Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

gtm-developer-ecosystemGTM 开发者生态系统

Agent Skill

gtm-developer-ecosystem 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

29,952

周安装

1,184

GitHub Stars

31,699

下载量

9,696
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:gtm-developer-ecosystem(GTM 开发者生态系统)
来源仓库:https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot
仓库路径:skills/gtm-developer-ecosystem
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill gtm-developer-ecosystem
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill gtm-developer-ecosystem

简介

gtm-developer-ecosystem 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合快速定位候选结果。

  • 适用于根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索进行信息检索。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意可能触发联网或文件操作。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Developer Ecosystem

Build and scale developer-led adoption through ecosystem programs, community, and partnerships. Focus on what actually drives adoption, not vanity metrics.

When to Use

Triggers:

  • "How do we build a developer ecosystem?"
  • "Should we curate quality or go open?"
  • "Developer community isn't growing"
  • "Nobody's building on our API"
  • "How do we compete with larger platforms?"

Context:

  • API platforms and developer tools
  • Products with extensibility (plugins, integrations)
  • Developer-first GTM motion
  • Platform business models

Core Frameworks

1. Open vs Curated Ecosystem (The Marketplace Decision)

The Pattern:

Running ecosystem at a developer platform. Leadership debate: Open the marketplace to anyone, or curate for quality?

Quality control camp: "We need gatekeeping. Otherwise we'll get SEO spam, low-quality integrations, brand damage."

Open camp: "Developers route around gatekeepers. Network effects matter more than quality control."

The decision: Went open. Quality concerns were real, but we made a bet: control comes from discovery and trust layers, not submission gatekeeping.

What We Built Instead of Gatekeeping:

  1. Search and discovery — Surface high-quality integrations through algorithms, not human curation
  2. Trust signals — Verified badges, usage stats, health scores
  3. Community curation — User ratings, collections, recommendations
  4. Moderation — Remove spam after publication, not block before

Result: Network effects won. Thousands of integrations published. Quality surfaced through usage, not through us deciding upfront.

Decision Framework:

  • Curated works when: Brand risk high, dozens of partners, can scale human review
  • Open works when: Hundreds/thousands of potential partners, network effects matter more than quality control

Common Mistake:

Defaulting to curated because "we need quality control." This works when you have 10 partners. At 100+, you become the bottleneck. Build discovery and trust systems instead.


2. The Three-Year Student Program Arc

The Pattern:

Most developer programs optimize for quick wins. Better approach: Build long-term talent pipeline.

Year 1: University Partnerships

  • Partner with CS departments
  • Curriculum integration (hackathons, coursework)
  • Student licenses (free or heavily discounted)
  • Metrics: # universities, # students activated

Year 2: Student Community & Certification

  • Student expert certification program
  • Student-led workshops and events
  • Campus ambassadors
  • Metrics: # certified, # student-led events

Year 3: Career Bridge

  • Job board connecting students → companies
  • Enterprise partnerships (hire certified students)
  • Alumni network
  • Metrics: # hired, company partnerships

Why This Works:

Students become enterprise buyers 5-10 years later. You're building brand loyalty before they have purchasing power.

Common Mistake:

Treating students as immediate revenue. They're not. They're future enterprise decision-makers.


3. Developer Journey (Awareness → Integration → Advocacy)

Stage 1: Awareness

  • How do they discover you?
  • Content, search, word-of-mouth, events

Stage 2: Onboarding

  • First API call in <10 minutes
  • Quick-start guides
  • Sample code in popular languages

Stage 3: Integration

  • Building real use cases
  • Integration guides
  • Support when stuck

Stage 4: Production

  • Deployed and generating value
  • Monitoring usage
  • Enterprise upgrade path

Stage 5: Advocacy

  • Sharing publicly
  • Recommending to others
  • Contributing back (docs, code, community)

Metrics That Matter:

  • Time to first API call (onboarding)
  • % reaching production (integration success)
  • Monthly active developers (engagement)
  • Developer NPS (advocacy)

Common Mistake:

Measuring vanity metrics (sign-ups, downloads) instead of real engagement (API calls, production deployments).


4. Documentation Hierarchy

Tier 1: Quick Starts (Get to Value Fast)

  • "Hello World" in 5 minutes
  • Common use case examples
  • Copy-paste code that works

Tier 2: Guides (Solve Real Problems)

  • Use case-specific tutorials
  • Integration patterns
  • Best practices

Tier 3: Reference (Complete API Docs)

  • Every endpoint documented
  • Request/response examples
  • Error codes and handling

Tier 4: Conceptual (Understand the System)

  • Architecture overviews
  • Design philosophy
  • Advanced patterns

Most developers need: Tier 1 first, then Tier 2. Very few read Tier 4.

Common Mistake:

Starting with Tier 3 (comprehensive API reference). Developers want quick wins first.


5. Community vs Support (When to Use Which)

Community (Async, Scalable):

  • Slack/Discord for real-time help
  • Forum for searchable Q&A
  • GitHub discussions for feature requests
  • Best for: Common questions, peer-to-peer help

Support (Sync, Expensive):

  • Email support for enterprise
  • Dedicated Slack channels for partners
  • Video calls for complex integrations
  • Best for: Paying customers, strategic partners

How to Route:

Community first:

  • Developer asks question
  • Community member answers
  • You validate and upvote
  • Searchable for future developers

Escalate to support when:

  • No community answer in 24 hours
  • Enterprise/paying customer
  • Security or compliance issue
  • Complex integration requiring custom work

Common Mistake:

Providing white-glove support to everyone. Doesn't scale. Build community that helps itself.


6. Partner Tiering for Developer Ecosystems

Tier 1: Integration Partners (Self-Serve)

  • Build with public API
  • You provide: docs, Slack channel, office hours
  • They drive their own marketing
  • Best for: Ambitious partners with resources

Tier 2: Strategic Partners (Co-Development)

  • Co-developed integration
  • You provide: dedicated channel, co-marketing
  • Joint case studies
  • Best for: High-impact integrations

Don't over-tier. 2 tiers is enough. More creates confusion.


Decision Trees

Open or Curated Ecosystem?

Is brand damage risk high if low-quality partners join?
├─ Yes (regulated, security) → Curated
└─ No → Continue...
    │
    Can you scale human review?
    ├─ No (hundreds/thousands) → Open + discovery systems
    └─ Yes (dozens) → Curated

Community or Support?

Is this a common question?
├─ Yes → Community (forum, Slack, docs)
└─ No → Continue...
    │
    Is requester paying customer?
    ├─ Yes → Support (email, dedicated)
    └─ No → Community (with escalation path)

Common Mistakes

1. Building ecosystem before product-market fit

  • Fix core product first, then build ecosystem

2. No developer success team

  • Developers need help to succeed beyond docs

3. Poor documentation

  • Foundation of ecosystem, non-negotiable

4. Treating all developers equally

  • Tier support by strategic value (paying > free, partners > hobbyists)

5. No integration quality standards

  • Low-quality integrations hurt your brand

6. Measuring only vanity metrics

  • Track activation and production usage, not just sign-ups

7. Developer advocates with no technical depth

  • Hire developers who can code and teach

Quick Reference

Open ecosystem checklist:

  • Search and discovery (surface quality algorithmically)
  • Trust signals (verified badges, usage stats, ratings)
  • Community curation (user recommendations, collections)
  • Moderation (remove spam after publication)

Developer journey metrics:

  • Awareness: Traffic, sign-ups
  • Onboarding: Time to first API call (<10 min target)
  • Integration: % reaching production deployment
  • Advocacy: Developer NPS, public sharing

Documentation hierarchy:

  1. Quick starts (5-min "Hello World")
  2. Use case guides (solve real problems)
  3. API reference (complete documentation)
  4. Conceptual (architecture, philosophy)

Partner tiers:

  • Tier 1: Self-serve (public API, docs, community)
  • Tier 2: Strategic (co-development, co-marketing)

Student program timeline:

  • Year 1: University partnerships, activation
  • Year 2: Certification, student community
  • Year 3: Job board, enterprise hiring bridge

Related Skills

  • partnership-architecture: Partner deal structures and co-marketing
  • product-led-growth: Self-serve activation funnels for developer products
  • 0-to-1-launch: Launching developer products

*Based on building developer ecosystems at multiple platform companies, including the open vs curated marketplace decision, student program development (3-year arc building talent pipeline), and partner ecosystem growth. Not theory — patterns from building developer ecosystems that actually drove platform adoption and multi-year brand loyalty.*

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.29%
按下载量换算3,519

Claude

28.13%
按下载量换算2,727

Cursor

19.27%
按下载量换算1,868

Gemini CLI

9.26%
按下载量换算898

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills