Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

context-engineering(情境工程)

context-engineering 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

context-engineering 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 36,067。

总安装 1,983周安装 81GitHub Stars 85下载 635核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:context-engineering(情境工程)
来源仓库:https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
仓库路径:skills/context-engineering
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill context-engineering
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill context-engineering

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

context-engineering 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。

安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法和功能边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/context-engineering

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill context-en…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

context-engineering 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill context-engineering。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

context-engineering 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

context-engineering 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

context-engineering 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

context-engineering 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,983 次,近一周安装 81 次,下载 635 次,GitHub 85 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

context-engineering 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
context-engineering

情境工程 · 本页

1,98385只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Context Engineering

Overview

Core principle: Context is a finite resource with diminishing returns. Find the smallest high-signal token set, not the largest.

200K tokens is shared space: system prompt + conversation history + your processing. As context grows, performance degrades predictably.

When to Use

  • Session > 30 minutes or 50k+ tokens
  • Instructions being ignored or forgotten
  • Repeated clarifications needed
  • Planning multi-agent workflows
  • Preparing handoffs between sessions

Quick Reference

ProblemSymptomFix
Lost-in-middleMid-conversation instructions ignoredMove critical info to start/end
Context poisoningErrors compounding, hallucinations referencedSummarize and reset
Context distractionIrrelevant info degrading performancePrune aggressively
Context confusionConflicting guidance causing inconsistencyConsolidate instructions

Degradation Patterns

1. Lost-in-Middle Effect

Information in context middle gets 10-40% lower recall than edges.

[START - High attention]
  ↓
[MIDDLE - Low attention zone]  ← Instructions here get ignored
  ↓
[END - High attention]

Fix: Strategic placement

  • Critical instructions → START (system prompt, first user message)
  • Recent decisions → END (last few messages)
  • Reference material → MIDDLE (acceptable for lookup, not instructions)

2. Context Poisoning

Early hallucination gets referenced → compounds → becomes "fact".

Symptoms:

  • Confident statements contradicting earlier facts
  • "As we discussed..." referencing things never said
  • Circular reasoning citing own previous errors

Fix: Checkpoint and summarize

Every 10-15 exchanges, create explicit checkpoint:

"Let me summarize what we've established:
1. [Verified fact]
2. [Verified fact]
3. [Decision made]

Continuing from here..."

3. Context Distraction

Irrelevant tokens compete for attention budget.

Symptoms:

  • Responses reference unrelated earlier topics
  • Focus drifts from current task
  • Unnecessary caveats about old context

Fix: Aggressive pruning

  • Use /clear + summary for fresh context
  • In multi-agent: give subagents ONLY relevant context
  • Remove resolved discussions from active consideration

4. Context Confusion

Multiple conflicting instructions create inconsistent behavior.

Symptoms:

  • Alternating between approaches
  • "On one hand... on the other hand..." hedging
  • Ignoring some instructions to satisfy others

Fix: Consolidate

Before: "Use TypeScript" (message 3) + "Keep it simple" (message 12) + "Add types everywhere" (message 27)

After: "TypeScript with practical typing - types where they help, skip where obvious"

Optimization Techniques

Compaction

When approaching limits, summarize context sections:

## Session Summary (compacted)

**Goal:** [One sentence]
**Decisions made:**
- [Decision 1]
- [Decision 2]
**Current state:** [What's done, what's next]
**Key constraints:** [Still-active requirements]

---
[Continue with fresh context]

Observation Masking

Replace verbose tool outputs with compact references:

Before: [500 lines of file content in context]
After: "Read src/app/page.tsx - React component with Hero, About, FAQ sections"

Context Partitioning (Multi-Agent)

Isolate subtasks in separate agents with clean contexts:

Main Agent (orchestrator):
  - High-level plan
  - Synthesis of results

Subagent 1 (search):        Subagent 2 (implement):
  - Only search context       - Only implementation context
  - Returns summary           - Returns code

Rule: Subagents get task + minimum required context, NOT full conversation history.

Practical Workflow

For Long Sessions (>1 hour)

digraph context_management {
  "Every 15-20 min" [shape=diamond];
  "Context healthy?" [shape=diamond];
  "Continue" [shape=box];
  "Create checkpoint summary" [shape=box];
  "Consider /clear + summary" [shape=box];

  "Every 15-20 min" -> "Context healthy?";
  "Context healthy?" -> "Continue" [label="yes"];
  "Context healthy?" -> "Create checkpoint summary" [label="degrading"];
  "Create checkpoint summary" -> "Consider /clear + summary";
}

Health check questions:

  • Are recent instructions being followed?
  • Is focus staying on current task?
  • Are responses becoming vague or hedgy?

For Handoffs (/save-session)

Capture for next session:

  1. Goal state - What were we trying to achieve?
  2. Current state - What's done, what's broken?
  3. Key decisions - Why did we choose X over Y?
  4. Active constraints - What rules still apply?
  5. Next steps - Where to pick up?

For Subagents

## Subagent Prompt Template

**Task:** [Specific deliverable]
**Context:** [ONLY what's needed - 50-200 words max]
**Constraints:** [Hard requirements]
**Output format:** [What to return]

[Do NOT include: conversation history, resolved discussions, unrelated files]

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy it failsBetter approach
"Include everything just in case"Dilutes attention, causes distractionInclude only what's needed NOW
Repeating instructions every messageWastes tokens, implies they weren't heardTrust system prompt, reinforce only when ignored
Long file dumps without summaryLost-in-middle effectRead → summarize → reference summary
Keeping resolved threads activeContext confusionSummarize resolution, move on

Token Budget Guidelines

Context sizeExpected qualityAction
< 20kOptimalContinue normally
20-50kGoodMonitor for degradation
50-100kDegradingActive management needed
100-150kPoorSummarize and reset soon
> 150kCriticalReset with checkpoint

Key Insight

"The goal isn't to use all 200K tokens. It's to use the fewest tokens that achieve your outcome."

Informativity over exhaustiveness. Include what matters for current decisions, exclude everything else, and design systems that access additional information on demand.


What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude handlesYou provide
Monitoring context healthDecision to reset or continue
Creating checkpoint summariesValidation that summary is accurate
Pruning irrelevant contentJudgment on what's still needed
Structuring subagent promptsStrategic task decomposition
Detecting degradation patternsTiming of interventions

Skill Boundaries

This skill excels for:

  • Long sessions (>30 min, >50k tokens)
  • Multi-agent workflows with handoffs
  • Complex projects spanning multiple sessions
  • Debugging "forgotten instruction" issues

This skill is NOT ideal for:

  • Short, focused interactions → Not needed
  • Single-turn queries → Overhead unnecessary
  • Tasks with naturally bounded context → Already constrained

Skill Metadata

name: context-engineering
category: meta
version: 2.0
author: GUIA
source_expert: Anthropic research, NeoLabHQ context-engineering-kit
difficulty: advanced
mode: centaur
tags: [context, tokens, memory, multi-agent, handoff, optimization]
created: 2026-02-03
updated: 2026-02-03

平台分布

Codex

34.63%
按下载量换算220

Claude

28.14%
按下载量换算179

Cursor

20.08%
按下载量换算128

Gemini CLI

10.45%
按下载量换算66

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills