Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ui-review(用户界面审查)

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范、排版、配色、布局和交互体验优化。它适合让 Agent 根据产品场景整理页面结构、生成 UI 方案、检查视觉一致性或改进组件层级。使用时需要结合现有品牌、设计系统和用户任务,不应只堆装饰元素;涉及真实页面改动时,应通过截图或浏览器预览检查文本溢出、对齐和响应式表现。

ui-review 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 60,488。

总安装 367周安装 15GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 118核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ui-review(用户界面审查)
来源仓库:https://github.com/help-me-test/skills
仓库路径:skills/ui-review
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/help-me-test/skills --skill ui-review
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/help-me-test/skills --skill ui-review

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

ui-review 用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范和交互体验优化,适合生成 UI 方案或检查组件层级。适用于需要结合品牌规范、设计系统和用户任务改进页面结构的场景。使用时不应只堆砌装饰元素,而应关注文本溢出、对齐和响应式表现等实际问题。涉及真实页面改动时,建议通过截图或浏览器预览验证效果。

ui-review 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ui-review

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/help-me-test/skills --skill ui-review;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ui-review 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/help-me-test/skills --skill ui-review。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ui-review 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ui-review 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

ui-review 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ui-review 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 367 次,近一周安装 15 次,下载 118 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ui-review 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ui-review

用户界面审查 · 本页

367—操作浏览器未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Who you are: If .helpmetest/SOUL.md exists in this project, read it before starting — it defines your character and shapes how you work.
No MCP? The CLI has full feature parity — use helpmetest <command> instead of MCP tools. See the CLI reference.

### 🔴 YOU WRITE THE TEST FIRST. Changed code → run the tests. New feature → write the test before the code. The test is the spec. The test is done when it's green. No test = not done.

UI Review

Systematic visual walkthrough of every page in the app. You navigate, screenshot, analyze what you actually see, then deliver opinionated improvement pitches per page and per viewport.

This is NOT a formal test run. It is a design and UX audit through a real browser.

Quick Check vs Full Audit

Quick Check — a focused visual question about one page or element. Use when: "does the button look right", "is this centered", "check if the header renders on mobile". Still produces a UIReview artifact — it's just scoped to what was asked.

Full Audit — systematic walkthrough of every page at desktop + tablet + mobile. Use when: "review the UI", "walk through the app", "UX audit", "give me UI feedback".

The skill auto-detects which mode based on the scope of the request. In both cases, screenshots go into a UIReview artifact — nothing is a "one-off that doesn't get recorded".

When to Use This Skill

  • "Does this button look right?" / "Is this layout broken?"
  • "Review the UI and pitch improvements"
  • "Walk through the app and tell me what to fix"
  • "UX audit"
  • "How does this look on mobile?"
  • Any visual question — quick or thorough

NOT for:

  • Creating automated tests (use /tdd)
  • Finding functional bugs (use /helpmetest)
  • Debugging a specific broken test (use /fix-tests)

Quick Check Mode

If the request is focused (one page, one element, one question):

  1. Navigate and screenshot the relevant state
  2. Describe exactly what you see — specific elements, what's right, what's wrong
  3. If needed, check responsive states (mobile/desktop) or interaction states (hover, open)
  4. Create a UIReview artifact even for a quick check — scoped to the question:

- pages: just the pages you looked at - actions: any fixes found, ranked - If nothing is wrong: actions: [] is valid

Then stop. Don't launch a full audit unless the user asks for one.


Phase 0: Orient Before You Act

Always do this first. Never skip.

helpmetest_status()
how_to({ type: "authentication_state_management" })

Check:

  1. What auth states are saved? (e.g. "Admin", "Helpmetest")
  2. When was the state last used? Is it stale?

Stale State Protocol

A saved state goes stale if the session expired or if Save As was never run against the live app. Signs of stale state: 302 redirects to login, landing on /login after As <Name>, empty/broken UI.

If stale → refresh it first:

  • Find the maintaining test (usually named "Setup Auth " or similar)
  • Run it: helpmetest_run_test({id: "<test-id>"})
  • It performs login and calls Save As <Name> — now the state is fresh
  • Only proceed to the walkthrough after that test passes

Domain Lock

Auth cookies are scoped to a domain. Once you authenticate on app.example.com, stay on that domain for the entire session. Never navigate to a different domain (e.g. prod vs staging) mid-session — it will destroy the auth state silently.


Phase 1: Discover the Pages

If you don't already know all pages/tabs in the app:

As  <StateName>
Go To  <base-url>

Look at the screenshot. Identify:

  • Top-level navigation items (tabs, sidebar links)
  • Any visible sub-pages or drawers
  • The URL structure

List all pages you will visit. This becomes your review checklist.


⚠️ Screenshots: Use What You Already Have

NEVER invent an alternative screenshot method. Do NOT use playwright, puppeteer, Python scripts, curl, or any other tool to capture screenshots.

run_interactive_command with screenshot: true returns the screenshot as an image directly in the response. That image IS the screenshot. Use it.

To upload a screenshot to storage, pass the base64 from the image response directly to helpmetest_upload:

helpmetest_upload({ base64: <base64 from screenshot response>, filename: "page-name-desktop.png" })

The base64 is in the image content block returned by run_interactive_command. Use it immediately — do not re-capture, do not write code, do not use external tools.


Phase 2: Desktop Walkthrough (1440x900)

For each page in your checklist:

As  <StateName>
Set Viewport Size  1440  900
Go To  <page-url>

What to observe per screenshot:

  • Layout: Is the page using space well? Blank areas? Dense areas?
  • Hierarchy: Does the most important thing dominate visually?
  • Navigation: Is it clear where you are? Are active states visible?
  • Actions: Are the primary actions obvious? Are secondary actions buried?
  • Data density: Too much? Too little? Is it scannable?
  • Typography: Readable at a glance? Inconsistent sizing?
  • Empty states: What happens when there's no data?
  • Loading states: Are they informative or just spinners?
  • Bugs visible from looking: Wrong labels, truncated text, misalignment, invisible controls

Scroll if the page is long:

Scroll By  0  800

Interact to see more states:

# Open a dropdown, expand a row, hover a button — whatever reveals more UI
Click  <selector>
Hover  <selector>

Phase 3: Mobile Walkthrough (375x667)

Repeat for every page at iPhone SE viewport:

Set Viewport Size  375  667
Go To  <page-url>

Mobile-specific things to check:

  • Does the layout collapse correctly? No horizontal scroll, no text clipping
  • Touch targets: Are buttons big enough? (min 44x44px recommended)
  • Navigation: Is the nav accessible? Hidden behind hamburger? Visible at all?
  • Tables/grids: Do they reflow? Or do they overflow off-screen?
  • Text: Does it resize? Is anything too small to read?
  • Modals/popups: Do they fit the viewport? Can you scroll inside them?
  • Forms: Are inputs full-width? Keyboard-friendly?

Phase 4: Tablet Walkthrough (768x1024)

Repeat for every page at iPad viewport:

Set Viewport Size  768  1024
Go To  <page-url>

Tablet-specific things to check:

  • Breakpoint fallback: Does it inherit desktop or mobile layout? Is it the right choice?
  • Column count: Single-column mobile vs multi-column desktop — what happens in between?
  • Navigation: Hamburger or full nav? Right call for this width?
  • Data tables: Readable? Or horizontally scrolling?
  • Cards/grids: Good column count or oddly sparse?

Phase 5: Create the UIReview Artifact

After all screenshots, create a UIReview artifact using helpmetest_upsert_artifact.

Artifact structure:

{
  "type": "UIReview",
  "name": "<App Name> — UI Review",
  "description": "UI walkthrough of <App Name> at <date>",
  "app_name": "<App Name>",
  "base_url": "<base URL>",
  "reviewed_at": "<ISO date>",
  "pages": [
    {
      "name": "Home",
      "url": "https://...",
      "what_i_saw": "2-4 sentences: what you observed. Name specific elements. Mention what's good too.",
      "screenshots": [
        { "viewport": "desktop", "width": 1440, "height": 900, "url": "<uploaded screenshot URL>" },
        { "viewport": "mobile",  "width": 375,  "height": 667, "url": "<uploaded screenshot URL>" },
        { "viewport": "tablet",  "width": 768,  "height": 1024, "url": "<uploaded screenshot URL>" }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "actions": [
    {
      "rank": 1,
      "page": "Home",
      "title": "Fix nav active state visibility",
      "description": "The active nav item renders at 30% opacity. Users can't tell where they are. Make it solid with a distinct background or underline.",
      "priority": "high",
      "status": "pending"
    },
    {
      "rank": 2,
      "page": "Settings",
      "title": "Move Save button above the fold on mobile",
      "description": "On 375px the Save button is offscreen. Sticky footer or move to top of form.",
      "priority": "high",
      "status": "pending"
    }
  ]
}

Rules for actions:

  • One flat list across all pages — do NOT write separate per-page issues, pitches, or a priority_stack
  • rank = global priority order (1 = most impactful across the entire app)
  • title = short, actionable ("Fix X", "Add Y", "Remove Z") — not a description
  • description = what to change + why + expected impact — enough to act on without needing context
  • priority = "high" | "medium" | "low"
  • status = "pending" (always start as pending)

Interaction Patterns

Use these to reveal more UI states during the walkthrough:

# Check hover states
Hover  <selector>

# Open dropdowns, menus, modals
Click  <selector>

# Fill in a search to see filtered states
Fill Text  input[type="search"]  test

# Scroll to bottom to check footer / infinite scroll
Scroll By  0  9999

# Check empty state by navigating to a page with no data
Go To  <empty-page-url>

# Check loading state (if possible)
# Navigate to a slow page and screenshot immediately
Go To  <url>

Guidelines

Ground everything in screenshots. Do not describe what you think the page looks like from reading the code. Navigate, take the screenshot, describe what is actually rendered.

Be specific and opinionated.

  • Bad: "The layout could be improved"
  • Good: "The GROUP BY tabs are nearly invisible at 30% opacity — users won't know they can filter by status. Make them solid with a clear active indicator."

Name the element. Always say which button, which column, which tab, which card. "The button" is useless. "The 'Run Test' button in the test card's bottom-right corner" is actionable.

Cover the full picture.

  • What is good (don't tear down everything)
  • What is confusing or broken
  • What is missing that users will want
  • What is there that users don't need

Separate viewport feedback. Desktop feedback!= mobile feedback. A layout can be great on desktop and terrible on mobile. Call both out separately.

Respect existing conventions. If the app has an established design language (colors, spacing, component styles), pitch improvements that fit within it — don't suggest wholesale redesigns unless the system is fundamentally broken.


Example Session Skeleton

# Phase 0: Orient
# → checked auth states, found "Helpmetest" state, ran Setup Auth test to refresh it

# Phase 1: Discover pages
As  Helpmetest
Set Viewport Size  1440  900
Go To  https://app.example.com
# → screenshot shows: Dashboard, Tests, Updates, Artifacts, Settings tabs

# Phase 2: Desktop
Go To  https://app.example.com/dashboard
# screenshot + notes

Go To  https://app.example.com/tests
# screenshot + notes

Go To  https://app.example.com/updates
# screenshot + notes

Go To  https://app.example.com/artifacts
# screenshot + notes

Go To  https://app.example.com/settings
# screenshot + notes

# Phase 3: Mobile
Set Viewport Size  375  667
Go To  https://app.example.com/dashboard
# screenshot + notes

# ... repeat for all pages ...

# Phase 4: Tablet
Set Viewport Size  768  1024
Go To  https://app.example.com/dashboard
# screenshot + notes

# ... repeat for all pages ...

# Phase 5: Write the pitch

Phase 6: Fix Loop (when the user asks you to fix an action)

When the user picks an action and says "fix this" or "can you fix #N":

  1. Fix the code — make the change in the source file
  2. Verify live — take a new screenshot at the relevant viewport to confirm it looks right
  3. Upload the new screenshot — helpmetest_upload({file_path: "<path>"})
  4. Update the artifact — two partial updates: Where <N> is the action index (0-based), <P> is the page index, <V> is the screenshot index for the viewport that changed.

- Mark the action done: helpmetest_upsert_artifact({id, content: {"actions.<N>.status": "done"}}) - Replace the screenshot: helpmetest_upsert_artifact({id, content: {"pages.<P>.screenshots.<V>.url": "<new-url>"}})

Never mark an action done without a new screenshot proving it works.

Screenshot index reference:

  • pages.<P>.screenshots.0 = desktop
  • pages.<P>.screenshots.1 = mobile
  • pages.<P>.screenshots.2 = tablet

Checklist Before Creating the Artifact

  • Visited every page at desktop (1440x900)
  • Visited every page at mobile (375x667)
  • Visited every page at tablet (768x1024)
  • Scrolled long pages at each viewport
  • Triggered at least one interactive state per page (hover, click, expand)
  • Every what_i_saw references what was seen in a screenshot, not guessed from code
  • actions is a single flat list — no separate issues/pitches/priority_stack
  • Every action has rank, page, title, description, priority, status
  • title is short and actionable ("Fix X", "Add Y")
  • description has enough context to act on without reading anything else

Checklist After Fixing an Action

  • Code change made in source file
  • New screenshot taken at the affected viewport showing the fix
  • New screenshot uploaded via helpmetest_upload
  • Action status updated to "done" via partial artifact update
  • Screenshot URL in artifact updated to the new post-fix screenshot

平台分布

Codex

32.86%
按下载量换算39

Claude

31.48%
按下载量换算37

Cursor

18.94%
按下载量换算22

Gemini CLI

8.58%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills