Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 效率

internal-narrative(内部叙述)

internal-narrative 用于辅助前端页面、组件、样式和交互逻辑开发,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要维护前端项目、生成组件或检查界面实现时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

internal-narrative 是效率类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在效率类的 21,003 个 Skill 里排第 5,036。

总安装 11,831周安装 503GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 4,145核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
2.1.1

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:internal-narrative(内部叙述)
来源仓库:https://github.com/alirezarezvani/internal-narrative
安装命令:
openclaw skills install internal-narrative
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install internal-narrative

这个 Skill 是做什么的

效率类 Skill 把重复的整理、汇总、转换工作交给助手完成,减少手工复制粘贴。

内部叙述技能为公司打造面向员工、投资者等多方受众的统一故事线。适用于品牌建设、招聘宣传与危机公关等需要叙事一致性的场合。自动检测不同渠道表述矛盾点,提出调和与强化建议。涉及企业战略信息时应遵循信息披露合规要求。internal-narrative 属于效率类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

建议由品牌部门主导使用该技能,确保对外口径准确无误。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install internal-narrative;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

internal-narrative 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install internal-narrative。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

internal-narrative 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

internal-narrative 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

internal-narrative 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

internal-narrative 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 11,831 次,近一周安装 503 次,下载 4,145 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

internal-narrative 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理效率类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

效率类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
github

GitHub 代码协作 · OpenClaw

7,632,918545需要联网MIT-0通过
nano-pdf

Nano PDF 文档 · OpenClaw

4,249,476231需要联网MIT-0通过
auto-updater

自动更新程序 · OpenClaw

2,964,063386操作浏览器MIT-0通过
video-frames

视频帧 · OpenClaw

2,621,304112需要联网MIT-0通过
gemini

Gemini 助手 · OpenClaw

2,547,39648需要联网MIT-0有提醒
internal-narrative

内部叙述 · 本页

11,831—需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
internal-narrative
description
Build and maintain one coherent company story across all audiences — employees, investors, customers, candidates, and partners. Detects narrative contradictions and ensures the same truth is framed for each audience's needs. Use when preparing investor updates, all-hands presentations, board communications, recruiting narratives, crisis communications, or when user mentions company narrative, messaging consistency, storytelling, all-hands, investor update, or crisis communication.
license
MIT
metadata
version
1.0.0
author
Alireza Rezvani
category
c-level
domain
narrative-strategy
updated
2026-03-05
frameworks
narrative-frameworks, all-hands-template

Internal Narrative Builder

One company. Many audiences. Same truth — different lenses. Narrative inconsistency is trust erosion. This skill builds and maintains coherent communication across every stakeholder group.

Keywords

narrative, company story, internal communication, investor update, all-hands, board communication, crisis communication, messaging, storytelling, narrative consistency, audience translation, founder narrative, employee communication, candidate narrative, partner communication

Core Principle

The same fact lands differently depending on who hears it and what they need.

"We're shifting resources from Product A to Product B" means:

  • To employees: "Is my job safe? Why are we abandoning what I built?"
  • To investors: "Smart capital allocation — they're doubling down on the winner"
  • To customers of Product A: "Are they abandoning us?"
  • To candidates: "Exciting new focus — are they decisive?"

Same fact. Four different narratives needed. The skill is maintaining truth while serving each audience's actual question.


Framework

Step 1: Build the Core Narrative

One paragraph that every other communication derives from. This is the source of truth.

Core narrative template:

[Company name] exists to [mission — present tense, specific]. We're building [what you're building] because [the problem you're solving]. Our approach is [your unique way of doing this]. We're at [honest description of current state] and heading toward [where you're going in concrete terms].

Good core narrative (example):

Acme Health exists to reduce preventable falls in elderly care using smartphone-based mobility analysis. We're building an AI diagnostic tool for care teams because current fall risk assessments are subjective, infrequent, and often wrong. Our approach — using the phone's camera during a 10-second walking test — means no new hardware, no specialist required. We have 80 care facilities in DACH paying us €800K ARR, and we're heading to €3M ARR by demonstrating clinical value at scale before our Series B.

Bad core narrative:

Acme Health is an innovative AI company revolutionizing elderly care through cutting-edge technology that empowers care providers and improves patient outcomes across the continuum of care.

The good version is usable. The bad version says nothing.


Step 2: Audience Translation Matrix

Take the core narrative and translate it for each audience. Same truth, different frame.

FactEmployees need to hearInvestors need to hearCustomers need to hearCandidates need to hear
We have 80 customers"We've proven the model — your work matters""Product-market fit signal, capital efficient""80 care facilities trust us""Traction you'd be joining"
We pivoted from hardware"We were honest enough to change course""Capital-efficient pivot to better unit economics""We found a faster, simpler way to serve you""We make decisions based on evidence, not ego"
We missed Q2 revenue"Here's why, here's the plan, here's what you can do""Revenue mix shifted — trailing indicator improving"[Usually don't tell customers revenue misses][Usually not shared externally]
We're hiring fast"The team is growing — your network matters""Headcount plan aligned to growth"[Not relevant unless it affects service]"This is a rocket ship moment"

Rules:

  • Never contradict yourself across audiences. Different framing ≠ different facts.
  • "We told investors growth, told employees efficiency" is a contradiction. Audit for this.
  • Investors and employees see each other. Board members talk to your team. Candidates google you.

Step 3: Contradiction Detection

Before any major communication, run the contradiction check:

Question 1: What did we tell investors last month about [topic]? Question 2: What did we tell employees about the same topic? Question 3: Are these consistent? If not — which version is true?

Common contradictions:

  • "Efficient growth" to investors + "we're hiring aggressively" to candidates
  • "Strong pipeline" to investors + "sales is struggling" at all-hands
  • "Customer-first" in culture + recent decisions that clearly prioritized revenue over customer need

When you catch a contradiction: Fix the less accurate version, then communicate the correction explicitly. "Last month I said X. After more reflection, X is not quite right. Here's the clearer version."

Correcting yourself before someone else catches it builds more trust than getting caught.


Step 4: Audience-Specific Communication Cadence

AudienceFormatFrequencyOwner
EmployeesAll-handsMonthlyCEO
EmployeesTeam updatesWeeklyTeam leads
InvestorsWritten updateMonthlyCEO + CFO
BoardBoard meeting + memoQuarterlyCEO
CustomersProduct updatesPer releaseCPO / CS
CandidatesCareers page + interview narrativeOngoingCHRO + Founders
PartnersQuarterly business reviewQuarterlyBD Lead

Step 5: All-Hands Structure and Cadence

See templates/all-hands-template.md for the full template.

Principles:

  • Lead with honest state of the company. No spin.
  • Connect company performance to individual work: "Here's how what you built contributed to this outcome."
  • Give people a reason to be proud of their choice to work here.
  • Leave time for real Q&A — not curated questions.

All-hands failure modes:

  • CEO speaks for 55 of 60 minutes; Q&A is "any quick questions?"
  • All good news, all the time — employees know when you're not being honest
  • Metrics without context: "ARR grew 15%" without explaining if that's good, bad, or expected
  • Questions deflected: "That's a great point, we should follow up on that" → never followed up

Step 6: Crisis Communication

When the narrative breaks — someone leaves publicly, a product fails, a security breach, a press article.

The 4-hour rule: If something is public or about to be, communicate internally within 4 hours. Employees should never learn about company news from Twitter.

Crisis communication sequence:

Hour 0–4 (internal first):

  1. CEO or relevant leader sends an internal message
  2. Acknowledge what happened factually
  3. State what you know and what you don't know yet
  4. Tell people what you're doing about it
  5. Tell people what they should do if they're asked about it

Hour 4–24 (external if needed):

  1. External statement (press, social) only if the event is public
  2. Consistent with the internal message — same facts, audience-appropriate framing
  3. Legal review if any claims or liability involved

What not to do in a crisis:

  • Silence: letting rumors fill the vacuum
  • Spin: people can detect it and it destroys trust
  • "No comment": says "we have something to hide"
  • Blaming: even if someone else caused the problem, your audience only cares what you're doing about it

Template for crisis internal communication:

"Here's what happened: [factual description]. Here's what we know right now: [known facts]. Here's what we don't know yet: [honest uncertainty]. Here's what we're doing: [specific actions]. Here's what you should do if you're asked about this: [specific guidance]. I'll update you by [specific time] with more information."

Narrative Consistency Checklist

Run before any major external communication:

  • [ ] Is this consistent with what we told investors last month?
  • [ ] Is this consistent with what we told employees at the last all-hands?
  • [ ] Does this contradict anything on our website, careers page, or press releases?
  • [ ] If an employee read this external communication, would they recognize the company being described?
  • [ ] If an investor read our internal all-hands deck, would they find anything inconsistent?
  • [ ] Have we been accurate about our current state, or are we projecting an aspiration?

Key Questions for Narrative

  • "Could a new employee explain to a friend why our company exists? What would they say?"
  • "What do we tell investors about our strategy? What do we tell employees? Are these the same?"
  • "If a journalist asked our team members to describe the company independently, what would they say?"
  • "When did we last update our 'why we exist' story? Is it still true?"
  • "What's the hardest question we'd get from each audience? Do we have an honest answer?"

Red Flags

  • Different departments describe the company mission differently
  • Investor narrative emphasizes growth; employee narrative emphasizes stability (or vice versa)
  • All-hands presentations are mostly slides, mostly one-way
  • Q&A questions are screened or deflected
  • Bad news reaches employees through Slack rumors before leadership communication
  • Careers page describes a culture that employees don't recognize

Integration with Other C-Suite Roles

When...Work with...To...
Investor update prepCFOAlign financial narrative with company narrative
Reorg or leadership changeCHRO + CEOSequence: employees first, then external
Product pivotCPOAlign customer communication with investor story
Culture changeCulture ArchitectEnsure internal story is consistent with external employer brand
M&A or partnershipCEO + COOControl information flow, prevent narrative leaks
CrisisAll C-suiteSingle voice, consistent story, internal first

Detailed References

  • references/narrative-frameworks.md — Storytelling structures, founder narrative, bad news delivery, all-hands templates
  • templates/all-hands-template.md — All-hands presentation template

平台分布

OpenClaw

81.26%
按下载量换算3,368

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills