Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

iso-27001-evidence-collection(ISO 27001 证据收集)

iso-27001-evidence-collection 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

iso-27001-evidence-collection 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 12,435。

总安装 10,266周安装 441GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 3,599核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
0.1.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:iso-27001-evidence-collection(ISO 27001 证据收集)
来源仓库:https://github.com/stevenobiajulu/iso-27001-evidence-collection
安装命令:
openclaw skills install iso-27001-evidence-collection
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install iso-27001-evidence-collection

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

自动化收集 ISO 27001 与 SOC 2 审核所需合规证据材料。适用于云平台配置审计与信息安全管理体系认证准备场景。生成带时间戳的操作日志与控制措施实施记录供评审使用。需配置对应云服务 API 密钥并授予必要只读权限。输出结果需经人工复核确保覆盖所有适用控制项要求。

iso-27001-evidence-collection 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install iso-27001-evidence-collection;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

iso-27001-evidence-collection 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install iso-27001-evidence-collection。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

iso-27001-evidence-collection 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

iso-27001-evidence-collection 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

iso-27001-evidence-collection 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

iso-27001-evidence-collection 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 10,266 次,近一周安装 441 次,下载 3,599 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

iso-27001-evidence-collection 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
iso-27001-evidence-collection

ISO 27001 证据收集 · 本页

10,266—调用外部服务MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
iso-27001-evidence-collection
description
>-
license
MIT
compatibility
>-
metadata
author
open-agreements
version
0.1.0
frameworks

ISO 27001 Evidence Collection

Systematically collect audit evidence for ISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2. This skill provides API-first evidence collection commands, organizes evidence by control, and validates completeness before auditor review.

Security Model

  • No scripts executed — this skill is markdown-only procedural guidance
  • No secrets required — works with reference checklists; CLI commands use existing local credentials
  • Evidence stays local — all outputs go to the local filesystem
  • IP-clean — references NIST SP 800-53 (public domain); ISO controls cited by section ID only

When to Use

Activate this skill when:

  1. Preparing evidence package for external audit — 2-4 weeks before auditor arrives
  2. Quarterly evidence refresh — update evidence that has aged beyond the audit window
  3. After remediation — collect evidence proving a finding has been fixed
  4. New system onboarding — establish baseline evidence for a newly in-scope system
  5. Evidence gap analysis — identify what's missing before the audit

Do NOT use for:

  • Running the internal audit itself — use iso-27001-internal-audit
  • SOC 2-only readiness assessment — use soc2-readiness
  • Interpreting audit findings — use the internal audit skill

Core Concepts

Evidence Hierarchy (Best to Worst)

RankTypeExampleWhy Better
1API export (JSON/CSV)gcloud iam service-accounts list --format=jsonTimestamped, tamper-evident, reproducible
2System-generated reportSOC 2 report from vendor, SIEM exportAuthoritative source, includes metadata
3Configuration exportTerraform state, policy JSONShows intended state, version-controlled
4Screenshot with system clockscreencapture -x ~/evidence/...Visual proof, but harder to validate
5Manual attestationSigned statement by responsible personLast resort, requires corroboration

Evidence Freshness Requirements

Evidence TypeMax AgeRefresh Cadence
Access lists90 daysQuarterly
Vulnerability scans30 daysMonthly
Configuration exports90 daysQuarterly
Training records12 monthsAnnual
Penetration test12 monthsAnnual
Policy documents12 monthsAnnual review
Incident recordsAudit periodContinuous
Risk assessment12 monthsAnnual + on change

Evidence Naming Convention

{control_id}_{evidence_type}_{YYYY-MM-DD}.{ext}

Examples:

  • A.5.15_user-access-list_2026-02-28.json
  • A.8.8_vulnerability-scan_2026-02-28.csv
  • A.8.13_backup-test-results_2026-02-28.pdf

Step-by-Step Workflow

Step 1: Identify Evidence Gaps

Determine what evidence is missing or stale.

# If compliance MCP is available:
list_evidence_gaps(framework="iso27001_2022", tier="critical")

# If reading local compliance data:
# Check compliance/evidence/*.md files for upload_status != "OK"
# Check renewal_next dates for upcoming expirations

Step 2: Prioritize Collection

Order evidence collection by:

  1. Missing evidence for Critical-tier controls — audit blockers
  2. Stale evidence past renewal date — auditor will reject
  3. Evidence for Relevant-tier controls — expected but not blocking
  4. Checkbox-tier evidence — policies and attestations

Step 3: Collect by Platform

Run evidence collection commands grouped by platform to minimize context-switching.

GitHub Evidence
# Org settings: MFA requirement, default permissions
gh api orgs/{org} | jq '{
  two_factor_requirement_enabled,
  default_repository_permission,
  members_can_create_public_repositories
}' > evidence/A.5.17_github-org-mfa_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).json

# Branch protection on production repos
for repo in $(gh repo list {org} --json name -q '.[].name'); do
  gh api repos/{org}/$repo/branches/main/protection 2>/dev/null | \
    jq '{repo: "'$repo'", protection: .}' >> evidence/A.8.32_branch-protection_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).json
done

# Recent merged PRs (change management evidence)
gh pr list --state merged --limit 50 --json number,title,author,reviewDecision,mergedAt,mergedBy \
  > evidence/A.8.32_change-records_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).json

# Dependabot alerts (vulnerability management)
gh api repos/{org}/{repo}/dependabot/alerts?state=open \
  > evidence/A.8.8_dependabot-alerts_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).json

# Secret scanning alerts
gh api orgs/{org}/secret-scanning/alerts --paginate \
  > evidence/A.8.24_secret-scanning_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).json

# Audit log
gh api orgs/{org}/audit-log?per_page=100 \
  > evidence/A.8.15_github-audit-log_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).json
GCP Evidence
# IAM policy (access control)
gcloud projects get-iam-policy {project} --format=json \
  > evidence/A.5.15_gcp-iam-policy_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).json

# Service accounts
gcloud iam service-accounts list --format=json \
  > evidence/A.5.16_gcp-service-accounts_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).json

# Audit logging config
gcloud projects get-iam-policy {project} --format=json | jq '.auditConfigs' \
  > evidence/A.8.15_gcp-audit-config_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).json

# Log sinks (centralization)
gcloud logging sinks list --format=json \
  > evidence/A.8.15_gcp-log-sinks_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).json

# Compute instances (asset inventory)
gcloud compute instances list --format=json \
  > evidence/A.5.9_gcp-compute-inventory_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).json

# Cloud SQL backup config
gcloud sql backups list --instance={instance} --format=json \
  > evidence/A.8.13_gcp-sql-backups_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).json

# Firewall rules
gcloud compute firewall-rules list --format=json \
  > evidence/A.8.20_gcp-firewall-rules_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).json
Azure Evidence
# Role assignments (access control)
az role assignment list --all --output json \
  > evidence/A.5.15_azure-role-assignments_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).json

# Activity log (audit trail)
az monitor activity-log list --max-events 100 --output json \
  > evidence/A.8.15_azure-activity-log_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).json

# Network security groups
az network nsg list --output json \
  > evidence/A.8.20_azure-nsgs_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).json

# Backup jobs
az backup job list --resource-group {rg} --vault-name {vault} --output json \
  > evidence/A.8.13_azure-backup-jobs_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).json

# Storage encryption
az storage account list --query "[].{name:name, encryption:encryption}" --output json \
  > evidence/A.8.24_azure-storage-encryption_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).json
Google Workspace Evidence
# User list with MFA status
gam print users fields primaryEmail,name,isEnrolledIn2Sv,isEnforcedIn2Sv,lastLoginTime,suspended \
  > evidence/A.5.17_workspace-users-mfa_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).csv

# Admin roles
gam print admins > evidence/A.8.2_workspace-admins_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).csv

# Mobile devices
gam print mobile > evidence/A.8.1_workspace-mobile-devices_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).csv
macOS Endpoint Evidence
# FileVault encryption
fdesetup status > evidence/A.8.24_filevault-status_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).txt

# System configuration
system_profiler SPHardwareDataType SPSoftwareDataType \
  > evidence/A.8.1_endpoint-config_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).txt

# Screen lock settings
profiles show -type configuration 2>/dev/null | grep -A10 -i "lock\|idle\|screensaver" \
  > evidence/A.6.7_screenlock-config_$(date +%Y-%m-%d).txt

Step 4: Validate Evidence Package

Check completeness before submitting to auditor:

  1. Completeness: Do you have evidence for every applicable control in the SoA?
  2. Freshness: Is every piece of evidence within the required age?
  3. Format: Are API exports in JSON/CSV with timestamps? Screenshots have system clock visible?
  4. Naming: Files follow the naming convention?
  5. Coverage: Critical-tier controls have at least 2 forms of evidence?
# If compliance MCP is available:
list_evidence_gaps(framework="iso27001_2022")  # Should return empty for complete package

Step 5: Generate Evidence Index

Create an index file listing all evidence, mapped to controls:

# Evidence Package Index
Generated: {date}
Audit period: {start} to {end}

| Control | Evidence File | Type | Collected | Status |
|---------|--------------|------|-----------|--------|
| A.5.15 | gcp-iam-policy_2026-02-28.json | API export | 2026-02-28 | Current |
| A.5.17 | workspace-users-mfa_2026-02-28.csv | API export | 2026-02-28 | Current |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

DO / DON'T

DO

  • Use API exports with ISO 8601 timestamps over screenshots whenever possible
  • Collect evidence from the SOURCE system (IdP, not a secondary report)
  • Include metadata: collection date, system version, user who collected
  • Store evidence in version-controlled directory with clear naming
  • Collect evidence for the AUDIT PERIOD (usually past 12 months), not just current state
  • Use screencapture -x ~/evidence/{filename}.png for screenshots (captures without shadow/border)

DON'T

  • Take screenshots without visible system clock (menu bar on macOS, taskbar on Windows)
  • Collect evidence from sandbox/staging instead of production
  • Manually edit evidence after collection (auditors may verify against source)
  • Wait until the week before the audit to collect everything
  • Assume stale evidence is acceptable — check freshness requirements above
  • Mix evidence from different audit periods in the same file

Troubleshooting

ProblemSolution
API command requires authUse existing local credentials: gcloud auth login, az login, gh auth login
Tool not installedInstall: brew install gh, brew install --cask google-cloud-sdk, brew install azure-cli
Insufficient permissionsRequest read-only access to the relevant service; document the access request as evidence
Evidence too largeUse --limit or --max-events flags; collect summary statistics instead of full export
Vendor won't provide SOC 2 reportRequest via their trust center; if unavailable, document the request and use their security page
Screenshot doesn't include clockOn macOS: use full-screen capture, or screencapture -x which includes menu bar

Rules

For detailed evidence collection guidance by topic:

FileCoverage
rules/api-exports.mdCLI commands by cloud provider (GCP, Azure, AWS, GitHub, Google Workspace)
rules/screenshot-guide.mdWhen and how to take audit-ready screenshots
rules/evidence-types.mdEvidence type requirements per control domain

Attribution

Evidence collection procedures and control guidance developed with Internal ISO Audit (Hazel Castro, ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, 14+ years, 100+ audits).

Runtime Detection

  1. Compliance MCP server available (best) — Automated gap detection, evidence freshness tracking
  2. Local compliance data available (good) — Reads evidence status from compliance/evidence/*.md
  3. Reference only (baseline) — Uses embedded checklists and command reference

平台分布

OpenClaw

94.98%
按下载量换算3,418

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills