Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

crm-hygiene(CRM hygiene 搜索)

crm-hygiene 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

crm-hygiene 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 33,756。

总安装 2,305周安装 98GitHub Stars 85下载 808核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:crm-hygiene(CRM hygiene 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
仓库路径:skills/crm-hygiene
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill crm-hygiene
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill crm-hygiene

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

crm-hygiene 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。

建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法和功能边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/crm-hygiene

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill crm-hygien…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

crm-hygiene 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill crm-hygiene。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

crm-hygiene 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

crm-hygiene 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

crm-hygiene 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

crm-hygiene 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,305 次,近一周安装 98 次,下载 808 次,GitHub 85 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

crm-hygiene 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
crm-hygiene

CRM hygiene 搜索 · 本页

2,30585只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

CRM Hygiene

Systematically identify and resolve data quality issues in your CRM to improve forecast accuracy, reporting, and automation reliability.

When to Use This Skill

  • Quarterly CRM audits
  • Before major reporting periods
  • When automation workflows fail
  • After team changes or migrations
  • Preparing for CRM integrations

Methodology Foundation

Based on Salesforce Data Quality Best Practices and RevOps Co-op Data Governance frameworks, focusing on:

  • Completeness (required fields populated)
  • Consistency (standardized values)
  • Accuracy (correct and current data)
  • Timeliness (recent updates)

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude DoesYou Decide
Defines audit criteriaWhich fields are required
Identifies data issuesPriority of fixes
Categorizes problems by typeWho owns cleanup tasks
Suggests remediation stepsAutomation vs manual fix
Creates cleanup reportsEnforcement policies

What This Skill Does

  1. Audit design - Define required fields and validation rules
  2. Issue identification - Find missing, inconsistent, duplicate data
  3. Prioritization - Rank issues by business impact
  4. Remediation planning - Action steps to fix issues
  5. Governance recommendations - Prevent future issues

How to Use

For Audit Design:

Help me create a CRM hygiene audit for [CRM System].

Key objects to audit:
- [Leads, Contacts, Accounts, Opportunities]

Critical fields for each:
- Leads: [list required fields]
- Opportunities: [list required fields]

Our main issues:
- [Describe known problems]

For Data Audit:

Audit this opportunity data for hygiene issues:

[Paste export or describe data]

Required fields:
- [List fields that must be populated]

Validation rules:
- [List rules like "Stage must match Amount > $0"]

Instructions

Step 1: Define Audit Scope

Object Priority (typical):

  1. Opportunities - Revenue impact
  2. Accounts - Relationship foundation
  3. Contacts - Communication accuracy
  4. Leads - Pipeline source

Field Categories:

  • Critical - Blocks processes if missing
  • Important - Affects reporting/segmentation
  • Nice-to-Have - Enriches but not required

Step 2: Completeness Audit

Check required fields by object:

Opportunities:

FieldCriticalityWhy Required
AmountCriticalForecast, pipeline value
Close DateCriticalForecast timing
StageCriticalPipeline reporting
OwnerCriticalAccountability
AccountCriticalCompany linkage
Primary ContactImportantCommunication
Next StepImportantDeal momentum
CompetitorImportantWin/loss analysis
Loss ReasonCritical (if lost)Improvement insights

Accounts:

FieldCriticalityWhy Required
IndustryImportantSegmentation
Employee CountImportantICP fit
WebsiteImportantResearch, enrichment
Billing AddressCriticalInvoicing
Account OwnerCriticalAccountability

Step 3: Consistency Audit

Check for standardization issues:

Issue TypeExampleImpact
Picklist variations"US" vs "USA" vs "United States"Reporting breaks
Case inconsistency"ACME" vs "Acme" vs "acme"Duplicates
Format variations"(555) 123-4567" vs "5551234567"Automation fails
Null vs blankNULL vs "" vs "N/A"Filters don't work

Step 4: Accuracy Audit

Identify likely incorrect data:

CheckCriteriaAction
Stale close datesPast date, still openUpdate or close
Amount mismatches$0 in late stageVerify pricing
Stage regressionStage 4 → Stage 2Investigate
Impossible values200% probabilityFix validation
Bounced emailsMarked invalidRemove or update

Step 5: Duplicate Detection

Find potential duplicates:

Match TypeCriteriaConfidence
Exact emailSame email address99% duplicate
Domain matchSame company domain80% duplicate
Fuzzy nameSimilar company nameInvestigate
Phone matchSame phone number90% duplicate

Step 6: Timeliness Audit

Flag stale records:

ObjectStaleness ThresholdAction
Open OpportunityNo activity 30 daysReview with rep
LeadNo touch 14 daysReassign or nurture
AccountNo contact 90 daysRe-engagement
ContactBounced + 30 daysArchive

Examples

Example 1: Opportunity Audit

Input:

Audit these opportunities:

1. Acme Corp - Stage: Proposal, Amount: $0, Close: Jan 15 (past), Owner: Empty
2. Beta Inc - Stage: Closed Won, Amount: $50K, Close: Feb 1, Loss Reason: "Price"
3. Gamma LLC - Stage: Discovery, Amount: $100K, Close: Mar 30, No activity 45 days
4. Delta Co - Stage: Negotiation, Amount: $75K, Close: Feb 28, Next Step: Empty
5. Echo Systems - Stage: Closed Lost, Amount: $200K, Loss Reason: Empty

Output:

## CRM Hygiene Audit: Opportunities

### Summary
- **Total Records**: 5
- **Critical Issues**: 4
- **Warnings**: 2
- **Clean Records**: 0

### Critical Issues (Fix Immediately)

#### 1. Acme Corp - 3 Critical Issues
| Issue | Field | Current | Required |
|-------|-------|---------|----------|
| 🔴 Missing | Owner | Empty | Assigned rep |
| 🔴 Missing | Amount | $0 | Deal value |
| 🔴 Stale | Close Date | Jan 15 (past) | Future date |

**Action**: Assign owner, verify if deal is active, update amount and close date.

#### 2. Beta Inc - Logic Error
| Issue | Field | Current | Problem |
|-------|-------|---------|---------|
| 🔴 Inconsistent | Loss Reason | "Price" | Stage is "Closed Won" |

**Action**: Either change stage to Closed Lost, or clear Loss Reason.

#### 3. Echo Systems - Missing Required
| Issue | Field | Current | Required |
|-------|-------|---------|----------|
| 🔴 Missing | Loss Reason | Empty | Required for Closed Lost |

**Action**: Rep must document why deal was lost.

#### 4. Delta Co - Missing Next Step
| Issue | Field | Current | Impact |
|-------|-------|---------|--------|
| 🟠 Missing | Next Step | Empty | No clear action |

**Action**: Rep should define next step for Negotiation stage.

### Warnings (Review This Week)

#### 5. Gamma LLC - Stale Deal
| Issue | Indicator | Value |
|-------|-----------|-------|
| 🟡 Stale | Last Activity | 45 days ago |

**Action**: Review with rep - is this deal still active? If yes, update. If no, close lost.

### Hygiene Score: 20/100 (Poor)

### Recommended Actions by Priority

1. **Today**: Fix Acme Corp (no owner = orphaned deal)
2. **Today**: Fix Beta Inc logic error (affects win rate)
3. **This Week**: Get Echo Systems loss reason
4. **This Week**: Update Gamma LLC status
5. **This Week**: Add Delta Co next step

### Process Recommendations
- Add validation rule: Amount required when Stage > Discovery
- Add validation rule: Owner required on all opportunities
- Add validation rule: Loss Reason required when Closed Lost
- Create stale deal report (no activity 30+ days)

Example 2: Duplicate Detection

Input:

Check these accounts for duplicates:

1. Acme Corporation, acme.com, San Francisco
2. ACME Corp, acme.com, SF
3. Acme Inc, acme-inc.com, San Francisco
4. Beta Technologies, beta.io, New York
5. Beta Tech, betatech.com, NYC
6. Beta Technologies Inc, beta.io, New York

Output:

## Duplicate Detection Report

### High Confidence Duplicates (Merge)

#### Duplicate Set 1: Acme Corporation
| Record | Name | Domain | Location | Confidence |
|--------|------|--------|----------|------------|
| #1 | Acme Corporation | acme.com | San Francisco | Master |
| #2 | ACME Corp | acme.com | SF | 99% - Same domain |

**Recommendation**: Merge #2 into #1
- Same domain (acme.com)
- Same location (SF = San Francisco)
- Name variation only (Corp vs Corporation)

#### Duplicate Set 2: Beta Technologies
| Record | Name | Domain | Location | Confidence |
|--------|------|--------|----------|------------|
| #4 | Beta Technologies | beta.io | New York | Master |
| #6 | Beta Technologies Inc | beta.io | New York | 99% - Same domain |

**Recommendation**: Merge #6 into #4
- Same domain (beta.io)
- Same location (New York)
- Name variation only (Inc suffix)

### Investigate (Possible Duplicates)

#### Possible Set 1: Acme variations
| Record | Name | Domain | Location | Confidence |
|--------|------|--------|----------|------------|
| #1 | Acme Corporation | acme.com | San Francisco | - |
| #3 | Acme Inc | acme-inc.com | San Francisco | 40% |

**Recommendation**: Investigate manually
- Same location, similar name
- BUT different domains (acme.com vs acme-inc.com)
- Could be: subsidiary, different company, or typo

#### Possible Set 2: Beta variations
| Record | Name | Domain | Location | Confidence |
|--------|------|--------|----------|------------|
| #4 | Beta Technologies | beta.io | New York | - |
| #5 | Beta Tech | betatech.com | NYC | 50% |

**Recommendation**: Investigate manually
- Same location (NYC = New York)
- Similar names (Beta Tech vs Beta Technologies)
- Different domains - likely different companies

### Summary
- **Definite Duplicates**: 2 sets (4 records → 2)
- **Possible Duplicates**: 2 sets (need research)
- **Unique Records**: Pending investigation

### Merge Checklist
Before merging, verify:
- [ ] All opportunities moved to master record
- [ ] All contacts linked to master
- [ ] Activity history preserved
- [ ] Custom fields compared
- [ ] Integration IDs noted (for external systems)

Skill Boundaries

What This Skill Does Well

  • Defining audit criteria systematically
  • Identifying common data quality issues
  • Prioritizing fixes by business impact
  • Creating actionable remediation plans

What This Skill Cannot Do

  • Access your actual CRM data
  • Execute cleanup automatically
  • Know your specific business rules
  • Detect all semantic errors

When to Escalate to Human

  • Merge decisions (data loss risk)
  • Business rule definitions
  • Enforcement policy decisions
  • Cross-object relationship issues

Iteration Guide

Follow-up Prompts

  • "Create a monthly hygiene report template."
  • "What validation rules would prevent these issues?"
  • "Prioritize the top 10 issues by revenue impact."
  • "Design a data entry form that enforces these rules."

Continuous Improvement Cycle

  1. Audit → Identify issues
  2. Fix → Clean data
  3. Prevent → Add validation rules
  4. Monitor → Track hygiene score weekly
  5. Iterate → Refine rules quarterly

Checklists & Templates

Weekly Hygiene Report Template

## CRM Hygiene Report - Week of [Date]

### Hygiene Score: X/100

### Critical Issues (Fix Today)
| Object | Record | Issue | Owner |
|--------|--------|-------|-------|

### Warnings (Fix This Week)
| Object | Count | Issue Type |
|--------|-------|------------|

### Trends
- Issues closed this week: X
- New issues this week: X
- Net change: +/- X

### Action Items
1.
2.
3.

Data Governance Checklist

  • Required fields defined per object
  • Validation rules implemented
  • Duplicate rules active
  • Stale record reports scheduled
  • Ownership assignments current
  • Integration mappings documented

References

  • Salesforce Data Quality Best Practices
  • RevOps Co-op Data Governance Framework
  • Marketo Database Health Guide
  • Gartner Data Quality Market Guide

Related Skills

  • pipeline-forecasting - Clean data improves forecasts
  • lead-scoring - Requires complete lead data
  • deal-risk-scoring - Depends on activity data

Skill Metadata

  • Domain: RevOps
  • Complexity: Intermediate
  • Mode: centaur
  • Time to Value: 30-60 min for audit, varies for cleanup
  • Prerequisites: CRM data export, field requirements list

平台分布

Codex

34.13%
按下载量换算276

Claude

31.82%
按下载量换算257

Cursor

19.63%
按下载量换算159

Gemini CLI

10.12%
按下载量换算82

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills