Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

helpmetest-visual-check(helpmetest 目视检查)

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范、排版、配色、布局和交互体验优化。它适合让 Agent 根据产品场景整理页面结构、生成 UI 方案、检查视觉一致性或改进组件层级。使用时需要结合现有品牌、设计系统和用户任务,不应只堆装饰元素;涉及真实页面改动时,应通过截图或浏览器预览检查文本溢出、对齐和响应式表现。

helpmetest-visual-check 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 52,401。

总安装 559周安装 24GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 196核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:helpmetest-visual-check(helpmetest 目视检查)
来源仓库:https://github.com/help-me-test/skills
仓库路径:skills/helpmetest-visual-check
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/help-me-test/skills --skill helpmetest-visual-check
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/help-me-test/skills --skill helpmetest-visual-check

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

helpmetest-visual-check 用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范和交互体验优化。适用于需要生成 UI 方案、检查视觉一致性或改进组件层级的开发场景。使用时需结合现有品牌、设计系统和用户任务,避免仅堆砌装饰元素。涉及真实页面改动时,应通过截图或浏览器预览检查文本溢出、对齐和响应式表现。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/helpmetest-visual-check

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/help-me-test/skills --skill helpmetest-visual-…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

helpmetest-visual-check 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/help-me-test/skills --skill helpmetest-visual-check。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

helpmetest-visual-check 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

helpmetest-visual-check 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

helpmetest-visual-check 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

helpmetest-visual-check 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 559 次,近一周安装 24 次,下载 196 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

helpmetest-visual-check 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
helpmetest-visual-check

helpmetest 目视检查 · 本页

559—调用外部服务未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Who you are: If .helpmetest/SOUL.md exists in this project, read it before starting — it defines your character and shapes how you work.
No MCP? The CLI has full feature parity — use helpmetest <command> instead of MCP tools. See the CLI reference.

Visual Check

Quick visual verification using screenshots. Tests how things look without creating formal test files.

When to Use This Skill

Use when user asks casual verification questions like:

  • "Check if the login button is blue"
  • "Does the header look right on mobile?"
  • "See if the pricing table is centered"
  • "Is the footer visible?"
  • "Verify the hero image loaded"
  • "Check that modal is showing correctly"

NOT for:

  • Creating formal tests (use /helpmetest-test-generator)
  • Comprehensive site testing (use /helpmetest)
  • Debugging failing tests (use /helpmetest-debugger)

Process

Step 1: Understand What to Check

Extract from user's request:

  • URL - Where to look (if not provided, ask)
  • Element/Feature - What to verify ("login button", "header", "pricing table")
  • Expected state - What should it look like? ("blue", "centered", "visible")

Step 2: Navigate and Capture

Use helpmetest_run_interactive_command with navigation + screenshot:

Go To  <url>

Tool returns:

  • Screenshot (automatically included)
  • Page state
  • Any console errors

Step 3: Describe What You See

Based on screenshot, describe:

  1. Is the element there? - Present or missing
  2. How does it look? - Color, size, position, styling
  3. Matches expectation? - Yes/No with specifics

Example response:

✓ Login button found in top-right navigation
✓ Color: Blue (#0066FF) - matches expected blue
✓ Size: Standard button size (~120px wide)
✓ Position: Aligned right, 20px from edge

Step 4: Test Interactions (If Needed)

If user wants to verify behavior (hover, click, etc):

# Hover to check hover state
Hover  button:has-text("Login")

# Click to check if it works
Click  button:has-text("Login")

Each command returns a new screenshot showing the result.

Step 5: Responsive Checks (If Needed)

If user mentions "mobile" or "tablet":

# Set mobile viewport
Set Viewport Size  375  667  # iPhone SE

# Capture mobile view
Go To  <url>

Common viewports:

  • Mobile: 375x667 (iPhone SE), 390x844 (iPhone 12)
  • Tablet: 768x1024 (iPad)
  • Desktop: 1920x1080

Guidelines

Be Specific:

  • ❌ "Button looks fine"
  • ✅ "Button is blue (#2563EB), 140px wide, centered in navbar"

Compare to Expectation:

  • User said: "check if button is blue"
  • You say: "Button is blue (#0066FF) ✓" or "Button is red (#DC2626) ✗ - Expected blue"

Mention Issues:

  • Overlapping elements
  • Cut-off text
  • Misaligned items
  • Wrong colors
  • Missing elements
  • Console errors

Keep It Casual:

  • This is quick verification, not formal QA
  • No need to create artifacts or tests
  • Just answer: "Does it look right? Yes/No, here's why"

Interactive Commands Available

# Navigation
Go To  <url>

# Element inspection
Get Element  <selector>  # Check if exists
Get Style  <selector>  <property>  # Get CSS value

# Viewport changes
Set Viewport Size  <width>  <height>

# Interactions (to check behavior)
Click  <selector>
Hover  <selector>
Fill Text  <selector>  <text>
Press Keys  <selector>  <key>

# Scrolling
Scroll To Element  <selector>
Scroll By  <x>  <y>

# Waiting (if page loads slowly)
Wait For Elements State  <selector>  visible  timeout=5000

Every command automatically returns a screenshot.

Example Workflows

Example 1: Quick Button Check

User: "Check if the Sign Up button is green"

1. Go To  https://example.com
2. Look at screenshot
3. Find "Sign Up" button in nav
4. Respond: "Sign Up button is green (#10B981) ✓"

Example 2: Layout Verification

User: "Is the pricing table centered?"

1. Go To  https://example.com/pricing
2. Look at screenshot
3. Check table position
4. Respond: "Pricing table is centered ✓ - Equal margins on both sides (~200px)"

Example 3: Responsive Check

User: "Does the header look good on mobile?"

1. Set Viewport Size  375  667
2. Go To  https://example.com
3. Look at screenshot
4. Respond: "Header stacks vertically ✓ - Logo on top, menu items below. Hamburger icon visible."

Example 4: Hover State

User: "Check if the button changes color on hover"

1. Go To  https://example.com
2. Look at initial screenshot (button default state)
3. Hover  button:has-text("Submit")
4. Look at new screenshot (button hover state)
5. Respond: "Button changes from blue (#0066FF) to dark blue (#0047B3) on hover ✓"

Example 5: Modal Appearance

User: "See if the modal shows up when clicking Contact"

1. Go To  https://example.com
2. Click  button:has-text("Contact")
3. Look at screenshot
4. Respond: "Modal appears ✓ - Dark overlay with white form centered on screen"

Output Format

Always structure your response:

[Element/Feature Name]

Status: ✓ Matches expectation / ✗ Issue found / ⚠️ Partial match

Details:
- [Specific observation 1]
- [Specific observation 2]
- [Specific observation 3]

[If issue found:]
Issue: [What's wrong]
Expected: [What it should be]
Actual: [What it is]

When to Stop

This skill is for QUICK checks. If user asks:

  • "Test this thoroughly" → Use /helpmetest
  • "Create a test for this" → Use /helpmetest-test-generator
  • "Why is this test failing?" → Use /helpmetest-debugger

Keep it simple: Look, describe, confirm.

平台分布

Codex

35.45%
按下载量换算69

Claude

33.9%
按下载量换算66

Cursor

19.13%
按下载量换算37

Gemini CLI

8.96%
按下载量换算18

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills