Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

gtm-pricing(GTM 定价)

gtm-pricing 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

gtm-pricing 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 35,455。

总安装 2,081周安装 85GitHub Stars 12下载 666核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:gtm-pricing(GTM 定价)
来源仓库:https://github.com/scientiacapital/skills
仓库路径:skills/gtm-pricing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/scientiacapital/skills --skill gtm-pricing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/scientiacapital/skills --skill gtm-pricing

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

gtm-pricing 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词快速定位候选结果时使用。它处理定价策略和商业模式设计,提供价格模型和收益分析。可通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用该技能。

安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,避免触发不必要的联网或文件操作。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/gtm-pricing

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/scientiacapital/skills --skill gtm-pricing;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

gtm-pricing 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/scientiacapital/skills --skill gtm-pricing。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

gtm-pricing 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

gtm-pricing 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

gtm-pricing 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

gtm-pricing 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,081 次,近一周安装 85 次,下载 666 次,GitHub 12 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

gtm-pricing 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
gtm-pricing

GTM 定价 · 本页

2,08112需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

<quick_start> ICP scoring: 80+ = Ideal | 60-79 = Good | 40-59 = Marginal | <40 = Pass

Positioning statement:

For [target] who [need], [product] is a [category] that [benefit].
Unlike [alternative], our product [differentiator].

Value-based pricing: Price at 10-20% of quantified value delivered

Opportunity score: /100 across Market Fit, Technical Fit, GTM Fit, Personal Fit, Economics </quick_start>

<success_criteria> GTM strategy is successful when:

  • ICP documented with scoring criteria (firmographics, technographics, psychographics)
  • Positioning statement follows April Dunford framework
  • Pricing anchored to quantified value (not cost-plus)
  • Tier structure follows Good/Better/Best with clear feature gates
  • Opportunity scoring identifies red flags and good signals
  • Battle cards created for top 3 competitors
  • Launch checklist completed (pre-launch, launch, post-launch) </success_criteria>

<core_content> Comprehensive guide for B2B go-to-market strategy, pricing, and opportunity evaluation.

Quick Reference

FrameworkPurposeWhen to Use
ICP DevelopmentDefine ideal customerBefore any outreach
PositioningDifferentiate in marketProduct launch, pivot
Messaging HierarchyConsistent communicationSales enablement
Competitive IntelUnderstand landscapeDeal strategy, positioning
Value-Based PricingPrice by value deliveredSetting initial prices
Tier StructurePackage offeringFeature gating decisions
Opportunity ScoringEvaluate fitNew client/project decisions

Part 1: Go-To-Market Strategy

ICP Development Framework

Build your ICP across three dimensions, then score each prospect:

Dimension 1 -- Firmographics (who they are):

  • Company size: employee count range, revenue range
  • Industry: primary verticals, secondary, and explicitly excluded
  • Geography: target regions, excluded regions
  • Company type: startup, growth-stage, enterprise, SMB
  • Funding stage: bootstrapped, seed, Series A-D, public/PE-backed

Dimension 2 -- Technographics (what they use):

  • Required stack: must-have tech, nice-to-have, incompatible
  • Tech maturity: early adopter, early majority, late majority, laggard
  • Current solutions: CRM, ERP, industry-specific tools
  • Integration requirements: what your product must connect to
  • Pain indicators: manual processes, disconnected systems, spreadsheet workarounds

Dimension 3 -- Psychographics (how they buy):

  • Awareness stage: unaware, problem-aware, solution-aware, product-aware
  • Buying committee: economic buyer, technical buyer, user buyer, champion, blocker
  • Decision criteria: primary (speed, cost, features) and secondary
  • Risk tolerance: budget concerns, implementation risk, change management, vendor stability

ICP Scoring Rubric:

ScoreLabelAction
80-100IdealPrioritize -- full outreach cadence, executive sponsorship
60-79GoodPursue -- standard cadence, qualify thoroughly
40-59MarginalConditional -- only if specific signal changes (budget, timing)
<40PassDecline -- opportunity cost too high

Behavioral Signals to Watch:

  • High intent: searched for competitor alternatives, visited pricing page 3+ times, downloaded buyer's guide
  • Medium intent: attended webinar, engaged with case study, connected on LinkedIn
  • Low intent: blog subscriber, social follower, newsletter open

ICP Validation Checklist:

  1. TAM/SAM/SOM calculated with minimum 1,000 companies in ICP
  2. Historical win rate against ICP >30%
  3. ICP customers have lowest churn and highest NPS
  4. Sales team, CS, and product all agree on the profile

See reference/gtm.md for full YAML ICP worksheet templates and an example ICP (MEP contractors).


Positioning (April Dunford Framework)

The 5 Components of Positioning:

  1. Competitive alternatives -- What would customers use if you didn't exist? (Not just direct competitors -- include spreadsheets, manual processes, hiring, doing nothing)
  2. Unique attributes -- What do you have that alternatives don't? (Features, architecture, team expertise, data, integrations)
  3. Value -- What does the unique attribute enable for customers? (Time saved, revenue gained, risk reduced, cost avoided)
  4. Target customer -- Who cares most about that value? (The segment where your strengths matter most)
  5. Market category -- What market do you position in? (Existing category, subcategory, or create new category)

Positioning Statement Template:

For [target customer segment] who [key need/pain],
[product name] is a [market category]
that [primary value proposition].
Unlike [competitive alternative],
our product [key differentiator tied to unique attribute].

Messaging Hierarchy (3 levels, max 3 differentiators each):

LevelAudienceMessage Type
StrategicC-suite, boardBusiness outcomes, ROI, risk reduction
SolutionDirectors, VPsCapability, integration, workflow improvement
PersonaEnd users, adminsFeatures, UX, daily workflow benefits

Competitive Battle Card Essentials: For each top-3 competitor, document:

  • Overview: founded, HQ, funding, target market, pricing model
  • Strengths (acknowledge honestly -- credibility requires it)
  • Weaknesses mapped to your advantages
  • Common objections with value-based responses
  • Win strategy: lead differentiator, proof point, reference story
  • Questions to ask the prospect that expose competitor weaknesses

See reference/gtm.md for battle card template, positioning examples, and competitive positioning framework.


GTM Motion and Launch

GTM Motion Selection:

MotionACVSales CycleTeam NeededCAC
Product-Led Growth (PLG)<$5KDaysGrowth/productLow
Sales-Assisted$5-50KWeeksSDR + AEMedium
Enterprise$50K+MonthsAE + SE + CSMHigh
Partner/ChannelVariableVariablePartner ManagerVariable

Channel Mix: 60-70% primary motion, 20-30% secondary, 10% experimental.

Launch Checklist Milestones:

  • T-30 (Pre-launch): ICP validated, positioning finalized, messaging hierarchy complete, battle cards created, pricing approved, sales team trained, demo environment stable
  • T-0 (Launch): Website updated, outbound sequences activated, press release distributed, social campaign live, partner notifications sent
  • T+30 (Post-launch): Win/loss analysis started, messaging refined from feedback, pipeline reviewed, competitive response documented, metrics dashboard active

See reference/gtm.md for full launch checklists, channel strategy details, and complexity-to-resource matching.


Part 2: Pricing Strategy

Value-Based Pricing Method

Step 1 -- Quantify customer value:

Total Value = Time Savings + Revenue Impact + Cost Avoidance

Time Savings:   Hours saved/month x Hourly rate x 12
Revenue Impact: Additional revenue enabled per year
Cost Avoidance: Costs eliminated or reduced per year

Step 2 -- Set price at 10-20% of quantified value:

  • 10% = conservative (easy sell, high perceived value)
  • 15% = balanced (standard B2B SaaS)
  • 20% = aggressive (strong differentiation required)

Step 3 -- Validate against willingness-to-pay:

  • Van Westendorp price sensitivity: ask "too cheap / cheap / expensive / too expensive"
  • Competitive benchmarking: where do alternatives price?
  • Customer interviews: "Would you pay $X for Y outcome?"

Pricing Models

ModelBest ForProsCons
Flat rateSimple productsEasy to understandDoesn't scale with value
Per seatTeam toolsPredictable, scales with orgDiscourages adoption
Usage-basedAPIs, infraAligns cost with valueUnpredictable revenue
Tiered (Good/Better/Best)Feature differentiationAnchoring, clear upgrade pathComplex to design
Hybrid (seat + usage)Enterprise SaaSPredictable base + upsideComplex billing

Tier Design (Good/Better/Best)

Tier structure principles:

  • 3-4 tiers optimal (more creates decision paralysis)
  • Middle tier should be your target -- it gets the "Most Popular" badge
  • Top tier makes middle tier look reasonable (price anchoring)
  • Free tier only if PLG motion (land, qualify, viral growth)

Feature Gating Rules:

Gate ByExamplesWhen to Use
ScaleUsers, API calls, storage, projectsUsage naturally grows with value
SophisticationAdvanced analytics, AI features, workflowsFeatures require maturity to use
ControlSSO, SAML, audit logs, custom rolesEnterprise compliance needs
SupportSLA, dedicated CSM, phone supportWillingness to pay for service

Never gate: Security features, data export, basic integrations. Gating these breeds resentment and churn.

Discounting Strategy

TypeTriggerRangeUse When
VolumeCommitment to scale10-30%Large seat count, multi-year
TermAnnual commitment15-25%Monthly-to-annual conversion
CompetitiveSwitching from competitor20-40%Match remaining contract value
StrategicReference customer, logo valueUp to 50%Brand-name + case study commitment

Protect your pricing -- never discount when:

  • Customer hasn't articulated the value they'll receive
  • No competitive pressure exists
  • You're early in negotiation (discount later, not first)
  • Customer is purely price-shopping (they'll churn anyway)

Alternatives to discounting: Extended payment terms, additional training/onboarding, extended trial period, success-milestone feature unlocks, multi-year lock-in at current rate.

Key SaaS Pricing Metrics

MetricTargetFormula
LTV>3x CACARPU / monthly churn rate
CAC Payback<12 monthsCAC / ARPU
NRR>100%(Start MRR + expansion - contraction - churn) / Start MRR
Gross Margin>70%(Revenue - COGS) / Revenue

See reference/pricing.md for per-model deep dives, price increase playbook, services pricing, productized service model, and revenue model templates.


Part 3: Opportunity Evaluation

Quick Score (/100)

DimensionPointsWhat to Assess
Market Fit25Problem clarity (10), market size (8), timing (7)
Technical Fit20Can I build it (10), infrastructure fit (5), maintenance burden (5)
GTM Fit20Sales complexity (8), channel access (7), competition (5)
Personal Fit20Interest/energy (8), growth potential (7), lifestyle fit (5)
Economics15Revenue potential (8), time to revenue (4), risk/reward (3)

Score Interpretation and Action

ScoreActionNext Step
80-100STRONG PURSUEPrioritize immediately, allocate resources
60-79EXPLOREWorth a time-boxed deep dive (1-2 weeks)
40-59CONDITIONALPark it -- revisit only if a specific factor changes
0-39PASSDecline -- opportunity cost too high

Red Flags (Automatic Deductions)

Any of these should subtract 10-20 points from your score:

  • Unclear payment terms: "We'll figure out compensation later"
  • Expanding scope pre-start: Requirements growing before contract signed
  • Pressure to decide fast: "We need an answer by Friday" on a major commitment
  • Misaligned incentives: Their success doesn't require your success
  • Economics don't work even optimistically: If best-case math doesn't pencil, walk away
  • Single-threaded champion: Only one person wants this; no organizational buy-in
  • No budget allocated: Interested but no approved spend

GTM Complexity Levels

LevelBuyerACVCycleDecision Style
PLGIndividual user<$2KDaysUser = buyer, self-serve
Low-TouchManager$2-15K1-4 weeksLight demo, quick approval
Mid-MarketDirector/VP$15-100K1-3 monthsCommittee, multiple stakeholders
EnterpriseC-suite$100K-1M6-18 monthsRFP, security review, legal
ComplexBoard-level$1M+12-36 monthsTransformation project

Match complexity to your resources:

  • Solo / side project: target Level 1-2 max
  • Small team: target Level 2-3
  • Funded startup: target Level 2-4
  • Enterprise sales org: target Level 3-5

5-Minute Viability Test

Before deep-diving any opportunity, answer four questions:

  1. How much will one customer pay? $____/month
  2. How many customers can I realistically get in 6 months? ____
  3. What does it cost to serve one customer? $____/month
  4. How many hours/week will this take? ____

Quick math:

  • Monthly revenue at 6 months: #2 x #1
  • Monthly costs: #2 x #3
  • Monthly margin: Revenue - Costs
  • Effective hourly rate: Margin / (hours x 4.33)
  • If hourly rate < $100 --> needs rethinking

Build vs Partner vs Buy Decision

SignalBuildPartnerBuy
Core differentiatorYes
Commodity capabilityYes
Complementary strengthYes
Time-criticalYes
Learning value highYes
Maintenance burden highYesYes
No good alternative existsYes

See reference/opportunity.md for detailed scoring rubrics per dimension, full scorecard YAML templates, unit economics worksheets, cost structure analysis, break-even calculations, and build-vs-partner decision trees.


Reference Files

  • reference/gtm.md - ICP YAML templates, behavioral signals, validation checklist, channel strategy, launch playbooks, battle card template, positioning examples
  • reference/pricing.md - Model deep dives, tier design, price increase playbook, services pricing, discount framework, SaaS metrics dashboard
  • reference/opportunity.md - Full scoring rubrics (5 sections), scorecard YAML, unit economics, cost analysis, break-even formulas, build/partner/buy decision trees </core_content>

Emit Outcome Sidecar

As the final step, write to ~/.claude/skill-analytics/last-outcome-gtm-pricing.json:

{"ts":"[UTC ISO8601]","skill":"gtm-pricing","version":"1.0.0","variant":"default",
 "status":"[success|partial|error]","runtime_ms":[estimated ms from start],
 "metrics":{"pricing_models_evaluated":[n],"tiers_designed":[n],"gtm_channels_mapped":[n]},
 "error":null,"session_id":"[YYYY-MM-DD]"}

Use status "partial" if some stages failed but results were produced. Use "error" only if no output was generated.

平台分布

Claude Code

27.3%
按下载量换算182

Gemini CLI

25.01%
按下载量换算167

Antigravity

19.63%
按下载量换算131

Codex

11.96%
按下载量换算80

OpenCode

8.65%
按下载量换算58

windsurf

3.88%
按下载量换算26

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills