Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

itil-ops(信息操作)

itil-ops 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

itil-ops 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 23,803。

总安装 4,176周安装 174GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,392核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:itil-ops(信息操作)
来源仓库:https://github.com/chefboyrdave21/itil-ops
安装命令:
openclaw skills install itil-ops
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install itil-ops

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

ITIL Ops 聚焦事件、问题与变更管理流程,适配 IT 服务运维中的标准化作业场景。可用于检测服务异常、分析故障重复发生原因及跟踪事件处理进展。支持根据关键词快速定位候选解决方案或历史工单记录,提升排障效率。使用前需确认组织内部 ITIL 框架版本及权限范围,避免越权访问敏感系统。

建议结合具体运维平台(如 ServiceNow)进行二次适配,确保流程兼容性。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install itil-ops;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

itil-ops 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install itil-ops。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

itil-ops 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

itil-ops 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

itil-ops 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

itil-ops 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 4,176 次,近一周安装 174 次,下载 1,392 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

itil-ops 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
itil-ops

信息操作 · 本页

4,176—需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
itil-ops
description
>

ITIL Ops — IT Service Management for AI Agents

Structured incident, problem, and change management adapted from ITIL 4 for autonomous agent operations.

Core Concepts

Severity Levels

LevelMeaningResponseExample
P1Critical — service down, data at riskImmediate alert + auto-remediateCrash loop, disk full, OOM
P2High — degraded serviceAlert within 1hService restarts, auth failures
P3Medium — non-critical issueNext review cycleCron timeouts, broken files
P4Low — cosmetic/minorTrack, fix when convenientLog warnings, config drift

Incident vs Problem vs Change

  • Incident: Something broke. Restore service ASAP. (reactive)
  • Problem: Pattern of incidents. Find and fix root cause. (proactive)
  • Change: Planned modification. Assess risk before executing. (controlled)

Incident Management

Detection Sources

Scan these in order of criticality:

  1. Service crashes — journalctl --user -u SERVICE --since "12 hours ago" for watchdog timeouts, SIGABRT, SIGSEGV, core dumps
  2. Cron failures — consecutive error count > 2 in job state files
  3. Health endpoints — HTTP health checks returning non-200
  4. Resource pressure — disk > 80%, RAM > 80%, swap active
  5. Data integrity — schema validation failures, broken files, load errors

Detection Script

Run scripts/itil-review.sh to scan all sources. It outputs:

  • ITIL_CLEAR if nothing found (reply HEARTBEAT_OK)
  • Formatted report with incidents and problems if issues detected

Incident Lifecycle

DETECTED → CLASSIFIED (P1-P4) → DIAGNOSED → RESOLVED → CLOSED
                                      ↓
                              (3+ occurrences)
                                      ↓
                              ESCALATE TO PROBLEM

Auto-Classification Rules

# P1 — Critical
- Service crash count >= 3 in 12h (crash loop)
- Disk usage >= 90%
- RAM usage >= 90%
- Data loss detected

# P2 — High
- Service crashed 1-2 times
- 3+ services down simultaneously
- Auth/token failures affecting operations
- Cron job with 5+ consecutive failures

# P3 — Medium
- Broken data files (schema violations)
- Memory load errors > 10 in 12h
- Cron job with 3-4 consecutive failures
- Disk usage 80-89%

# P4 — Low
- 1 service down (non-critical)
- Config warnings
- Log noise

Creating Incident Tickets

When incidents are found, create coordination tasks:

Title: [ITIL-INC] <brief description>
Body:
- Severity: P1/P2/P3/P4
- Category: service|cron|memory|disk|security
- Detected: <timestamp>
- Detail: <what happened>
- Impact: <what's affected>
- Action: <what to do>

Problem Management

Pattern Detection

An incident becomes a problem when:

  • Same error occurs 3+ times in 24h
  • Same incident type recurs across 2+ review cycles
  • Multiple related incidents share a common root cause

Root Cause Analysis (RCA)

When a problem is identified:

  1. Gather evidence — journal logs, error messages, state files, recent changes
  2. Timeline — reconstruct the sequence of events
  3. 5 Whys — ask why iteratively until you reach the actual root cause
  4. Fix classification:

- Quick fix — config change, file repair, timeout bump - Code fix — bug in script or daemon, needs PR - Architecture fix — design flaw, needs redesign

Problem Ticket Format

Title: [ITIL-PRB] <root cause description>
Body:
- Related incidents: <list>
- Root cause: <what's actually broken>
- Evidence: <logs, patterns, data>
- Fix applied: <immediate remediation>
- Fix needed: <permanent solution>
- Prevention: <how to prevent recurrence>

Known Error Database

Track resolved problems in state file (itil-state.json):

{
  "last_review": "2026-03-22T04:19:50Z",
  "last_incident_count": 2,
  "last_problem_count": 1,
  "known_errors": {
    "memory-content-dict": {
      "description": "Scripts writing content as dict instead of string",
      "root_cause": "Missing json.dumps() in memory file writers",
      "fix": "Wrap content in json.dumps() before saving",
      "fixed_date": "2026-03-22"
    }
  }
}

Change Management

Pre-Change Checklist

Before modifying services, configs, or infrastructure:

  1. What's changing? — specific files, services, configs
  2. Why? — linked incident/problem ticket
  3. Risk? — what could go wrong
  4. Rollback plan? — how to undo if it breaks
  5. Test? — how to verify it worked
  6. Notify? — does the human need to know

Change Categories

TypeApprovalExample
StandardPre-approved, just do itRestart service, bump timeout
NormalInform human, wait for OKNew cron job, config change
EmergencyFix now, inform afterService down, data at risk

Post-Change Verification

After any change:

  1. Check service status — systemctl --user status SERVICE
  2. Watch logs for 60s — journalctl --user -u SERVICE -f --since "now"
  3. Run health check — scripts/itil-review.sh
  4. Verify no new errors in first 5 minutes

Event Management

Log Monitoring Patterns

# Service crashes
journalctl --user -u SERVICE --since "12h ago" | grep -ciE "watchdog timeout|killed|SIGABRT|SIGSEGV|failed with"

# Memory/resource issues
journalctl --user -u SERVICE --since "12h ago" | grep -c "Failed to load"

# Auth failures
journalctl --user -u SERVICE --since "12h ago" | grep -ciE "unauthorized|403|token expired|auth fail"

Health Check Endpoints

Check services with curl:

curl -sf --max-time 5 "$URL" >/dev/null 2>&1 || echo "DOWN"

Configure endpoints in the review script for your environment.

Continual Improvement

Review Cadence

ReviewFrequencyPurpose
Incident reviewEvery 12hDetect and classify new issues
Problem reviewWeeklyIdentify patterns, track RCA progress
Capacity reviewWeeklyDisk, RAM, memory count trends
Process reviewMonthlyAre our detection rules catching real issues?

KPIs to Track

  • MTTR (Mean Time to Resolve) — how fast do we fix incidents?
  • Incident recurrence rate — are the same things breaking?
  • False positive rate — are we alerting on non-issues?
  • Known error resolution — are problems getting permanent fixes?

State Tracking

The review script maintains itil-state.json with:

  • Last review timestamp and results
  • Incident/problem counts per review
  • System metrics (disk, RAM, restart count)
  • Cross-review pattern detection data

Cron Setup

Recommended Schedule

# Incident review — every 12 hours
openclaw cron add --name "itil-review" --every "12h" \
  --model "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6" --timeout-seconds 180 \
  --session isolated \
  --message "Run ITIL review: bash ~/.skcapstone/agents/lumina/scripts/itil-review.sh"

# Weekly problem review (Sunday 9 AM)
# Analyze the week's incidents, identify patterns, suggest improvements

File Structure

itil-ops/
├── SKILL.md              # This file
├── scripts/
│   └── itil-review.sh    # Main review script (scan + classify + report)
└── references/
    └── itil4-agent-mapping.md  # ITIL 4 → Agent operations reference

Integration Points

  • Coordination tasks — skcapstone coord create for incident/problem tickets
  • Memory snapshots — skmemory_snapshot to record resolutions for future reference
  • Heartbeat — integrate with existing heartbeat to run lightweight checks
  • Cron — scheduled reviews via OpenClaw cron system
  • Alerting — Telegram/Discord delivery for P1/P2 issues

平台分布

OpenClaw

89.16%
按下载量换算1,241

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills