Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 运维和基础设施

incident-triaging(事件分类)

incident-triaging 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

incident-triaging 是运维和基础设施类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在运维和基础设施类的 2,449 个 Skill 里排第 2,028。

总安装 312周安装 13GitHub Stars 5下载 104核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:incident-triaging(事件分类)
来源仓库:https://github.com/wizeline/sdlc-agents
仓库路径:skills/incident-triaging
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/wizeline/sdlc-agents --skill incident-triaging
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/wizeline/sdlc-agents --skill incident-triaging

这个 Skill 是做什么的

运维和基础设施类 Skill 处理部署、监控、日志和云资源,多数需要较高的执行权限。

incident-triaging 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。通过 GitHub 安装,需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意是否触发联网或文件读写。

安装命令为 npx skills add https://github.com/wizeline/sdlc-agents --skill incident-triaging。建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法,避免直接执行敏感操作。

来源仓库内路径:skills/incident-triaging

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/wizeline/sdlc-agents --skill incident-triaging;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

incident-triaging 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/wizeline/sdlc-agents --skill incident-triaging。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

incident-triaging 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

incident-triaging 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

incident-triaging 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

incident-triaging 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 312 次,近一周安装 13 次,下载 104 次,GitHub 5 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

incident-triaging 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理运维和基础设施类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

运维和基础设施类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
brainstorming

头脑风暴 · Codex、Claude

3,148,776173,131操作浏览器MIT通过
copywriting

文案写作 · Codex、Claude

1,996,72425,583需要联网MIT通过
openclaw-secure-linux-cloud

OpenClaw secure linux cloud 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,853,08840接触敏感数据未明确未通过
xget

xget 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,799,28040执行命令未明确未通过
requesting-code-review

代码审查请求 · Codex、Claude

1,590,144173,103权限未标注MIT通过
incident-triaging

事件分类 · 本页

3125需要联网未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Incident Triage Skill

Your job is to take the first, often incomplete report of something broken and rapidly produce two things: a severity classification and the minimum viable context needed to begin root cause analysis. Speed matters here — every minute of ambiguity at the triage stage costs time downstream.

This skill covers all SDLC stages: local dev, CI/CD, staging/QA, and production.


Phase 0: Intake

When an incident is first reported, extract what you can immediately from the raw input — don't ask questions you can already answer from what's been provided.

Minimum context to establish before handing off:

FieldWhat to look for
StageKeywords: local, CI, staging, prod, pipeline, review app
SymptomThe observable signal: error message, metric name, user complaint, alert title
WhenOnset time, or correlation with a deploy/config change
ScopeUsers affected, % of traffic, which services, which endpoints
System contextLanguage, framework, infra (k8s, ECS, Lambda), key services involved

If the developer pastes a stack trace, error log, or raw error message — begin analysis immediately and ask for missing context in parallel. Never make them wait while you ask for things you don't yet need.

If you have enough to classify severity, do it — you can refine later.


Phase 1: Triage & Severity Classification

Classify every incident using this matrix. Severity determines urgency, escalation path, and which remediation options are on the table. Getting this wrong in either direction is costly: over-triaging burns the team; under-triaging delays the response.

P0 — Critical / SEV1
  Conditions (any one is sufficient):
  - Complete outage of a customer-facing system
  - Data loss or corruption actively in progress
  - Active security breach or unauthorized access
  - SLA breach imminent in <15 minutes
  Response: Immediate — page everyone now, all hands, no async

P1 — High / SEV2
  Conditions (any one is sufficient):
  - Major feature broken for a significant percentage of users
  - Performance degraded >2x baseline latency on a critical path
  - Payment, auth, or billing flows impaired (even partially)
  - Error rate >5% above baseline and climbing
  Response: 30-minute SLA, on-call engineer takes ownership

P2 — Medium / SEV3
  Conditions:
  - Non-critical feature broken, workaround exists
  - Error rate elevated but below SLA threshold
  - Staging environment broken, blocking releases
  - CI pipeline broken, blocking merges
  Response: 4-hour SLA, owned in current sprint

P3 — Low / SEV4
  Conditions:
  - Cosmetic issue, no functional impact
  - Single flaky test in CI (not a pattern)
  - Developer local environment issue
  - Low-CVSS vulnerability with no active exploit
  Response: Backlog — Jira ticket, no paging

Escalation triggers to watch for during triage

Even before RCA, flag these conditions immediately:

  • Any mention of data being written to a system that's behaving incorrectly → potential data integrity risk → escalate
  • Auth or session tokens involved in the error path → security implication, treat as P1 minimum
  • Third-party payment processor in the error path → revenue impact, treat as P1 minimum
  • Incident started during a maintenance window or migration → coordinated failure, higher severity

Output: Triage Summary Block

Produce this block for every incident before handing off to RCA. It is the contract between triage and the next phase — fill every field, even if with "unknown."

INCIDENT TRIAGE
───────────────
Severity    : P[0-3]
Stage       : [local | ci | staging | prod]
Symptom     : [one precise sentence — not "it's broken", e.g., "HTTP 503s on /api/checkout for ~30% of users"]
Blast Radius: [e.g., "~2,000 users, checkout flow only" or "all CI builds blocked" or "unknown"]
SLA Risk    : [yes — breach in ~N min | no | unknown]
Started     : [HH:MM UTC or "unknown — no timestamp in report"]
Trigger     : [deployment | config change | traffic spike | dependency outage | unknown]
Next Step   : [immediate escalation | begin RCA | monitor for 10min | backlog]

Handoff

After producing the Triage Block:

  • P0/P1: If no Jira ticket was provided initially, instruct the Incident Commander to create one. Then pass the full context to incident-analyzing immediately. State: "Handing off to RCA — time is critical."
  • P2: If no Jira ticket was provided initially, instruct the Incident Commander to create one. Then pass to incident-analyzing with a note that the 4-hour window gives room for methodical investigation.
  • P3: Pass to incident-documenting to generate a Jira ticket. No RCA needed unless pattern repeats.

If the developer needs to page someone right now (P0/P1), also invoke incident-documenting in parallel to generate an escalation brief they can send immediately.

平台分布

Codex

33.07%
按下载量换算34

Claude

28.85%
按下载量换算30

Cursor

19.04%
按下载量换算20

Gemini CLI

9.23%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills