Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

contract-review(合同审查)

contract-review 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

contract-review 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 1,534。

总安装 2,987周安装 127GitHub Stars 85下载 1,046核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:contract-review(合同审查)
来源仓库:https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
仓库路径:skills/contract-review
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill contract-review
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill contract-review

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

contract-review 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。

安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法和功能边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/contract-review

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill contract-r…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

contract-review 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill contract-review。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

contract-review 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

contract-review 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

contract-review 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

contract-review 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,987 次,近一周安装 127 次,下载 1,046 次,GitHub 85 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

contract-review 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
contract-review

合同审查 · 本页

2,98785只读未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Contract Review

Systematically analyze contracts to identify risks, unfavorable clauses, and negotiation opportunities before signing.

When to Use This Skill

  • Reviewing vendor/SaaS contracts
  • Analyzing partnership agreements
  • Evaluating client service agreements
  • Reviewing employment contracts
  • Due diligence on M&A documents

Methodology Foundation

Based on legal contract analysis frameworks combined with:

  • Risk assessment matrices
  • Common clause libraries
  • Industry-standard benchmarks
  • Negotiation leverage analysis

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude DoesYou Decide
Identifies risky clausesRisk tolerance level
Flags unusual termsWhat to negotiate
Compares to standardsFinal accept/reject
Suggests alternativesBusiness trade-offs
Summarizes obligationsLegal counsel needs

Instructions

Step 1: Contract Overview

Initial Assessment:

ElementWhat to Capture
PartiesWho's bound
TypeService, license, partnership
TermDuration, renewal
ValueTotal commitment
JurisdictionGoverning law

Step 2: Risk Categories

Clause Risk Matrix:

CategoryLow RiskMedium RiskHigh Risk
LiabilityMutual capsUncappedUnlimited indemnity
TermMonthlyAnnualMulti-year auto-renew
DataStandard DPACustom termsBroad usage rights
IPLicense onlyWork for hireAssignment
Termination30-day noticeFor cause onlyPenalties

Step 3: Clause-by-Clause Analysis

Key Clauses to Review:

Payment Terms:

  • Net terms (30/60/90)
  • Late payment penalties
  • Price escalation clauses
  • Audit rights

Liability & Indemnification:

  • Cap on liability (multiple of fees)
  • Carve-outs (willful misconduct, IP)
  • Indemnification scope
  • Insurance requirements

Termination:

  • For convenience vs. for cause
  • Notice periods
  • Transition assistance
  • Data return/destruction

IP & Data:

  • Ownership of deliverables
  • License scope
  • Data usage rights
  • Confidentiality obligations

Step 4: Benchmarking

Industry Standards:

ClauseTypicalFavorableUnfavorable
Liability cap12 mo fees24 mo feesUncapped
PaymentNet 30Net 45Net 15
Termination30 days60 days90+ days
Auto-renewal30-day opt-out60-day opt-out90-day opt-out

Step 5: Generate Recommendations

Output Structure:

  1. Executive summary (2-3 sentences)
  2. Risk rating (Low/Medium/High/Critical)
  3. Red flags (must address)
  4. Yellow flags (should negotiate)
  5. Green flags (acceptable)
  6. Recommended redlines
  7. Questions for counsel

Examples

Example 1: SaaS Vendor Contract Review

Input:

Review this SaaS contract summary:
- 3-year term with 90-day auto-renewal notice
- Unlimited liability for data breaches
- Vendor can change pricing with 30-day notice
- Data can be used for "service improvement"
- Termination only for material breach

Output:

## Contract Review: SaaS Vendor Agreement

### Risk Rating: HIGH

---

### Executive Summary

This contract heavily favors the vendor with limited termination rights, uncapped liability exposure for you, and one-sided price increase provisions. Recommend significant negotiation before signing.

---

### Red Flags (Must Address)

| Clause | Issue | Risk | Recommendation |
|--------|-------|------|----------------|
| **Auto-Renewal** | 90-day notice for 3-year contract | Lock-in risk | Reduce to 30-60 days |
| **Pricing** | Vendor can change with 30-day notice | Budget risk | Cap increases at 5%/year or CPI |
| **Termination** | Material breach only | Lock-in risk | Add termination for convenience with notice |
| **Liability** | Unlimited for data breaches | Financial risk | Cap at 24 months of fees |

---

### Yellow Flags (Should Negotiate)

| Clause | Issue | Recommendation |
|--------|-------|----------------|
| **Data Usage** | "Service improvement" is vague | Define scope, exclude training AI |
| **Term Length** | 3 years is long | Request 1-year with renewal option |
| **SLA** | None mentioned | Require 99.9% uptime with credits |

---

### Green Flags (Acceptable)

- Standard confidentiality provisions
- Reasonable IP license terms
- Clear support response times

---

### Recommended Redlines

**Priority 1 (Deal Breakers):**

Section 8.2: Change "90 days" to "30 days" Section 12.1: Add "and termination for convenience with 60 days written notice" Section 14.3: Add "not to exceed 24 months of fees paid under this Agreement"

**Priority 2 (Strongly Preferred):**

Section 5.1: Add "Price increases shall not exceed 5% annually" Section 9.4: Change "service improvement" to "providing and improving the Service for Customer"

---

### Questions for Legal Counsel

1. Is unlimited data breach liability acceptable given our cyber insurance coverage?
2. What's our exposure if we need to exit before term completion?
3. Are there regulatory implications for the data usage clause?

---

### Negotiation Leverage

**Your Position:** First-year customer, significant deal size

**Their Likely Flex:**
- Auto-renewal notice period
- Liability caps
- Pricing caps

**Their Likely Firm:**
- Base term length
- Core data usage rights

Example 2: Quick Risk Assessment

Input:

Quick review - key concerns only:
- Unlimited indemnification for IP claims
- 2x annual fees liability cap
- Net 45 payment terms
- 60-day termination notice
- Standard DPA included

Output:

## Quick Risk Assessment

### Overall: MEDIUM RISK

| Clause | Rating | Note |
|--------|--------|------|
| Indemnification | HIGH | Unlimited IP indemnity is risky |
| Liability Cap | GREEN | 2x is standard |
| Payment | GREEN | Net 45 is favorable |
| Termination | GREEN | 60 days is reasonable |
| Data Protection | GREEN | Standard DPA |

### Priority Action

**Address Indemnification:**
- Request mutual cap on IP indemnity
- Propose "lesser of [amount] or 12 months fees"
- Alternative: carve out for willful infringement only

**Everything Else:** Acceptable, proceed if IP indemnity resolved.

Skill Boundaries

What This Skill Does Well

  • Identifying common risk patterns
  • Comparing to industry benchmarks
  • Structuring negotiation priorities
  • Flagging unusual clauses

What This Skill Cannot Do

  • Provide legal advice
  • Know jurisdiction-specific requirements
  • Assess strategic business importance
  • Replace qualified legal counsel

When to Escalate to Human

  • Contracts over $100K annual value
  • Non-standard or heavily negotiated terms
  • Any regulated industry requirements
  • Indemnification or liability questions

Iteration Guide

Follow-up Prompts:

  • "What's the worst-case scenario for the liability clause?"
  • "Draft redline language for [specific clause]"
  • "How does this compare to [competitor] contracts?"
  • "What should we ask for in return if we accept [term]?"

References

  • ACC (Association of Corporate Counsel) Contract Guidelines
  • IACCM Contract Terms Benchmarking
  • Tech Contract Negotiation Best Practices
  • Standard SaaS Agreement Templates

Related Skills

  • rfp-response - Creating proposals
  • nda-generator - Confidentiality agreements
  • terms-analyzer - Terms of service review

Skill Metadata

  • Domain: Legal
  • Complexity: Intermediate
  • Mode: centaur
  • Time to Value: 30-60 min per contract
  • Prerequisites: Contract access, business context

平台分布

Codex

34.92%
按下载量换算365

Claude

30.38%
按下载量换算318

Cursor

20.43%
按下载量换算214

Gemini CLI

10.09%
按下载量换算106

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills