Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ai-governance(AI 治理)

ai-governance 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ai-governance 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 13,330。

总安装 9,476周安装 329GitHub Stars 6下载 2,731核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ai-governance(AI 治理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/hack23/homepage
仓库路径:skills/ai-governance
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/hack23/homepage --skill 'AI Governance'
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/hack23/homepage --skill 'AI Governance'

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

AI 治理技能用于处理 GitHub 协作信息与代码变更跟踪,支持多宿主环境集成。适用于围绕仓库状态、Issue 管理和 Pull Request 流程的信息整理任务。通过 npx skills add 命令安装,需结合原始 README 了解具体交互方式。

使用前应确认 token 权限和操作边界,避免对私有仓库造成意外影响。建议在实际使用中验证输出准确性,确保不传播未经验证的信息。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ai-governance

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/hack23/homepage --skill 'AI Governance';命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ai-governance 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/hack23/homepage --skill 'AI Governance'。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ai-governance 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ai-governance 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

ai-governance 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ai-governance 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 9,476 次,近一周安装 329 次,下载 2,731 次,GitHub 6 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ai-governance 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ai-governance

AI 治理 · 本页

9,4766需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

🤖 AI Governance Skill

🎯 Purpose

Enforce comprehensive AI risk management and EU AI Act compliance, based on AI Policy.

Key Principle: *"AI systems require systematic risk management and human oversight."*

📚 Scope

  • 🤖 AI System Classification (EU AI Act risk levels)
  • 🛡️ LLM Usage Governance (GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT)
  • 👁️ Human Oversight Requirements
  • ⚖️ Bias and Fairness Controls
  • 📊 AI Risk Assessment
  • 🔍 Transparency and Explainability

⚙️ Security Rules

MUST Requirements

ai_system_classification:
  unacceptable_risk:
    prohibited_systems:
      - social_scoring: government_or_private_social_credit
      - real_time_biometric: public_space_surveillance_without_warrant
      - subliminal_manipulation: ai_that_manipulates_behavior
      - exploit_vulnerabilities: ai_targeting_vulnerable_groups
    action: never_develop_deploy_or_use

  high_risk_systems:
    examples:
      - recruitment_ai: candidate_screening_or_selection
      - credit_scoring: loan_approval_algorithms
      - law_enforcement: predictive_policing_tools
    requirements:
      - risk_assessment: comprehensive_before_deployment
      - data_quality: high_quality_representative_datasets
      - documentation: technical_docs_and_user_manuals
      - human_oversight: meaningful_human_review_required
      - transparency: users_informed_of_ai_involvement
      - conformity_assessment: third_party_audit_required

  limited_risk_systems:
    examples:
      - chatbots: customer_service_bots
      - deepfakes: synthetic_media_generation
    requirements:
      - transparency_obligations: users_informed_interacting_with_ai
      - disclosure: ai_generated_content_labeled

  minimal_risk_systems:
    examples:
      - spam_filters: email_filtering
      - ai_video_games: entertainment_applications
      - github_copilot: code_completion_assistance
    requirements:
      - voluntary_codes: follow_best_practices
      - basic_transparency: disclose_ai_use_in_documentation

llm_usage_governance:
  github_copilot:
    approved_use:
      - code_completion: autocomplete_and_suggestions
      - documentation: generating_code_comments
      - test_generation: creating_unit_test_scaffolding

    security_controls:
      - code_review: all_ai_generated_code_manually_reviewed
      - secret_scanning: automated_pre_commit_hooks
      - license_compliance: verify_suggested_code_licenses
      - no_sensitive_data: never_input_customer_or_confidential_data

    prohibited_use:
      - production_secrets: entering_api_keys_or_passwords
      - customer_data: inputting_personal_or_business_data
      - unreviewed_deployment: deploying_ai_code_without_review

  chatgpt_claude:
    approved_use:
      - research: general_information_gathering
      - brainstorming: idea_generation_and_planning
      - documentation: writing_assistance_for_public_docs

    prohibited_use:
      - confidential_data: client_information_or_trade_secrets
      - source_code: proprietary_code_or_algorithms
      - personal_data: customer_or_employee_information

human_oversight:
  ai_decisions:
    code_generation:
      - review_required: all_copilot_suggestions_reviewed
      - testing: ai_code_must_pass_automated_tests
      - security_scan: sast_sca_checks_mandatory

    business_decisions:
      - ai_as_advisor: ai_provides_recommendations_only
      - human_final_decision: ceo_makes_final_call
      - documentation: record_ai_input_and_human_decision

MUST NOT Prohibitions

prohibited_ai_practices:
  - unclassified_systems: deploying_ai_without_risk_assessment
  - no_human_oversight: fully_automated_critical_decisions
  - biased_training_data: using_unrepresentative_datasets
  - black_box_systems: unexplainable_ai_for_high_risk_decisions
  - sensitive_data_training: training_ai_on_personal_data_without_consent
  - bypassing_controls: using_personal_ai_for_business_without_approval

💡 Examples

Example 1: GitHub Copilot Secure Usage

copilot_workflow:
  development:
    enable_copilot: vscode_github_copilot_extension
    use_suggestions:
      - code_completion: accept_for_boilerplate_code
      - function_generation: review_logic_before_accepting
      - test_scaffolding: verify_test_coverage_and_assertions

  security_checks:
    pre_commit:
      - secret_scanning: gitleaks_pre_commit_hook
      - code_review: manual_review_of_ai_suggestions
      - license_check: verify_no_copyleft_violations

    ci_cd_pipeline:
      - sast: sonarcloud_static_analysis
      - sca: dependabot_vulnerability_scanning
      - test_coverage: minimum_80_percent_coverage

  prohibited_inputs:
    never_type:
      - api_keys: aws_access_keys_database_passwords
      - customer_data: email_addresses_names_personal_info
      - proprietary_algorithms: trade_secret_business_logic
      - production_configs: database_connection_strings

  documentation:
    - attribution: note_ai_assisted_code_in_comments
    - review_notes: document_manual_changes_to_ai_suggestions
    - lessons_learned: track_copilot_false_positives_for_training

Example 2: AI Risk Assessment Process

ai_risk_assessment:
  system_identification:
    name: recruitment_candidate_screening_tool
    classification: HIGH_RISK_per_eu_ai_act
    trigger: involves_employment_decisions

  risk_analysis:
    potential_harms:
      - discrimination: algorithm_may_have_gender_or_age_bias
      - privacy: processes_personal_data_from_resumes
      - transparency: candidates_unaware_of_ai_involvement

    likelihood: MEDIUM
    impact: HIGH
    overall_risk: HIGH

  risk_mitigation:
    technical_measures:
      - bias_testing: fairness_metrics_on_diverse_test_set
      - explainability: shap_or_lime_for_decision_explanations
      - data_quality: representative_training_dataset

    organizational_measures:
      - human_review: recruiter_reviews_all_ai_recommendations
      - transparency: candidates_informed_of_ai_use
      - appeal_process: candidates_can_request_human_review
      - audit: annual_third_party_fairness_audit

  compliance_obligations:
    eu_ai_act:
      - risk_management_system: implemented_and_documented
      - data_governance: high_quality_training_data_verified
      - technical_documentation: available_for_authorities
      - conformity_assessment: third_party_audit_planned

    gdpr:
      - lawful_basis: legitimate_interest_assessment
      - data_minimization: only_relevant_resume_data_processed
      - automated_decision: human_review_prevents_art_22_violation

  approval:
    decision: APPROVED_WITH_CONDITIONS
    approver: CEO
    date: 2026_02_10
    review_date: 2026_08_10_semi_annual
    conditions:
      - quarterly_bias_testing
      - monthly_human_override_rate_monitoring
      - annual_external_audit

Example 3: Prohibited AI Use (Corrected)

❌ Non-Compliant:

incorrect_chatgpt_use:
  prompt: "Review this customer database schema and suggest optimizations"
  attached: production_database_dump_with_customer_emails
  risk: exposing_personal_data_to_third_party_ai

✅ Corrected:

compliant_chatgpt_use:
  data_anonymization:
    - remove_personal_data: replace_emails_with_placeholders
    - sanitize_schema: generic_field_names_only
    - sample_data: synthetic_test_data_not_production

  prompt: "Review this anonymized schema and suggest optimizations"
  attached: sanitized_schema_with_no_real_data

  verification:
    - no_personal_data: verified_before_submission
    - no_secrets: no_connection_strings_or_credentials
    - documented: ai_consultation_logged_in_project_notes

🔗 Integration

Policies: AI Policy, Information Security

Skills: owasp-llm-security, data-classification, privacy-policy

Frameworks: EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001 (draft)

📋 Document Control

  • Version: 1.0 | Updated: 2026-02-10
  • License: Apache-2.0
  • Classification: ![Public](https://github.com/Hack23/ISMS-PUBLIC/blob/main/CLASSIFICATION.md)

平台分布

Codex

36.48%
按下载量换算996

Claude

31.05%
按下载量换算848

Cursor

19.39%
按下载量换算530

Gemini CLI

9.71%
按下载量换算265

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills