Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

implementing-mcp-tools(implementing MCP tools 搜索)

implementing-mcp-tools 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

implementing-mcp-tools 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 40,912。

总安装 1,236周安装 51GitHub Stars 34,217下载 404核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:implementing-mcp-tools(implementing MCP tools 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/posthog/posthog
仓库路径:skills/implementing-mcp-tools
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/posthog/posthog --skill implementing-mcp-tools
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/posthog/posthog --skill implementing-mcp-tools

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合 MCP 工具生态研究。适用于 Codex、Claude、Cursor 和 Gemini CLI 中的工具集成场景。通过 GitHub 仓库安装,需结合 PostHog 文档确认接口规范。使用前应验证网络连通性和 API 权限配置。

implementing-mcp-tools 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/implementing-mcp-tools

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/posthog/posthog --skill implementing-mcp-tools;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

implementing-mcp-tools 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/posthog/posthog --skill implementing-mcp-tools。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

implementing-mcp-tools 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

implementing-mcp-tools 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

implementing-mcp-tools 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

implementing-mcp-tools 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,236 次,近一周安装 51 次,下载 404 次,GitHub 34,217 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

implementing-mcp-tools 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 34,217 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
implementing-mcp-tools

implementing MCP tools 搜索 · 本页

1,23634,217调用外部服务未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Implementing MCP tools

Read the full guide at docs/published/handbook/engineering/ai/implementing-mcp-tools.md.

Quick workflow

# 1. Scaffold a starter YAML with all operations disabled.
#    --product discovers endpoints via x-explicit-tags (priority 1) then
#    URL substring match (fallback). ViewSets in products/<name>/backend/
#    are auto-tagged. ViewSets elsewhere need @extend_schema(tags=["<product>"]).
pnpm --filter=@posthog/mcp run scaffold-yaml -- --product your_product \
    --output ../../products/your_product/mcp/tools.yaml

# 2. Configure the YAML — enable tools, add scopes, annotations, descriptions
#    Place in products/<product>/mcp/*.yaml (preferred) or services/mcp/definitions/*.yaml

# 3. Add a HogQL system table in posthog/hogql/database/schema/system.py
#    and a model reference in products/posthog_ai/skills/querying-posthog-data/references/

# 4. Generate handlers and schemas
hogli build:openapi

Before you scaffold: fix the backend first

The codegen pipeline can only generate correct tools if the Django backend exposes correct types. Read the type system guide for the full picture.

Before scaffolding YAML, verify:

  1. Serializers have explicit field types and help_text — these flow all the way to Zod .describe() in the generated tool. Missing descriptions = agents guessing at parameters. Use ListField(child=serializers.CharField()) instead of bare ListField(), and @extend_schema_field(PydanticModel) on JSONField subclasses to get typed Zod output (see posthog/api/alert.py for the pattern).
  2. Plain ViewSet methods have @extend_schema(request=...) — without it, drf-spectacular can't discover the request body and the generated tool gets z.object({}) (zero parameters). ModelViewSet with a serializer_class is fine; plain ViewSet with manual validation is not.
  3. Query parameters use @validated_request or @extend_schema with a query serializer — otherwise boolean and array query params may produce type mismatches in the generated code.

If a generated tool has an empty or wrong schema, the fix is almost always on the Django side, not in the YAML config. For a full audit checklist and before/after examples, use the improving-drf-endpoints skill.

When to add MCP tools

When a product exposes API endpoints that agents should be able to call. MCP tools are atomic capabilities (list, get, create, update, delete) — not workflows.

If you're adding a new endpoint, check whether it should be agent-accessible. If yes, add a YAML definition and generate the tool.

Tool design

Tools should be basic capabilities — atomic CRUD operations and simple actions. Agents compose these primitives into higher-level workflows.

Good: "List feature flags", "Get experiment by ID", "Create a survey". Bad: "Search for session recordings of an experiment" — bundles multiple concerns.

Tool naming constraints

Tool names and feature identifiers are validated at build time and in CI. Violations fail the build.

Tool names

  • Format: lowercase kebab-case — only [a-z0-9-], no leading/trailing hyphens
  • Length: 52 characters or fewer
  • Convention: domain-action, e.g. cohorts-create, dashboard-get, feature-flags-list

Feature identifiers

  • Format: lowercase snake*case — only [a-z0-9*], must start with a letter
  • Convention: should match the product folder name, e.g. error_tracking, feature_flags

Why 52 characters?

MCP clients enforce different limits on tool names. The 52-char limit is the safe zone that works across all known clients:

ClientLimitNotes
MCP spec (draft)1–128 chars, [A-Za-z0-9_\-.]Official recommendation, not enforced
Claude Code64 charsHard limit; prefixes tool names with mcp____
Cursor60 chars combinedserver_name + tool_name; tools over this are silently filtered
OpenAI API^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$, 64 charsNo dots allowed

With the server name "posthog" (7 chars) plus a separator, tool names must stay at or below 52 characters to fit within Cursor's 60-char combined limit.

CI enforcement

  • pnpm --filter=@posthog/mcp lint-tool-names — validates length and pattern for YAML and JSON definitions
  • A vitest test validates all runtime TOOL_MAP and GENERATED_TOOL_MAP entries

YAML definitions

YAML files configure which operations are exposed as MCP tools. See existing definitions for patterns:

  • products/<product>/mcp/*.yaml — preferred, keeps config close to the code
  • services/mcp/definitions/*.yaml — fallback for functionality without a product folder

The build pipeline discovers YAML files from both paths.

Key fields

category: Human readable name
feature: snake_case_name # should match the product folder name (used for runtime filtering)
url_prefix: /path # frontend app route, used for enrich_url links
tools:
  your-tool-name: # kebab-case
    operation: operationId_from_openapi
    enabled: true
    scopes:
      - your_product:read
    annotations:
      readOnly: true
      destructive: false
      idempotent: true
    # Optional:
    mcp_version: 1 # 2 for create/update/delete ops, 1 for read/list if available via HogQL
    title: List things
    description: >
      Human-friendly description for the LLM.
    list: true
    enrich_url: '{id}'
    param_overrides:
      name:
        description: Custom description for the LLM
    response: # filter response fields (applied per-item on list endpoints)
      include: [id, key, name] # keep only these fields (dot-path wildcards supported)
      exclude: [filters.groups.*.properties] # remove these fields
      # include and exclude are mutually exclusive
    feature_flag: my-flag-key # gate this tool behind a PostHog feature flag
    feature_flag_behavior: enable # 'enable' (default) or 'disable'

Unknown keys are rejected at build time (Zod .strict()).

Gating tools with feature flags

Add feature_flag to any tool (standard or query wrapper) to gate its exposure on a PostHog feature flag evaluated at MCP init time for the current user.

  • feature_flag_behavior: enable (default) — tool is shown only when the flag is on. Use for rolling out new tools.
  • feature_flag_behavior: disable — tool is hidden when the flag is on. Use for sunsetting old tools.

Reusing the same flag key with both behaviors performs an atomic swap: flag on → new tool visible, old tool hidden; flag off → old tool visible, new tool hidden. Useful for A/B testing tool variations.

Flags are evaluated in parallel at init via evaluateFeatureFlags. If a flag can't be evaluated (service error, missing flag), enable-gated tools are excluded and disable-gated tools are included — fail-closed for new tools, fail-open for existing ones.

Syncing after endpoint changes

pnpm --filter=@posthog/mcp run scaffold-yaml -- --sync-all

Idempotent and non-destructive — adds new operations as enabled: false, removes stale ones.

Serializer descriptions

Descriptions flow through the entire pipeline:

Django serializer field → OpenAPI spec → Zod schema → MCP tool description

These descriptions are what agents read to understand tool parameters.

  • Use help_text on serializer fields — it becomes the OpenAPI description.
  • Use param_overrides in YAML to override generated descriptions with imperative instructions.
  • Be specific about formats, constraints, and valid values.
  • Avoid jargon that an LLM wouldn't understand without context.

HogQL system tables

Every list/get endpoint should have a corresponding HogQL system table in posthog/hogql/database/schema/system.py. This lets agents query data via SQL in v2 of the MCP.

Each system table must include a team_id column for data isolation.

Use mcp_version: 1 on read/list YAML tools when a system table covers the same data — v2 agents use SQL instead.

When adding a system table, also add a model reference file (models-<domain>.md) in products/posthog_ai/skills/querying-posthog-data/references/ and register it in products/posthog_ai/skills/querying-posthog-data/SKILL.md under Data Schema.

Two MCP versions

  • v1 (legacy): all CRUD tools exposed, for clients without skill support.
  • v2 (SQL-first): read/list tools replaced by HogQL, create/update/delete tools kept. For coding agents.

Control per-tool availability with mcp_version: 1/2 in the YAML definition.

平台分布

Codex

35.87%
按下载量换算145

Claude

27.28%
按下载量换算110

Cursor

18.74%
按下载量换算76

Gemini CLI

8.8%
按下载量换算36

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills