🔍 Investigative Journalism Skill
🔴 AI FIRST Quality Principle
Apply the AI FIRST principle: never accept first-pass quality. Minimum 2 iterations. Read all output, improve every section. No shortcuts.
Purpose
Provides expertise in investigative journalism techniques for deep political accountability reporting. Covers source verification, document analysis, freedom of information (FOI) requests, data journalism, and ethical investigative practices for systematic transparency in Swedish governance.
Core Principles
- Truth-Seeking - Uncover facts that powerful actors prefer to hide
- Rigorous Verification - Multiple independent sources for major claims
- Public Interest - Investigations serve democratic accountability
- Ethical Boundaries - Respect privacy, minimize harm, protect sources
- Transparency - Openly document methodology and limitations
- Persistence - Investigations take time; quality over speed
This Skill Enforces
- Source verification - Multiple independent corroboration
- Document analysis - Financial records, contracts, correspondence
- FOI strategy - Swedish Offentlighetsprincipen (Public Access to Information)
- Data journalism - Statistical analysis, database queries, visualization
- Ethical guidelines - Source protection, privacy, harm minimization
- Legal awareness - Defamation, privacy laws, GDPR compliance
- Security practices - Encrypted communications, source anonymization
Key Investigation Techniques
Source Development
- Cultivating insiders - Building trust with whistleblowers
- Network mapping - Identifying key actors and relationships
- Background research - Public records, social media, publications
- Interview techniques - Open-ended questions, rapport building
- Source protection - Anonymization, secure communications
- Credibility assessment - Motive analysis, corroboration
Document Investigation
- FOI requests - Strategic use of Offentlighetsprincipen
- Financial analysis - Budget documents, contracts, payments
- Email analysis - Patterns, relationships, timeline reconstruction
- Contract review - Terms, conflicts of interest, irregularities
- Court records - Legal filings, judgments, corporate documents
- Cross-referencing - Connecting disparate documents
Data Journalism
- Database queries - SQL analysis of structured data
- Statistical analysis - Regression, correlation, trend detection
- Visualization - Charts, graphs, network diagrams
- OSINT tools - Open-source intelligence collection
- Scraping ethics - Respecting robots.txt, rate limiting
- Data validation - Quality checks, error detection
Swedish FOI System
Offentlighetsprincipen (Constitutional right to access public documents):
- All government documents are public unless specifically protected
- No need to explain why you want documents
- Response required "immediately" (typically within days)
- Appeals to Parliamentary Ombudsman if denied
- Covers Riksdag, Government, Myndigheter (agencies)
Protected Categories:
- National security and defense
- International relations
- Crime prevention and investigation
- Personal privacy (personal data)
- Commercial confidentiality
- Ongoing decision-making processes (limited)
When to Use This Skill
Political Accountability
- Investigating conflicts of interest among MPs/ministers
- Tracking voting pattern anomalies and party discipline breaches
- Examining government contract awards and procurement
- Analyzing lobbying activities and influence operations
Financial Investigations
- Budget analysis for waste, fraud, or misallocation
- Political party financing and donation sources
- MP expenses and allowances audit
- Agency spending and procurement irregularities
Regulatory Oversight
- Agency enforcement patterns and selective prosecution
- Regulatory capture by industry interests
- Compliance failures and cover-ups
- Interagency coordination problems
Systemic Issues
- Patterns of discrimination or bias in government
- Institutional failures and accountability gaps
- Long-term policy implementation problems
- Democratic deficit identification
Examples
FOI Investigation
**Investigation: Ministry of Finance Real Estate Contracts**
**FOI Request Strategy**:
1. Initial request: "All contracts over 1 million SEK with real
estate companies, 2024-2025"
2. Response: 47 contracts totaling 890 million SEK
3. Follow-up: "All email correspondence regarding contracts
[specific IDs] with [specific companies]"
4. Response: Partial denial citing "ongoing negotiations"
5. Appeal: To Ombudsman, citing public interest override
**Document Analysis**:
- Contract [X]: No competitive bidding, sole-source award
- Company [Y]: Owned by former Ministry official (3 years ago)
- Contract value: 40% above market rates (per audit office data)
- Timeline: Award 2 weeks after official left government
**Verification**:
- Land registry: Confirmed company ownership
- Audit Office: Provided comparative pricing data
- Former Ministry colleagues: Confirmed relationship (anonymous)
- Company representative: No comment
- Ministry spokesperson: "All contracts followed proper procedures"
**Publication Decision**:
- Public interest: Clear (taxpayer money, potential conflict)
- Evidence: Strong (documents, comparative data, timeline)
- Right to reply: Exercised (Ministry, company, individual)
- Legal risk: Low (factual reporting, documented)
- Privacy: Former official is public figure, minimal privacy expectation
*Result: Published investigation with full document citations*Voting Pattern Investigation
**Investigation: Voting Discipline Breach Pattern**
**Data Analysis**:
- Analyzed 2,487 Riksdag votes (2023-2025)
- Identified 12 MPs with >15% deviation from party line
- Focused on 3 MPs with systematic pattern in specific policy area
**Interview Process**:
- Background research on MPs' constituencies and donor relationships
- Initial contact: Open-ended questions about voting rationale
- Follow-up: Specific questions about industry connections
- Confidential sources: Two party insiders confirmed pressure
**Document Trail**:
- Committee minutes: Revealed close relationships with industry reps
- Meeting schedules: Frequent meetings with affected companies
- Campaign finance: Donations from industry PACs (legal but relevant)
**Analysis**:
- Pattern: All 3 MPs voted against party on regulations affecting donors
- Timeline: Votes correlated with campaign donation dates (+/- 30 days)
- Context: No principled explanation given, pattern suspicious
**Publication Considerations**:
- Public interest: High (accountability, potential undue influence)
- Evidence: Circumstantial but strong pattern
- Alternative explanations: MPs claim "constituency concerns"
- Balance: Present evidence, note alternative explanations
- Conclusion: Let readers judge, provide context
*Result: Published analysis with call for stronger disclosure rules*Ethical Guidelines
Source Protection
- Confidentiality - Never reveal source without explicit permission
- Secure communications - Encrypted email, Signal, in-person meetings
- Document handling - Redact identifying information, secure storage
- Legal protection - Swedish law protects journalistic sources
- Anonymization - Remove identifying details in published work
Privacy and Harm
- Public interest test - Invasion of privacy must serve public good
- Minimize harm - Consider impact on individuals and families
- Children's privacy - Exceptional protection for minors
- Right to reply - Always offer opportunity to respond
- Proportionality - Information disclosed proportional to wrongdoing
Legal Compliance
- Defamation - Ensure factual accuracy, document evidence
- GDPR - Political figures have reduced privacy expectations, but comply
- Copyright - Properly attribute and fair use for excerpts
- Data protection - Secure storage, limited retention, access control
- Harassment - No intimidation, threats, or undue pressure
Quality Standards
Verification Checklist
- Primary source documents obtained and authenticated
- Two independent sources for major claims
- All statistics verified against original data
- Contrary evidence considered and addressed
- Expert opinion sought where appropriate
- Legal review completed for defamation risk
- Right to reply exercised for all criticized parties
Publication Standards
- Clear sourcing and attribution throughout
- Methodology transparently explained
- Limitations and uncertainties acknowledged
- Raw documents provided where possible (linked)
- Timeline and context clearly presented
- Alternative explanations considered
- Impact on individuals minimized where possible
Remember
- Public interest first - Investigations serve democratic accountability
- Verification is non-negotiable - Multiple independent sources
- Protect sources - Confidentiality is sacred
- Ethical boundaries - Privacy, harm minimization, proportionality
- Legal awareness - Understand defamation, privacy, GDPR
- Persistence pays - Deep investigations take time
- Document everything - Audit trail for transparency and legal defense
- Collaborate - Work with data journalists, legal experts, academics
- Swedish FOI is powerful - Use Offentlighetsprincipen strategically
- Quality over speed - Better to delay than publish unverified claims
References
- Journalistförbundet (Swedish Union of Journalists) Ethics Code
- Offentlighetsprincipen Guide
- Global Investigative Journalism Network
- OCCRP Investigative Dashboard
- European Court of Human Rights Press Freedom Jurisprudence
- Swedish Press Ombudsman (Pressombudsmannen)
- Data Journalism Handbook
Use this skill when: Conducting in-depth accountability investigations, filing FOI requests, analyzing documents and data for corruption patterns, verifying sources for major revelations, or navigating ethical boundaries in investigative reporting.