Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

gtm-enterprise-onboarding(GTM 企业入职)

gtm-enterprise-onboarding 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

gtm-enterprise-onboarding 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 4,792。

总安装 29,664周安装 1,166GitHub Stars 31,701下载 9,312核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:gtm-enterprise-onboarding(GTM 企业入职)
来源仓库:https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot
仓库路径:skills/gtm-enterprise-onboarding
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill gtm-enterprise-onboarding
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill gtm-enterprise-onboarding

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

gtm-enterprise-onboarding 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词快速定位候选结果时使用。它针对企业客户入职流程,提供相关文档和操作指南。

可通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用该技能。安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,避免触发不必要的联网或文件操作。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/gtm-enterprise-onboarding

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill gtm-enterprise-…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

gtm-enterprise-onboarding 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill gtm-enterprise-onboarding。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

gtm-enterprise-onboarding 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

gtm-enterprise-onboarding 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

gtm-enterprise-onboarding 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

gtm-enterprise-onboarding 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 29,664 次,近一周安装 1,166 次,下载 9,312 次,GitHub 31,701 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

gtm-enterprise-onboarding 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 31,701 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
gtm-enterprise-onboarding

GTM 企业入职 · 本页

29,66431,701权限未标注未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Enterprise Onboarding

Four-phase framework for onboarding enterprise customers from contract to value realization. The goal isn't just go-live — it's sustained adoption that doesn't cliff at Week 12.

When to Use

Triggers:

  • "How do we onboard this enterprise customer?"
  • "Customer went live but adoption is weak"
  • "We keep losing customers 3 months after go-live"
  • "POC to production transition"
  • "How do I prevent Week 4 ghosting?"
  • "Customer success onboarding framework"

Context:

  • Enterprise or mid-market deals
  • Complex technical requirements
  • Multiple stakeholders involved
  • 30-90 day implementation timelines
  • Risk of churn during first year

Core Frameworks

1. The Week 4 Ghosting Problem (And How to Prevent It)

The Pattern:

Week 1: Kickoff call goes great. Everyone's excited. Week 2-3: Technical discovery, requirements gathering. Still good. Week 4: Customer stops responding. Meetings get cancelled. "Too busy."

What Happened?

You started customer onboarding before internal alignment on their side.

Who Owns This Project Internally?

  • Sales rep? (Already moved to next deal)
  • Technical champion? (Day job took over)
  • Executive sponsor? (Delegates, doesn't drive)
  • Nobody? (This is why they're ghosting)

The Framework: Internal Owner Validation

Before kickoff call, answer:

Who on customer side will:

  • Attend weekly project meetings? (Not "invited" — will actually show up)
  • Unblock issues with procurement/legal/security? (Has authority)
  • Drive adoption with end users? (Has influence)
  • Escalate when things stall? (Has executive access)

If you can't name a specific person for each, you don't have a project owner. You have a signed contract with nobody driving it.

How to Fix It:

During sales → CS handoff (before customer kickoff):

Sales rep must identify:

  • Primary project owner (name, not role)
  • Their capacity (dedicated or side project?)
  • Their authority (can they unblock?)
  • Their motivation (what's in it for them?)

If there's no clear owner:

Don't start onboarding yet. Have sales introduce you to economic buyer:

"Before we kick off implementation, we want to make sure we have the right project owner on your side. In our experience, implementations succeed when someone owns driving this forward week-to-week. Who on your team should we partner with?"

Common Mistake:

Assuming someone will own it. Ask explicitly. If they can't name someone, the deal is at risk.


2. The Adoption Cliff (Week 12 Problem)

The Pattern:

Go-live happens Week 6. Usage spikes. You celebrate.

Week 8: Usage plateaus. Week 10: Usage declining. Week 12: Usage down 50% from peak.

Why This Happens:

You treated go-live as the finish line. Go-live is the starting line.

What Drives Sustained Adoption:

Not: Feature completeness, technical integration, training sessions

Yes: Ongoing value demonstration, user success stories, expanding use cases

Framework: Adoption Stages Beyond Go-Live

Week 1-6 (Implementation): Get it working

  • Measure: % of technical setup complete
  • Owner: Technical lead

Week 6-12 (Initial Adoption): Get people using it

  • Measure: # active users, frequency of use
  • Owner: Enablement / DevRel

Week 12-26 (Sustained Adoption): Prove ongoing value

  • Measure: Use case expansion, team spread
  • Owner: Customer success

Week 26+ (Expansion): Grow within account

  • Measure: New teams, new use cases, upgrade triggers
  • Owner: Account executive + CS

The Handoff That Most Teams Miss:

Week 6 (go-live) → Week 12 (sustained adoption)

Most CS teams celebrate go-live and move to next customer. This is when churn seeds get planted.

What to Do Week 6-12:

Week 7: First value report "Here's what your team accomplished in the first week: [specific metric]. Here's what good looks like at Week 12: [target]."

Week 9: User success story "[User name] on [team name] saved [X hours/reduced Y errors] this week. Here's how they're using it."

Week 11: Use case expansion conversation "You're using us for [primary use case]. Teams like yours also use us for [adjacent use case]. Want to explore?"

Common Mistake:

Measuring "go-live completion" instead of "sustained active usage." Go-live is not success. Week 26 retained adoption is success.


3. Pre-Onboarding: Success Is Built Before First Customer Call

The Pattern:

Most onboarding failures trace back to pre-kickoff gaps.

What Gets Missed:

Sales didn't brief CS properly:

  • Deal drivers unknown
  • Stakeholder dynamics unclear
  • Technical requirements assumed

No internal project owner identified:

  • CS reaches out, nobody responds
  • Meetings get scheduled with wrong people
  • Decisions don't stick

Customer timeline unrealistic:

  • They want go-live in 2 weeks
  • Technical setup takes 6 weeks minimum
  • Expectations misaligned from Day 1

Framework: Pre-Kickoff Checklist

Before scheduling kickoff call, validate:

Account Intelligence:

  • Sales handoff completed (deal drivers, stakeholders, technical requirements)
  • Past interactions reviewed (demo notes, proposal, emails)
  • Organizational structure mapped (team sizes, reporting lines)
  • Use cases documented (primary + future)

Internal Setup:

  • Internal Slack channel created (#account-[customer-name])
  • Account plan updated in CRM
  • Project plan template prepared
  • Roles assigned (CSM lead, technical lead, exec sponsor)

Customer Readiness:

  • Project owner identified by name (not just "their DevRel team")
  • Executive sponsor confirmed on both sides
  • Timeline realistic (their goals vs your typical timeline)
  • Known blockers documented (procurement, security, legal)

Timeline Validation:

  • Customer's go-live date is realistic given technical requirements
  • Internal capacity available (not overbooked)
  • Dependencies identified (SSO, integrations, data migration)

Decision Criteria:

Only schedule kickoff when all four sections validated. If gaps exist, surface to sales or executive sponsor before engaging customer.

Common Mistake:

Starting onboarding without internal clarity. This creates confusion, missed deadlines, and erosion of customer confidence.


4. The Four-Phase Onboarding Flow

Phase 1: Kickoff (Week 1)

Goal: Align on objectives, timeline, success metrics

Attendees: Executive sponsors + project leads + technical leads

Agenda:

  1. Introductions and roles (5 min)
  2. Executive alignment on strategic objectives (5 min)
  3. Success definition: "What does success look like in 3/6/12 months?" (10 min)
  4. Timeline and milestones (5 min)
  5. Meeting cadence (weekly project team, monthly exec review) (5 min)
  6. Next steps (technical discovery call, success plan review) (5 min)

Deliverable: Kickoff recap sent within 24 hours with success metrics, timeline, next meetings

Phase 2: Discovery & Planning (Week 2-3)

Goal: Understand technical landscape, map use cases, plan rollout

Three parallel workstreams:

Workstream 1: Technical Discovery

  • Current infrastructure (on-prem, cloud, hybrid)
  • Existing tools and integrations
  • Security/compliance requirements
  • Timeline constraints

Workstream 2: Success Planning

  • Use cases prioritized (start with highest-value)
  • Success metrics defined (how to measure adoption)
  • Training needs identified (who needs what)

Workstream 3: Technical Setup

  • SSO/identity configuration
  • Integrations required
  • Data migration (if applicable)
  • Pilot group identified

Deliverable: Customer Success Plan document with use cases, metrics, timeline, milestones

Phase 3: Implementation (Week 4-6)

Goal: Deploy to pilot group, validate use cases, prepare for broader rollout

Three parallel tracks:

Track 1: Administration & Setup

  • SSO configuration complete
  • Integrations live
  • Data migrated (if applicable)

Track 2: User Enablement

  • Training sessions for pilot group
  • Documentation shared
  • Office hours scheduled

Track 3: Pilot & Feedback

  • Pilot group using product
  • Feedback collected weekly
  • Issues triaged and resolved

Deliverable: Go-live readiness checklist completed, pilot group validated

Phase 4: Go-Live & Ongoing Success (Week 6+)

Goal: Roll out broadly, sustain adoption, expand use cases

Week 6-8 (Rollout):

  • Broader rollout to all teams
  • Training sessions scheduled
  • Support available (Slack, email, office hours)

Week 8-12 (Value Demonstration):

  • First value report (Week 7)
  • User success stories shared (Week 9)
  • Use case expansion conversation (Week 11)

Week 12-26 (Sustained Adoption):

  • Monthly business reviews
  • Adoption tracking (active users, frequency, use cases)
  • Expansion opportunities identified

Common Mistake:

Treating go-live as completion. Phase 4 is where retention is won or lost.


5. The Parallel Tracks Anti-Pattern

The Pattern:

Most onboarding teams run workstreams sequentially:

  1. Technical setup (Weeks 1-2)
  2. Then training (Weeks 3-4)
  3. Then pilot (Weeks 5-6)

Total time: 6 weeks

What Works Better: Parallel Tracks

Run technical setup, training, and pilot simultaneously:

  • Week 1: Technical discovery + identify pilot group + schedule training
  • Week 2: SSO config + pilot group training + pilot starts
  • Week 3: Integrations + broader training + pilot feedback

Total time: 3 weeks

Why Parallel Works:

  1. Shortens time-to-value
  2. Keeps customer engaged (something happening every week)
  3. Identifies blockers early (pilot group surfaces issues before broad rollout)

How to Execute:

Assign clear owners to each track:

  • Track 1 (Admin): Technical lead
  • Track 2 (Enablement): Training/DevRel lead
  • Track 3 (Pilot): CSM + pilot group champion

Weekly sync across tracks to surface dependencies and blockers.

Common Mistake:

Waiting for "perfect technical setup" before starting pilot. Get pilot group using it early, even if setup isn't perfect. Their feedback makes the broad rollout better.


Decision Trees

Should I Start Customer Onboarding?

Has sales identified a project owner by name?
├─ No → Get project owner identified before kickoff
└─ Yes → Continue...
    │
    Is their timeline realistic given typical deployment?
    ├─ No → Reset expectations before kickoff
    └─ Yes → Continue...
        │
        Do you have internal capacity?
        ├─ No → Delay kickoff or get more resources
        └─ Yes → Proceed to kickoff

Is This Onboarding At Risk?

Is customer responding to meeting invites?
├─ No → Week 4 ghosting, escalate to exec sponsor
└─ Yes → Continue...
    │
    Are they completing their action items?
    ├─ No → No project owner, identify who drives this
    └─ Yes → Continue...
        │
        Is pilot group using the product?
        ├─ No → Pilot group wrong or product not solving pain
        └─ Yes → On track

Is Adoption Sustained Post-Go-Live?

Are active users growing Week 6 → Week 12?
├─ Yes → Healthy adoption
└─ No → Continue...
    │
    Are active users declining?
    ├─ Yes → Adoption cliff, intervene immediately
    └─ No (plateau) → At risk, start value demonstration

Common Mistakes

1. Starting customer onboarding before internal alignment

  • Wastes first 2-3 weeks, creates confusion, kills credibility

2. Not identifying real project owner upfront

  • Discovers it Week 4, has to restart or deal stalls

3. Overcommitting on timeline without technical requirements

  • Discovers blockers mid-implementation, misses deadline

4. No internal communication hub

  • Decisions don't propagate across teams, rework happens

5. Treating go-live as project complete

  • Adoption cliff at Week 12, account at risk

6. Sequential tracks instead of parallel

  • Implementation takes twice as long, customer loses momentum

7. No ongoing metrics post go-live

  • Discovers adoption issues too late to save account

Quick Reference

Pre-Kickoff Validation:

  • Sales handoff complete (deal drivers, stakeholders, requirements)
  • Project owner identified by name on customer side
  • Timeline realistic (their goals vs typical deployment)
  • Internal roles assigned (CSM, technical, exec sponsor)

Kickoff Agenda (30-45 min):

  1. Introductions (5 min)
  2. Executive alignment (5 min)
  3. Success definition (10 min)
  4. Timeline and milestones (5 min)
  5. Meeting cadence (5 min)
  6. Next steps (5 min)

Adoption Tracking (Week 6-26):

  • Week 7: First value report
  • Week 9: User success story
  • Week 11: Use case expansion conversation
  • Week 13: First monthly business review
  • Week 26: Expansion readiness assessment

Four Phases:

  1. Kickoff (Week 1): Align
  2. Discovery (Week 2-3): Plan
  3. Implementation (Week 4-6): Deploy to pilot
  4. Go-Live & Sustained (Week 6+): Rollout, value demonstration, expansion

Red Flags:

  • Customer not responding Week 4 → No project owner
  • Pilot group not using product Week 5 → Wrong group or wrong use case
  • Active users declining Week 8-12 → Adoption cliff forming

Related Skills

  • enterprise-account-planning: Pre-sale deal planning and stakeholder mapping
  • operating-cadence: Onboarding review cadence and health metrics
  • product-led-growth: Self-serve onboarding patterns

*Based on enterprise onboarding across multiple platform companies — designing partner onboarding directly and collaborating closely with CS on customer onboarding. Not theory — lessons from seeing Week 4 ghosting happen repeatedly and learning that go-live ≠ success, and understanding the adoption cliff that kills 30% of deals in first year.*

平台分布

Codex

34.68%
按下载量换算3,229

Claude

27.18%
按下载量换算2,531

Cursor

19.26%
按下载量换算1,793

Gemini CLI

9.11%
按下载量换算848

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills