

distill 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 242 次,近一周安装 10 次,下载 79 次,GitHub 35 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

distill 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
distill

设计提炼 · 本页

24235只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Remove unnecessary complexity from designs, revealing the essential elements and creating clarity through ruthless simplification.

MANDATORY PREPARATION

Context Gathering (Do This First)

You cannot do a great job without having necessary context, such as target audience (critical), desired use-cases (critical), and understanding what's truly essential vs nice-to-have for this product.

Attempt to gather these from the current thread or codebase.

  1. If you don't find *exact* information and have to infer from existing design and functionality, you MUST STOP and {{ask_instruction}} whether you got it right.
  2. Otherwise, if you can't fully infer or your level of confidence is medium or lower, you MUST {{ask_instruction}} clarifying questions first to complete your context.

Do NOT proceed until you have answers. Simplifying the wrong things destroys usability.

Use frontend-design skill

Use the frontend-design skill for design principles and anti-patterns. Do NOT proceed until it has executed and you know all DO's and DON'Ts.


Assess Current State

Analyze what makes the design feel complex or cluttered:

  1. Identify complexity sources:

- Too many elements: Competing buttons, redundant information, visual clutter - Excessive variation: Too many colors, fonts, sizes, styles without purpose - Information overload: Everything visible at once, no progressive disclosure - Visual noise: Unnecessary borders, shadows, backgrounds, decorations - Confusing hierarchy: Unclear what matters most - Feature creep: Too many options, actions, or paths forward

  1. Find the essence:

- What's the primary user goal? (There should be ONE) - What's actually necessary vs nice-to-have? - What can be removed, hidden, or combined? - What's the 20% that delivers 80% of value?

If any of these are unclear from the codebase, {{ask_instruction}}

CRITICAL: Simplicity is not about removing features - it's about removing obstacles between users and their goals. Every element should justify its existence.

Plan Simplification

Create a ruthless editing strategy:

  • Core purpose: What's the ONE thing this should accomplish?
  • Essential elements: What's truly necessary to achieve that purpose?
  • Progressive disclosure: What can be hidden until needed?
  • Consolidation opportunities: What can be combined or integrated?

IMPORTANT: Simplification is hard. It requires saying no to good ideas to make room for great execution. Be ruthless.

Simplify the Design

Systematically remove complexity across these dimensions:

Information Architecture

  • Reduce scope: Remove secondary actions, optional features, redundant information
  • Progressive disclosure: Hide complexity behind clear entry points (accordions, modals, step-through flows)
  • Combine related actions: Merge similar buttons, consolidate forms, group related content
  • Clear hierarchy: ONE primary action, few secondary actions, everything else tertiary or hidden
  • Remove redundancy: If it's said elsewhere, don't repeat it here

Visual Simplification

  • Reduce color palette: Use 1-2 colors plus neutrals, not 5-7 colors
  • Limit typography: One font family, 3-4 sizes maximum, 2-3 weights
  • Remove decorations: Eliminate borders, shadows, backgrounds that don't serve hierarchy or function
  • Flatten structure: Reduce nesting, remove unnecessary containers—never nest cards inside cards
  • Remove unnecessary cards: Cards aren't needed for basic layout; use spacing and alignment instead
  • Consistent spacing: Use one spacing scale, remove arbitrary gaps

Layout Simplification

  • Linear flow: Replace complex grids with simple vertical flow where possible
  • Remove sidebars: Move secondary content inline or hide it
  • Full-width: Use available space generously instead of complex multi-column layouts
  • Consistent alignment: Pick left or center, stick with it
  • Generous white space: Let content breathe, don't pack everything tight

Interaction Simplification

  • Reduce choices: Fewer buttons, fewer options, clearer path forward (paradox of choice is real)
  • Smart defaults: Make common choices automatic, only ask when necessary
  • Inline actions: Replace modal flows with inline editing where possible
  • Remove steps: Can signup be one step instead of three? Can checkout be simplified?
  • Clear CTAs: ONE obvious next step, not five competing actions

Content Simplification

  • Shorter copy: Cut every sentence in half, then do it again
  • Active voice: "Save changes" not "Changes will be saved"
  • Remove jargon: Plain language always wins
  • Scannable structure: Short paragraphs, bullet points, clear headings
  • Essential information only: Remove marketing fluff, legalese, hedging
  • Remove redundant copy: No headers restating intros, no repeated explanations, say it once

Code Simplification

  • Remove unused code: Dead CSS, unused components, orphaned files
  • Flatten component trees: Reduce nesting depth
  • Consolidate styles: Merge similar styles, use utilities consistently
  • Reduce variants: Does that component need 12 variations, or can 3 cover 90% of cases?

NEVER:

  • Remove necessary functionality (simplicity ≠ feature-less)
  • Sacrifice accessibility for simplicity (clear labels and ARIA still required)
  • Make things so simple they're unclear (mystery ≠ minimalism)
  • Remove information users need to make decisions
  • Eliminate hierarchy completely (some things should stand out)
  • Oversimplify complex domains (match complexity to actual task complexity)

Verify Simplification

Ensure simplification improves usability:

  • Faster task completion: Can users accomplish goals more quickly?
  • Reduced cognitive load: Is it easier to understand what to do?
  • Still complete: Are all necessary features still accessible?
  • Clearer hierarchy: Is it obvious what matters most?
  • Better performance: Does simpler design load faster?

Document Removed Complexity

If you removed features or options:

  • Document why they were removed
  • Consider if they need alternative access points
  • Note any user feedback to monitor

Remember: You have great taste and judgment. Simplification is an act of confidence - knowing what to keep and courage to remove the rest. As Antoine de Saint-Exupéry said: "Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away."

平台分布

Codex

38.41%
按下载量换算30

Claude

30.76%
按下载量换算24

Cursor

18.65%
按下载量换算15

Gemini CLI

10.07%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills