Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

implementing-compliance(实施合规)

implementing-compliance 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

implementing-compliance 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为执行命令;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 15,264。

总安装 612周安装 25GitHub Stars 350下载 196核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:implementing-compliance(实施合规)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components
仓库路径:skills/implementing-compliance
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components --skill implementing-compliance
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components --skill implementing-compliance

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

implementing-compliance 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,协助整理仓库状态与变更事项。适用于围绕代码变更、协作流程或仓库状态进行信息组织与梳理的场景。支持基于 GitHub API 获取仓库信息与协作动态,便于生成变更摘要。

安装命令为 npx skills add https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components --skill implementing-compliance。使用前需确认权限范围、维护状态,注意是否触发联网或文件读写操作。

来源仓库内路径:skills/implementing-compliance

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components --skill impleme…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要执行命令,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

implementing-compliance 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components --skill implementing-comp…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

implementing-compliance 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

implementing-compliance 需要什么权限?

权限级别是执行命令。安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components --skill implementing-compliance 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

implementing-compliance 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

implementing-compliance 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 612 次,近一周安装 25 次,下载 196 次,GitHub 350 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

implementing-compliance 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要执行命令,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 不能接受 Skill 在你机器上执行命令的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
implementing-compliance

实施合规 · 本页

612350执行命令未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Compliance Frameworks

Implement continuous compliance with major regulatory frameworks through unified control mapping, policy-as-code enforcement, and automated evidence collection.

Purpose

Modern compliance is a continuous engineering discipline requiring technical implementation of security controls. This skill provides patterns for SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, PCI-DSS 4.0, and GDPR compliance using infrastructure-as-code, policy automation, and evidence collection. Focus on unified controls that satisfy multiple frameworks simultaneously to reduce implementation effort by 60-80%.

When to Use

Invoke when:

  • Building SaaS products requiring SOC 2 Type II for enterprise sales
  • Handling healthcare data (PHI) requiring HIPAA compliance
  • Processing payment cards requiring PCI-DSS validation
  • Serving EU residents and processing personal data under GDPR
  • Implementing security controls that satisfy multiple compliance frameworks
  • Automating compliance evidence collection and audit preparation
  • Enforcing compliance policies in CI/CD pipelines

Framework Selection

Tier 1: Trust & Security Certifications

SOC 2 Type II

  • Audience: SaaS vendors, cloud service providers
  • When required: Enterprise B2B sales, handling customer data
  • Timeline: 6-12 month observation period
  • 2025 updates: Monthly control testing, AI governance, 72-hour breach disclosure

ISO 27001

  • Audience: Global enterprises
  • When required: International business, government contracts
  • Timeline: 3-6 month certification, annual surveillance

Tier 2: Industry-Specific Regulations

HIPAA (Healthcare)

  • Audience: Healthcare providers, health tech handling PHI
  • When required: Processing Protected Health Information
  • 2025 focus: Zero Trust Architecture, EDR/XDR, AI assessments

PCI-DSS 4.0 (Payment Card Industry)

  • Audience: Merchants, payment processors
  • When required: Processing, storing, transmitting cardholder data
  • Effective: April 1, 2025 (mandatory)
  • Key changes: Client-side security, 12-char passwords, enhanced MFA

Tier 3: Privacy Regulations

GDPR (EU Privacy)

  • Audience: Organizations processing EU residents' data
  • When required: EU customers/users (extraterritorial)
  • 2025 updates: 48-hour breach reporting, 6% revenue fines, AI transparency

CCPA/CPRA (California Privacy)

  • Audience: Businesses serving California residents
  • When required: Revenue >$25M, or 100K+ CA residents, or 50%+ revenue from data sales

For detailed framework requirements, see references/soc2-controls.md, references/hipaa-safeguards.md, references/pci-dss-requirements.md, and references/gdpr-articles.md.

Universal Control Implementation

Unified Control Strategy

Implement controls once, map to multiple frameworks. Reduces effort by 60-80%.

Implementation Priority:

  1. Encryption (ENC-001, ENC-002): AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.3 in transit
  2. Access Control (MFA-001, RBAC-001): MFA, RBAC, least privilege
  3. Audit Logging (LOG-001): Centralized, immutable, 7-year retention
  4. Monitoring (MON-001): SIEM, intrusion detection, alerting
  5. Incident Response (IR-001): Detection, escalation, breach notification

Control Categories

Identity & Access:

  • Multi-factor authentication for privileged access
  • Role-based access control with least privilege
  • Quarterly access reviews
  • Password policy: 12+ characters, complexity

Data Protection:

  • Encryption: AES-256 (rest), TLS 1.3 (transit)
  • Data classification and tagging
  • Retention policies aligned with regulations
  • Data minimization

Logging & Monitoring:

  • Centralized audit logging (all auth and data access)
  • 7-year retention (satisfies all frameworks)
  • Immutable storage (S3 Object Lock)
  • Real-time alerting

Network Security:

  • Network segmentation and VPC isolation
  • Firewalls with deny-by-default
  • Intrusion detection/prevention
  • Regular vulnerability scanning

Incident Response:

  • Documented incident response plan
  • Automated detection and alerting
  • Breach notification: HIPAA 60d, GDPR 48h, SOC 2 72h, PCI-DSS immediate

Business Continuity:

  • Automated backups with defined RPO/RTO
  • Multi-region disaster recovery
  • Regular failover testing

For complete control implementations, see references/control-mapping-matrix.md.

Compliance as Code

Policy Enforcement with OPA

Enforce compliance policies in CI/CD before infrastructure deployment.

Architecture:

Git Push → Terraform Plan → JSON → OPA Evaluation
                                    ├─► Pass → Deploy
                                    └─► Fail → Block

Example: Encryption Policy

Enforce encryption requirements (SOC 2 CC6.1, HIPAA §164.312(a)(2)(iv), PCI-DSS Req 3.4):

See examples/opa-policies/encryption.rego for complete implementation.

CI/CD Integration:

terraform plan -out=tfplan.binary
terraform show -json tfplan.binary > tfplan.json
opa eval --data policies/ --input tfplan.json 'data.compliance.main.deny'

For complete CI/CD patterns, see references/cicd-integration.md.

Static Analysis with Checkov

Scan IaC with built-in compliance framework support:

checkov -d ./terraform \
  --check SOC2 --check HIPAA --check PCI --check GDPR \
  --output cli --output json

Create custom policies for organization-specific requirements. See examples/checkov-policies/ for examples.

Automated Testing

Integrate compliance validation into test suites:

def test_s3_encrypted(terraform_plan):
    """SOC2:CC6.1, HIPAA:164.312(a)(2)(iv)"""
    buckets = get_resources(terraform_plan, "aws_s3_bucket")
    encrypted = get_encryption_configs(terraform_plan)
    assert all_buckets_encrypted(buckets, encrypted)

def test_opa_policies():
    result = subprocess.run(["opa", "eval", "--data", "policies/",
        "--input", "tfplan.json", "data.compliance.main.deny"])
    assert not json.loads(result.stdout)

For complete test patterns, see references/compliance-testing.md.

Technical Control Implementations

Encryption at Rest

Standards: AES-256, managed KMS, automatic rotation

AWS Example:

resource "aws_kms_key" "data" {
  enable_key_rotation = true
  tags = { Compliance = "ENC-001" }
}

resource "aws_s3_bucket_server_side_encryption_configuration" "data" {
  bucket = aws_s3_bucket.data.id
  rule {
    apply_server_side_encryption_by_default {
      sse_algorithm     = "aws:kms"
      kms_master_key_id = aws_kms_key.data.arn
    }
  }
}

resource "aws_db_instance" "main" {
  storage_encrypted = true
  kms_key_id       = aws_kms_key.data.arn
}

For complete encryption implementations including Azure and GCP, see references/encryption-implementations.md.

Encryption in Transit

Standards: TLS 1.3 (TLS 1.2 minimum), strong ciphers, HSTS

ALB Example:

resource "aws_lb_listener" "https" {
  port       = 443
  protocol   = "HTTPS"
  ssl_policy = "ELBSecurityPolicy-TLS13-1-2-2021-06"
}

Multi-Factor Authentication

Standards: TOTP, hardware tokens, biometric for privileged access

AWS IAM Enforcement:

resource "aws_iam_policy" "require_mfa" {
  policy = jsonencode({
    Statement = [{
      Effect = "Deny"
      NotAction = ["iam:CreateVirtualMFADevice", "iam:EnableMFADevice"]
      Resource = "*"
      Condition = {
        BoolIfExists = { "aws:MultiFactorAuthPresent" = "false" }
      }
    }]
  })
}

For application-level MFA (TOTP), see examples/mfa-implementation.py.

Role-Based Access Control

Standards: Least privilege, job function-based roles, quarterly reviews

Kubernetes Example:

apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: Role
metadata:
  name: developer
  namespace: development
rules:
- apiGroups: ["", "apps"]
  resources: ["pods", "deployments", "services"]
  verbs: ["get", "list", "watch", "create", "update", "patch", "delete"]
- apiGroups: [""]
  resources: ["secrets"]
  verbs: ["get", "list"]  # Read-only

For complete RBAC patterns including AWS IAM and OPA policies, see references/access-control-patterns.md.

Audit Logging

Standards: Structured JSON, 7-year retention, immutable storage

Required Events: Authentication, authorization, data access, administrative actions, security events

Python Example:

class AuditLogger:
    def log_event(self, event_type, user_id, resource_type,
                  resource_id, action, result, ip_address):
        audit_event = {
            "timestamp": datetime.utcnow().isoformat() + "Z",
            "event_type": event_type.value,
            "user_id": user_id,
            "action": action,
            "result": result,
            "resource": {"type": resource_type, "id": resource_id},
            "source": {"ip": ip_address}
        }
        self.logger.info(json.dumps(audit_event))

Log Retention:

resource "aws_cloudwatch_log_group" "audit" {
  retention_in_days = 2555  # 7 years
  kms_key_id        = aws_kms_key.logs.arn
}

resource "aws_s3_bucket_object_lock_configuration" "audit" {
  bucket = aws_s3_bucket.audit_logs.id
  rule {
    default_retention { mode = "COMPLIANCE"; years = 7 }
  }
}

For complete audit logging patterns including HIPAA PHI access logging, see references/audit-logging-patterns.md.

Evidence Collection Automation

Continuous Monitoring

Automate evidence collection for continuous compliance validation.

Architecture:

AWS Config → EventBridge → Lambda → S3 (Evidence)
                                   → DynamoDB (Status)

Evidence Collection:

class EvidenceCollector:
    def collect_encryption_evidence(self):
        evidence = {
            "control_id": "ENC-001",
            "frameworks": ["SOC2-CC6.1", "HIPAA-164.312(a)(2)(iv)"],
            "timestamp": datetime.utcnow().isoformat(),
            "status": "PASS",
            "findings": []
        }
        # Check S3, RDS, EBS encryption status
        # Document findings
        return evidence

For complete evidence collector, see examples/evidence-collection/evidence_collector.py.

Audit Report Generation

Generate compliance reports automatically:

class AuditReportGenerator:
    def generate_soc2_report(self, start_date, end_date):
        controls = self.get_control_status("SOC2")
        return {
            "framework": "SOC 2 Type II",
            "compliance_score": self.calculate_score(controls),
            "trust_services_criteria": {...},
            "controls": self.format_controls(controls)
        }

For complete report generator, see examples/evidence-collection/report_generator.py.

Control Mapping Matrix

Unified control mapping across frameworks:

ControlSOC 2HIPAAPCI-DSSGDPRISO 27001
MFACC6.1§164.312(d)Req 8.3Art 32A.9.4.2
Encryption at RestCC6.1§164.312(a)(2)(iv)Req 3.4Art 32A.10.1.1
Encryption in TransitCC6.1§164.312(e)(1)Req 4.1Art 32A.13.1.1
Audit LoggingCC7.2§164.312(b)Req 10.2Art 30A.12.4.1
Access ReviewsCC6.1§164.308(a)(3)(ii)(C)Req 8.2.4Art 32A.9.2.5
Vulnerability ScanningCC7.1§164.308(a)(8)Req 11.2Art 32A.12.6.1
Incident ResponseCC7.3§164.308(a)(6)Req 12.10Art 33A.16.1.1

Strategy: Implement once with proper tagging, map to all applicable frameworks.

For complete control mapping with 45+ controls, see references/control-mapping-matrix.md.

Breach Notification Requirements

Framework-Specific Timelines:

  • HIPAA: 60 days to HHS and affected individuals
  • GDPR: 48 hours to supervisory authority (2025 update)
  • SOC 2: 72 hours to affected customers
  • PCI-DSS: Immediate to payment brands

Required Elements:

  • Description of incident and data involved
  • Estimated number of affected individuals
  • Steps taken to mitigate harm
  • Contact information for questions
  • Remediation actions and timeline

For incident response templates, see references/incident-response-templates.md.

Vendor Management

Business Associate Agreements (HIPAA):

  • Required for all vendors handling PHI
  • Specify permitted uses and disclosures
  • Require appropriate safeguards
  • Annual review and renewal

Data Processing Agreements (GDPR):

  • Required for all vendors processing personal data
  • Process only on controller instructions
  • Implement appropriate technical measures
  • Sub-processor approval required

Assessment Process:

  1. Risk classification by data access level
  2. Security questionnaire evaluation
  3. BAA/DPA execution
  4. SOC 2 report collection (≤90 days old)
  5. Annual re-assessment

For vendor management templates, see references/vendor-management.md.

Tools & Libraries

Policy as Code:

  • Open Policy Agent (OPA): General-purpose policy engine
  • Checkov: IaC security scanning with compliance frameworks
  • tfsec: Terraform security scanner
  • Trivy: Container and IaC scanner

Compliance Automation:

  • AWS Config: AWS resource compliance monitoring
  • Cloud Custodian: Multi-cloud compliance automation
  • Drata/Vanta/Secureframe: Continuous compliance platforms

For tool selection guidance, see references/tool-recommendations.md.

Integration with Other Skills

Related Skills:

  • security-hardening: Technical security control implementation
  • secret-management: Secrets handling per HIPAA/PCI-DSS
  • infrastructure-as-code: IaC implementing compliance controls
  • kubernetes-operations: K8s RBAC, network policies
  • building-ci-pipelines: Policy enforcement in CI/CD
  • siem-logging: Audit logging and monitoring
  • incident-management: Incident response procedures

Quick Reference

Implementation Checklist:

  • Identify applicable frameworks
  • Implement encryption (AES-256, TLS 1.3)
  • Configure MFA for privileged access
  • Implement RBAC with least privilege
  • Set up audit logging (7-year retention)
  • Configure security monitoring/alerting
  • Create incident response plan
  • Execute vendor agreements (BAAs, DPAs)
  • Implement policy-as-code (OPA, Checkov)
  • Automate evidence collection
  • Conduct quarterly access reviews
  • Perform annual risk assessments

Common Mistakes:

  • Treating compliance as one-time project vs continuous process
  • Implementing per-framework vs unified controls
  • Manual evidence collection vs automation
  • Insufficient log retention (<7 years)
  • Missing MFA enforcement
  • Not encrypting backups/logs
  • Inadequate vendor due diligence

References

Framework Details:

  • references/soc2-controls.md - SOC 2 TSC control catalog
  • references/hipaa-safeguards.md - HIPAA safeguards
  • references/pci-dss-requirements.md - PCI-DSS 4.0 requirements
  • references/gdpr-articles.md - GDPR key articles

Implementation Patterns:

  • references/control-mapping-matrix.md - Unified control mapping
  • references/encryption-implementations.md - Encryption patterns
  • references/access-control-patterns.md - MFA, RBAC implementations
  • references/audit-logging-patterns.md - Logging requirements
  • references/incident-response-templates.md - IR procedures

Automation:

  • references/cicd-integration.md - OPA/Checkov CI/CD integration
  • references/compliance-testing.md - Automated test patterns
  • references/vendor-management.md - Vendor assessment templates
  • references/tool-recommendations.md - Tool selection guide

Code Examples:

  • examples/opa-policies/ - OPA policy examples
  • examples/terraform/ - Terraform control implementations
  • examples/evidence-collection/ - Evidence automation
  • examples/mfa-implementation.py - TOTP MFA implementation

Consult qualified legal counsel and auditors for legal interpretation and audit preparation.

平台分布

Codex

35.41%
按下载量换算69

Claude

28.41%
按下载量换算56

Cursor

20.22%
按下载量换算40

Gemini CLI

9.26%
按下载量换算18

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components --skill implementing-compliance 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills