Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 运维和基础设施

implementing-zero-trust-in-cloud(在云中实现零信任)

implementing-zero-trust-in-cloud 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

implementing-zero-trust-in-cloud 是运维和基础设施类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在运维和基础设施类的 2,449 个 Skill 里排第 2,252。

总安装 222周安装 9GitHub Stars 5,864下载 70核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:implementing-zero-trust-in-cloud(在云中实现零信任)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
仓库路径:skills/implementing-zero-trust-in-cloud
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill implementing-zero-trust-in-cloud
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill implementing-zero-trust-in-cloud

这个 Skill 是做什么的

运维和基础设施类 Skill 处理部署、监控、日志和云资源,多数需要较高的执行权限。

在云中实现零信任技能用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适用于 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理的任务场景。核心能力包括云环境安全架构设计、身份管理和访问控制策略,支持多云安全部署。

安装方式:github;安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill implementing-zero-trust-in-cloud。

使用前需确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。

来源仓库内路径:skills/implementing-zero-trust-in-cloud

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skil…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

implementing-zero-trust-in-cloud 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill implemen…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

implementing-zero-trust-in-cloud 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

implementing-zero-trust-in-cloud 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

implementing-zero-trust-in-cloud 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

implementing-zero-trust-in-cloud 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 222 次,近一周安装 9 次,下载 70 次,GitHub 5,864 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

implementing-zero-trust-in-cloud 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 来源仓库有 5,864 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理运维和基础设施类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

运维和基础设施类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
brainstorming

头脑风暴 · Codex、Claude

3,148,776173,131操作浏览器MIT通过
copywriting

文案写作 · Codex、Claude

1,996,72425,583需要联网MIT通过
openclaw-secure-linux-cloud

OpenClaw secure linux cloud 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,853,08840接触敏感数据未明确未通过
xget

xget 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,799,28040执行命令未明确未通过
requesting-code-review

代码审查请求 · Codex、Claude

1,590,144173,103权限未标注MIT通过
implementing-zero-trust-in-cloud

在云中实现零信任 · 本页

2225,864操作浏览器未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Implementing Zero Trust in Cloud

When to Use

  • When migrating from traditional perimeter-based security to identity-centric access controls
  • When eliminating VPN dependencies for remote workforce access to cloud applications
  • When implementing continuous verification for every access request regardless of network location
  • When designing micro-segmentation strategies for multi-cloud workloads
  • When regulatory requirements mandate zero trust architecture adoption (federal mandates, NIST guidelines)

Do not use for simple VPN replacement without broader architectural changes, for network firewall rule management alone (see implementing-cloud-network-segmentation), or for identity provider initial setup (see managing-cloud-identity-with-okta).

Prerequisites

  • Identity provider capable of OIDC/SAML integration (Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace)
  • Device management solution for endpoint trust assessment (Intune, Jamf, Google Endpoint Verification)
  • Cloud workloads accessible via HTTPS with load balancer or reverse proxy infrastructure
  • SIEM platform for continuous monitoring of access decisions and anomaly detection

Workflow

Step 1: Define Zero Trust Principles and Architecture

Establish the core principles following NIST SP 800-207: never trust, always verify. Every access request must be authenticated, authorized, and encrypted regardless of origin.

Zero Trust Architecture Components:
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                        Policy Decision Point                       |
|  +-------------------+  +------------------+  +-----------------+ |
|  | Identity Provider |  | Device Trust     |  | Risk Engine     | |
|  | (Okta/Azure AD)   |  | (Intune/Jamf)    |  | (Continuous)    | |
|  +-------------------+  +------------------+  +-----------------+ |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
                              |
                    +--------------------+
                    | Policy Enforcement |
                    | Point (IAP/Proxy)  |
                    +--------------------+
                              |
          +-------------------+-------------------+
          |                   |                   |
    +----------+        +----------+        +----------+
    | App A    |        | App B    |        | App C    |
    | (AWS)    |        | (Azure)  |        | (GCP)    |
    +----------+        +----------+        +----------+

Step 2: Deploy Identity-Aware Proxy

Configure Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP) to enforce identity and context-based access decisions before requests reach applications. Eliminate direct network access to application backends.

# GCP: Enable Identity-Aware Proxy for a backend service
gcloud services enable iap.googleapis.com

# Configure IAP for an App Engine application
gcloud iap web enable --resource-type=app-engine

# Set IAP access policy requiring specific user group
gcloud iap web add-iam-policy-binding \
  --resource-type=app-engine \
  --member="group:engineering@company.com" \
  --role="roles/iap.httpsResourceAccessor"

# Create Access Level requiring corporate device and MFA
gcloud access-context-manager levels create corporate-device \
  --title="Corporate Device with MFA" \
  --basic-level-spec='{
    "conditions": [
      {
        "devicePolicy": {
          "requireScreenlock": true,
          "allowedEncryptionStatuses": ["ENCRYPTED"],
          "osConstraints": [
            {"osType": "DESKTOP_CHROME_OS", "minimumVersion": "100.0"},
            {"osType": "DESKTOP_MAC", "minimumVersion": "12.0"},
            {"osType": "DESKTOP_WINDOWS", "minimumVersion": "10.0.19041"}
          ]
        },
        "requiredAccessLevels": ["accessPolicies/POLICY_ID/accessLevels/require-mfa"]
      }
    ]
  }'
# AWS: Configure AWS Verified Access for zero trust application access
aws ec2 create-verified-access-instance \
  --description "Zero Trust Access Instance"

aws ec2 create-verified-access-trust-provider \
  --trust-provider-type user \
  --user-trust-provider-type oidc \
  --oidc-options '{
    "Issuer": "https://company.okta.com/oauth2/default",
    "AuthorizationEndpoint": "https://company.okta.com/oauth2/default/v1/authorize",
    "TokenEndpoint": "https://company.okta.com/oauth2/default/v1/token",
    "UserInfoEndpoint": "https://company.okta.com/oauth2/default/v1/userinfo",
    "ClientId": "verified-access-client-id",
    "ClientSecret": "verified-access-client-secret",
    "Scope": "openid profile groups"
  }'

Step 3: Implement Continuous Verification

Configure real-time risk assessment that evaluates every access request based on identity, device posture, location, behavior patterns, and threat intelligence signals.

# Azure Conditional Access Policy (JSON representation)
{
  "displayName": "Zero Trust - Require MFA and Compliant Device",
  "state": "enabled",
  "conditions": {
    "users": {"includeUsers": ["All"]},
    "applications": {"includeApplications": ["All"]},
    "locations": {
      "includeLocations": ["All"],
      "excludeLocations": ["AllTrusted"]
    },
    "signInRiskLevels": ["medium", "high"],
    "deviceStates": {
      "includeStates": ["All"],
      "excludeStates": ["Compliant", "DomainJoined"]
    }
  },
  "grantControls": {
    "operator": "AND",
    "builtInControls": [
      "mfa",
      "compliantDevice"
    ]
  },
  "sessionControls": {
    "signInFrequency": {"value": 4, "type": "hours"},
    "persistentBrowser": {"mode": "never"}
  }
}

Step 4: Enforce Micro-Segmentation

Apply network-level zero trust by segmenting cloud workloads into isolated zones with explicit allow rules for each communication path.

# AWS: Create isolated VPC with no default routes
aws ec2 create-vpc --cidr-block 10.100.0.0/16 --no-amazon-provided-ipv6-cidr-block

# Create security groups implementing micro-segmentation
aws ec2 create-security-group \
  --group-name web-tier-sg \
  --description "Web tier - accepts traffic from ALB only" \
  --vpc-id vpc-abc123

aws ec2 authorize-security-group-ingress \
  --group-id sg-web123 \
  --protocol tcp --port 8080 \
  --source-group sg-alb123

aws ec2 create-security-group \
  --group-name app-tier-sg \
  --description "App tier - accepts traffic from web tier only"

aws ec2 authorize-security-group-ingress \
  --group-id sg-app123 \
  --protocol tcp --port 8443 \
  --source-group sg-web123

Step 5: Implement Device Trust Assessment

Integrate endpoint verification to assess device security posture before granting access. Require encryption, OS patches, and endpoint protection.

# Google Endpoint Verification with BeyondCorp
gcloud access-context-manager levels create managed-device \
  --title="Managed and Encrypted Device" \
  --basic-level-spec='{
    "conditions": [{
      "devicePolicy": {
        "requireScreenlock": true,
        "requireAdminApproval": true,
        "allowedEncryptionStatuses": ["ENCRYPTED"],
        "allowedDeviceManagementLevels": ["COMPLETE"]
      }
    }]
  }'

# Apply access level to IAP-protected resource
gcloud iap web set-iam-policy \
  --resource-type=backend-services \
  --service=web-app-backend \
  --condition='expression=accessPolicies/POLICY_ID/accessLevels/managed-device'

Step 6: Monitor and Adapt with Continuous Analytics

Deploy logging and analytics to monitor all access decisions, detect anomalies, and continuously refine zero trust policies based on real usage patterns.

# Export IAP access logs to BigQuery for analysis
gcloud logging sinks create iap-access-logs \
  bigquery.googleapis.com/projects/my-project/datasets/security_logs \
  --log-filter='resource.type="gce_backend_service" AND protoPayload.serviceName="iap.googleapis.com"'

# AWS Verified Access logs to CloudWatch
aws ec2 modify-verified-access-instance-logging-configuration \
  --verified-access-instance-id vai-abc123 \
  --access-logs '{
    "CloudWatchLogs": {"Enabled": true, "LogGroup": "/aws/verified-access/logs"},
    "S3": {"Enabled": true, "BucketName": "verified-access-logs"}
  }'

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
Zero TrustSecurity model that eliminates implicit trust by requiring continuous authentication, authorization, and encryption for every access request
BeyondCorpGoogle's implementation of zero trust that shifts access controls from network perimeter to individual users and devices
Identity-Aware ProxyReverse proxy that verifies user identity and context before forwarding requests to backend applications, replacing VPN-based access
Continuous VerificationReal-time assessment of identity, device posture, location, and behavior for every access request, not just at initial authentication
Device TrustAssessment of endpoint security posture including encryption status, OS version, patch level, and MDM compliance before granting access
NIST SP 800-207National Institute of Standards and Technology publication defining zero trust architecture principles and deployment models
Access Context ManagerGCP service for defining conditional access policies based on device attributes, IP ranges, and identity properties
AWS Verified AccessAWS service providing zero trust application access based on identity and device trust signals without VPN

Tools & Systems

  • Google BeyondCorp Enterprise: End-to-end zero trust platform with Identity-Aware Proxy, Access Context Manager, and Endpoint Verification
  • AWS Verified Access: Zero trust application access service integrating with identity providers and device trust services
  • Azure Conditional Access: Policy engine enforcing identity, device, location, and risk-based access controls for Azure AD applications
  • Zscaler Private Access: Zero trust network access platform replacing VPN with identity and context-based application access
  • Cloudflare Access: Zero trust proxy for securing internal applications with identity verification and device posture checks

Common Scenarios

Scenario: Eliminating VPN for Remote Engineering Access

Context: An organization has 500 engineers accessing internal tools via VPN. The VPN concentrator is a single point of failure and recent credential theft incidents showed that VPN access grants excessive lateral movement capability.

Approach:

  1. Inventory all internal applications accessed via VPN and classify by sensitivity level
  2. Deploy Identity-Aware Proxy (GCP) or Verified Access (AWS) in front of each application
  3. Configure OIDC integration with the corporate identity provider requiring MFA for all access
  4. Implement device trust policies requiring encrypted devices with current OS patches and endpoint protection
  5. Enable continuous session evaluation with 4-hour re-authentication for sensitive applications
  6. Gradually migrate teams from VPN to IAP access, monitoring for access failures and adjusting policies
  7. Decommission VPN after 100% migration and 30-day parallel operation period

Pitfalls: Deploying zero trust without device management in place blocks legitimate users with personal devices. Setting re-authentication intervals too short disrupts developer productivity with excessive login prompts.

Output Format

Zero Trust Architecture Assessment Report
===========================================
Organization: Acme Corp
Cloud Providers: AWS, Azure, GCP
Assessment Date: 2025-02-23

MATURITY LEVEL: Level 2 (Advanced) - NIST ZTA Maturity Model

IDENTITY PILLAR:
  MFA Enforcement: 98% of users (target: 100%)
  Phishing-Resistant MFA: 34% (target: 80%)
  SSO Coverage: 87% of applications
  Conditional Access Policies: 12 active policies

DEVICE PILLAR:
  MDM Enrollment: 92% of corporate devices
  Encryption Enforcement: 95%
  OS Patch Compliance: 78% (30-day window)
  Endpoint Protection: 96%

NETWORK PILLAR:
  VPN Dependency: 3 applications remaining (target: 0)
  IAP-Protected Applications: 47/50
  Micro-Segmented Workloads: 65%
  East-West Traffic Encryption: 40% (mTLS adoption)

APPLICATION PILLAR:
  Applications Behind Zero Trust Proxy: 94%
  Session Re-Authentication: Configured for 85% of apps
  Runtime Access Logging: 100%

RECOMMENDATIONS:
  1. [HIGH] Migrate remaining 3 VPN-dependent apps to IAP
  2. [HIGH] Increase phishing-resistant MFA to 80% within 6 months
  3. [MEDIUM] Expand micro-segmentation to remaining 35% of workloads
  4. [MEDIUM] Deploy service mesh for east-west mTLS encryption

平台分布

Codex

34.32%
按下载量换算24

Claude

29.98%
按下载量换算21

Cursor

19.02%
按下载量换算13

Gemini CLI

8.29%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills