Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

seo-content-audit(SEO 内容审核)

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

seo-content-audit 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 73,495。

总安装 49周安装 8GitHub Stars 630下载 65核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:seo-content-audit(SEO 内容审核)
来源仓库:https://github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills
仓库路径:skills/seo-content-audit
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill seo-content-audit
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill seo-content-audit

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

seo-content-audit 用于辅助文档、README 和 Markdown 内容的整理与改写,适合提炼结构和统一术语。它适用于 SEO 内容优化和信息架构改进,可用于提升可读性和搜索引擎排名。使用时需保留项目已有事实和路径,避免将未确认信息写成确定结论。涉及对外文案时应控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

安装前建议核实权限范围和维护状态,确保符合项目实际需求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/seo-content-audit

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill seo-content…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

seo-content-audit 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill seo-content-audit。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

seo-content-audit 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

seo-content-audit 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

seo-content-audit 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

seo-content-audit 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 49 次,近一周安装 8 次,下载 65 次,GitHub 630 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

seo-content-audit 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
seo-content-audit

SEO 内容审核 · 本页

49630需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

SEO Content Audit

The complete SEO footprint analysis — content inventory, real SEO metrics, competitor comparison, gap matrices, and prioritized recommendations in one report.

Quick Start

Run an SEO content audit for [company]. Website: [url]. Competitors: [list].

Inputs

InputRequiredDescription
Company nameYesUser provides
Company domainYese.g., "example.com"
Seed competitorsRecommended2-5 competitor domains; system discovers more
Target keywordsOptionalUser provides; system also auto-discovers

Cost

ComponentEst. Cost
Content catalog (target)~$0-0.50 (free unless Apify fallback needed)
Semrush data (target)~$0.10
Ahrefs data (target)~$0.10
Google rank checks (~30 keywords)~$0.06
Competitor Semrush data (3-5 competitors)~$0.30-0.50
Content catalog (competitors, lighter)~$0-1.00
Brand voice extractionFree (WebFetch)
Total typical audit~$1-3

Step-by-Step Process

Phase 1: Context & Setup

Gather basics from the user: company name, domain, seed competitors, target keywords.

Phase 2: Content Inventory

Crawl the target domain to build a complete content inventory:

  1. Fetch sitemap.xml (or RSS, blog index as fallback)
  2. Catalog every page: URL, title, date, content type, topic cluster
  3. Group content by type (blog posts, landing pages, case studies, comparisons, etc.)
  4. Analyze publishing cadence (posts/month, trend, recency)
  5. Optionally deep-analyze top 20 pages for word count, funnel stage, CTA presence

Phase 3: SEO Performance Data

Pull SEO metrics for the target domain:

  1. Domain overview — authority score, organic traffic estimate, keyword count, traffic trend (via Apify Semrush scraper if APIFY_API_TOKEN is set, or web search probes as fallback)
  2. Backlink profile — domain rating, referring domains, top linking sites (via Apify Ahrefs scraper)
  3. Keyword rankings — check actual Google rankings for target keywords (via web search or Apify Google Search scraper)
  4. Competitor discovery — identify competing domains from keyword overlap
  5. Competitor metrics — run a lighter version of steps 1-2 for each competitor

Phase 4: Competitor Content Analysis

For each competitor (3-5 max), crawl their site to get:

  • Content type breakdown (blog posts, case studies, comparisons, etc.)
  • Topic clusters (what topics they cover)
  • Publishing cadence (how often they publish)

No deep analysis needed for competitors — just structure and volume.

Phase 5: Build Gap Matrices

Using data from Phases 2-4, build two matrices:

A) Topic/Keyword Gap Matrix

Cross-reference the target's keyword rankings and content topics against competitors:

| Topic / Keyword | [Target] | [Comp 1] | [Comp 2] | [Comp 3] | Gap? |
|-----------------|----------|----------|----------|----------|------|
| cloud cost optimization | #4, 3 posts | #1, 12 posts | #2, 8 posts | #7, 5 posts | Partial |
| aws savings plans | No content | #3, 4 posts | No content | #1, 6 posts | YES |
| finops best practices | 1 post, not ranking | #5, 3 posts | #2, 7 posts | — | YES |

For each topic/keyword:

  • Does the target have content? How much?
  • Does the target rank for it? What position?
  • Which competitors rank? How much content do they have?
  • Is this a gap? (target has no/weak content, competitors are strong)

How to build this:

  1. Collect all unique topic clusters from target + all competitors
  2. For each topic, count content pieces per company
  3. Cross-reference with keyword ranking data (from Phase 3)
  4. Flag gaps where competitors have coverage and target doesn't
B) Content Type Gap Matrix

Compare what types of content each company produces:

| Content Type | [Target] | [Comp 1] | [Comp 2] | [Comp 3] | Gap? |
|-------------|----------|----------|----------|----------|------|
| Blog posts | 89 | 156 | 112 | 45 | Volume gap |
| Comparison pages | 0 | 12 | 8 | 3 | YES |
| Case studies | 5 | 22 | 15 | 8 | Weak |
| Glossary / educational | 0 | 45 | 0 | 30 | YES |
| Integration pages | 12 | 34 | 28 | 15 | Partial |
| ROI calculator / tools | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | Opportunity |
| Webinars / video | 3 | 18 | 12 | 6 | Weak |

How to build this:

  1. Use the content type classifications from all content catalogs
  2. Count per type per company
  3. Flag types where target is at zero or significantly behind competitors

Phase 6: Brand Voice Extraction (Optional)

If the audit will feed into content creation:

  1. From the content inventory (Phase 2), select 10-15 of the best blog posts (most recent, longest, most diverse topics)
  2. Fetch each page and analyze the writing style
  3. Produce brand voice guidelines: tone, vocabulary patterns, sentence structure, do's and don'ts

Phase 7: Synthesis & Report

Combine all findings into the final report. Save to the current working directory or wherever the user prefers.


Output Template

# SEO Content Audit: [Company Name]

**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Domain:** [domain]
**Competitors analyzed:** [list]
**Data sources:** [Semrush (via Apify), Ahrefs (via Apify), Google SERP, sitemap crawl, RSS]

---

## Executive Summary

[3-5 sentences. Overall SEO health assessment. Biggest strength. Biggest gap.
Most important recommendation. How they compare to competitors overall.]

---

## 1. Content Inventory

### Overview
- **Total pages cataloged:** X
- **Blog posts:** X
- **Landing pages:** X
- **Case studies:** X
- **Comparison pages:** X
- **Other:** X

### Content by Topic Cluster
| Topic | Posts | % of Content | Most Recent |
|-------|-------|-------------|-------------|
| [Topic 1] | X | X% | YYYY-MM-DD |
| ... |

### Publishing Cadence
- **Average:** X posts/month
- **Trend:** [increasing/decreasing/stable]
- **Most recent publish:** YYYY-MM-DD
- **Unique authors:** X

### Content Depth Assessment
[From deep analysis of top 20 pages: average word count, funnel stage distribution,
how many have CTAs, internal linking patterns]

---

## 2. SEO Performance

### Domain Metrics
| Metric | [Target] | Industry Benchmark* |
|--------|----------|-------------------|
| Authority Score (Semrush) | X/100 | |
| Domain Rating (Ahrefs) | X/100 | |
| Monthly Organic Traffic | ~X | |
| Organic Keywords | X | |
| Backlinks | X | |
| Referring Domains | X | |

### Top Performing Pages
| # | URL | Est. Traffic | Top Keyword | Position |
|---|-----|-------------|-------------|----------|
| 1 | ... | ... | ... | ... |

### Keyword Rankings
| Keyword | Position | URL | Gap? |
|---------|----------|-----|------|
| [keyword 1] | #X | [url] | |
| [keyword 2] | Not ranking | — | YES |

### Backlink Profile
- Domain Rating: X/100
- Referring Domains: X
- Top linking sites: [list]
- Notable: [any insights about link profile quality]

---

## 3. Competitor Comparison

### Domain Metrics Comparison
| Metric | [Target] | [Comp 1] | [Comp 2] | [Comp 3] |
|--------|----------|----------|----------|----------|
| Authority Score | | | | |
| Organic Traffic | | | | |
| Keywords | | | | |
| Blog Posts | | | | |
| Content Types | | | | |

### Topic/Keyword Gap Matrix
| Topic / Keyword | [Target] | [Comp 1] | [Comp 2] | [Comp 3] | Gap? |
|-----------------|----------|----------|----------|----------|------|
| [topic 1] | X posts, #Y | ... | ... | ... | |
| ... |

### Content Type Gap Matrix
| Content Type | [Target] | [Comp 1] | [Comp 2] | [Comp 3] | Gap? |
|-------------|----------|----------|----------|----------|------|
| Blog posts | X | X | X | X | |
| Comparison pages | X | X | X | X | |
| Case studies | X | X | X | X | |
| ... |

---

## 4. Gaps & Opportunities

### Critical Gaps (High Impact, Act Now)
1. **[Gap]:** [Description. What competitors have that target doesn't.
   Estimated search volume / traffic opportunity. Difficulty to address.]
2. ...

### Content Type Opportunities
1. **[Missing content type]:** [Why it matters. What competitors are doing.
   Estimated effort to create.]
2. ...

### Quick Wins (Low Effort, Immediate Impact)
1. **[Quick win]:** [What to do. Expected impact.]
2. ...

### Keyword Opportunities
| Keyword | Est. Search Volume | Competitor Positions | Difficulty | Priority |
|---------|-------------------|---------------------|------------|----------|
| ... |

---

## 5. Brand Voice Profile

### Voice Summary
[2-3 sentence summary of their writing voice]

### Tone
| Dimension | Position |
|-----------|----------|
| Formality | [e.g., Professional-casual] |
| Authority | [e.g., Expert/teacher] |
| Humor | [e.g., None] |
| Directness | [e.g., Very direct] |

### Writing Guidelines
**Do:**
- [Guideline 1]
- [Guideline 2]

**Don't:**
- [Anti-pattern 1]
- [Anti-pattern 2]

[Link to full brand voice profile if generated]

---

## 6. Recommendations (Prioritized)

### Tier 1: High Impact, Do First
1. **[Recommendation]**
   - What: [specific action]
   - Why: [evidence from audit]
   - Expected impact: [traffic/ranking improvement]
   - Effort: [Low/Medium/High]

2. ...

### Tier 2: Medium Impact, Plan For
1. ...

### Tier 3: Long-term Strategic
1. ...

---

## Appendix

### A. Full Content Catalog
[Link to content-inventory.md]

### B. Complete SEO Profile
[Link to seo-profile.md]

### C. Brand Voice Guidelines
[Link to brand-voice.md]

### D. Raw Data
- Content inventory JSON
- SEO profile JSON
- Competitor content JSONs

Tips

  • Run Phases 2-3 in parallel. Content cataloging and SEO metrics are independent — run them simultaneously to save time.
  • Start with 3 competitors, not 5. More competitors = more Apify costs. Start small, add more if the initial analysis shows gaps.
  • The gap matrices are the most valuable output. Focus your analysis effort there. They directly feed into content strategy recommendations.
  • Brand voice is optional but valuable. If you're pressed for time, skip it. But if this feeds into content creation or outreach, it's worth the 10 minutes.
  • Update quarterly. SEO landscapes shift. Re-run the audit every quarter to track progress and discover new gaps.
  • Combine with AEO visibility for a complete organic search picture — traditional SEO + AI answer engine coverage.
  • The free fallback works. If Apify is unavailable, the scripts fall back to web search probes. You get less precise data but still a useful audit.

Dependencies

  • APIFY_API_TOKEN env var (for Semrush/Ahrefs data via Apify; free web search probes work without it)
  • Web search and web fetch capabilities

平台分布

Codex

34.67%
按下载量换算23

Claude

29.43%
按下载量换算19

Cursor

19.53%
按下载量换算13

Gemini CLI

9.86%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills