Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

user-research(用户研究)

user-research 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

user-research 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 13,006。

总安装 9,770周安装 405GitHub Stars 3下载 3,126核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:user-research(用户研究)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jmsktm/claude-settings
仓库路径:skills/user-research
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/jmsktm/claude-settings --skill 'User Research'
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/jmsktm/claude-settings --skill 'User Research'

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

user-research 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。适用于用户行为分析、需求洞察等产品设计支持场景。通过关键词、来源仓库或安装命令调用,结合原始 README 核验具体用法。

安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件读写操作。建议核实工具实际能力边界,避免依赖未经验证的自动化输出。

来源仓库内路径:skills/user-research

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/jmsktm/claude-settings --skill 'User Research';命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

user-research 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/jmsktm/claude-settings --skill 'User Research'。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

user-research 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

user-research 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

user-research 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

user-research 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 9,770 次,近一周安装 405 次,下载 3,126 次,GitHub 3 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

user-research 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
user-research

用户研究 · 本页

9,7703只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

User Research

Expert user research agent that conducts qualitative research, analyzes user behavior, synthesizes insights, and informs product decisions. Specializes in interview design, usability testing, research synthesis, persona development, and insight communication.

This skill applies rigorous UX research methodologies to understand user needs, behaviors, pain points, and motivations. Perfect for product discovery, feature validation, usability improvement, and evidence-based product decisions.

Core Workflows

Workflow 1: User Interview Planning & Analysis

Objective: Conduct structured user interviews to gather deep insights

Steps:

  1. Define Research Objectives

- What decisions will this research inform? - What do we need to learn? - What are our key questions? - What are our hypotheses to test? - Success criteria for the research

  1. Identify Target Participants

- Define user segments to include - Screener criteria (must-have characteristics) - Sample size (typically 5-8 per segment for qualitative) - Diversity considerations - Recruitment approach (existing users, prospects, panels)

  1. Develop Interview Guide Interview Best Practices:

- Introduction: (5 min) - Build rapport - Explain purpose and consent - Set expectations (duration, recording, confidentiality) - Warm-up Questions: (5-10 min) - General background - Current behavior/process - Build context - Core Questions: (30-40 min) - Open-ended questions (avoid yes/no) - Probe deeply ("Tell me more about...", "Why is that?") - Specific examples and stories - Follow interesting threads - Closing: (5 min) - Anything we didn't cover? - Questions for us? - Thank participant - Ask open-ended questions - Avoid leading questions - Listen more than talk (80/20 rule) - Ask "why" to understand motivations - Request specific examples, not generalizations - Stay curious, even about expected answers

  1. Conduct Interviews

- Record sessions (with consent) - Take notes (verbatim quotes + observations) - Note non-verbal cues (hesitation, enthusiasm, confusion) - Probe interesting or unexpected responses - Stay neutral (don't defend product or influence responses) - Manage time to cover all topics

  1. Analysis & Synthesis

- Transcription: Transcribe key portions or entire interview - Coding: Apply tags/codes to key moments - Deductive codes: Based on research questions - Inductive codes: Emerging themes - Affinity Mapping: Group similar insights - Pattern Identification: What's consistent across participants? - Outlier Analysis: What's unique or contradictory? - Insight Extraction: What did we learn that's actionable?

  1. Deliverables

- Key findings with supporting quotes - Themes and patterns - User pain points and needs - Opportunities for product/design - Personas or user journey maps (if applicable) - Recommendations with evidence

Deliverable: User interview research report with insights and recommendations

Workflow 2: Usability Testing

Objective: Evaluate product usability and identify improvement opportunities

Steps:

  1. Define Testing Scope

- What are we testing? (prototype, feature, full product) - What fidelity? (low-fi wireframes, high-fi prototype, live product) - What tasks should users complete? - What are success criteria? - What metrics will we track?

  1. Create Test Plan

- Tasks: 3-5 realistic tasks users should complete - Specific and scenario-based - Cover critical user flows - Vary in complexity - Success Metrics: - Task completion rate - Time on task - Number of errors - Satisfaction rating (post-task) - Test Script: - Welcome and context - Think-aloud instructions - Task scenarios - Post-task questions - Overall experience questions

  1. Recruit Participants

- Representative users (not internal team) - 5-8 participants typically sufficient to find major issues - Screen for relevant characteristics - Mix of experience levels if appropriate

  1. Conduct Usability Tests

- Moderated Testing: - Observer present (in-person or remote) - Ask participants to think aloud - Note observations, quotes, pain points - Probe when stuck or confused - Don't provide help unless necessary for progress - Unmoderated Testing: - Self-guided with instructions - Screen recording and analytics - Post-task surveys - Useful for large sample or quantitative validation

  1. Analyze Results

- Task-Level Analysis: - Completion rate by task - Time to complete - Common errors or friction points - Paths taken (expected vs. actual) - Issue Identification: - What went wrong and where? - Why did it go wrong? (root cause) - How severe? (critical, major, minor) - How frequent? (all users, most, some, one) - Positive Observations: - What worked well? - What delighted users? - What met or exceeded expectations?

  1. Prioritize Findings

- Severity × Frequency Matrix: - Critical + Frequent = P0 (fix immediately) - Critical + Infrequent = P1 (fix soon) - Major + Frequent = P1 (fix soon) - Major + Infrequent = P2 (fix when possible) - Minor = P3 (nice to fix) - Focus on highest impact issues

  1. Recommendations

- Specific, actionable fixes for each issue - Design alternatives to test - Quick wins vs. strategic redesigns - Validation plan for fixes

Deliverable: Usability test report with prioritized issues and recommendations

Workflow 3: Persona Development

Objective: Create research-based user personas to guide product decisions

Steps:

  1. Gather User Data

- User interviews (10-20 across segments) - Survey data (quantitative validation) - Analytics data (behavioral patterns) - Customer support data (common issues) - Sales/CS team insights

  1. Identify Patterns

- Demographic patterns - Behavioral patterns (how they use product) - Goal patterns (what they're trying to achieve) - Pain point patterns (common frustrations) - Motivation patterns (why they use product) - Attitude patterns (tech-savvy, risk-averse, etc.)

  1. Segment Users

- Cluster users by meaningful differences - Typically 3-5 personas (more = less useful) - Each persona should be distinct and actionable - Validate segments with data

  1. Build Persona Profiles

- Demographic Info: - Name (fictional but memorable) - Age, role, location (if relevant) - Photo (stock photo for visualization) - Background: - Job/life context - Relevant responsibilities - Technical proficiency - Goals & Motivations: - What are they trying to achieve? - What drives their decisions? - Success criteria - Pain Points & Frustrations: - Current challenges - Blockers to success - Workarounds they use - Behaviors & Preferences: - How they work/live - Tools they use - Communication preferences - Decision-making style - Quote: - Representative quote from research - "A Day in the Life": - Typical workflow or day - When/how product fits in

  1. Validate Personas

- Share with team for feedback - Test against real user data - Confirm with additional research if needed - Refine based on feedback

  1. Socialize & Use

- Present to broader team - Create posters or reference cards - Reference in product discussions - Use in design reviews ("What would Sarah think?") - Update as you learn more

Deliverable: Persona profiles with supporting research data

Workflow 4: Journey Mapping

Objective: Visualize end-to-end user experience to identify opportunities

Steps:

  1. Define Journey Scope

- Which persona? - Which journey? (onboarding, core workflow, purchase, etc.) - Start and end points - Key touchpoints to include

  1. Gather Journey Data

- User interviews about their process - Observational research (watch users) - Analytics (actual paths taken) - Support tickets (where things break) - Survey feedback

  1. Map Journey Stages

- Identify 5-10 key stages from start to finish - For each stage: - User Actions: What are they doing? - Touchpoints: What are they interacting with? - Thoughts: What are they thinking? - Emotions: How do they feel? (frustration, confidence, delight) - Pain Points: What's hard or broken? - Opportunities: How could we improve?

  1. Visualize Journey

- Timeline or flow from left to right - Stages clearly delineated - Emotion curve (highs and lows) - Pain points highlighted - Opportunities noted - Use color, icons, quotes for clarity

  1. Analyze & Prioritize

- Identify critical pain points - Find moments of truth (high-impact moments) - Spot opportunities for delight - Prioritize by impact and feasibility

  1. Generate Recommendations

- Quick fixes for pain points - Strategic improvements for moments of truth - Delight opportunities - Cross-functional actions (product, marketing, support)

Deliverable: User journey map with pain points, emotions, and opportunities

Workflow 5: Research Synthesis & Insight Communication

Objective: Synthesize research findings and communicate insights effectively

Steps:

  1. Organize Raw Data

- Transcripts, notes, recordings - Survey responses - Analytics data - Observation notes

  1. Code & Tag Data

- Apply tags to key moments - Use consistent coding framework - Tag themes, pain points, behaviors, quotes - Track frequency of codes

  1. Affinity Mapping

- Group similar insights together - Create hierarchy (themes → sub-themes → specific observations) - Identify patterns and outliers - Build narrative from patterns

  1. Extract Key Insights

- What are the big takeaways? - What surprised us? - What confirmed hypotheses? - What contradicted assumptions? - What's actionable?

  1. Build Evidence for Each Insight

- Quantify when possible (X out of Y participants) - Include supporting quotes - Show behavioral data - Link to specific examples

  1. Craft Insight Statements

- Format: [Observation] + [Implication] + [Recommendation] - Example: "Users struggle to find the export feature (mentioned by 7/8 participants), leading them to use workarounds or give up. → Recommend making export more prominent in main navigation." - Clear, specific, actionable

  1. Create Presentation

- Executive Summary: Key findings and recommendations - Methodology: How we conducted research - Participant Overview: Who we talked to - Key Insights: One insight per slide with evidence - Recommendations: Prioritized actions - Appendix: Detailed data, quotes, methodology notes

  1. Communication Formats

- For Executives: High-level summary, key recommendations, business impact - For Product/Design: Detailed insights, user quotes, design implications - For Engineering: Specific issues, reproduction steps, severity - For Marketing/Sales: User language, value props, positioning insights

Deliverable: Research synthesis presentation tailored to audience

Quick Reference

ActionCommand/Trigger
Plan user interviews"Help me plan user interviews for [product/feature]"
Create interview guide"Create interview guide for [research goal]"
Usability test plan"Create usability test plan for [feature]"
Analyze interview data"Synthesize insights from these interview notes"
Build personas"Create user personas based on this research"
Journey map"Create user journey map for [flow]"

Research Methods Overview

When to Use Each Method

MethodBest ForSample SizeTimeline
User InterviewsDeep understanding, exploratory, "why"5-10 per segment2-3 weeks
Usability TestingEvaluate specific designs, find issues5-8 participants1-2 weeks
SurveysQuantitative validation, prioritization100+ responses1-2 weeks
Field StudiesContextual understanding, natural behavior5-10 sessions3-4 weeks
Diary StudiesBehavior over time, longitudinal10-20 participants2-4 weeks
Card SortingInformation architecture, categorization15-30 participants1 week
A/B TestingValidate design decisions, optimize1000+ per variant1-2 weeks
Analytics AnalysisBehavioral patterns, usage metricsAll usersOngoing

Interview Question Types

Good Open-Ended Questions

  • "Tell me about the last time you..."
  • "Walk me through your process for..."
  • "What's most challenging about..."
  • "How do you currently..."
  • "What would make this easier?"
  • "Why is that important to you?"

Questions to Avoid

  • Leading: "Don't you think this feature is useful?" → "How do you feel about this feature?"
  • Closed: "Do you like this?" → "What do you think about this?"
  • Hypothetical: "Would you use this?" → "Tell me about a time you needed this."
  • Multiple: "What do you think about A and B and C?" → Ask one at a time

Usability Testing Best Practices

Think-Aloud Protocol

  • "As you complete these tasks, please think out loud."
  • "Tell me what you're looking at, thinking, and trying to do."
  • "There are no wrong answers; we're testing the design, not you."

When Participants Get Stuck

  • Don't immediately help; let them struggle (reveals issues)
  • Probe: "What are you thinking right now?"
  • "What are you looking for?"
  • "What would you expect to happen?"
  • Only provide hints if completely blocked

What to Observe

  • Where they look first
  • What they click/tap
  • What they say (verbally and non-verbally)
  • Hesitations and confusion
  • Delightful moments
  • Workarounds and coping strategies

Persona Template

# Persona: [Name]

![Photo]

**Age:** XX | **Role:** [Job Title] | **Location:** [City/Region]

## Background
[2-3 sentences about their role, experience, and context]

## Goals & Motivations
- Goal 1
- Goal 2
- Goal 3

## Pain Points & Frustrations
- Pain point 1
- Pain point 2
- Pain point 3

## Behaviors & Preferences
- **Tech Proficiency:** [Low/Medium/High]
- **Tools Used:** [List key tools]
- **Communication Style:** [Preference]
- **Decision Style:** [Data-driven, intuitive, collaborative, etc.]

## Quote
> "[Representative quote from research that captures their perspective]"

## A Day in the Life
[Narrative describing typical workflow and how product fits in]

## How [Product] Helps
- Value 1
- Value 2
- Value 3

---
**Based on:** X interviews with [segment description]

Best Practices

  • Recruit real users: Friends and family don't count
  • Small sample, deep insights: 5-8 interviews reveal most issues
  • Record everything: Memory is unreliable; transcripts are gold
  • Stay curious: Even "obvious" answers deserve a "why?"
  • Avoid confirmation bias: Actively look for disconfirming evidence
  • Show, don't just tell: Quotes and clips are more compelling than summaries
  • Focus on behavior, not opinions: What people do > what they say they do
  • Iterate research questions: Refine as you learn
  • Synthesize regularly: Don't wait until all data is collected
  • Share insights broadly: Research is only valuable if it informs decisions

Research Report Template

# User Research Report: [Study Name]

**Date:** [Report Date]
**Researcher:** Claude User Research Agent
**Study Type:** [Interviews/Usability Testing/etc.]

## Executive Summary
- **Objective:** [What we set out to learn]
- **Method:** [How we conducted research]
- **Participants:** [Who we talked to]
- **Key Findings:** [Top 3-5 insights]
- **Recommendations:** [Top 3 actions]

## Research Objectives
1. Objective 1
2. Objective 2

## Methodology
- **Method:** [Interviews, usability testing, etc.]
- **Participants:** [n=X, description of who]
- **Recruitment:** [How we found them]
- **Session Details:** [Duration, format, compensation]
- **Analysis:** [How we synthesized data]

## Key Findings

### Finding 1: [Insight Title]
**Observation:** [What we observed]
**Evidence:** [Data, quotes, frequency]
**Implication:** [What this means for product]

> "[Supporting quote from participant]"
> – Participant X

[Repeat for each finding]

## Pain Points & Opportunities

### Pain Point 1
**Description:** [What's broken or frustrating]
**Impact:** [High/Medium/Low]
**Frequency:** [X/Y participants mentioned]
**Opportunity:** [How we could address]

## Recommendations

### Priority 1: [Recommendation]
**Rationale:** [Why this matters]
**Impact:** [Expected benefit]
**Effort:** [Low/Medium/High]
**Evidence:** [Supporting data]

[Repeat for each recommendation]

## Participant Overview
- [Brief description of who we talked to]
- [Demographic breakdown if relevant]

## Appendix
- Interview guide
- Detailed notes or transcripts
- Additional quotes
- Methodology details

Integration with Other Skills

  • Use with survey-analyzer: Combine qualitative and quantitative research
  • Use with data-analyzer: Validate qualitative insights with behavioral data
  • Use with competitive-intelligence: User research on competitor products
  • Use with market-research-analyst: Understand user segments and needs
  • Use with ui-builder: Inform design decisions with user insights

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Asking for solutions: Users are experts in problems, not solutions
  • Small sample fallacy: Don't generalize from 1-2 participants
  • Confirmation bias: Only hearing what you want to hear
  • Leading questions: Influencing responses
  • Not probing deeply: Staying at surface level
  • Researching the wrong users: Talking to edge cases instead of core users
  • Analysis paralysis: Waiting for perfect certainty
  • Not sharing insights: Research that stays in a report is wasted
  • Ignoring context: Not understanding where/why behavior happens
  • Defensive listening: Taking feedback personally instead of as data

平台分布

Codex

35.98%
按下载量换算1,125

Claude

32.31%
按下载量换算1,010

Cursor

18.08%
按下载量换算565

Gemini CLI

10.09%
按下载量换算315

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills