- name
- insecure-defaults
- description
- Detects fail-open insecure defaults (hardcoded secrets, weak auth, permissive security) that allow apps to run insecurely in production. Use when auditing security, reviewing config management, or analyzing environment variable handling.
- allowed-tools
Insecure Defaults Detection
Finds fail-open vulnerabilities where apps run insecurely with missing configuration. Distinguishes exploitable defaults from fail-secure patterns that crash safely.
- Fail-open (CRITICAL):
SECRET = env.get('KEY') or 'default'→ App runs with weak secret - Fail-secure (SAFE):
SECRET = env['KEY']→ App crashes if missing
When to Use
- Security audits of production applications (auth, crypto, API security)
- Configuration review of deployment files, IaC templates, Docker configs
- Code review of environment variable handling and secrets management
- Pre-deployment checks for hardcoded credentials or weak defaults
When NOT to Use
Do not use this skill for:
- Test fixtures explicitly scoped to test environments (files in
test/,spec/,__tests__/) - Example/template files (
.example,.template,.samplesuffixes) - Development-only tools (local Docker Compose for dev, debug scripts)
- Documentation examples in README.md or docs/ directories
- Build-time configuration that gets replaced during deployment
- Crash-on-missing behavior where app won't start without proper config (fail-secure)
When in doubt: trace the code path to determine if the app runs with the default or crashes.
Rationalizations to Reject
- "It's just a development default" → If it reaches production code, it's a finding
- "The production config overrides it" → Verify prod config exists; code-level vulnerability remains if not
- "This would never run without proper config" → Prove it with code trace; many apps fail silently
- "It's behind authentication" → Defense in depth; compromised session still exploits weak defaults
- "We'll fix it before release" → Document now; "later" rarely comes
Workflow
Follow this workflow for every potential finding:
1. SEARCH: Perform Project Discovery and Find Insecure Defaults
Determine language, framework, and project conventions. Use this information to further discover things like secret storage locations, secret usage patterns, credentialed third-party integrations, cryptography, and any other relevant configuration. Further use information to analyze insecure default configurations.
Example Search for patterns in **/config/, **/auth/, **/database/, and env files:
- Fallback secrets:
getenv.*\) or ['"],process\.env\.[A-Z_]+ \|\| ['"],ENV\.fetch.*default: - Hardcoded credentials:
password.*=.*['"][^'"]{8,}['"],api[_-]?key.*=.*['"][^'"]+['"] - Weak defaults:
DEBUG.*=.*true,AUTH.*=.*false,CORS.*=.*\* - Crypto algorithms:
MD5|SHA1|DES|RC4|ECBin security contexts
Tailor search approach based on discovery results.
Focus on production-reachable code, not test fixtures or example files.
2. VERIFY: Actual Behavior
For each match, trace the code path to understand runtime behavior.
Questions to answer:
- When is this code executed? (Startup vs. runtime)
- What happens if a configuration variable is missing?
- Is there validation that enforces secure configuration?
3. CONFIRM: Production Impact
Determine if this issue reaches production:
If production config provides the variable → Lower severity (but still a code-level vulnerability) If production config missing or uses default → CRITICAL
4. REPORT: with Evidence
Example report:
Finding: Hardcoded JWT Secret Fallback
Location: src/auth/jwt.ts:15
Pattern: const secret = process.env.JWT_SECRET || 'default';
Verification: App starts without JWT_SECRET; secret used in jwt.sign() at line 42
Production Impact: Dockerfile missing JWT_SECRET
Exploitation: Attacker forges JWTs using 'default', gains unauthorized accessQuick Verification Checklist
Fallback Secrets: SECRET = env.get(X) or Y → Verify: App starts without env var? Secret used in crypto/auth? → Skip: Test fixtures, example files
Default Credentials: Hardcoded username/password pairs → Verify: Active in deployed config? No runtime override? → Skip: Disabled accounts, documentation examples
Fail-Open Security: AUTH_REQUIRED = env.get(X, 'false') → Verify: Default is insecure (false/disabled/permissive)? → Safe: App crashes or default is secure (true/enabled/restricted)
Weak Crypto: MD5/SHA1/DES/RC4/ECB in security contexts → Verify: Used for passwords, encryption, or tokens? → Skip: Checksums, non-security hashing
Permissive Access: CORS *, permissions 0777, public-by-default → Verify: Default allows unauthorized access? → Skip: Explicitly configured permissiveness with justification
Debug Features: Stack traces, introspection, verbose errors → Verify: Enabled by default? Exposed in responses? → Skip: Logging-only, not user-facing
For detailed examples and counter-examples, see examples.md.