Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

humanize-beagle(比格犬拟人化)

humanize-beagle 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

humanize-beagle 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 31,740。

总安装 2,645周安装 107GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 830核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.1

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:humanize-beagle(比格犬拟人化)
来源仓库:https://github.com/anderskev/humanize-beagle
安装命令:
openclaw skills install humanize-beagle
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install humanize-beagle

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

humanize-beagle 重写开发人员文本以消除 AI 痕迹,使其听起来更自然人性化。适合在 OpenClaw 中处理代码文档、API 说明或技术博客内容时使用。可修复夸大的语言与机器人语气,提升沟通亲和力。

安装命令为 openclaw skills install humanize-beagle,建议结合来源仓库了解触发条件。使用前应确认是否依赖外部 API,并评估响应时间与成本。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install humanize-beagle;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

humanize-beagle 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install humanize-beagle。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

humanize-beagle 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

humanize-beagle 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

humanize-beagle 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

humanize-beagle 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,645 次,近一周安装 107 次,下载 830 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

humanize-beagle 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
humanize-beagle

比格犬拟人化 · 本页

2,645—需要联网MIT-0有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
humanize-beagle
description
Rewrite AI-generated developer text to sound human — fix inflated language, filler, tautological docs, and robotic tone. Use after review-ai-writing identifies issues.
disable-model-invocation
true
user-invocable
true
dependencies

Humanize

Apply fixes from a previous review-ai-writing run with automatic safe/risky classification.

Usage

/beagle-docs:humanize-beagle [--dry-run] [--all] [--category <name>]

Flags:

  • --dry-run - Show what would be fixed without changing files
  • --all - Fix entire codebase (runs review with --all first)
  • --category <name> - Only fix specific category: content|vocabulary|formatting|communication|filler|code_docs

Instructions

Hard gates

Advance past destructive or evidence-bound steps only when each PASS is true (commands and artifacts—not “I checked mentally”):

  1. G1 — Safe to edit files — PASS: git status --porcelain is empty, or git stash push -u -m "beagle-docs: pre-humanize backup" exits 0.
  2. G2 — Review input is real JSON with expected shape — PASS: .beagle/ai-writing-review.json exists and the file parses as JSON with a git_head key and a findings value that is an array (possibly empty). Use the jq -e command in step 3, or the same checks with json.load in Python. If this fails, stop with a parse/validation error—do not apply fixes.
  3. G3 — References before rewrites — PASS: For each finding you will edit, the references/*.md files required by step 4 for that category/type are read in this session before you change text.
  4. G4 — Per-file validation — PASS: Every modified file passes the step 8 check for its type; otherwise run git checkout -- "$file" for that file and do not list it as OK in the summary.
  5. G5 — Delete review file only on full success — PASS: Run rm .beagle/ai-writing-review.json only when G4 holds for all files you are keeping unchanged from validation failures (aligns with step 10).

1. Parse Arguments

Extract flags from $ARGUMENTS:

  • --dry-run - Preview mode only
  • --all - Full codebase scan
  • --category <name> - Filter to specific category

2. Pre-flight Safety Checks

# Check for uncommitted changes
git status --porcelain

If working directory is dirty, warn:

Warning: You have uncommitted changes. Creating a git stash before proceeding.
Run `git stash pop` to restore if needed.

Create stash if dirty:

git stash push -u -m "beagle-docs: pre-humanize backup"

G1 PASS: Either the working tree was already clean, or the stash command exited 0.

3. Load Review Results

Check for existing review file:

cat .beagle/ai-writing-review.json 2>/dev/null

If file missing:

  • If --all flag: Run /beagle-docs:review-ai-writing --all first
  • Otherwise: Fail with: "No review results found. Run /beagle-docs:review-ai-writing first."

If file exists, validate JSON and freshness (G2):

# Required shape: parseable JSON with git_head and findings array (may be empty)
jq -e 'has("git_head") and ((.findings // []) | type == "array")' .beagle/ai-writing-review.json >/dev/null 2>&1 \
  || { echo "Invalid or incompatible ai-writing-review.json"; exit 1; }

# Get stored git HEAD from JSON
stored_head=$(jq -r '.git_head' .beagle/ai-writing-review.json)
current_head=$(git rev-parse HEAD)

if [ "$stored_head" != "$current_head" ]; then
  echo "Warning: Review was run at commit $stored_head, but HEAD is now $current_head"
fi

If stale, prompt: "Review results are stale. Re-run review? (y/n)"

4. Load Reference Material

Read the appropriate reference files based on the findings being fixed:

  • Read references/vocabulary-swaps.md when applying ai_vocabulary_high or ai_vocabulary_low fixes
  • Read references/fix-strategies.md for strategy details and before/after examples for any category
  • Read references/developer-voice.md for tone/register guidance when rewriting prose

Only load what you need — if fixing only vocabulary, skip the voice guide.

5. Filter Findings

If --category is set, filter findings to that category only.

Partition remaining findings by fix_safety:

Safe Fixes (auto-apply):

  • chat_leak - Delete conversational artifacts
  • cutoff_disclaimer - Delete knowledge cutoff references
  • filler_phrase - Delete filler phrases
  • heading_restatement - Delete restating first sentence
  • emoji_decoration - Remove emoji from technical text
  • boldface_overuse - Remove excessive bold formatting
  • ai_vocabulary_high - Swap high-signal AI words
  • narrating_obvious - Delete obvious code comments
  • synthetic_opener - Delete "In today's..." openers
  • sycophantic_tone - Delete or neutralize praise
  • vague_authority - Delete unattributed claims
  • excessive_hedging - Remove qualifiers
  • generic_conclusion - Delete summary padding
  • copula_avoidance - Use "is/are" naturally
  • rhetorical_device - Delete rhetorical questions
  • em_dash_overuse - Replace formulaic em dashes with commas, parentheses, or colons
  • thematic_break - Remove horizontal rules before headings
  • title_case_heading - Convert AI title-case headings to sentence case
  • curly_quotes - Normalize curly quotes/apostrophes to straight
  • negative_parallelism - Delete "Not just X, but also Y" filler constructions
  • challenges_and_prospects - Delete "Despite its... faces challenges..." formulaic wrappers

Needs Review Fixes (require confirmation):

  • promotional_language - Rewrite with specifics
  • formulaic_structure - Restructure sections
  • synonym_cycling - Pick consistent term
  • commit_inflation - Rewrite commit scope
  • tautological_docstring - Rewrite or delete docstring
  • exhaustive_enumeration - Trim parameter docs
  • this_noun_verbs - Rewrite docstring voice
  • ai_vocabulary_low - Reduce cluster density
  • apologetic_error - Rewrite error message
  • rule_of_three - Simplify three-item lists used as filler comprehensiveness
  • inline_header_list - Restructure boldfaced inline-header vertical lists
  • unnecessary_table - Convert small tables to prose
  • regression_to_mean - Restore specific facts replaced by vague praise

6. Apply Safe Fixes

If --dry-run:

## Safe Fixes (would apply automatically)

| # | File | Line | Type | Action |
|---|------|------|------|--------|
| 1 | README.md | 3 | synthetic_opener | Delete "In today's rapidly evolving..." |
| 2 | src/auth.py | 15 | narrating_obvious | Delete "# Check if user exists" |
| 3 | README.md | 42 | ai_vocabulary_high | Replace "utilize" with "use" |
...

Otherwise, apply fixes grouped by file to minimize file I/O:

  1. Sort findings by file, then by line number (descending, to avoid offset drift)
  2. For each file, apply all safe fixes in reverse line order
  3. For git artifacts (git:commit:*, git:pr:*), skip — these can't be auto-fixed. Report them for manual attention.

7. Handle Needs Review Fixes

If --dry-run, list them:

## Needs Review Fixes (would prompt interactively)

| # | File | Line | Type | Original | Suggested |
|---|------|------|------|----------|-----------|
| 4 | README.md | 8 | promotional_language | "powerful, enterprise-grade solution" | "authentication library" |
...

Otherwise, for each fix, prompt interactively:

[README.md:8] Promotional language: "powerful, enterprise-grade solution"
Suggested: "authentication library"
(y)es / (n)o / (e)dit / (s)kip all:

Track user choices:

  • y - Apply this fix as suggested
  • n - Skip this fix
  • e - User provides custom replacement
  • s - Skip all remaining interactive fixes

8. Validate Results

For each modified markdown file, verify basic validity:

# Check for broken markdown (unclosed code blocks, broken links)
# Simple check: matching ``` pairs
grep -c '```' "$file" | awk '{print ($1 % 2 == 0) ? "OK" : "WARNING: odd number of code fences"}'

For modified source files, check syntax is still valid:

Python:

python3 -c "import ast; ast.parse(open('$file').read())"

TypeScript/JavaScript:

npx -y acorn --ecma2020 "$file" > /dev/null 2>&1

If validation fails for any file, revert that file:

git checkout -- "$file"
echo "Reverted $file due to validation failure"

9. Report Results

## Humanize Summary

### Applied Fixes
- [x] README.md:3 - Deleted synthetic opener
- [x] README.md:42 - Replaced "utilize" with "use"
- [x] src/auth.py:15 - Deleted obvious comment

### Interactive Fixes
- [x] README.md:8 - Rewrote promotional language (user approved)
- [ ] docs/guide.md:22 - Skipped by user

### Skipped (Git Artifacts)
- [ ] git:commit:abc1234 - Chat leak in commit message (amend manually)

### Validation
- README.md: OK
- src/auth.py: OK

### Diff Summary
git diff --stat

10. Cleanup

On successful completion (all validations pass):

rm .beagle/ai-writing-review.json

If any validation fails, keep the file and report:

Review file preserved at .beagle/ai-writing-review.json
Fix issues and re-run, or restore with: git stash pop

Core Principles

  1. Delete first, rewrite second. Most AI patterns are padding. Removing them improves the text.
  2. Use simple words. Replace "utilize" with "use", "facilitate" with "help", "implement" with "add".
  3. Keep sentences short. Break compound sentences. One idea per sentence.
  4. Preserve meaning. Never change what the text says, only how it says it.
  5. Match the register. Commit messages are terse. READMEs are conversational. API docs are precise. Read references/developer-voice.md for the full register guide.
  6. Don't overcorrect. A slightly formal sentence is fine. Only fix patterns that read as obviously AI-generated.
  7. Understand regression to the mean. LLMs produce the most statistically likely output. Specific, unusual facts get replaced with generic, positive descriptions. When humanizing, restore specificity — replace vague praise with concrete details.
  8. Score density, not individual words. AI vocabulary words co-occur. One or two may be coincidental; a cluster of 3+ is a strong AI tell.

Example

# Preview all fixes without applying
/beagle-docs:humanize-beagle --dry-run

# Fix only vocabulary issues
/beagle-docs:humanize-beagle --category vocabulary

# Full codebase scan and fix
/beagle-docs:humanize-beagle --all

# Preview filler fixes only
/beagle-docs:humanize-beagle --category filler --dry-run

Rules

  • Always load reference material before applying fixes (step 4); satisfy G3 per finding
  • Never modify files without a clean working tree or a successful stash (G1)
  • Apply safe fixes in reverse line order to avoid offset drift
  • Never auto-fix git artifacts (commits, PRs) — report them for manual action
  • Validate every modified file before considering it done (G4)
  • Revert files that fail validation
  • Do not present the step 9 summary as “complete” until step 8 validation has passed for every file you are keeping
  • Remove .beagle/ai-writing-review.json only after full success (G5); if validation failed partway, keep the file and follow step 10

平台分布

OpenClaw

70.12%
按下载量换算582

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills