Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

iterative-fleet(迭代舰队)

iterative-fleet 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

iterative-fleet 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为执行命令;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 59,000。

总安装 396周安装 17GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 139核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:iterative-fleet(迭代舰队)
来源仓库:https://github.com/quickcall-dev/skills
仓库路径:skills/iterative-fleet
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/quickcall-dev/skills --skill iterative-fleet
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/quickcall-dev/skills --skill iterative-fleet

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,快速定位候选结果。适合在关键词、任务场景或来源线索明确时使用。可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,以及是否会触发联网或命令执行。注意检查是否会触发文件读写或高风险操作。

iterative-fleet 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/iterative-fleet

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/quickcall-dev/skills --skill iterative-fleet;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要执行命令,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

iterative-fleet 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/quickcall-dev/skills --skill iterative-fleet。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

iterative-fleet 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

iterative-fleet 需要什么权限?

权限级别是执行命令。安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/quickcall-dev/skills --skill iterative-fleet 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

iterative-fleet 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

iterative-fleet 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 396 次,近一周安装 17 次,下载 139 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

iterative-fleet 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要执行命令,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 不能接受 Skill 在你机器上执行命令的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
iterative-fleet

迭代舰队 · 本页

396—执行命令未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Iterative Fleet

A skill for reviewer-gated iterative loops of parallel claude -p or codex exec workers. Workers run per-iteration, a reviewer reads their output and writes a verdict, and a generated orchestrator decides whether to continue or stop — without ever killing or restarting workers. Supports both Claude and Codex providers — set per-fleet or per-worker. See dag-fleet SKILL.md for full codex provider documentation (model aliases, reasoning_effort, limitations).

When to use this skill

Reach for iterative-fleet when:

  • The work needs multiple rounds of refinement (not one-shot)
  • A reviewer/verifier must approve output before the work is done
  • You want operator-declared stop conditions (max iterations, LGTM count, cost cap)
  • Workers are long-running or have high bootstrap costs (no auto-restart — see CRITICAL section)

Use dag-fleet instead when:

  • Workers run once and are done (no iteration needed)
  • There is no reviewer quality gate

Use worktree-fleet instead when:

  • Tasks are fully independent with no shared state

CRITICAL: No auto-kill, no auto-restart

The orchestrator generated by this skill reads and decides only. It NEVER kills or restarts workers. Workers run to natural completion per iteration. This design comes from a $20 death spiral in experiment 001 where auto-restart on "stuck" workers caused cache rebuilds that cost more than the actual work. The reviewer is the quality gate. The operator is the kill switch.

fleet.json schema

{
  "fleet_name": "my-iterative-fleet",
  "type": "iterative",
  "config": {
    "max_concurrent": 3,
    "model": "sonnet",
    "fallback_model": "haiku",
    "max_iterations": 10,
    "cost_cap_usd": 10.0
  },
  "workers": [
    { "id": "builder-a", "type": "code-run", "task": "...", "max_budget_per_iter": 1.0 },
    { "id": "builder-b", "type": "code-run", "task": "...", "max_budget_per_iter": 1.0 },
    { "id": "reviewer",  "type": "reviewer", "task": "Review output, write verdict: lgtm | iterate | escalate",
      "depends_on": ["builder-a", "builder-b"] }
  ],
  "stop_when": {
    "reviewer_lgtm_count": 3,
    "max_iterations": 10,
    "cost_cap_usd": 10.0
  }
}

DAG ordering via depends_on

Each iteration is a DAG. Workers declare dependencies with depends_on:

{ "id": "reviewer", "type": "reviewer", "depends_on": ["builder-a", "builder-b"] }

At launch, only layer-0 workers (no deps) are spawned. The orchestrator spawns subsequent layers after their dependencies complete, then repeats the DAG on the next iteration.

iteration 1:  [builder-a, builder-b] → [reviewer] → verdict: iterate
iteration 2:  [builder-a, builder-b] → [reviewer] → verdict: lgtm → stop

Multi-layer DAGs work too (e.g., researcher → builder → reviewer = 3 layers). The shared lib/dag.sh provides topo-sort and dependency checking, reusable across all fleet types.

If no worker has depends_on, all workers launch in parallel (backward compatible).

Iteration directory structure

$FLEET_ROOT/
  fleet.json
  iterations/
    1/
      builder-a.log
      builder-b.log
      review.md          # reviewer writes verdict here
    2/
      ...
  workers/
    builder-a/
      prompt.md
      session.jsonl
    ...
  orchestrator.sh        # generated — reads logs, decides iterate/pause/stop
  .paused                # exists when paused (touch to pause, rm to resume)

Reviewer interface

The reviewer worker reads iterations/<N>/*.log and writes iterations/<N>/review.md. The review.md MUST contain one of:

  • verdict: lgtm — output is approved, count toward stop condition
  • verdict: iterate — needs another round
  • verdict: escalate — needs human attention, orchestrator pauses

Reviewer prompt requirements

Every reviewer prompt.md MUST include these instructions verbatim (with paths adjusted). Without them, the reviewer won't know where to write the verdict and the orchestrator defaults to iterate, wasting an iteration.

## Writing your verdict

1. Determine the current iteration number: list the `iterations/` directory and find the
   highest-numbered subdirectory that does NOT yet contain a `review.md`.
2. Write your verdict to `iterations/<N>/review.md` (relative to your working directory).
   **Never use absolute paths.**
3. The file MUST contain a line exactly like one of:
   - `verdict: lgtm`
   - `verdict: iterate`
   - `verdict: escalate`
4. Below the verdict line, list **actionable fix instructions** per worker — not just what's
   wrong, but exactly where and how to fix it (file path, function name, what to change).
   The builder sees this feedback on the next iteration, so vague issues waste a cycle.

Example `iterations/1/review.md`:

verdict: iterate

builder-a

  1. src/parser.py:parse_input() — no try/except around JSON decode. Wrap lines 45-48 in try/except json.JSONDecodeError, return None on failure.
  2. src/parser.py:validate_schema() — missing required field "timestamp" in schema dict at line 72. Add "timestamp": {"type": "string", "required": True}.

builder-b

  1. src/utils.py — format_output() defined but not in __all__ or exported in __init__.py. Add to src/__init__.py line 5: from.utils import format_output.

Available scripts

ScriptPurpose
launch.sh <fleet-root> [--dry-run]Parse fleet.json, generate orchestrator.sh, spawn workers + orchestrator in tmux
status.sh <fleet-root>Show iteration count, reviewer verdict history, per-worker status, cost
pause.sh <fleet-root>Touch .paused — orchestrator stops at next iteration boundary
resume.sh <fleet-root>Remove .paused — orchestrator continues
kill.sh <fleet-root> all [--force]Hard stop: kill tmux session, sweep orphans, unregister

Launch procedure

  1. Create $FLEET_ROOT/fleet.json with workers including exactly one type: "reviewer" worker (with depends_on pointing to builder workers)
  2. Create $FLEET_ROOT/workers/<id>/prompt.md for each worker
  3. Run bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/launch.sh $FLEET_ROOT
  4. ALWAYS tell the user the exact status command so they can monitor manually: bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/status.sh $FLEET_ROOT This is mandatory after every launch. The user must be able to check status without asking you.
  5. Pause if needed: bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/pause.sh $FLEET_ROOT
  6. Hard stop: bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/kill.sh $FLEET_ROOT all

Rationalizations to reject

Agent saysRebuttal
"The worker has been running for 10 minutes with no output — it must be stuck, I should pause it"Long thinking blocks look like silence. The orchestrator waits for result events, not timeouts. This is exactly the failure mode that caused the $20 death spiral in experiment 001. Do not intervene.
"The reviewer said 'looks mostly good' — I'll count that as LGTM"Only verdict: lgtm counts. "Mostly good" is iterate. If the reviewer is ambiguous, the verdict is iterate. Do not interpret generously.
"I should kill this worker and restart it with a better prompt"The orchestrator NEVER kills workers. Workers run to natural completion. If you need a different prompt, pause the fleet, edit prompt.md, and let the next iteration pick it up.
"The cost is getting high — I'll reduce max_iterations mid-run"Stop conditions are baked into orchestrator.sh at generation time. To change them, kill the fleet, regenerate with new fleet.json, and relaunch. Do not edit orchestrator.sh directly.
"I can skip the reviewer for this simple task"If the task doesn't need a reviewer, use dag-fleet (one-shot) or worktree-fleet (independent). Iterative-fleet without a reviewer is a runaway loop.

Decision tree: which fleet?

1. Tasks independent (no shared files/state)?  YES → worktree-fleet
2. Need iteration with reviewer quality gate?  YES → iterative-fleet (this skill)
3. One-shot DAG with dependencies?             YES → dag-fleet
4. None of the above?                          → open multiple Claude Code sessions

$ARGUMENTS

平台分布

Codex

39.1%
按下载量换算54

Claude

28.46%
按下载量换算40

Cursor

19.78%
按下载量换算27

Gemini CLI

9.78%
按下载量换算14

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/quickcall-dev/skills --skill iterative-fleet 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills