Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

roadmap-builder(路线图生成器)

roadmap-builder 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

roadmap-builder 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 9,269。

总安装 14,580周安装 618GitHub Stars 3下载 8,001核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:roadmap-builder(路线图生成器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jmsktm/claude-settings
仓库路径:skills/roadmap-builder
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/jmsktm/claude-settings --skill 'Roadmap Builder'
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/jmsktm/claude-settings --skill 'Roadmap Builder'

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

roadmap-builder 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。适用于根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索进行信息聚合与初步筛选的场景。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。

安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意可能触发联网或文件读写操作。建议结合原始 README 文档进一步验证具体功能和使用边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/roadmap-builder

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/jmsktm/claude-settings --skill 'Roadmap Builde…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

roadmap-builder 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/jmsktm/claude-settings --skill 'Roadmap Builder'。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

roadmap-builder 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

roadmap-builder 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

roadmap-builder 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

roadmap-builder 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 14,580 次,近一周安装 618 次,下载 8,001 次,GitHub 3 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

roadmap-builder 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
roadmap-builder

路线图生成器 · 本页

14,5803只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Roadmap Builder

The Roadmap Builder skill helps product teams create strategic roadmaps that align tactical execution with business objectives. It emphasizes theme-based planning over feature lists, outcome-focused goals using OKRs, and flexible planning that adapts to market feedback and changing priorities.

This skill excels at translating business strategy into quarterly themes, breaking themes into initiatives and epics, aligning stakeholders around shared goals, and maintaining roadmap clarity while preserving execution flexibility.

Roadmap Builder follows modern product management principles: outcomes over outputs, themes over features, and quarterly planning with monthly reviews.

Core Workflows

Workflow 1: Create Product Roadmap

Steps:

  1. Define Strategic Context

- Review company vision and business goals - Analyze market position and competitive landscape - Gather customer insights and pain points - Identify key metrics to move (North Star, etc.) - Understand resource constraints (team, budget, time)

  1. Set Quarterly Themes

- Define 2-4 themes for next quarter - Each theme represents a strategic bet or focus area - Themes should be outcome-oriented, not feature lists - Examples: "Reduce churn", "Enterprise-ready", "10x performance" - Align themes with OKRs or company goals

  1. Create OKRs for Each Theme

- Objective: Qualitative, inspiring goal - Key Results: 3-5 measurable outcomes - Ensure Key Results are ambitious but achievable - Define baseline and target metrics - Assign ownership to product/engineering leads

  1. Identify Initiatives

- For each theme, brainstorm potential initiatives - Initiative = significant effort to move a Key Result - Prioritize initiatives by impact vs. effort - Select top 2-4 initiatives per theme - Estimate rough timeline (weeks or months)

  1. Break Down into Epics

- Decompose initiatives into epics - Epic = large user story spanning multiple sprints - Write epic descriptions with user value and success criteria - Sequence epics based on dependencies and learning goals - Assign to teams or squads

  1. Create Timeline View

- Plot themes, initiatives, and epics on timeline - Use swim lanes for different teams or product areas - Show dependencies and sequencing - Highlight milestones and release dates - Add confidence levels (high/medium/low)

  1. Stakeholder Alignment

- Present roadmap to leadership and stakeholders - Gather feedback and adjust priorities - Communicate trade-offs and decisions - Set expectations on what's NOT on roadmap - Establish review cadence (monthly or quarterly)

Output: Strategic roadmap with themes, OKRs, initiatives, epics, and timeline.

Workflow 2: Quarterly Roadmap Review

Steps:

  1. Review previous quarter's OKRs and achievement
  2. Analyze what worked, what didn't, and why
  3. Gather updated customer and market insights
  4. Assess team capacity and velocity trends
  5. Set next quarter's themes and OKRs
  6. Adjust long-term roadmap based on learnings
  7. Communicate changes to all stakeholders

Workflow 3: Monthly Roadmap Health Check

Steps:

  1. Review progress on current initiatives
  2. Check if Key Results are trending toward targets
  3. Identify risks, blockers, or scope issues
  4. Adjust timeline or scope if needed
  5. Communicate status to stakeholders
  6. Reprioritize if market or business conditions change

Workflow 4: Feature Request Evaluation

When new feature requests arrive:

  1. Understand the underlying customer problem
  2. Evaluate against current themes and OKRs
  3. Assess impact (how many users, revenue potential)
  4. Estimate effort and opportunity cost
  5. Decide: Add to roadmap, defer to backlog, or decline
  6. Communicate decision with clear rationale

Quick Reference

ActionCommand/Trigger
Create roadmap"build product roadmap"
Set quarterly themes"define Q[n] themes"
Create OKRs"create OKRs for [theme]"
Add initiative"add initiative: [description]"
Review roadmap"roadmap health check"
Quarterly planning"plan Q[n] roadmap"
Evaluate feature"evaluate feature: [idea]"
Show timeline"show roadmap timeline"
Stakeholder view"create stakeholder roadmap view"
Prioritize initiatives"prioritize roadmap items"

Best Practices

  • Themes over features: Organize by strategic themes, not lists of features; themes provide context and flexibility
  • Outcomes over outputs: Focus on business outcomes (reduce churn, increase revenue) not outputs (ship feature X)
  • Use OKRs properly: Objectives inspire, Key Results measure; aim for 70% achievement (not 100%)
  • Plan quarterly, review monthly: Quarter is sweet spot for strategic planning; review monthly to adapt
  • Communicate the "why": Every roadmap item should clearly connect to business strategy
  • Show confidence levels: Be transparent about uncertainty; high/medium/low confidence
  • Timelines are estimates: Use "Q2" or "H2" not specific dates; preserve flexibility
  • Visualize simply: Avoid cluttered roadmaps; focus on themes and key milestones
  • Say no strategically: Roadmap power comes from what you DON'T do; protect focus
  • Align, don't dictate: Roadmap should align teams, not micromanage execution
  • Balance innovation and maintenance: Reserve capacity for tech debt, bugs, and platform improvements
  • Update regularly: Stale roadmaps kill trust; keep it current and communicate changes

Roadmap Formats

Theme-Based Roadmap

Q1 2026: Enterprise-Ready
  Initiative: SSO & Advanced Security
  Initiative: Audit Logs & Compliance

Q2 2026: 10x Performance
  Initiative: Database Optimization
  Initiative: Caching Layer

Q3 2026: Mobile-First Experience
  Initiative: Native Mobile Apps
  Initiative: Offline Support

Now-Next-Later Roadmap

NOW (this quarter)
  - Theme 1: [Active work]
  - Theme 2: [Active work]

NEXT (next quarter)
  - Theme 3: [Planned]
  - Theme 4: [Planned]

LATER (future)
  - Theme 5: [Exploring]
  - Theme 6: [Researching]

Outcome-Based Roadmap

Goal: Reduce Customer Churn by 30%
  → Improve onboarding (Q1)
  → Better customer support (Q2)
  → Product stability (Q2-Q3)

Goal: 2x Enterprise Revenue
  → SSO & Advanced Auth (Q1)
  → Compliance Features (Q2)
  → Enterprise Admin Tools (Q3)

OKR Template

Theme: [Strategic Focus Area]

Objective: [Inspiring, qualitative goal]

Key Results:
  KR1: [Metric] from [baseline] to [target]
  KR2: [Metric] from [baseline] to [target]
  KR3: [Metric] from [baseline] to [target]

Initiatives:
  1. [Initiative name] - [Timeline]
  2. [Initiative name] - [Timeline]
  3. [Initiative name] - [Timeline]

Example:

Theme: Enterprise-Ready

Objective: Make our product the default choice for enterprise customers

Key Results:
  KR1: Increase enterprise deals from 5/quarter to 15/quarter
  KR2: Achieve SOC 2 Type II certification
  KR3: Reduce enterprise sales cycle from 6 months to 3 months

Initiatives:
  1. SSO & Advanced Auth - Q1
  2. Audit Logs & Compliance - Q1-Q2
  3. Enterprise Admin Console - Q2

Prioritization Framework

RICE Scoring

For each initiative:

  • Reach: How many customers will benefit?
  • Impact: How much will it help them? (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3)
  • Confidence: How sure are we? (%, as decimal)
  • Effort: Person-months required

Score = (Reach × Impact × Confidence) / Effort

Value vs. Complexity Matrix

       HIGH VALUE
           |
   DO NEXT | DO FIRST
           |
  -------- + --------  COMPLEXITY
           |
   SKIP    | DO LATER
           |
      LOW VALUE

Strategic Alignment Score

Rate each initiative (1-5):

  • Aligns with company vision
  • Moves key business metrics
  • Requested by strategic customers
  • Competitive necessity
  • Technical foundation for future work

Total score guides prioritization.

Timeline Planning

Rough Sizing:

  • Small Initiative: 1-2 months
  • Medium Initiative: 3-4 months
  • Large Initiative: 5-6 months

If longer than 6 months: Break into smaller initiatives.

Buffer Rules:

  • Add 20% time buffer for unknowns
  • Reserve 20% capacity for bugs and support
  • Plan for 70% of team's theoretical capacity

Stakeholder Communication

Executive Roadmap: High-level themes and business outcomes Team Roadmap: Detailed initiatives, epics, and dependencies Customer Roadmap: Public-facing features and timelines (broad) Board Roadmap: Strategic bets and expected business impact

Update Cadence:

  • Executives: Quarterly with monthly check-ins
  • Teams: Bi-weekly or sprint planning
  • Customers: Major releases or quarterly updates
  • Board: Quarterly or as needed

Integration Points

  • Project Planner: Converts roadmap initiatives into project plans
  • Sprint Planner: Breaks epics into sprint work
  • OKR Tracker: Monitors Key Results progress
  • Analytics: Tracks metrics and validates outcomes
  • User Research: Informs roadmap priorities with customer insights
  • GitHub Projects: Links initiatives to code and releases

平台分布

Codex

33.46%
按下载量换算2,677

Claude

31.36%
按下载量换算2,509

Cursor

17.63%
按下载量换算1,411

Gemini CLI

10.62%
按下载量换算850

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills