Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

internalaudit(internalaudit 搜索)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

internalaudit 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 56,831。

总安装 445周安装 18GitHub Stars 1下载 140核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:internalaudit(internalaudit 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/robdtaylor/personal-ai-infrastructure
仓库路径:skills/internalaudit
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/robdtaylor/personal-ai-infrastructure --skill Internalaudit
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/robdtaylor/personal-ai-infrastructure --skill Internalaudit

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

internalaudit 用于辅助安全审计、权限检查和凭据风险排查。适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,需人工复核关键操作。涉及密钥、令牌或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限和脱敏方式。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/internalaudit

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/robdtaylor/personal-ai-infrastructure --skill…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

internalaudit 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/robdtaylor/personal-ai-infrastructure --skill Internalau…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

internalaudit 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

internalaudit 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

internalaudit 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

internalaudit 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 445 次,近一周安装 18 次,下载 140 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

internalaudit 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
internalaudit

internalaudit 搜索 · 本页

4451只读MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Internal Audit

When to Activate This Skill

  • "Plan internal audit programme"
  • "Create audit checklist for [process/area]"
  • "Conduct process/product/QMS audit"
  • "Document audit findings"
  • "Write nonconformance report"
  • "Plan layered process audit (LPA)"
  • "Prepare for IATF 16949 certification audit"

IATF 16949 Audit Requirements

Clause 9.2.2.1 - Internal Audit Programme

The organization shall:

  • Maintain documented internal audit programme
  • Cover all QMS processes over audit cycle (typically 3 years)
  • Include customer-specific requirements (CSRs)
  • Consider process risk and previous audit results
  • Define audit criteria, scope, frequency, methods

Types of Internal Audits

IATF 16949 requires three types of internal audit (clauses 9.2.2.2–9.2.2.4):

Audit TypeFocusFrequencyReference
QMS AuditManagement system conformance to IATF 16949/ISO 9001Annual minimum per clause9.2.2.2
Process AuditManufacturing process effectiveness (process approach)Based on risk, min annual9.2.2.3
Product AuditProduct conformance at production/delivery stagesPer control plan, min annual9.2.2.4
Note: Layered Process Audits (LPA) are not a standalone IATF 16949 requirement. They are a customer-specific requirement (CSR) from certain OEMs (e.g., GM, Ford, Stellantis). They must be implemented when required by customer CSRs but are separate from the three IATF-mandated audit types above.

QMS Audit (9.2.2.2)

Purpose

Verify conformance to IATF 16949/ISO 9001 requirements and organization's QMS.

Scope

All clauses of IATF 16949 over the audit cycle:

  • Context of organization (4)
  • Leadership (5)
  • Planning (6)
  • Support (7)
  • Operation (8)
  • Performance evaluation (9)
  • Improvement (10)

Approach

  • Clause-based checklist
  • Interview management and staff
  • Review documented information
  • Verify implementation and effectiveness

Output

  • Completed checklist
  • Finding report (NCRs, OFIs)
  • Audit report

Process Audit (9.2.2.3)

Purpose

Evaluate effectiveness of manufacturing processes using process approach.

Scope

Each manufacturing process including:

  • Inputs and outputs
  • Process controls
  • Operator competence
  • Equipment capability
  • Work instructions compliance

Approach - Turtle Diagram Method

         INPUTS                    OUTPUTS
            ↓                         ↑
    Materials, specs           Products, data
            ↓                         ↑
       ┌─────────────────────────────┐
       │                             │
WITH → │      PROCESS BEING          │ → METRICS
WHAT?  │        AUDITED              │   KPIs met?
       │                             │
       └─────────────────────────────┘
            ↑                         ↑
      WHO?                        HOW?
    Competent?                  Per procedure?

Key Questions

  • Are inputs conforming?
  • Are process parameters controlled?
  • Are operators competent and trained?
  • Is equipment maintained and capable?
  • Are work instructions followed?
  • Are outputs conforming?
  • Are KPIs being met?

Product Audit (9.2.2.4)

Purpose

Verify product conformance at appropriate stages of production and delivery.

Scope

  • Dimensional verification vs. drawing
  • Functional testing vs. specification
  • Appearance vs. standards
  • Packaging and labeling
  • Documentation/traceability

Approach

  • Select sample per Control Plan
  • Measure against all drawing requirements
  • Verify special characteristics
  • Check packaging and identification
  • Document all measurements

Frequency

  • At defined stages (per Control Plan)
  • All special characteristics covered annually
  • After process changes

Layered Process Audit (LPA)

Purpose

Standardized process verification at multiple organizational levels.

Structure

LevelAuditorFrequencyScope
Level 1Team LeaderDailyKey process steps
Level 2SupervisorWeeklyProcess area
Level 3ManagerMonthlyDepartment
Level 4Plant ManagerMonthlyMultiple areas

Key Characteristics

  • Same checklist at all levels
  • Focus on standardized work
  • Quick (10-15 minutes)
  • Immediate corrective action
  • Trend tracking

Audit Planning

Annual Audit Schedule

Consider:

  • All QMS processes over cycle (max 3 years)
  • All manufacturing processes annually
  • Risk-based frequency (high risk = more frequent)
  • Previous audit results
  • Customer complaints
  • Internal quality performance
  • Changes to processes

Audit Plan Elements

ElementDescription
Audit numberUnique identifier
DateScheduled date
ScopeWhat will be audited
CriteriaRequirements to audit against
Auditor(s)Qualified auditor assignment
AuditeeProcess owner/department
DurationExpected time

Auditor Qualification

Requirements (per 9.2.2.2)

  • Understanding of automotive process approach
  • Customer-specific requirements knowledge
  • ISO 19011 audit principles
  • Core tools knowledge (FMEA, SPC, MSA)
  • IATF 16949 requirements knowledge

Independence

  • Auditors shall not audit their own work
  • Cross-functional audit teams encouraged
  • External auditor for sensitive areas

Training Path

  1. Internal training on QMS and IATF 16949
  2. Core tools training
  3. Audit technique training
  4. Shadow audits (observe experienced auditor)
  5. Supervised audits
  6. Independent auditor status

Conducting the Audit

Opening Meeting

  • Confirm scope and schedule
  • Explain audit method
  • Confirm resources and access
  • Answer questions

Evidence Collection

  • Interview personnel
  • Review documents and records
  • Observe processes
  • Take notes with objective evidence

Audit Techniques

  • Open-ended questions (How? What? Why?)
  • Request evidence for claims
  • Follow the trail (traceability)
  • Verify vs. specification
  • Compare to procedure

Closing Meeting

  • Present findings
  • Confirm accuracy with auditee
  • Agree on corrective action timelines
  • Thank participants

Finding Classification

Major Nonconformance

Definition: Absence or complete breakdown of system to meet requirement, or situation likely to result in shipping nonconforming product.

Examples:

  • No documented procedure when required
  • Consistent failure to follow procedure
  • Pattern of nonconforming product
  • Missing required records

Action: Requires root cause analysis, corrective action, and verification before certification.

Minor Nonconformance

Definition: Single lapse in meeting a requirement; does not affect product quality or system integrity.

Examples:

  • Isolated instance of missing signature
  • Minor record-keeping gap
  • Single deviation from procedure
  • Incomplete training record

Action: Requires correction, may require root cause and corrective action.

Opportunity for Improvement (OFI)

Definition: Not a nonconformance, but improvement recommendation.

Examples:

  • Better organization possible
  • More efficient method available
  • Good practice from other areas
  • Proactive enhancement

Action: Optional implementation, tracked for consideration.


Corrective Action Process

Timeline Requirements

FindingInitial ResponseCorrective ActionVerification
Major24-48 hours30 days maxWithin 90 days
Minor5 business days60 days maxWithin 90 days
OFI30 daysAs appropriateAs appropriate

Corrective Action Elements

  1. Containment: Immediate action to contain impact
  2. Root Cause: Analysis to determine true cause (5-Why, Fishbone)
  3. Corrective Action: Action to eliminate root cause
  4. Implementation: Execute corrective action
  5. Verification: Confirm effectiveness
  6. Prevent Recurrence: Systemic changes

Output Format

Audit Report Structure

# Internal Audit Report

## Audit Information
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Audit Number | IA-[YYYY]-[SEQ] |
| Type | QMS / Process / Product |
| Date | [YYYY-MM-DD] |
| Auditor(s) | [Names] |
| Auditee | [Name/Department] |
| Scope | [Description] |

## Executive Summary
[Brief summary of audit results]

## Findings Summary
| Major NC | Minor NC | OFI | Positive Findings |
|----------|----------|-----|-------------------|
| [count] | [count] | [count] | [count] |

## Detailed Findings

### Finding 1: [Title]
**Classification:** Major / Minor / OFI
**Requirement:** [Reference]
**Evidence:** [Objective evidence]
**Finding:** [Description]
**Response Due:** [Date]

[Repeat for each finding]

## Positive Observations
[Good practices observed]

## Conclusions
[Overall assessment]

## Approvals
| Role | Name | Signature | Date |
|------|------|-----------|------|
| Lead Auditor | | | |
| Quality Manager | | | |

Integration with Related Skills

AutomotiveManufacturing

Process audits verify work instruction compliance:

  • Are documented procedures being followed?
  • Are quality checkpoints being executed?
  • Are records being maintained?

Load: read ~/.claude/skills/Automotivemanufacturing/SKILL.md

A3criticalthinking

For audit finding root cause analysis:

  • Use 5-Why methodology
  • Fishbone diagram for complex issues
  • A3 format for corrective action plans

Load: read ~/.claude/skills/A3criticalthinking/SKILL.md


Supplementary Resources

For detailed guidance: read ~/.claude/skills/Internalaudit/CLAUDE.md

For checklists: ls ~/.claude/skills/Internalaudit/templates/

For IATF clause questions: read ~/.claude/skills/Internalaudit/reference/iatf-clause-questions.md

平台分布

Claude Code

28.81%
按下载量换算40

windsurf

20.55%
按下载量换算29

trae

16.49%
按下载量换算23

OpenCode

13.28%
按下载量换算19

Cursor

8.17%
按下载量换算11

Codex

3.3%
按下载量换算5

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills