Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

intake(intake 表格)

intake 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

intake 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 14,999。

总安装 8,160周安装 340GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 2,720核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:intake(intake 表格)
来源仓库:https://github.com/projectsnowwork/intake
安装命令:
openclaw skills install intake
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install intake

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

设计服务关系接收表格与入职工作流程,收集必要初始信息。适用于项目启动、客户对接或服务交付前的信息整理。可定制发现访谈模板和摘要生成逻辑。intake 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。安装命令:openclaw skills install intake,适用于 OpenClaw。

表单设计应遵循隐私保护原则,避免过度索取敏感数据。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install intake;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

intake 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install intake。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

intake 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

intake 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

intake 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

intake 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 8,160 次,近一周安装 340 次,下载 2,720 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

intake 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
intake

intake 表格 · 本页

8,160—需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
intake
description
>

Intake

Intake is the system for collecting the right information, in the right order, with the right level of trust, before real work begins.

Trigger Conditions

Use this skill when the user needs to:

  • onboard a new client, patient, customer, tenant, student, or employee
  • design an intake form or discovery questionnaire
  • structure an onboarding workflow
  • gather requirements before providing a service
  • identify what information should be collected at the start of a relationship
  • improve an existing intake process that feels incomplete, bureaucratic, or low-conversion

Also trigger when the user says things like:

  • "I need an intake form"
  • "Help me onboard a new client"
  • "What should I ask before starting"
  • "I need a discovery process"
  • "How do I collect the right information upfront"

The Information You Wish You Had Asked

Every service relationship has a moment — usually six weeks in — where the provider thinks: I wish I had known that at the start.

The therapist who discovers the client has tried this approach twice before. The contractor who finds out the client had a bad experience with the last three contractors. The accountant who learns about the offshore account in month four. The coach who realizes the presenting goal is not the real goal.

Intake is not paperwork. It is the intelligence-gathering operation that determines whether the work that follows will be effective or expensive.

This skill builds intake systems that surface the information that matters — before the work begins.

Core Principle

People do not withhold important information because they are secretive. They withhold it because nobody asked the right question, or because the form felt like bureaucracy rather than care. The intake process that feels like a thoughtful conversation extracts more useful information than the intake process that feels like a legal requirement.

Design for the conversation. The information follows.

Default Outputs

Depending on the request, produce one or more of the following:

  1. Intake Form

A structured form with sections, field names, and question wording.

  1. Intake Interview Guide

A conversation-based script for live intake calls or first sessions.

  1. Intake Workflow

A step-by-step onboarding flow showing what is collected, when, and why.

  1. Intake Summary Template

A reusable template for summarizing what was learned during intake.

  1. Intake Audit

A diagnostic review of an existing intake process, including friction points, missing questions, over-collection, and compliance considerations.

Response Rules

When responding:

  • first identify the service type
  • separate administrative intake from discovery intake
  • avoid collecting information that will not be used
  • explain why sensitive questions are asked
  • prefer clarity and usability over comprehensiveness
  • flag privacy or regulatory issues without pretending to give legal, medical, or financial advice

Intake System Architecture

~~~python INTAKE_FRAMEWORK = { "information_layers": { "layer_1_administrative": { "purpose": "Legal, billing, and contact requirements", "examples": ["Full legal name", "Date of birth", "Contact information", "Insurance or billing details", "Emergency contact", "Consent and authorization signatures"], "format": "Form — this is genuinely administrative, forms are appropriate here" }, "layer_2_presenting": { "purpose": "Why they are here and what they want", "examples": ["Primary reason for seeking service", "What they hope to achieve", "What has already been tried", "Timeline and urgency"], "format": "Questionnaire with open-ended fields — not multiple choice" }, "layer_3_context": { "purpose": "The information that changes how you provide the service", "examples": ["Relevant history", "Previous experiences with similar services", "Factors that affect delivery", "Preferences and constraints", "What success looks like to them specifically"], "format": "Intake interview — conversation extracts what forms miss" }, "layer_4_relationship": { "purpose": "How to work with this person effectively", "examples": ["Communication preferences", "Decision-making style", "What they need from a provider relationship", "Previous experiences that shaped their expectations"], "format": "Discovery conversation — built into first session or call" } } } ~~~

Intake Form Design

~~~python FORM_DESIGN = { "principles": { "minimum_viable_intake": "Collect only what you will actually use — every field not used creates friction without return", "progressive_disclosure": "Administrative fields first, sensitive questions later — trust is built before vulnerability is requested", "open_fields_over_checkboxes": "Checkboxes tell you what you gave them to say. Open fields tell you what they actually think.", "explain_why": "A sentence explaining why you need sensitive information dramatically increases completion rate and accuracy" },

"question_design": { "weak": "Do you have any medical conditions? [ ] Yes [ ] No", "strong": "Please describe any physical conditions, injuries, or health factors that are relevant to our work together. This helps me tailor my approach from our first session.",

"weak_2": "What are your goals?", "strong_2": "If our work together goes exactly as you hope, what will be different in your life six months from now? Be as specific as you can." },

"completion_rate_factors": [ "Mobile-optimized — 60%+ of forms are completed on phone", "Progress indicator for multi-page forms", "Save and resume for longer forms", "Plain language — no jargon or clinical terminology", "Estimated completion time stated upfront", "Confirmation message that feels human not automated" ] } ~~~

The Intake Interview

~~~python INTAKE_INTERVIEW = { "structure": { "opening": { "purpose": "Establish safety and set expectations", "script": "Before we dive in, I want to explain how I use what you share with me. Everything you tell me today helps me [specific benefit]. There are no wrong answers — the more honest you can be, the better I can help you." }, "presenting": { "questions": ["What brings you here now — why today rather than six months ago", "What have you already tried, and what happened", "What would have to change for you to feel this was worth it"], "listen_for": "Gap between stated goal and real goal — they are often different" }, "history": { "questions": ["What is the relevant background I should know", "Have you worked with someone on this before — what was that like", "What has gotten in the way in the past"], "purpose": "Previous failed attempts contain more useful information than successes" }, "expectations": { "questions": ["What do you expect this process to look like", "What would make you want to stop working together", "What do you need from me that you have not always gotten"], "purpose": "Surface misaligned expectations before they become relationship problems" }, "closing": { "script": "Is there anything important that I have not asked about — something you came in hoping I would understand that we have not covered yet", "purpose": "This single question surfaces more useful information than most of the rest of the interview combined" } },

"active_listening_protocol": """ INTAKE_LISTENING = { "note_what_is_avoided": "Topics skirted or answered too quickly often matter most", "note_energy_shifts": "Where does engagement increase or decrease", "note_contradictions": "Between stated priorities and described behavior", "note_language": "Their exact words for their problem become your vocabulary", "do_not_solve_yet": "Intake is information gathering — resist the urge to help before you understand" } """ } ~~~

Intake by Service Type

~~~python SERVICE_SPECIFIC = { "healthcare_therapy": { "required": ["Chief complaint", "Medical history", "Medications and allergies", "Previous treatment", "Family history if relevant", "Consent and privacy acknowledgment"], "sensitive": "Trauma history, substance use, mental health history — ask with care, explain purpose, never require before trust is established" }, "legal": { "required": ["Matter description", "Relevant dates and deadlines", "Prior legal representation", "Documents in possession", "Desired outcome", "Budget and timeline expectations"], "conflict_check": "Run conflict check before intake interview — before sensitive information is shared" }, "financial_advisory": { "required": ["Current financial situation", "Income and assets", "Liabilities and obligations", "Risk tolerance", "Goals and timeline", "Previous advisory relationships"], "sensitive": "Financial shame is real — create psychological safety before asking for numbers" }, "coaching": { "required": ["Presenting goal", "Current situation", "Previous attempts", "Resources available", "Accountability preferences", "Definition of success"], "distinguish": "Presenting goal vs real goal vs root cause — coaching intake should surface all three" }, "creative_services": { "required": ["Project scope and deliverables", "Timeline and milestones", "Budget", "Decision-making process", "Brand guidelines", "Examples of work they love and hate — both equally important"], "critical": "Examples of work they hate prevent the most expensive revisions" } } ~~~

Information Management

~~~python INTAKE_DATA_MANAGEMENT = { "storage_principles": [ "Information collected for one purpose should not be used for another", "Sensitive information needs appropriate security — not in email threads", "Retention policy defined before collection begins", "Destruction process for data when relationship ends" ],

"usability": { "principle": "Intake information only has value if it is used", "system": "Review intake notes before every session — not just the first", "update": "Intake is not a one-time event — update as circumstances change", "transfer": "If client transfers to another provider, intake summary is the most valuable thing you can provide" },

"compliance_flags": { "healthcare": "HIPAA (US) or equivalent — specific requirements for PHI", "financial": "KYC and AML obligations for financial services", "general": "GDPR, CCPA, or applicable privacy regulation — get legal advice for your jurisdiction before collecting sensitive data" } } ~~~

Boundaries

This skill helps design intake systems, forms, interviews, and information workflows. It does not replace legal, medical, financial, privacy, or regulatory advice.

For regulated contexts, adapt outputs to the user's jurisdiction and consult a qualified professional before using the workflow in production.

Quality Check Before Delivering

  • [ ] Information layers separated — administrative, presenting, context, relationship
  • [ ] Form questions are open-ended not checkbox-dominated
  • [ ] Sensitive questions explained with purpose
  • [ ] Intake interview includes closing question — what have I not asked
  • [ ] Service type matched to specific intake requirements
  • [ ] Data storage and compliance flagged for sensitive service types
  • [ ] Review protocol built in — intake used throughout relationship not just at start

平台分布

OpenClaw

70.1%
按下载量换算1,907

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills