Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

python-anti-patterns(Python anti 模式)

用于辅助 Python 项目开发、测试、依赖管理和常见框架工作流。它适合让 Agent 阅读 Python 代码、定位测试问题、整理运行命令、生成脚本或分析数据处理逻辑。使用时需要确认项目虚拟环境、依赖版本和测试入口;涉及执行脚本、读写文件、访问数据库或调用外部 API 时,应先明确运行目录和输入输出范围,避免误改生产数据。

python-anti-patterns 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 15,051。

总安装 635周安装 27GitHub Stars 61下载 222核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:python-anti-patterns(Python anti 模式)
来源仓库:https://github.com/julianobarbosa/claude-code-skills
仓库路径:skills/python-anti-patterns
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/julianobarbosa/claude-code-skills --skill python-anti-patterns
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/julianobarbosa/claude-code-skills --skill python-anti-patterns

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

用于辅助 Python 项目开发、测试和依赖管理。适合阅读代码、定位问题或生成运行脚本。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。通过 GitHub 仓库安装,需确认虚拟环境和依赖版本。涉及数据库或 API 调用时应明确输入输出范围。

python-anti-patterns 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/python-anti-patterns

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/julianobarbosa/claude-code-skills --skill pyth…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

python-anti-patterns 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/julianobarbosa/claude-code-skills --skill python-anti-pa…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

python-anti-patterns 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

python-anti-patterns 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

python-anti-patterns 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

python-anti-patterns 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 635 次,近一周安装 27 次,下载 222 次,GitHub 61 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

python-anti-patterns 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
python-anti-patterns

Python anti 模式 · 本页

63561接触敏感数据未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Python Anti-Patterns Checklist

A reference checklist of common mistakes and anti-patterns in Python code. Review this before finalizing implementations to catch issues early.

When to Use This Skill

  • Reviewing code before merge
  • Debugging mysterious issues
  • Teaching or learning Python best practices
  • Establishing team coding standards
  • Refactoring legacy code

Note: This skill focuses on what to avoid. For guidance on positive patterns and architecture, see the python-design-patterns skill.

Infrastructure Anti-Patterns

Scattered Timeout/Retry Logic

# BAD: Timeout logic duplicated everywhere
def fetch_user(user_id):
    try:
        return requests.get(url, timeout=30)
    except Timeout:
        logger.warning("Timeout fetching user")
        return None

def fetch_orders(user_id):
    try:
        return requests.get(url, timeout=30)
    except Timeout:
        logger.warning("Timeout fetching orders")
        return None

Fix: Centralize in decorators or client wrappers.

# GOOD: Centralized retry logic
@retry(stop=stop_after_attempt(3), wait=wait_exponential())
def http_get(url: str) -> Response:
    return requests.get(url, timeout=30)

Double Retry

# BAD: Retrying at multiple layers
@retry(max_attempts=3)  # Application retry
def call_service():
    return client.request()  # Client also has retry configured!

Fix: Retry at one layer only. Know your infrastructure's retry behavior.

Hard-Coded Configuration

# BAD: Secrets and config in code
DB_HOST = "prod-db.example.com"
API_KEY = "sk-12345"

def connect():
    return psycopg.connect(f"host={DB_HOST}...")

Fix: Use environment variables with typed settings.

# GOOD
from pydantic_settings import BaseSettings

class Settings(BaseSettings):
    db_host: str = Field(alias="DB_HOST")
    api_key: str = Field(alias="API_KEY")

settings = Settings()

Architecture Anti-Patterns

Exposed Internal Types

# BAD: Leaking ORM model to API
@app.get("/users/{id}")
def get_user(id: str) -> UserModel:  # SQLAlchemy model
    return db.query(UserModel).get(id)

Fix: Use DTOs/response models.

# GOOD
@app.get("/users/{id}")
def get_user(id: str) -> UserResponse:
    user = db.query(UserModel).get(id)
    return UserResponse.from_orm(user)

Mixed I/O and Business Logic

# BAD: SQL embedded in business logic
def calculate_discount(user_id: str) -> float:
    user = db.query("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?", user_id)
    orders = db.query("SELECT * FROM orders WHERE user_id = ?", user_id)
    # Business logic mixed with data access
    if len(orders) > 10:
        return 0.15
    return 0.0

Fix: Repository pattern. Keep business logic pure.

# GOOD
def calculate_discount(user: User, orders: list[Order]) -> float:
    # Pure business logic, easily testable
    if len(orders) > 10:
        return 0.15
    return 0.0

Error Handling Anti-Patterns

Bare Exception Handling

# BAD: Swallowing all exceptions
try:
    process()
except Exception:
    pass  # Silent failure - bugs hidden forever

Fix: Catch specific exceptions. Log or handle appropriately.

# GOOD
try:
    process()
except ConnectionError as e:
    logger.warning("Connection failed, will retry", error=str(e))
    raise
except ValueError as e:
    logger.error("Invalid input", error=str(e))
    raise BadRequestError(str(e))

Ignored Partial Failures

# BAD: Stops on first error
def process_batch(items):
    results = []
    for item in items:
        result = process(item)  # Raises on error - batch aborted
        results.append(result)
    return results

Fix: Capture both successes and failures.

# GOOD
def process_batch(items) -> BatchResult:
    succeeded = {}
    failed = {}
    for idx, item in enumerate(items):
        try:
            succeeded[idx] = process(item)
        except Exception as e:
            failed[idx] = e
    return BatchResult(succeeded, failed)

Missing Input Validation

# BAD: No validation
def create_user(data: dict):
    return User(**data)  # Crashes deep in code on bad input

Fix: Validate early at API boundaries.

# GOOD
def create_user(data: dict) -> User:
    validated = CreateUserInput.model_validate(data)
    return User.from_input(validated)

Resource Anti-Patterns

Unclosed Resources

# BAD: File never closed
def read_file(path):
    f = open(path)
    return f.read()  # What if this raises?

Fix: Use context managers.

# GOOD
def read_file(path):
    with open(path) as f:
        return f.read()

Blocking in Async

# BAD: Blocks the entire event loop
async def fetch_data():
    time.sleep(1)  # Blocks everything!
    response = requests.get(url)  # Also blocks!

Fix: Use async-native libraries.

# GOOD
async def fetch_data():
    await asyncio.sleep(1)
    async with httpx.AsyncClient() as client:
        response = await client.get(url)

Type Safety Anti-Patterns

Missing Type Hints

# BAD: No types
def process(data):
    return data["value"] * 2

Fix: Annotate all public functions.

# GOOD
def process(data: dict[str, int]) -> int:
    return data["value"] * 2

Untyped Collections

# BAD: Generic list without type parameter
def get_users() -> list:
    ...

Fix: Use type parameters.

# GOOD
def get_users() -> list[User]:
    ...

Testing Anti-Patterns

Only Testing Happy Paths

# BAD: Only tests success case
def test_create_user():
    user = service.create_user(valid_data)
    assert user.id is not None

Fix: Test error conditions and edge cases.

# GOOD
def test_create_user_success():
    user = service.create_user(valid_data)
    assert user.id is not None

def test_create_user_invalid_email():
    with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Invalid email"):
        service.create_user(invalid_email_data)

def test_create_user_duplicate_email():
    service.create_user(valid_data)
    with pytest.raises(ConflictError):
        service.create_user(valid_data)

Over-Mocking

# BAD: Mocking everything
def test_user_service():
    mock_repo = Mock()
    mock_cache = Mock()
    mock_logger = Mock()
    mock_metrics = Mock()
    # Test doesn't verify real behavior

Fix: Use integration tests for critical paths. Mock only external services.

Quick Review Checklist

Before finalizing code, verify:

  • No scattered timeout/retry logic (centralized)
  • No double retry (app + infrastructure)
  • No hard-coded configuration or secrets
  • No exposed internal types (ORM models, protobufs)
  • No mixed I/O and business logic
  • No bare except Exception: pass
  • No ignored partial failures in batches
  • No missing input validation
  • No unclosed resources (using context managers)
  • No blocking calls in async code
  • All public functions have type hints
  • Collections have type parameters
  • Error paths are tested
  • Edge cases are covered

Common Fixes Summary

Anti-PatternFix
Scattered retry logicCentralized decorators
Hard-coded configEnvironment variables + pydantic-settings
Exposed ORM modelsDTO/response schemas
Mixed I/O + logicRepository pattern
Bare exceptCatch specific exceptions
Batch stops on errorReturn BatchResult with successes/failures
No validationValidate at boundaries with Pydantic
Unclosed resourcesContext managers
Blocking in asyncAsync-native libraries
Missing typesType annotations on all public APIs
Only happy path testsTest errors and edge cases

平台分布

Codex

34.63%
按下载量换算77

Claude

30.59%
按下载量换算68

Cursor

16.44%
按下载量换算36

Gemini CLI

8.62%
按下载量换算19

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills