Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

grad-cas(中科院毕业生)

grad-cas 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

grad-cas 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 59,221。

总安装 392周安装 16GitHub Stars 125下载 127核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:grad-cas(中科院毕业生)
来源仓库:https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills
仓库路径:skills/grad-cas
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill grad-cas
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill grad-cas

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

grad-cas 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。适用于科研机构、高校或学术资源相关的信息检索场景。通过关键词和来源线索匹配,返回相关学术或机构资料。

安装方式:npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill grad-cas 建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否涉及联网或文件操作。

来源仓库内路径:skills/grad-cas

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill grad-cas;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

grad-cas 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill grad-cas。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

grad-cas 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

grad-cas 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

grad-cas 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

grad-cas 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 392 次,近一周安装 16 次,下载 127 次,GitHub 125 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

grad-cas 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
grad-cas

中科院毕业生 · 本页

392125需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS)

Overview

Complex Adaptive Systems are composed of diverse, autonomous agents that interact locally according to simple rules, producing emergent global behavior that cannot be predicted from individual components. CAS exhibit self-organization, co-evolution with their environment, and operate at the edge of chaos — the zone between rigid order and random disorder where adaptation and innovation are maximized.

When to Use

  • Analyzing systems where aggregate behavior cannot be predicted from component behavior
  • Understanding why top-down control fails in certain organizational or market contexts
  • Modeling innovation ecosystems, markets, or organizational change as adaptive processes
  • Explaining sudden phase transitions or tipping points in social or economic systems

When NOT to Use

  • When the system is genuinely simple and decomposable (use linear models)
  • When precise quantitative prediction is required (CAS yields patterns, not point forecasts)
  • When the research question is about individual agent psychology rather than system-level emergence

Assumptions

IRON LAW: In a CAS, system behavior EMERGES from local interactions
and CANNOT be predicted by analyzing individual components — the whole
is fundamentally different from the sum of parts.

Key assumptions:

  1. Agents are heterogeneous, autonomous, and adaptive (they learn and change rules)
  2. Interactions are local and nonlinear — small causes can produce large effects
  3. There is no central controller — order emerges from decentralized interaction
  4. The system co-evolves with its environment — fitness landscapes shift as agents adapt

Methodology

Step 1: Identify the System and Its Agents

Define system boundaries. Identify the diverse agents, their decision rules, and their local interaction patterns.

Step 2: Map Interaction Topology

Describe how agents interact: network structure, feedback loops (positive and negative), information flows, and resource dependencies.

Step 3: Identify Emergent Properties

Document system-level behaviors that no individual agent designed or intended. Look for self-organization, pattern formation, phase transitions, and attractors.

Step 4: Assess Adaptive Dynamics

Analyze how agents modify their rules in response to outcomes, how the fitness landscape shifts through co-evolution, and whether the system operates near the edge of chaos.

Output Format

## CAS Analysis: [Context]

### System Identification
- System boundary: [what is inside/outside the system]
- Agent types: [categories of autonomous actors]
- Agent rules: [simple behavioral rules agents follow]

### Interaction Topology
| Agent Type | Interacts With | Mechanism | Feedback Type |
|------------|---------------|-----------|---------------|
| [type] | [partners] | [how] | [positive/negative] |

### Emergent Properties
- Observed emergence: [system behaviors not designed by any agent]
- Self-organization: [spontaneous order that has formed]
- Phase transitions: [sudden shifts observed or possible]

### Adaptive Dynamics
- Co-evolution: [how agents and environment change together]
- Fitness landscape: [stable peaks / shifting / rugged]
- Edge of chaos assessment: [too rigid / adaptive zone / too chaotic]

### Implications
1. [Why top-down intervention may fail or succeed]
2. [Leverage points for influencing system behavior]

Gotchas

  • Emergence is NOT just "complicated" — it means qualitatively new properties that are irreducible to components
  • Do not assume CAS means uncontrollable; leverage points exist but require understanding system dynamics
  • Agent-based models are useful but their validity depends on rule specification — garbage rules in, garbage emergence out
  • The edge of chaos is a metaphor in social systems, not a precisely measurable state
  • CAS thinking does not replace reductionist analysis — it complements it for systems where reductionism fails
  • Beware of using "complexity" as a hand-wave to avoid rigorous analysis

References

  • Holland, J. H. (1995). *Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity*. Addison-Wesley.
  • Kauffman, S. A. (1993). *The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution*. Oxford University Press.
  • Miller, J. H., & Page, S. E. (2007). *Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life*. Princeton University Press.

平台分布

Codex

33.58%
按下载量换算43

Claude

29.4%
按下载量换算37

Cursor

17.49%
按下载量换算22

Gemini CLI

9.6%
按下载量换算12

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills