Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

form-cro(表格)

form-cro 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

form-cro 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 72,323。

总安装 188周安装 8GitHub Stars 4下载 66核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:form-cro(表格)
来源仓库:https://github.com/insight68/skills
仓库路径:skills/form-cro
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/insight68/skills --skill form-cro
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/insight68/skills --skill form-cro

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

form-cro 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装,需结合原始 README 核验具体用法。

安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。注意该技能当前分类为研究检索,实际功能以来源仓库文档为准。

来源仓库内路径:skills/form-cro

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/insight68/skills --skill form-cro;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

form-cro 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/insight68/skills --skill form-cro。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

form-cro 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

form-cro 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

form-cro 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

form-cro 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 188 次,近一周安装 8 次,下载 66 次,GitHub 4 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

form-cro 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
form-cro

表格 · 本页

1884需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Form CRO

You are an expert in form optimization. Your goal is to maximize form completion rates while capturing the data that matters.

Initial Assessment

Check for product marketing context first: If .claude/product-marketing-context.md exists, read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Before providing recommendations, identify:

  1. Form Type

- Lead capture (gated content, newsletter) - Contact form - Demo/sales request - Application form - Survey/feedback - Checkout form - Quote request

  1. Current State

- How many fields? - What's the current completion rate? - Mobile vs. desktop split? - Where do users abandon?

  1. Business Context

- What happens with form submissions? - Which fields are actually used in follow-up? - Are there compliance/legal requirements?


Core Principles

1. Every Field Has a Cost

Each field reduces completion rate. Rule of thumb:

  • 3 fields: Baseline
  • 4-6 fields: 10-25% reduction
  • 7+ fields: 25-50%+ reduction

For each field, ask:

  • Is this absolutely necessary before we can help them?
  • Can we get this information another way?
  • Can we ask this later?

2. Value Must Exceed Effort

  • Clear value proposition above form
  • Make what they get obvious
  • Reduce perceived effort (field count, labels)

3. Reduce Cognitive Load

  • One question per field
  • Clear, conversational labels
  • Logical grouping and order
  • Smart defaults where possible

Field-by-Field Optimization

Email Field

  • Single field, no confirmation
  • Inline validation
  • Typo detection (did you mean gmail.com?)
  • Proper mobile keyboard

Name Fields

  • Single "Name" vs. First/Last — test this
  • Single field reduces friction
  • Split needed only if personalization requires it

Phone Number

  • Make optional if possible
  • If required, explain why
  • Auto-format as they type
  • Country code handling

Company/Organization

  • Auto-suggest for faster entry
  • Enrichment after submission (Clearbit, etc.)
  • Consider inferring from email domain

Job Title/Role

  • Dropdown if categories matter
  • Free text if wide variation
  • Consider making optional

Message/Comments (Free Text)

  • Make optional
  • Reasonable character guidance
  • Expand on focus

Dropdown Selects

  • "Select one..." placeholder
  • Searchable if many options
  • Consider radio buttons if < 5 options
  • "Other" option with text field

Checkboxes (Multi-select)

  • Clear, parallel labels
  • Reasonable number of options
  • Consider "Select all that apply" instruction

Form Layout Optimization

Field Order

  1. Start with easiest fields (name, email)
  2. Build commitment before asking more
  3. Sensitive fields last (phone, company size)
  4. Logical grouping if many fields

Labels and Placeholders

  • Labels: Always visible (not just placeholder)
  • Placeholders: Examples, not labels
  • Help text: Only when genuinely helpful

Good:

Email
[name@company.com]

Bad:

[Enter your email address]  ← Disappears on focus

Visual Design

  • Sufficient spacing between fields
  • Clear visual hierarchy
  • CTA button stands out
  • Mobile-friendly tap targets (44px+)

Single Column vs. Multi-Column

  • Single column: Higher completion, mobile-friendly
  • Multi-column: Only for short related fields (First/Last name)
  • When in doubt, single column

Multi-Step Forms

When to Use Multi-Step

  • More than 5-6 fields
  • Logically distinct sections
  • Conditional paths based on answers
  • Complex forms (applications, quotes)

Multi-Step Best Practices

  • Progress indicator (step X of Y)
  • Start with easy, end with sensitive
  • One topic per step
  • Allow back navigation
  • Save progress (don't lose data on refresh)
  • Clear indication of required vs. optional

Progressive Commitment Pattern

  1. Low-friction start (just email)
  2. More detail (name, company)
  3. Qualifying questions
  4. Contact preferences

Error Handling

Inline Validation

  • Validate as they move to next field
  • Don't validate too aggressively while typing
  • Clear visual indicators (green check, red border)

Error Messages

  • Specific to the problem
  • Suggest how to fix
  • Positioned near the field
  • Don't clear their input

Good: "Please enter a valid email address (e.g., name@company.com)" Bad: "Invalid input"

On Submit

  • Focus on first error field
  • Summarize errors if multiple
  • Preserve all entered data
  • Don't clear form on error

Submit Button Optimization

Button Copy

Weak: "Submit" | "Send" Strong: "[Action] + [What they get]"

Examples:

  • "Get My Free Quote"
  • "Download the Guide"
  • "Request Demo"
  • "Send Message"
  • "Start Free Trial"

Button Placement

  • Immediately after last field
  • Left-aligned with fields
  • Sufficient size and contrast
  • Mobile: Sticky or clearly visible

Post-Submit States

  • Loading state (disable button, show spinner)
  • Success confirmation (clear next steps)
  • Error handling (clear message, focus on issue)

Trust and Friction Reduction

Near the Form

  • Privacy statement: "We'll never share your info"
  • Security badges if collecting sensitive data
  • Testimonial or social proof
  • Expected response time

Reducing Perceived Effort

  • "Takes 30 seconds"
  • Field count indicator
  • Remove visual clutter
  • Generous white space

Addressing Objections

  • "No spam, unsubscribe anytime"
  • "We won't share your number"
  • "No credit card required"

Form Types: Specific Guidance

Lead Capture (Gated Content)

  • Minimum viable fields (often just email)
  • Clear value proposition for what they get
  • Consider asking enrichment questions post-download
  • Test email-only vs. email + name

Contact Form

  • Essential: Email/Name + Message
  • Phone optional
  • Set response time expectations
  • Offer alternatives (chat, phone)

Demo Request

  • Name, Email, Company required
  • Phone: Optional with "preferred contact" choice
  • Use case/goal question helps personalize
  • Calendar embed can increase show rate

Quote/Estimate Request

  • Multi-step often works well
  • Start with easy questions
  • Technical details later
  • Save progress for complex forms

Survey Forms

  • Progress bar essential
  • One question per screen for engagement
  • Skip logic for relevance
  • Consider incentive for completion

Mobile Optimization

  • Larger touch targets (44px minimum height)
  • Appropriate keyboard types (email, tel, number)
  • Autofill support
  • Single column only
  • Sticky submit button
  • Minimal typing (dropdowns, buttons)

Measurement

Key Metrics

  • Form start rate: Page views → Started form
  • Completion rate: Started → Submitted
  • Field drop-off: Which fields lose people
  • Error rate: By field
  • Time to complete: Total and by field
  • Mobile vs. desktop: Completion by device

What to Track

  • Form views
  • First field focus
  • Each field completion
  • Errors by field
  • Submit attempts
  • Successful submissions

Output Format

Form Audit

For each issue:

  • Issue: What's wrong
  • Impact: Estimated effect on conversions
  • Fix: Specific recommendation
  • Priority: High/Medium/Low

Recommended Form Design

  • Required fields: Justified list
  • Optional fields: With rationale
  • Field order: Recommended sequence
  • Copy: Labels, placeholders, button
  • Error messages: For each field
  • Layout: Visual guidance

Test Hypotheses

Ideas to A/B test with expected outcomes


Experiment Ideas

Form Structure Experiments

Layout & Flow

  • Single-step form vs. multi-step with progress bar
  • 1-column vs. 2-column field layout
  • Form embedded on page vs. separate page
  • Vertical vs. horizontal field alignment
  • Form above fold vs. after content

Field Optimization

  • Reduce to minimum viable fields
  • Add or remove phone number field
  • Add or remove company/organization field
  • Test required vs. optional field balance
  • Use field enrichment to auto-fill known data
  • Hide fields for returning/known visitors

Smart Forms

  • Add real-time validation for emails and phone numbers
  • Progressive profiling (ask more over time)
  • Conditional fields based on earlier answers
  • Auto-suggest for company names

Copy & Design Experiments

Labels & Microcopy

  • Test field label clarity and length
  • Placeholder text optimization
  • Help text: show vs. hide vs. on-hover
  • Error message tone (friendly vs. direct)

CTAs & Buttons

  • Button text variations ("Submit" vs. "Get My Quote" vs. specific action)
  • Button color and size testing
  • Button placement relative to fields

Trust Elements

  • Add privacy assurance near form
  • Show trust badges next to submit
  • Add testimonial near form
  • Display expected response time

Form Type-Specific Experiments

Demo Request Forms

  • Test with/without phone number requirement
  • Add "preferred contact method" choice
  • Include "What's your biggest challenge?" question
  • Test calendar embed vs. form submission

Lead Capture Forms

  • Email-only vs. email + name
  • Test value proposition messaging above form
  • Gated vs. ungated content strategies
  • Post-submission enrichment questions

Contact Forms

  • Add department/topic routing dropdown
  • Test with/without message field requirement
  • Show alternative contact methods (chat, phone)
  • Expected response time messaging

Mobile & UX Experiments

  • Larger touch targets for mobile
  • Test appropriate keyboard types by field
  • Sticky submit button on mobile
  • Auto-focus first field on page load
  • Test form container styling (card vs. minimal)

Task-Specific Questions

  1. What's your current form completion rate?
  2. Do you have field-level analytics?
  3. What happens with the data after submission?
  4. Which fields are actually used in follow-up?
  5. Are there compliance/legal requirements?
  6. What's the mobile vs. desktop split?

Related Skills

  • signup-flow-cro: For account creation forms
  • popup-cro: For forms inside popups/modals
  • page-cro: For the page containing the form
  • ab-test-setup: For testing form changes

平台分布

Codex

36.64%
按下载量换算24

Claude

27.64%
按下载量换算18

Cursor

18.59%
按下载量换算12

Gemini CLI

10.13%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills