Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

gstack-workflow(gstack 工作流程)

gstack-workflow 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

gstack-workflow 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 25,754。

总安装 3,702周安装 159GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,297核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:gstack-workflow(gstack 工作流程)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jahonn/gstack-workflow
安装命令:
openclaw skills install gstack-workflow
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install gstack-workflow

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

受 Garry Tan 的 gstack 启发的结构化开发工作流程,用于构建功能、启动项目或进行代码审查。适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。通过 clawhub 安装,结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。

安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。注意该技能主要用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,不直接执行开发操作。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install gstack-workflow;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

gstack-workflow 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install gstack-workflow。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

gstack-workflow 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

gstack-workflow 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

gstack-workflow 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

gstack-workflow 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,702 次,近一周安装 159 次,下载 1,297 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

gstack-workflow 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
gstack-workflow

gstack 工作流程 · 本页

3,702—操作浏览器MIT-0有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
dev-workflow
description
Structured development workflow inspired by Garry Tan's gstack. Use when the user wants to build a feature, start a project, do a code review, or ship code with a disciplined Think → Plan → Build → Review → Test → Ship process. Triggers on phrases like "start a project", "build a feature", "dev workflow", "ship code", "code review workflow", "plan and build", "structured development". Also useful when the user wants to run a disciplined development process with role-based subagents for analysis, design, review, QA, and release.

Dev Workflow — Structured Development Sprint

A 6-phase development process that turns a vague idea into shipped code. Each phase has a clear role, a defined output, and feeds into the next. Run phases sequentially or skip ahead when context is clear.

Phases

#PhaseRoleOutput
1ThinkYC Office Hours CoachDESIGN.md
2PlanEng ManagerPLAN.md
3BuildImplementerCode + Tests
4ReviewStaff EngineerReview Report
5TestQA LeadBug Report + Fixes
6ShipRelease EngineerPR / Deploy

How to Use

Full Sprint (recommended for new features)

# Start from scratch
"I want to build X" → run all 6 phases

# Or ask me:
"Run dev-workflow on [feature description]"

I will walk through each phase, spawning a focused subagent per phase with the right model and prompt.

Partial Sprint

Skip phases when you already have context:

  • "Skip think, I have DESIGN.md" → start from Plan
  • "Just review and ship this branch" → run Review → Test → Ship
  • "I need a design review" → run Phase 2 (Plan) only

Single Phase

Any phase can run standalone:

  • /think — Reframe the problem, challenge assumptions, write DESIGN.md
  • /plan — Architecture, data flow, test strategy, write PLAN.md
  • /build — Implement from PLAN.md
  • /review — Code review with auto-fix for obvious issues
  • /test — Browser testing, regression tests, bug reports
  • /ship — Sync, test, push, open PR

Phase Details

Phase 1: Think (YC Office Hours)

Goal: Reframe the problem before writing code.

Spawn a subagent (Sonnet) with the Think prompt from references/prompts.md. It will:

  1. Ask 6 forcing questions about the real pain, not the feature request
  2. Challenge the framing — "You said X but you actually need Y"
  3. Generate 3 implementation approaches with effort estimates
  4. Recommend the narrowest wedge to ship tomorrow
  5. Write DESIGN.md with the distilled product vision

Key rule: Listen to the pain, not the feature request. The user says "daily briefing app" but means "personal chief of staff AI."

Phase 2: Plan (Eng Manager)

Goal: Lock architecture before building.

Spawn a subagent (Sonnet) with the Plan prompt. It reads DESIGN.md and produces PLAN.md containing:

  1. Architecture diagram (ASCII)
  2. Data flow and state machines
  3. File structure and module boundaries
  4. Test strategy and failure modes
  5. Milestone breakdown (what ships first)

Key rule: No code until the plan is approved. Challenge scope ruthlessly.

Phase 3: Build (Implementer)

Goal: Write code from PLAN.md.

Use the main session or spawn a subagent (Haiku for simple, Sonnet for complex). It reads PLAN.md and:

  1. Implements each milestone in order
  2. Writes tests alongside code (aim for >80% coverage)
  3. Commits atomically per milestone
  4. Updates PLAN.md with implementation notes

Key rule: Follow the plan. If the plan is wrong, update PLAN.md first, then code.

Phase 4: Review (Staff Engineer)

Goal: Find bugs that pass CI but blow up in production.

Spawn a subagent (Sonnet) with the Review prompt. It:

  1. Reads the diff against main/develop
  2. Catches logic errors, race conditions, edge cases
  3. Auto-fixes obvious issues (formatting, unused imports)
  4. Flags completeness gaps and security concerns
  5. Writes a review report

Key rule: Be paranoid. Assume the code will be hit by edge cases tomorrow.

Phase 5: Test (QA Lead)

Goal: Test like a user, not like a developer.

Spawn a subagent (Sonnet) with the Test prompt. It:

  1. Opens the app in a real browser (use browser tool)
  2. Clicks through every user flow
  3. Tests edge cases and error states
  4. Reports bugs with reproduction steps
  5. Auto-fixes and generates regression tests

Key rule: The user doesn't read code. Click the buttons. Break things.

Phase 6: Ship (Release Engineer)

Goal: One command to production.

Run in main session:

  1. Sync with remote (git pull/rebase)
  2. Run full test suite
  3. Audit test coverage
  4. Push and open PR
  5. Update project docs

Key rule: If tests fail, don't ship. Fix first.

Model Selection

PhaseModelWhy
ThinkSonnetNeeds judgment to reframe problems
PlanSonnetArchitecture decisions need reasoning
BuildHaiku/SonnetSimple features → Haiku, complex → Sonnet
ReviewSonnetBug detection needs deep analysis
TestSonnetBrowser interaction needs context
ShipHaikuMechanical execution

Parallel Sprints

For large projects, run multiple sprints on different branches:

  1. Create feature branches for each sprint
  2. Spawn subagents per branch
  3. Each subagent works in isolation
  4. Review and merge sequentially

Max practical parallelism: 3-5 sprints (limited by context management).

Output Files

All phase outputs go to the project root:

  • DESIGN.md — Product vision from Think phase
  • PLAN.md — Architecture and milestones from Plan phase
  • Review reports are written to stdout (capture in conversation)
  • Test reports are written to stdout

Clean up output files after shipping if not needed long-term.

平台分布

OpenClaw

91.67%
按下载量换算1,189

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills