Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

incident-ingesting(事件摄取)

incident-ingesting 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

incident-ingesting 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 64,379。

总安装 303周安装 13GitHub Stars 5下载 106核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:incident-ingesting(事件摄取)
来源仓库:https://github.com/wizeline/sdlc-agents
仓库路径:skills/incident-ingesting
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/wizeline/sdlc-agents --skill incident-ingesting
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/wizeline/sdlc-agents --skill incident-ingesting

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

incident-ingesting 从工单系统提取事件背景信息,映射为标准接收字段便于后续处理。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要统一事件数据结构、识别关联 PR 时使用。自动解析 Jira 字段、评论线程与附件内容,填充优先级与组件标签等关键字段。

安装方式:npx skills add https://github.com/wizeline/sdlc-agents --skill incident-ingesting。注意 Jira 优先级仅为提示,实际严重性需结合日志与业务影响人工判断修正。

来源仓库内路径:skills/incident-ingesting

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/wizeline/sdlc-agents --skill incident-ingestin…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

incident-ingesting 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/wizeline/sdlc-agents --skill incident-ingesting。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

incident-ingesting 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

incident-ingesting 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

incident-ingesting 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

incident-ingesting 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 303 次,近一周安装 13 次,下载 106 次,GitHub 5 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

incident-ingesting 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
incident-ingesting

事件摄取 · 本页

3035调用外部服务未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Jira Incident Intake Skill

Your job is to bridge an existing Jira ticket to the Incident Commander's response flow. A ticket already exists — meaning someone already identified the problem. Your goal is to extract everything the incident response pipeline needs so it can proceed without asking the developer to repeat information that's already in Jira.


Phase 0: Resolve the Ticket Reference

Accept any of these input forms:

  • Bare key: OPS-412, PROD-88, INC-7
  • Full URL: https://company.atlassian.net/browse/OPS-412
  • Natural language: "the Jira for the checkout outage", "look at the incident ticket"

If a bare key or URL is provided, extract the issue key and proceed directly to fetch. If the reference is ambiguous (e.g., "the checkout Jira"), use Jira search to find the most likely match before fetching.


Phase 1: Fetch the Ticket

Use the Atlassian MCP (getJiraIssue) to retrieve the full ticket. Request these fields:

FieldPurpose
summaryShort incident title
descriptionFull symptom description, error messages, logs pasted by the reporter
priorityJira priority → use to inform initial severity hint
statusCurrent workflow state (helps assess if incident is active or resolved)
issuetypeBug, Incident, Task — affects routing
labelsMay include incident, severity-p0, production, security, etc.
componentsAffected services/systems
assigneeWho currently owns the ticket
reporterWho filed it
createdWhen the ticket was created (proxy for incident onset if no better signal)
updatedLast activity — signals if investigation is recent or stale
commentComments thread — often contains diagnostic steps already taken, stack traces, and timeline
attachmentLog files, screenshots, exported metrics
customfield_*Any custom fields: environment, affected region, linked runbook, SLA fields

Also fetch linked issues (getJiraIssueRemoteIssueLinks) to identify:

  • Linked PRs (hotfixes in progress)
  • Duplicate or related incidents
  • Parent epics (for service context)

Phase 2: Extract Incident Context

Map ticket data to the standard incident intake fields. Fill every field — use "unknown" rather than leaving anything blank.

Priority mapping

Use the Jira priority as a hint only — do not blindly trust it. Jira priorities are often set by reporters who may not follow the severity matrix. The Incident Commander will classify severity properly during triage.

Jira PrioritySeverity Hint
Blocker / CriticalLikely P0 or P1 — flag immediately
MajorLikely P1 or P2
MinorLikely P2 or P3
TrivialLikely P3
Not setUnknown — defer to triage

Status mapping

Jira StatusSignal
Open / To DoIncident may not yet have an active responder
In ProgressSomeone is actively working it — check assignee and comments for context
Resolved / DoneIncident is over — route to incident-documenting for postmortem/summary only
ReopenedRegression — treat as new active incident

Context extraction rules

  • Symptom: Pull from summary + first paragraph of description. If description contains raw error messages, stack traces, or log excerpts — include them verbatim in the handoff.
  • When: Check created timestamp, but also scan description and early comments for phrases like "started at", "began around", "first noticed at". Use the most specific time.
  • Scope: Look for user counts, error rates, affected regions, or service names in the description and comments. Extract them explicitly.
  • Trigger: Scan for mentions of deploys, config changes, dependency upgrades, traffic spikes, or cron jobs that correlate with onset.
  • Actions taken: Read the full comment thread. Extract any diagnostic steps, attempted fixes, and their outcomes into a bullet list. This prevents the team from retrying failed approaches.
  • Attachments: Note any attached log files or exports. If the AI assistant can read them, extract key error signals and include in the handoff package.

Phase 3: Build the Intake Package

Produce a structured intake package that the Incident Commander consumes as if a developer had reported it directly. Do not summarize or lose fidelity — include the raw error messages and stack traces verbatim.

JIRA INCIDENT INTAKE
────────────────────
Source Ticket   : [KEY] — [title]
Ticket URL      : [https://...]
Status          : [Jira status]
Reporter        : [name] at [timestamp]
Assignee        : [name or "unassigned"]
Priority Hint   : [Jira priority] → estimated [P0/P1/P2/P3/unknown]

Stage           : [prod | staging | ci | local | unknown]
Symptom         : [precise observable symptom extracted from description]
Raw Error       :
  [Verbatim error messages, stack traces, or log excerpts from ticket — or "none in ticket"]

When            : [Onset time from ticket — or "unknown, ticket created at HH:MM UTC"]
Scope           : [Users/services/endpoints affected — or "unknown"]
Trigger         : [Deployment, config change, dependency, traffic spike — or "unknown"]

Actions Already Taken:
  [Bullet list from comment thread — or "none documented in ticket"]
  - [action] → [outcome]
  - [action] → [outcome]

Linked Context  :
  - PRs: [links or "none"]
  - Related incidents: [links or "none"]
  - Runbook: [link or "none referenced"]

Attachments     : [list filenames or "none"]

Phase 4: Route to Incident Commander

After building the intake package, pass it to the Incident Commander with a clear handoff note.

If the ticket status is Resolved/Done:

"Ticket [KEY] is already resolved. Routing to incident-documenting to generate postmortem and close the documentation loop. Skipping triage and RCA." → Invoke incident-documenting directly.

If the ticket status is active (Open, In Progress, Reopened):

"Ticket [KEY] is an active incident. Handing full context to the Incident Commander to begin the response flow." → Pass the intake package to the Incident Commander. The Commander will invoke incident-triaging as the first step, using the extracted context instead of asking the developer to re-enter it.

If priority hint is Blocker/Critical:

Flag immediately: "Jira priority is [Blocker/Critical] — treating as potential P0/P1. Proceeding to triage at high urgency."

Phase 5: Jira Ticket Updates and Hygiene (if MCP write is available)

During or after the response flow, manage the ticket state:

  • Status & Comments: If the user provides comments or progress updates regarding the incident, use your tools (e.g., Atlassian MCP) to update the ticket status accordingly and append their comments to the ticket.
  • Hygiene: After the response flow completes, offer to update the Jira ticket with:

- Severity classification from triage (add label severity-p<N>) - Link to escalation brief, runbook, or postmortem artifact written to disk - Final status transition

Always explicitly ask before writing back to Jira — unless the user specifically directed you to update the ticket.


Constraints

  • Never ask for information already in the ticket. Read the full description and comment thread before determining what context is missing.
  • Preserve raw error messages verbatim. Summarizing stack traces loses signal. Include them in the intake package exactly as they appear.
  • Do not classify severity yourself. Provide a hint based on Jira priority, but defer final severity classification to incident-triaging.
  • Comments are part of the incident record. A ticket with 20 comments may have the root cause already identified. Read them all before handing off.
  • Stale tickets need a freshness check. If the ticket was last updated >24 hours ago and is still "In Progress", flag this to the developer before proceeding — the incident state may have changed without the ticket being updated.

平台分布

Codex

34.1%
按下载量换算36

Claude

32.63%
按下载量换算35

Cursor

21.23%
按下载量换算23

Gemini CLI

9.81%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills