Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

dispatching-parallel-agents调度并行 Agent

Agent Skill

dispatching-parallel-agents 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

186

周安装

8

GitHub Stars

3

下载量

65
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:dispatching-parallel-agents(调度并行 Agent)
来源仓库:https://github.com/hjewkes/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/dispatching-parallel-agents
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/hjewkes/agent-skills --skill dispatching-parallel-agents
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/hjewkes/agent-skills --skill dispatching-parallel-agents

简介

dispatching-parallel-agents 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词或任务场景快速定位候选结果。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装,需结合原始 README 核验具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。
  • 当前无原始 SKILL.md 内容可参考,需进一步查阅源码了解实现细节。

SKILL.md

Dispatching Parallel Agents

Overview

When you have multiple unrelated failures (different test files, different subsystems, different bugs), investigating them sequentially wastes time. Each investigation is independent and can happen in parallel.

Core principle: Dispatch one agent per independent problem domain. Let them work concurrently.

When to Use

digraph when_to_use {
    "Multiple failures?" [shape=diamond];
    "Are they independent?" [shape=diamond];
    "Single agent investigates all" [shape=box];
    "One agent per problem domain" [shape=box];
    "Can they work in parallel?" [shape=diamond];
    "Sequential agents" [shape=box];
    "Parallel dispatch" [shape=box];

    "Multiple failures?" -> "Are they independent?" [label="yes"];
    "Are they independent?" -> "Single agent investigates all" [label="no - related"];
    "Are they independent?" -> "Can they work in parallel?" [label="yes"];
    "Can they work in parallel?" -> "Parallel dispatch" [label="yes"];
    "Can they work in parallel?" -> "Sequential agents" [label="no - shared state"];
}

Use when: 3+ failures with different root causes, multiple independent subsystems broken, no shared state between investigations.

Don't use when: failures are related, need full system context, agents would interfere (editing same files).

The Pattern

1. Identify Independent Domains

Group failures by what's broken. Each domain is independent — fixing one doesn't affect others.

2. Create Focused Agent Tasks

Each agent gets: specific scope (one file/subsystem), clear goal, constraints (don't change other code), expected output (summary of findings and fixes). Include a return format constraint: token budget (e.g., "under 1000 tokens") and structure (e.g., "verdict first, then details").

Model selection: Use Opus for implementation agents, Sonnet for review/analysis agents, Haiku for simple validation or formatting tasks.

Use the dispatch prompt template for the canonical 6-section prompt structure.

3. Dispatch in Parallel

Task("Fix agent-tool-abort.test.ts failures")
Task("Fix batch-completion-behavior.test.ts failures")
Task("Fix tool-approval-race-conditions.test.ts failures")

4. Review and Integrate

Read each summary, verify fixes don't conflict, run full test suite, integrate all changes.

When NOT to Use

  • Related failures: Fix one might fix others — investigate together first
  • Need full context: Understanding requires seeing entire system
  • Exploratory debugging: You don't know what's broken yet
  • Shared state: Agents would interfere (consider git worktrees for isolation if parallelism is otherwise beneficial)

Verification

After agents return:

  1. Review each summary — Understand what changed
  2. Check for conflicts — Did agents edit same code?
  3. Run full suite — Verify all fixes work together
  4. Spot check — Agents can make systematic errors

For agent prompt structure, common mistakes, and a real example walkthrough, see references/agent-prompts-and-examples.md.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

31.54%
按下载量换算21

Claude

31.94%
按下载量换算21

Cursor

18.45%
按下载量换算12

Gemini CLI

8.36%
按下载量换算5

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills