Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

crisis-detector(危机探测器)

crisis-detector 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

crisis-detector 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 35,455。

总安装 2,081周安装 85GitHub Stars 85下载 666核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:crisis-detector(危机探测器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
仓库路径:skills/crisis-detector
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill crisis-detector
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill crisis-detector

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

crisis-detector 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。

安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法和功能边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/crisis-detector

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill crisis-det…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

crisis-detector 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill crisis-detector。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

crisis-detector 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

crisis-detector 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

crisis-detector 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

crisis-detector 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,081 次,近一周安装 85 次,下载 666 次,GitHub 85 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

crisis-detector 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
crisis-detector

危机探测器 · 本页

2,08185需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Crisis Detector

Identify early warning signs of potential crises before they escalate through pattern recognition, signal monitoring, and risk assessment.

When to Use This Skill

  • Setting up early warning systems
  • Assessing crisis probability
  • Training teams on signals
  • Building escalation criteria
  • Post-crisis prevention planning

Methodology Foundation

Based on Institute for Crisis Management research and Burson crisis frameworks, combining:

  • Signal identification
  • Pattern recognition
  • Risk assessment matrices
  • Escalation protocols

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude DoesYou Decide
Identifies warning signalsRisk tolerance
Assesses crisis probabilityResponse resources
Creates detection criteriaEscalation authority
Designs monitoring systemsCommunication strategy
Suggests response triggersFinal action calls

Instructions

Step 1: Map Crisis Types

Crisis Categories:

CategoryExamplesWarning Time
OperationalOutage, product failureHours to days
ReputationalExecutive scandal, viral complaintMinutes to hours
Legal/RegulatoryLawsuit, investigationDays to weeks
FinancialEarnings miss, fraudHours to days
HumanWorkplace incident, harassmentHours to days
ExternalNatural disaster, market crashVariable

Step 2: Identify Early Signals

Signal Types:

Signal TypeExamplesMonitoring
InternalEmployee complaints, support ticketsHR, Support data
CustomerReview patterns, churn spikesCX metrics
SocialMention volume, sentiment shiftSocial tools
MediaPress inquiries, journalist interestPR inbox
RegulatoryCompliance notices, audit findingsLegal
FinancialPayment disputes, refund requestsFinance

Step 3: Build Detection Matrix

Signal Strength Assessment:

SignalWeakModerateStrongCritical
Volume spike+25%+50%+100%+300%
Sentiment shift-10%-20%-30%-50%
Media inquiries12-34-56+
Support tickets+10%+25%+50%+100%
Social influencer10K50K100K500K+

Step 4: Create Escalation Triggers

Trigger Framework:

LevelSignals PresentAction
Watch1 moderate signalMonitor closely
Alert2+ moderate or 1 strongNotify team
WarningMultiple strong signalsAssemble team
CrisisAny critical signalActivate protocol

Step 5: Document and Improve

Post-Detection Review:

  • How early did we detect?
  • What signals did we miss?
  • How accurate was assessment?
  • What should we add to monitoring?

Examples

Example 1: Crisis Detection System Design

Input:

Design a crisis detection system for:
- E-commerce company (clothing)
- 500K customers
- Active on Instagram, TikTok, Twitter
- Past issue: Shipping delays during holiday

Output:

## Crisis Detection System: E-Commerce Fashion

### Crisis Risk Map

| Crisis Type | Probability | Impact | Priority |
|-------------|-------------|--------|----------|
| Shipping delays | High | High | P1 |
| Product quality issue | Medium | High | P1 |
| Social media backlash | Medium | High | P1 |
| Data breach | Low | Critical | P1 |
| Influencer controversy | Medium | Medium | P2 |
| Supply chain disruption | Medium | High | P2 |
| Payment fraud | Low | Medium | P3 |

---

### Early Warning Signals

#### P1: Shipping Delays

**Leading Indicators (3-5 days before crisis):**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Carrier delay reports | Logistics API | >10% delayed |
| Warehouse backlog | WMS data | >24hr processing |
| Weather events | News/weather | Storm in hub |
| "Where's my order" tickets | Support | +50% daily |

**Lagging Indicators (crisis starting):**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Social mentions | Social listening | "shipping" +100% |
| Review mentions | Trustpilot/G2 | Shipping 3/5 stars |
| Refund requests | Payment system | +30% |
| Chargeback rate | Payment processor | >1% |

---

#### P1: Product Quality Issue

**Leading Indicators:**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Return rate spike | Returns data | >10% on SKU |
| Quality complaints | Support tickets | 3+ same issue |
| Photo complaints | Social | "damaged", "wrong color" |
| Batch-specific issues | QC data | Same lot number |

**Lagging Indicators:**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Viral unboxing | TikTok/Instagram | >10K views negative |
| Review bomb | Product pages | Multiple 1-stars |
| Media inquiry | PR inbox | Journalist question |

---

#### P1: Social Media Backlash

**Leading Indicators:**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Sentiment shift | Social tools | -20% in 24hr |
| Controversial post | Your social | Negative comments >10% |
| Influencer complaint | Social | >50K follower post |
| Screenshot spreading | Twitter/Reddit | Same image 5+ times |

**Lagging Indicators:**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Viral negative | Any platform | >50K engagements |
| Hashtag trending | Twitter | Brand + negative |
| Media pickup | News sites | Article published |
| Competitor amplification | Social | Competitor sharing |

---

### Detection Dashboard

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ CRISIS DETECTION DASHBOARD 🟢 NORMAL │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ │ │ SHIPPING STATUS 🟢 Normal │ │ ├─ Carrier delays: 3% (threshold: 10%) │ │ ├─ Backlog: 4 hours (threshold: 24hr) │ │ └─ "Where's my order": 45 (baseline: 50) │ │ │ │ PRODUCT QUALITY 🟢 Normal │ │ ├─ Return rate: 5.2% (threshold: 10%) │ │ ├─ Quality tickets: 2 (threshold: 3+ same) │ │ └─ Photo complaints: 1 (threshold: 5) │ │ │ │ SOCIAL SENTIMENT 🟡 Watch │ │ ├─ Sentiment: -15% (threshold: -20%) │ │ ├─ Volume: +40% (threshold: +50%) │ │ └─ Influencer: None flagged │ │ │ │ SECURITY 🟢 Normal │ │ ├─ Login anomalies: Normal │ │ └─ Payment fraud: 0.3% │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

---

### Escalation Matrix

| Level | Criteria | Notification | Response |
|-------|----------|--------------|----------|
| 🟢 Normal | All metrics in range | None | Standard ops |
| 🟡 Watch | 1 metric at threshold | Slack alert | Increased monitoring |
| 🟠 Alert | 2+ metrics or 1 exceeded | Team notification | Standby team |
| 🔴 Crisis | Critical threshold breached | All-hands alert | Activate protocol |

---

### Alert Routing

| Signal Type | Primary | Backup | Escalation |
|-------------|---------|--------|------------|
| Shipping | Operations | COO | CEO |
| Product quality | Product | VP Ops | CEO |
| Social media | Marketing | CMO | CEO |
| Security | IT | CTO | CEO + Legal |
| Legal/PR | Legal | CEO | Board |

---

### Holiday Season Adjustments

During high-volume periods (Nov 15 - Dec 31):

| Metric | Normal Threshold | Holiday Threshold |
|--------|------------------|-------------------|
| Carrier delays | 10% | 15% |
| Support volume | +50% | +100% |
| Social volume | +50% | +75% |
| Response time | 4 hours | 8 hours |

**Rationale:** Higher baseline expected; adjust to avoid false alerts
while maintaining genuine crisis detection.

Example 2: Real-Time Crisis Assessment

Input:

Assess this situation:
- Support tickets up 80% in 2 hours
- Twitter mentions up 150%
- Hashtag #[Brand]Scam trending locally
- 3 refund requests mentioning "charged twice"
- No known system issues

Output:

## Crisis Assessment: Potential Payment Issue

### Alert Level: 🔴 CRISIS

---

### Signal Analysis

| Signal | Value | Normal | Status |
|--------|-------|--------|--------|
| Support spike | +80% | <25% | CRITICAL |
| Social spike | +150% | <50% | CRITICAL |
| Trending hashtag | Yes | No | CRITICAL |
| Duplicate charge reports | 3 | 0 | CONCERNING |

---

### Probable Cause

**Most likely: Payment processing error**

Evidence:
1. Multiple "charged twice" complaints
2. No known system issues rules out outage
3. Sudden spike suggests batch problem
4. #Scam hashtag = customers think fraud

---

### Immediate Actions

| Priority | Action | Owner | Timeline |
|----------|--------|-------|----------|
| 1 | Check payment processor logs | Engineering | NOW |
| 2 | Identify affected transactions | Finance | 30 min |
| 3 | Prepare holding statement | Comms | 15 min |
| 4 | Alert customer service team | CX Lead | NOW |
| 5 | Monitor hashtag spread | Social | Ongoing |

---

### Holding Statement (Draft)

We're aware some customers may have experienced duplicate charges. Our team is investigating urgently. If you've been affected, please DM us or email [support] - we'll make this right immediately.

Updates to follow shortly.

---

### Escalation Path

**Now:** CTO + CFO + CMO notified
**+30 min:** CEO briefing if not resolved
**+1 hour:** External statement if ongoing

---

### Crisis Trajectory

**If unaddressed (next 2-4 hours):**
- Hashtag goes national
- Media inquiries begin
- Trust pilot review bomb
- Social influencers amplify

**If addressed quickly (next 1-2 hours):**
- Contain to affected customers
- Flip narrative to "responsive company"
- Prevent media escalation
- Build goodwill through fast resolution

---

### Resolution Checklist

- [ ] Root cause identified
- [ ] Affected customers identified
- [ ] Refunds initiated
- [ ] Proactive communication sent
- [ ] Social response deployed
- [ ] Hashtag monitoring active
- [ ] Post-incident review scheduled

Skill Boundaries

What This Skill Does Well

  • Identifying early warning signals
  • Creating detection frameworks
  • Assessing crisis probability
  • Designing escalation systems

What This Skill Cannot Do

  • Access your actual systems
  • Monitor in real-time
  • Make response decisions
  • Know your specific thresholds

Iteration Guide

Follow-up Prompts:

  • "Design detection for [specific crisis type]"
  • "Create escalation protocol for [scenario]"
  • "What signals should we add for [risk]?"
  • "How do we prevent [past crisis] from recurring?"

References

  • Institute for Crisis Management
  • Burson Crisis Playbook
  • Harvard Business Review Crisis Research
  • Edelman Trust Barometer

Related Skills

  • social-listening - Monitoring systems
  • response-coordinator - Crisis response
  • reputation-recovery - Post-crisis rebuild

Skill Metadata

  • Domain: Crisis
  • Complexity: Intermediate-Advanced
  • Mode: centaur
  • Time to Value: 2-4 hours for system design
  • Prerequisites: Access to metrics, stakeholder alignment

平台分布

Codex

37.88%
按下载量换算252

Claude

29.38%
按下载量换算196

Cursor

18.03%
按下载量换算120

Gemini CLI

8.3%
按下载量换算55

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills