Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

crm-hygieneCRM hygiene 搜索

Agent Skill

crm-hygiene 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

2,305

周安装

98

GitHub Stars

85

下载量

808
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:crm-hygiene(CRM hygiene 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
仓库路径:skills/crm-hygiene
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill crm-hygiene
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill crm-hygiene

简介

crm-hygiene 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。
  • 建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法和功能边界。

SKILL.md

CRM Hygiene

Systematically identify and resolve data quality issues in your CRM to improve forecast accuracy, reporting, and automation reliability.

When to Use This Skill

  • Quarterly CRM audits
  • Before major reporting periods
  • When automation workflows fail
  • After team changes or migrations
  • Preparing for CRM integrations

Methodology Foundation

Based on Salesforce Data Quality Best Practices and RevOps Co-op Data Governance frameworks, focusing on:

  • Completeness (required fields populated)
  • Consistency (standardized values)
  • Accuracy (correct and current data)
  • Timeliness (recent updates)

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude DoesYou Decide
Defines audit criteriaWhich fields are required
Identifies data issuesPriority of fixes
Categorizes problems by typeWho owns cleanup tasks
Suggests remediation stepsAutomation vs manual fix
Creates cleanup reportsEnforcement policies

What This Skill Does

  1. Audit design - Define required fields and validation rules
  2. Issue identification - Find missing, inconsistent, duplicate data
  3. Prioritization - Rank issues by business impact
  4. Remediation planning - Action steps to fix issues
  5. Governance recommendations - Prevent future issues

How to Use

For Audit Design:

Help me create a CRM hygiene audit for [CRM System].

Key objects to audit:
- [Leads, Contacts, Accounts, Opportunities]

Critical fields for each:
- Leads: [list required fields]
- Opportunities: [list required fields]

Our main issues:
- [Describe known problems]

For Data Audit:

Audit this opportunity data for hygiene issues:

[Paste export or describe data]

Required fields:
- [List fields that must be populated]

Validation rules:
- [List rules like "Stage must match Amount > $0"]

Instructions

Step 1: Define Audit Scope

Object Priority (typical):

  1. Opportunities - Revenue impact
  2. Accounts - Relationship foundation
  3. Contacts - Communication accuracy
  4. Leads - Pipeline source

Field Categories:

  • Critical - Blocks processes if missing
  • Important - Affects reporting/segmentation
  • Nice-to-Have - Enriches but not required

Step 2: Completeness Audit

Check required fields by object:

Opportunities:

FieldCriticalityWhy Required
AmountCriticalForecast, pipeline value
Close DateCriticalForecast timing
StageCriticalPipeline reporting
OwnerCriticalAccountability
AccountCriticalCompany linkage
Primary ContactImportantCommunication
Next StepImportantDeal momentum
CompetitorImportantWin/loss analysis
Loss ReasonCritical (if lost)Improvement insights

Accounts:

FieldCriticalityWhy Required
IndustryImportantSegmentation
Employee CountImportantICP fit
WebsiteImportantResearch, enrichment
Billing AddressCriticalInvoicing
Account OwnerCriticalAccountability

Step 3: Consistency Audit

Check for standardization issues:

Issue TypeExampleImpact
Picklist variations"US" vs "USA" vs "United States"Reporting breaks
Case inconsistency"ACME" vs "Acme" vs "acme"Duplicates
Format variations"(555) 123-4567" vs "5551234567"Automation fails
Null vs blankNULL vs "" vs "N/A"Filters don't work

Step 4: Accuracy Audit

Identify likely incorrect data:

CheckCriteriaAction
Stale close datesPast date, still openUpdate or close
Amount mismatches$0 in late stageVerify pricing
Stage regressionStage 4 → Stage 2Investigate
Impossible values200% probabilityFix validation
Bounced emailsMarked invalidRemove or update

Step 5: Duplicate Detection

Find potential duplicates:

Match TypeCriteriaConfidence
Exact emailSame email address99% duplicate
Domain matchSame company domain80% duplicate
Fuzzy nameSimilar company nameInvestigate
Phone matchSame phone number90% duplicate

Step 6: Timeliness Audit

Flag stale records:

ObjectStaleness ThresholdAction
Open OpportunityNo activity 30 daysReview with rep
LeadNo touch 14 daysReassign or nurture
AccountNo contact 90 daysRe-engagement
ContactBounced + 30 daysArchive

Examples

Example 1: Opportunity Audit

Input:

Audit these opportunities:

1. Acme Corp - Stage: Proposal, Amount: $0, Close: Jan 15 (past), Owner: Empty
2. Beta Inc - Stage: Closed Won, Amount: $50K, Close: Feb 1, Loss Reason: "Price"
3. Gamma LLC - Stage: Discovery, Amount: $100K, Close: Mar 30, No activity 45 days
4. Delta Co - Stage: Negotiation, Amount: $75K, Close: Feb 28, Next Step: Empty
5. Echo Systems - Stage: Closed Lost, Amount: $200K, Loss Reason: Empty

Output:

## CRM Hygiene Audit: Opportunities

### Summary
- **Total Records**: 5
- **Critical Issues**: 4
- **Warnings**: 2
- **Clean Records**: 0

### Critical Issues (Fix Immediately)

#### 1. Acme Corp - 3 Critical Issues
| Issue | Field | Current | Required |
|-------|-------|---------|----------|
| 🔴 Missing | Owner | Empty | Assigned rep |
| 🔴 Missing | Amount | $0 | Deal value |
| 🔴 Stale | Close Date | Jan 15 (past) | Future date |

**Action**: Assign owner, verify if deal is active, update amount and close date.

#### 2. Beta Inc - Logic Error
| Issue | Field | Current | Problem |
|-------|-------|---------|---------|
| 🔴 Inconsistent | Loss Reason | "Price" | Stage is "Closed Won" |

**Action**: Either change stage to Closed Lost, or clear Loss Reason.

#### 3. Echo Systems - Missing Required
| Issue | Field | Current | Required |
|-------|-------|---------|----------|
| 🔴 Missing | Loss Reason | Empty | Required for Closed Lost |

**Action**: Rep must document why deal was lost.

#### 4. Delta Co - Missing Next Step
| Issue | Field | Current | Impact |
|-------|-------|---------|--------|
| 🟠 Missing | Next Step | Empty | No clear action |

**Action**: Rep should define next step for Negotiation stage.

### Warnings (Review This Week)

#### 5. Gamma LLC - Stale Deal
| Issue | Indicator | Value |
|-------|-----------|-------|
| 🟡 Stale | Last Activity | 45 days ago |

**Action**: Review with rep - is this deal still active? If yes, update. If no, close lost.

### Hygiene Score: 20/100 (Poor)

### Recommended Actions by Priority

1. **Today**: Fix Acme Corp (no owner = orphaned deal)
2. **Today**: Fix Beta Inc logic error (affects win rate)
3. **This Week**: Get Echo Systems loss reason
4. **This Week**: Update Gamma LLC status
5. **This Week**: Add Delta Co next step

### Process Recommendations
- Add validation rule: Amount required when Stage > Discovery
- Add validation rule: Owner required on all opportunities
- Add validation rule: Loss Reason required when Closed Lost
- Create stale deal report (no activity 30+ days)

Example 2: Duplicate Detection

Input:

Check these accounts for duplicates:

1. Acme Corporation, acme.com, San Francisco
2. ACME Corp, acme.com, SF
3. Acme Inc, acme-inc.com, San Francisco
4. Beta Technologies, beta.io, New York
5. Beta Tech, betatech.com, NYC
6. Beta Technologies Inc, beta.io, New York

Output:

## Duplicate Detection Report

### High Confidence Duplicates (Merge)

#### Duplicate Set 1: Acme Corporation
| Record | Name | Domain | Location | Confidence |
|--------|------|--------|----------|------------|
| #1 | Acme Corporation | acme.com | San Francisco | Master |
| #2 | ACME Corp | acme.com | SF | 99% - Same domain |

**Recommendation**: Merge #2 into #1
- Same domain (acme.com)
- Same location (SF = San Francisco)
- Name variation only (Corp vs Corporation)

#### Duplicate Set 2: Beta Technologies
| Record | Name | Domain | Location | Confidence |
|--------|------|--------|----------|------------|
| #4 | Beta Technologies | beta.io | New York | Master |
| #6 | Beta Technologies Inc | beta.io | New York | 99% - Same domain |

**Recommendation**: Merge #6 into #4
- Same domain (beta.io)
- Same location (New York)
- Name variation only (Inc suffix)

### Investigate (Possible Duplicates)

#### Possible Set 1: Acme variations
| Record | Name | Domain | Location | Confidence |
|--------|------|--------|----------|------------|
| #1 | Acme Corporation | acme.com | San Francisco | - |
| #3 | Acme Inc | acme-inc.com | San Francisco | 40% |

**Recommendation**: Investigate manually
- Same location, similar name
- BUT different domains (acme.com vs acme-inc.com)
- Could be: subsidiary, different company, or typo

#### Possible Set 2: Beta variations
| Record | Name | Domain | Location | Confidence |
|--------|------|--------|----------|------------|
| #4 | Beta Technologies | beta.io | New York | - |
| #5 | Beta Tech | betatech.com | NYC | 50% |

**Recommendation**: Investigate manually
- Same location (NYC = New York)
- Similar names (Beta Tech vs Beta Technologies)
- Different domains - likely different companies

### Summary
- **Definite Duplicates**: 2 sets (4 records → 2)
- **Possible Duplicates**: 2 sets (need research)
- **Unique Records**: Pending investigation

### Merge Checklist
Before merging, verify:
- [ ] All opportunities moved to master record
- [ ] All contacts linked to master
- [ ] Activity history preserved
- [ ] Custom fields compared
- [ ] Integration IDs noted (for external systems)

Skill Boundaries

What This Skill Does Well

  • Defining audit criteria systematically
  • Identifying common data quality issues
  • Prioritizing fixes by business impact
  • Creating actionable remediation plans

What This Skill Cannot Do

  • Access your actual CRM data
  • Execute cleanup automatically
  • Know your specific business rules
  • Detect all semantic errors

When to Escalate to Human

  • Merge decisions (data loss risk)
  • Business rule definitions
  • Enforcement policy decisions
  • Cross-object relationship issues

Iteration Guide

Follow-up Prompts

  • "Create a monthly hygiene report template."
  • "What validation rules would prevent these issues?"
  • "Prioritize the top 10 issues by revenue impact."
  • "Design a data entry form that enforces these rules."

Continuous Improvement Cycle

  1. Audit → Identify issues
  2. Fix → Clean data
  3. Prevent → Add validation rules
  4. Monitor → Track hygiene score weekly
  5. Iterate → Refine rules quarterly

Checklists & Templates

Weekly Hygiene Report Template

## CRM Hygiene Report - Week of [Date]

### Hygiene Score: X/100

### Critical Issues (Fix Today)
| Object | Record | Issue | Owner |
|--------|--------|-------|-------|

### Warnings (Fix This Week)
| Object | Count | Issue Type |
|--------|-------|------------|

### Trends
- Issues closed this week: X
- New issues this week: X
- Net change: +/- X

### Action Items
1.
2.
3.

Data Governance Checklist

  • Required fields defined per object
  • Validation rules implemented
  • Duplicate rules active
  • Stale record reports scheduled
  • Ownership assignments current
  • Integration mappings documented

References

  • Salesforce Data Quality Best Practices
  • RevOps Co-op Data Governance Framework
  • Marketo Database Health Guide
  • Gartner Data Quality Market Guide

Related Skills

  • pipeline-forecasting - Clean data improves forecasts
  • lead-scoring - Requires complete lead data
  • deal-risk-scoring - Depends on activity data

Skill Metadata

  • Domain: RevOps
  • Complexity: Intermediate
  • Mode: centaur
  • Time to Value: 30-60 min for audit, varies for cleanup
  • Prerequisites: CRM data export, field requirements list

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.13%
按下载量换算276

Claude

31.82%
按下载量换算257

Cursor

19.63%
按下载量换算159

Gemini CLI

10.12%
按下载量换算82

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills