Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 效率

inventory-reorder-calculator(库存重新订购计算器)

inventory-reorder-calculator 用于补充效率相关能力,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要让 Agent 承接效率相关任务时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

inventory-reorder-calculator 是效率类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在效率类的 21,003 个 Skill 里排第 3,678。

总安装 15,994周安装 680GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 5,603核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.1.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:inventory-reorder-calculator(库存重新订购计算器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/leooooooow/inventory-reorder-calculator
安装命令:
openclaw skills install inventory-reorder-calculator
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install inventory-reorder-calculator

这个 Skill 是做什么的

效率类 Skill 把重复的整理、汇总、转换工作交给助手完成,减少手工复制粘贴。

inventory-reorder-calculator 基于需求、交货期与安全库存估算再订购点与数量。适用于降低缺货风险,优化采购周期与资金占用成本。输入日均销量、供应商 lead time 等参数,自动计算建议下单时机。假设需求稳定,突发波动可能导致误差,建议设置缓冲系数应对不确定性。

输出为参考值,实际下单前应结合当前库存与订单状态二次确认。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install inventory-reorder-calculator;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

inventory-reorder-calculator 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install inventory-reorder-calculator。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

inventory-reorder-calculator 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

inventory-reorder-calculator 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

inventory-reorder-calculator 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

inventory-reorder-calculator 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 15,994 次,近一周安装 680 次,下载 5,603 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

inventory-reorder-calculator 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理效率类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

效率类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
github

GitHub 代码协作 · OpenClaw

7,632,918545需要联网MIT-0通过
nano-pdf

Nano PDF 文档 · OpenClaw

4,249,476231需要联网MIT-0通过
auto-updater

自动更新程序 · OpenClaw

2,964,063386操作浏览器MIT-0通过
video-frames

视频帧 · OpenClaw

2,621,304112需要联网MIT-0通过
gemini

Gemini 助手 · OpenClaw

2,547,39648需要联网MIT-0有提醒
inventory-reorder-calculator

库存重新订购计算器 · 本页

15,994—只读MIT-0有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
inventory-reorder-calculator
description
Estimate ecommerce reorder timing and quantity using demand, lead time, and safety stock assumptions so teams can set reorder points and reduce stockout risk with less guesswork.

Inventory Reorder Calculator

Estimate when to reorder and how much to buy before stock risk turns into lost revenue or excess inventory.

This skill goes beyond plugging numbers into a formula. It applies a structured inventory-planning workflow — demand analysis, lead-time modeling, safety stock calibration, and cash-vs-stockout tradeoff framing — to produce reorder recommendations operators can actually act on.


Quick Reference

DecisionKey SignalStrongAcceptableWeak
Demand estimationHistorical vs assumedUses actual sales data + trend/seasonalityReasonable assumption documentedMade-up round number
Safety stockRisk calibrationService-level-based (z-score × σ)Days-of-cover heuristicNo safety stock or arbitrary buffer
Lead timeSupplier reliabilityAvg + variability modeledSingle estimate documentedIgnored or assumed instant
Reorder pointFormula clarityROP = LT demand + safety stock, shownCalculated but not explainedJust a number with no breakdown
Order quantityConstraint-awareAccounts for MOQ, carton multiples, cashBasic EOQ or demand × daysArbitrary round number
Risk framingActionable tradeoffsStockout cost vs carrying cost quantifiedRisks named qualitativelyNo risk discussion

Solves

Most ecommerce teams get reorder planning wrong not because they lack data, but because:

  • Gut-feel ordering — buying "about the same as last time" without modeling demand changes
  • Ignoring lead-time variability — treating supplier lead time as fixed when it fluctuates 20–50%
  • No safety stock logic — either zero buffer (stockouts) or massive buffer (cash drag)
  • Formula without context — calculating ROP without explaining what drives it or when it breaks
  • Missing constraints — ignoring MOQs, carton multiples, storage limits, or cash flow
  • No risk framing — presenting a single number without showing the stockout vs overstock tradeoff
  • Static calculations — one-time number with no guidance on when to recalculate

Goal: Produce a reorder recommendation that an ops lead, buyer, or founder can act on today — with the math shown, assumptions visible, and risks framed.


Use when

  • You need a practical reorder point for a SKU or product group
  • Demand is growing, volatile, or seasonal
  • Lead time is long or unreliable
  • You want to reduce stockouts without overbuying cash-intensive inventory
  • A team needs to explain reorder logic to a buyer, founder, or ops lead
  • You're setting up initial reorder rules for a new product or supplier
  • Transitioning from gut-feel ordering to data-informed replenishment

Do not use when

  • You need a full supply-chain planning system or ERP implementation
  • Historical demand is too weak to support even rough assumptions
  • Supplier constraints are unknown and nobody can estimate them
  • The task is warehouse slotting or operations design rather than reorder planning
  • You need multi-echelon or multi-warehouse optimization

Inputs

Gather these inputs — mark any gaps explicitly:

Demand data:

  • Average daily or weekly unit sales (last 30/60/90 days)
  • Demand trend direction (growing / stable / declining)
  • Demand variability (standard deviation of daily sales, or coefficient of variation)
  • Known seasonality, promotions, or launches upcoming
  • Historical stockout periods (to adjust demand estimates)

Supply data:

  • Supplier average lead time (order-to-receipt, in days)
  • Lead-time variability (best case / worst case / std dev)
  • Minimum order quantity (MOQ)
  • Carton multiples or packaging constraints
  • Supplier reliability notes (late shipment frequency, quality issues)

Inventory data:

  • Current on-hand stock (units)
  • Current in-transit stock (units, ETA)
  • Storage capacity constraints
  • Current inventory carrying cost (% of COGS per year, or $/unit/month)

Business context:

  • Target service level (e.g., 95%, 98%, 99%)
  • Stockout cost estimate (lost margin + customer impact)
  • Cash flow constraints or budget limits
  • Review cycle / reorder cadence (daily / weekly / monthly)
  • Product lifecycle stage (launch / growth / mature / clearance)

See references/safety-stock-guide.md for service level and z-score tables. See references/demand-analysis-guide.md for demand estimation methods.


Workflow

1. Analyze demand pattern

Before calculating anything, understand the demand signal:

Average daily demand: [X] units/day
Demand std deviation: [σd] units/day
Trend: [growing / stable / declining at Y% per period]
Seasonality: [none / seasonal with peak in Z months]
Data quality: [strong (90+ days) / moderate (30–90 days) / weak (<30 days)]

If demand data is weak, flag this prominently — the entire calculation depends on this input.

See references/demand-analysis-guide.md for methods to handle trend, seasonality, and sparse data.

2. Model lead time

Supplier lead time is rarely constant. Model both average and variability:

Average lead time: [LT] days
Lead time std deviation: [σLT] days
Best case: [X] days
Worst case: [Y] days
Data source: [supplier quote / historical POs / assumption]

Rule: If lead time is based on a supplier quote alone (not historical data), add 20–30% buffer. Suppliers are optimistic.

3. Calculate safety stock

Safety stock bridges the gap between average expectations and real-world variability:

Method 1: Service-level approach (preferred when data exists)

SS = z × √(LT × σd² + d² × σLT²)

Where:
z = service level z-score (1.65 for 95%, 1.96 for 97.5%, 2.33 for 99%)
LT = average lead time in days
σd = standard deviation of daily demand
d = average daily demand
σLT = standard deviation of lead time in days

Method 2: Days-of-cover heuristic (when data is limited)

SS = average daily demand × safety days

Where safety days = typically 5–14 days depending on:
- Lead time length (longer LT → more safety days)
- Demand variability (higher variability → more safety days)
- Stockout cost (higher cost → more safety days)

See references/safety-stock-guide.md for z-score tables and method selection guidance.

4. Calculate reorder point

ROP = (average daily demand × average lead time) + safety stock
ROP = (d × LT) + SS

Interpret the result: "When on-hand inventory drops to [ROP] units, place a new order."

If in-transit stock exists, use effective inventory position:

Inventory position = on-hand + in-transit - backorders
Trigger reorder when: inventory position ≤ ROP

5. Determine reorder quantity

Basic approach:

Reorder quantity = average daily demand × days of coverage target

Constraint-adjusted approach:

Raw quantity = demand × coverage days
Adjusted for MOQ: max(raw quantity, MOQ)
Adjusted for carton multiple: round up to nearest carton multiple
Adjusted for cash: min(adjusted quantity, budget ÷ unit cost)
Adjusted for storage: min(adjusted quantity, available storage)

EOQ approach (when holding and ordering costs are known):

EOQ = √(2 × annual demand × order cost / holding cost per unit per year)

See references/output-template.md for the complete output format.

6. Frame the risk tradeoffs

Every reorder decision involves tradeoffs. Make them visible:

ScenarioStockout RiskCash Tied UpCoverage
Conservative (ROP + 20%)Very lowHigh[X] days
Recommended (ROP)LowModerate[Y] days
Aggressive (ROP - 20%)ModerateLow[Z] days

Quantify when possible:

  • "Stockout of [X] days costs ~$[Y] in lost margin"
  • "Extra [X] units ties up $[Y] in cash for [Z] weeks"

7. Quality-check the recommendation

Before delivering, verify with assets/reorder-checklist.md:

  • Is the demand estimate based on data (not just a guess)?
  • Is lead-time variability accounted for?
  • Is safety stock calibrated to a service level or risk tolerance?
  • Does the reorder quantity respect MOQ and packaging constraints?
  • Are cash flow implications visible?
  • Are assumptions explicitly stated?
  • Is there guidance on when to recalculate?

Output

Return a structured package (see references/output-template.md):

  1. Assumptions table

- Every input value with source and confidence level

  1. Demand and lead-time model

- Demand stats, trend, variability - Lead time stats and variability

  1. Reorder point calculation

- Safety stock with method shown - ROP with formula and plain-English interpretation

  1. Reorder quantity recommendation

- Raw quantity and constraint-adjusted quantity - Cash impact estimate

  1. Risk scenario table

- Conservative / recommended / aggressive options - Stockout risk and cash tradeoff for each

  1. Action items and review triggers

- When to place the next order - When to recalculate (demand shift, supplier change, etc.) - Sensitivity warnings


Quality bar

Strong output should:

  • Show the math AND explain it in plain English
  • Separate reorder point (when to order) from reorder quantity (how much)
  • Account for demand variability, not just averages
  • Account for lead-time variability, not just supplier quotes
  • Respect real-world constraints (MOQ, cash, storage)
  • Frame the stockout vs overstock tradeoff explicitly
  • Flag fragile assumptions that could change the recommendation

What "better" looks like

Better output helps the operator act with confidence:

  • Knows when to reorder (and understands why that number, not another)
  • Knows roughly how much to buy (and sees the tradeoff in buying more or less)
  • Sees the cash vs stockout tradeoff in concrete terms
  • Understands where lead-time risk changes the answer
  • Can explain the decision to a buyer, founder, or ops lead
  • Has clear triggers for when to recalculate

Examples

Example 1: Growing DTC skincare brand

Inputs:

  • Product: Vitamin C Serum 30ml
  • Average daily sales: 42 units/day (last 90 days, growing ~8%/month)
  • Daily demand std dev: 12 units
  • Unit cost: $8.50, selling price: $29.99
  • Supplier lead time: 21 days avg (std dev: 4 days)
  • MOQ: 500 units, carton multiple: 50
  • Current stock: 890 units, none in transit
  • Target service level: 95%
  • Review cadence: weekly

Output excerpt:

DEMAND MODEL
Avg daily demand: 42 units → adjusted for growth: 46 units/day (8%/mo trend)
Demand σ: 12 units/day
Data quality: Strong (90 days, consistent)

SAFETY STOCK (Service-level method, z=1.65 for 95%)
SS = 1.65 × √(21 × 12² + 46² × 4²)
SS = 1.65 × √(3024 + 33856)
SS = 1.65 × 192
SS = 317 units → round to 320

REORDER POINT
ROP = (46 × 21) + 320 = 966 + 320 = 1,286 units

⚠️ Current stock (890) is BELOW reorder point. Order now.

REORDER QUANTITY
Target coverage: 30 days post-receipt
Raw qty: 46 × 30 = 1,380 units
Adjusted for MOQ: 1,380 (above 500 MOQ ✓)
Adjusted for carton: 1,400 (nearest 50 multiple)
Cash required: 1,400 × $8.50 = $11,900

RISK SCENARIOS
| Scenario | Order Qty | Stockout Risk | Cash | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | 1,700 | <2% | $14,450 | 37 days |
| Recommended | 1,400 | ~5% | $11,900 | 30 days |
| Aggressive | 1,100 | ~12% | $9,350 | 24 days |

Example 2: Seasonal product with unreliable supplier

Inputs:

  • Product: Insulated water bottle
  • Average daily sales: 18 units/day (but seasonal: 30/day in summer, 8/day in winter)
  • Current month: April (ramping up)
  • Supplier lead time: 35 days avg, range: 28–50 days
  • MOQ: 200, unit cost: $6.20
  • Current stock: 520, 300 in transit (ETA 2 weeks)

Output excerpt:

DEMAND MODEL
Current avg: 18 units/day
Seasonal forecast (next 60 days): ramping to ~25 units/day
Using forward estimate: 25 units/day
Demand σ: 7 units/day (higher variability due to seasonal transition)

⚠️ LEAD TIME WARNING
Avg LT: 35 days, but range is 28–50 days (σLT ≈ 6 days)
This supplier has high variability — safety stock must account for this.

SAFETY STOCK (z=1.65 for 95%)
SS = 1.65 × √(35 × 49 + 625 × 36) = 1.65 × √(1715 + 22500) = 1.65 × 156 = 257 units

REORDER POINT
ROP = (25 × 35) + 257 = 875 + 257 = 1,132 units

INVENTORY POSITION
On-hand: 520 + in-transit: 300 = 820
820 < 1,132 → ⚠️ Below ROP. Order immediately.

Days until stockout (no reorder): 520 ÷ 25 = 20.8 days
In-transit arrives in ~14 days → post-arrival: (520 - 350) + 300 = 470 units
470 ÷ 25 = 18.8 more days → ~33 days total before stockout

ACTION: Order now. Lead time of 35 days means new stock arrives just as
current + in-transit runs out. Any delay = stockout during peak season.

Common mistakes

  1. Using averages without variability — "We sell 20/day" ignores that some days are 8 and others are 35
  2. Trusting supplier lead times — Quoted lead times are best-case; actual delivery is often 20–50% longer
  3. Forgetting in-transit inventory — Reordering when stock is low but 1,000 units are already shipping
  4. Ignoring MOQ and carton constraints — Calculating a perfect 347-unit order when MOQ is 500
  5. No cash flow context — Recommending a $50K order to a business with $30K available
  6. Static one-time calculation — Giving a number without saying when it should be recalculated
  7. Safety stock = gut feel — Using "2 weeks of safety stock" without connecting it to demand variability
  8. Not adjusting for trend — Using historical averages for a product that's growing 15%/month

Resources

  • references/output-template.md — Complete structured output template
  • references/safety-stock-guide.md — Service levels, z-scores, and safety stock methods
  • references/demand-analysis-guide.md — Demand estimation, trend adjustment, and seasonality handling
  • assets/reorder-checklist.md — Pre-delivery quality checklist

平台分布

OpenClaw

78.66%
按下载量换算4,407

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills