Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

sf-ai-agentforce-testing(SF AI AgentForce 测试)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

sf-ai-agentforce-testing 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 46,467。

总安装 776周安装 33GitHub Stars 225下载 272核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:sf-ai-agentforce-testing(SF AI AgentForce 测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jaganpro/claude-code-sfskills
仓库路径:skills/sf-ai-agentforce-testing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/jaganpro/claude-code-sfskills --skill sf-ai-agentforce-testing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/jaganpro/claude-code-sfskills --skill sf-ai-agentforce-testing

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

sf-ai-agentforce-testing 用于辅助测试设计、用例编写和回归验证,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要生成测试脚本或分析失败日志时使用。适用于单元测试、端到端测试和测试计划管理,支持自动化测试流程。

通过 GitHub 仓库安装,使用 npx skills add 命令添加技能,需确认项目测试框架和运行命令。使用时需避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑,涉及外部服务时应区分本地模拟和生产环境。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/sf-ai-agentforce-testing

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/jaganpro/claude-code-sfskills --skill sf-ai-ag…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

sf-ai-agentforce-testing 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/jaganpro/claude-code-sfskills --skill sf-ai-agentforce-t…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

sf-ai-agentforce-testing 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

sf-ai-agentforce-testing 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

sf-ai-agentforce-testing 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

sf-ai-agentforce-testing 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 776 次,近一周安装 33 次,下载 272 次,GitHub 225 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

sf-ai-agentforce-testing 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
sf-ai-agentforce-testing

SF AI AgentForce 测试 · 本页

776225接触敏感数据未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

sf-ai-agentforce-testing: Agentforce Test Execution & Coverage Analysis

Use this skill when the user needs formal Agentforce testing: multi-turn conversation validation, CLI Testing Center specs, topic/action coverage analysis, preview checks, or a structured test-fix loop after publish.

When This Skill Owns the Task

Use sf-ai-agentforce-testing when the work involves:

  • sf agent test workflows
  • multi-turn Agent Runtime API testing
  • topic routing, action invocation, context preservation, guardrail, or escalation validation
  • test-spec generation and coverage analysis
  • post-publish / post-activate test-fix loops

Delegate elsewhere when the user is:


Core Operating Rules

  • Testing comes after deploy / publish / activate.
  • Use multi-turn API testing as the primary path when conversation continuity matters.
  • Use CLI Testing Center as the secondary path for single-utterance and org-supported test-center workflows.
  • Interactive and programmatic CLI preview use standard sf org login web authentication; ECA is only required for Agent Runtime API testing, not for live preview.
  • Fixes to the agent should be delegated to sf-ai-agentscript when Agent Script changes are needed.
  • Do not use raw curl for OAuth token validation in the ECA flow; use the provided credential tooling.

Script path rule

Use the existing scripts under:

  • ~/.claude/skills/sf-ai-agentforce-testing/hooks/scripts/

These scripts are pre-approved. Do not recreate them.


Required Context to Gather First

Ask for or infer:

  • agent API name / developer name
  • target org alias
  • testing goal: smoke test, regression, coverage expansion, or bug reproduction
  • whether the agent is already published and activated
  • whether the org has Agent Testing Center available
  • whether ECA credentials are available for Agent Runtime API testing

Preflight checks:

  1. discover the agent
  2. confirm publish / activation state
  3. verify dependencies (Flows, Apex, data)
  4. choose testing track

Dual-Track Workflow

Track A — Multi-turn API testing (primary)

Use when you need:

  • multi-turn conversation testing
  • topic re-matching validation
  • context preservation checks
  • escalation or action-chain analysis across turns

Requires:

  • ECA / auth setup
  • agent runtime access

Track B — CLI Testing Center (secondary)

Use when you need:

  • org-native sf agent test workflows
  • test spec YAML execution
  • quick single-utterance validation
  • CLI-centered CI/CD usage where Testing Center is available

Quick manual path

For manual validation without full formal testing, use preview workflows first, then escalate to Track A or B as needed.


Recommended Workflow

1. Discover and verify

  • locate the agent in the target org
  • confirm it is published and activated
  • confirm required actions / Flows / Apex exist
  • decide whether Track A or Track B fits the request

2. Plan tests

Cover at least:

  • main topics
  • expected actions
  • guardrails / off-topic handling
  • escalation behavior
  • phrasing variation

3. Execute the right track

Track A
  • validate ECA credentials with the provided tooling
  • retrieve metadata needed for scenario generation
  • run multi-turn scenarios with the provided Python scripts
  • analyze per-turn failures and coverage
Track B
  • generate or refine a flat YAML test spec
  • run sf agent test commands
  • inspect structured results and verbose action output

4. Classify failures

Typical failure buckets:

  • topic not matched
  • wrong topic matched
  • action not invoked
  • wrong action selected
  • action invocation failed
  • context preservation failure
  • guardrail failure
  • escalation failure

5. Run fix loop

When failures imply agent-authoring issues:

  • delegate fixes to sf-ai-agentscript
  • re-publish / re-activate if needed
  • re-run focused tests before full regression

Testing Guardrails

Never skip these:

  • test only after publish/activate
  • include harmful / off-topic / refusal scenarios
  • use multiple phrasings per important topic
  • clean up sessions after API tests
  • keep swarm execution small and controlled

Avoid these anti-patterns:

  • testing unpublished agents
  • treating one happy-path utterance as coverage
  • storing ECA secrets in repo files
  • debugging auth with brittle shell-expanded curl commands
  • changing both tests and agent simultaneously without isolating the cause

Output Format

When finishing a run, report in this order:

  1. Test track used
  2. What was executed
  3. Pass/fail summary
  4. Coverage gaps
  5. Root-cause themes
  6. Recommended fix loop / next test step

Suggested shape:

Agent: <name>
Track: Multi-turn API | CLI Testing Center | Preview
Executed: <specs / scenarios / turns>
Result: <passed / partial / failed>
Coverage: <topics, actions, guardrails, context>
Issues: <highest-signal failures>
Next step: <fix, republish, rerun, or expand coverage>

Cross-Skill Integration

NeedDelegate toReason
fix Agent Script logicsf-ai-agentscriptauthoring and deterministic fix loops
create test datasf-dataaction-ready data setup
fix Flow-backed actionssf-flowFlow repair
fix Apex-backed actionssf-apexApex repair
set up ECA / OAuth for Agent Runtime APIsf-connected-appsauth and app configuration
analyze session telemetrysf-ai-agentforce-observabilitySTDM / trace analysis

Reference Map

Start here

Execution / auth

Coverage / fix loops

Advanced / specialized

Templates / assets


Score Guide

ScoreMeaning
90+production-ready test confidence
80–89strong coverage with minor gaps
70–79acceptable but coverage expansion recommended
60–69partial validation only
< 60insufficient confidence; block release

平台分布

Codex

39.01%
按下载量换算106

Claude

28.59%
按下载量换算78

Cursor

19.47%
按下载量换算53

Gemini CLI

9.95%
按下载量换算27

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills