Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ios-code-review(iOS 代码审查)

ios-code-review 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ios-code-review 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 70,176。

总安装 212周安装 9GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 74核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ios-code-review(iOS 代码审查)
来源仓库:https://github.com/sh-oh/ios-agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/ios-code-review
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/sh-oh/ios-agent-skills --skill ios-code-review
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/sh-oh/ios-agent-skills --skill ios-code-review

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索与筛选 iOS 代码审查相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词快速定位候选结果。可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态。

ios-code-review 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。注意其可能触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ios-code-review

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/sh-oh/ios-agent-skills --skill ios-code-review;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ios-code-review 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/sh-oh/ios-agent-skills --skill ios-code-review。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ios-code-review 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ios-code-review 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

ios-code-review 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ios-code-review 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 212 次,近一周安装 9 次,下载 74 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ios-code-review 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ios-code-review

iOS 代码审查 · 本页

212—接触敏感数据未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

iOS Code Review

Comprehensive security and quality review guide for Swift/iOS code changes. Covers memory leaks, concurrency issues, iOS security vulnerabilities, and Swift best practices.

When to Apply

  • Reviewing pull requests or code changes in Swift/iOS projects
  • Running pre-merge quality gates on Swift codebases
  • Performing security audits on iOS applications
  • Validating concurrency safety for Swift 6 migration
  • Checking memory management in ViewModels, closures, and Combine pipelines
  • Ensuring compliance with App Store review guidelines

Quick Reference

Review Checklist Summary

AreaPriorityKey Checks
SecurityCRITICALNo hardcoded secrets, Keychain for sensitive data, ATS compliance
Memory ManagementCRITICALNo retain cycles, weak delegates, cancellable cleanup
Code QualityHIGHNo force unwraps, proper error handling, size limits
ConcurrencyHIGH@MainActor for UI, Sendable compliance, Task cancellation
Best PracticesMEDIUMSwift API Guidelines, accessibility, localization

Approval Criteria

VerdictConditionAction
ApproveNo CRITICAL or HIGH issuesSafe to merge
WarningOnly MEDIUM issues presentCan merge with caution
BlockCRITICAL or HIGH issues foundMust fix before merge

Workflow

How to Conduct a Review

  1. Get changed files
# See all changed files
git diff --name-only HEAD

# See full diff for review
git diff HEAD
  1. Focus on Swift files -- Filter to .swift files and prioritize by change size.
  2. Categorize each finding by severity:

- CRITICAL: Security vulnerabilities, memory leaks, data races - HIGH: Force unwraps, missing error handling, concurrency violations - MEDIUM: Style issues, missing accessibility, optimization opportunities

  1. Generate report using the output format below.
  2. Determine verdict based on approval criteria.

Key Review Areas

Security (CRITICAL)

Full checklist: references/security-checks.md
  • No sensitive data stored in UserDefaults (use Keychain instead)
  • No hardcoded API keys, secrets, or credentials in source code
  • App Transport Security (ATS) exceptions justified and documented
  • Debug code guarded with #if DEBUG and excluded from release builds
  • Privacy manifest (PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy) present and Required Reason APIs declared

Memory Management (CRITICAL)

Full checklist: references/concurrency-checks.md
  • Closures use [weak self] to prevent retain cycles in escaping contexts
  • Delegates declared as weak to avoid ownership cycles
  • NotificationCenter observers removed on deinit
  • Timers invalidated on deinit
  • Combine AnyCancellable stored properly in Set<AnyCancellable>

Code Quality (HIGH)

  • No force unwrapping (!) without guard/if-let safety
  • Functions stay under 40 lines; files under 500 lines
  • Nesting depth does not exceed 4 levels
  • Empty catch blocks are not used; errors are handled or propagated
  • Access control applied (default to private; expose only what is needed)

Concurrency (HIGH)

Full checklist: references/concurrency-checks.md
  • UI updates happen on @MainActor or main thread
  • Non-Sendable types do not cross actor boundaries
  • Tasks are cancelled when the owning scope is deallocated
  • No blocking synchronous operations on the main thread
  • Actor isolation is correct and nonisolated is not overused

Best Practices (MEDIUM)

  • Naming follows Swift API Design Guidelines (UpperCamelCase for types, lowerCamelCase for members)
  • Boolean properties read as assertions (isEmpty, isEnabled, hasCompleted)
  • Accessibility labels and hints provided for interactive elements
  • User-facing strings are localized (no hardcoded display text)
  • Public APIs have documentation comments

Review Output Format

For each issue found, use this structure:

[SEVERITY] Brief Issue Title
File: path/to/file.swift:lineNumber
Issue: Description of the problem and its impact.
Fix: How to resolve it.

// Current (problematic)
<code showing the problem>

// Suggested (fixed)
<code showing the fix>

Example: Critical Issue

[CRITICAL] Sensitive data in UserDefaults
File: Sources/Services/AuthService.swift:42
Issue: API token stored in UserDefaults, accessible without encryption.
Fix: Move to Keychain with appropriate protection class.

// Current
UserDefaults.standard.set(token, forKey: "authToken")

// Suggested
try KeychainService.shared.save(token, forKey: "authToken",
                                 accessibility: .whenUnlockedThisDeviceOnly)

Example: High Issue

[HIGH] Retain cycle in closure
File: Sources/ViewModels/HomeViewModel.swift:78
Issue: Strong reference to self in async closure may cause memory leak.
Fix: Depends on actor isolation context.

// Case 1: @MainActor class - Task inherits actor context, weak self optional
@MainActor
final class HomeViewModel: ObservableObject {
    func load() {
        Task {
            items = await fetchItems()  // OK - inherits MainActor
        }
    }
}

// Case 2: Non-isolated class - weak self required
final class DataManager {
    func load() {
        Task { [weak self] in
            guard let self else { return }
            await self.process()
        }
    }
}

// Case 3: Escaping closures - always weak self
repository.fetch { [weak self] result in
    self?.handleResult(result)
}

Summary Template

Use this template for the final review report:

## Code Review Summary

### Files Reviewed
- `path/to/file.swift` (Modified)
- `path/to/other.swift` (Added)

### CRITICAL Issues (X)
| Issue | Location | Fix |
|-------|----------|-----|
| Brief description | file:line | How to fix |

### HIGH Issues (X)
| Issue | Location | Fix |
|-------|----------|-----|
| Brief description | file:line | How to fix |

### MEDIUM Suggestions (X)
| Issue | Location | Fix |
|-------|----------|-----|
| Brief description | file:line | How to fix |

### Good Practices Found
- [What was done well]

### Verdict: Approve / Warning / Block

Quick Check Commands

Run these before committing to catch common issues early:

# Check for print statements in production code
grep -rn "print(" --include="*.swift" Sources/

# Check for force unwraps
grep -rn "!" --include="*.swift" Sources/ | grep -v "//"

# Check for TODO/FIXME without ticket references
grep -rn "TODO\|FIXME" --include="*.swift" Sources/

# Check for hardcoded secrets (basic scan)
grep -rn "api_key\|apiKey\|secret\|password" --include="*.swift" Sources/

References

  • references/security-checks.md -- Full security review checklist (data storage, network, authentication, App Store compliance)
  • references/concurrency-checks.md -- Swift 6 concurrency, Combine memory, and performance checks
  • references/cascading-verification.md -- Cascading verification scenarios, code quality, best practices, accessibility, and test quality

Common Mistakes

1. Approving code with unguarded force unwraps

Force unwraps (!) crash at runtime when the value is nil. Always require guard/if-let unless the value is provably non-nil (e.g., IBOutlet after viewDidLoad).

2. Missing retain cycle detection in nested closures

A closure inside another closure can capture self strongly even if the outer closure uses [weak self]. Check the full closure chain, especially in Combine sink and map pipelines.

3. Overlooking @MainActor requirements for UI updates

ViewModels that update @Published properties driving SwiftUI views must be annotated with @MainActor or explicitly dispatch to the main actor. Missing this causes runtime warnings or undefined UI behavior.

4. Ignoring Sendable compliance warnings

Swift 6 strict concurrency requires types crossing actor boundaries to conform to Sendable. Treating these warnings as noise leads to data races in production. Review each warning and either conform or restructure.

5. Not verifying cascading impacts of API changes

Changing an enum case, protocol requirement, or function signature can break callers throughout the codebase. Always search for all usage sites before approving such changes. See references/cascading-verification.md.

平台分布

Codex

34.1%
按下载量换算25

Claude

31.59%
按下载量换算23

Cursor

18.32%
按下载量换算14

Gemini CLI

9.35%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills