Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

pain-language-engagers(痛苦语言参与者)

pain-language-engagers 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

pain-language-engagers 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 72,323。

总安装 188周安装 8GitHub Stars 630下载 66核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:pain-language-engagers(痛苦语言参与者)
来源仓库:https://github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills
仓库路径:skills/pain-language-engagers
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill pain-language-engagers
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill pain-language-engagers

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

pain-language-engagers 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词或任务场景快速定位候选结果。它适用于客户痛点语言识别和营销话术优化,可用于提升沟通效果。使用时需结合来源仓库和原始 README 继续核验具体模型和语料库限制。

安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网或外部服务调用。涉及客户反馈时应评估隐私保护和合规要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/pain-language-engagers

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill pain-langua…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

pain-language-engagers 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill pain-language-engager…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

pain-language-engagers 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

pain-language-engagers 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

pain-language-engagers 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

pain-language-engagers 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 188 次,近一周安装 8 次,下载 66 次,GitHub 630 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

pain-language-engagers 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
pain-language-engagers

痛苦语言参与者 · 本页

188630接触敏感数据未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Pain-Language Engagers

Find warm leads by scraping LinkedIn for pain-language posts and their engagers. People who write about, react to, or comment on posts expressing operational frustrations are signaling they live with a problem your product solves. This skill turns those signals into a qualified lead list.

Core principle: Search for pain-language, not solution-language. Solution keywords ("AI automation", "workflow optimization") attract builders and VCs. Pain keywords ("can't find drivers", "check calls are killing us") attract operators living with the problem.

Phase 0: Intake

Before generating keywords or running anything, ask the user these questions. Present them as a numbered list and tell the user to answer what's relevant and skip what's not.

Product & Pain Context

  1. What does your product/service do in one sentence?
  2. What specific problem does it solve? Who feels this pain most acutely?
  3. What does your ICP's day-to-day look like WITHOUT your product? (The frustrations, workarounds, manual processes)
  4. What phrases would someone use when complaining about this problem on LinkedIn? (e.g., "check calls are killing us", "can't find drivers", "spending hours on manual data entry")

ICP Definition

  1. What industries/verticals are your target buyers in?
  2. What job titles or roles are your ideal buyers? (e.g., "VP Operations", "Broker owner", "Head of Logistics")
  3. What titles should be EXCLUDED? (e.g., "Software Engineer", "AI researcher")
  4. Any specific competitors whose employees should be filtered out?
  5. Geographic focus? (e.g., "United States only", "global")

LinkedIn Signal Sources

  1. Any LinkedIn company pages where your ICP is likely to engage? (Industry publications, communities, competitor pages)
  2. Any specific LinkedIn posts or content creators your ICP follows?

Phase 1: Generate Pain-Language Keywords

Based on the intake answers, generate ~15-25 pain-language keywords in LinkedIn boolean search syntax. Organize into categories:

  • Staffing/Resource Pain — hiring difficulties, turnover, burnout
  • Operational Friction — manual processes, missed SLAs, communication breakdowns
  • Margin/Growth Pain — cost pressure, scaling challenges
  • Process Complaints — specific workflow frustrations

Key principle: Every keyword should be something a frustrated operator would actually type or say, not marketing language or solution framing.

Also generate:

  • ICP keyword list — industry terms for ICP classification (from answer #5)
  • Tech vendor exclusion list — competitor names + generic tech titles (from answers #7, #8)
  • Pain-pattern regexes — for filtering company page posts (derived from the keywords)
  • Broad topic patterns — industry terms for known industry page filtering
  • Hardcoded company pages — from answer #10, plus any the agent suggests based on the industry

Present the full keyword list to the user for approval/refinement before running. This is the most critical step — bad keywords = bad leads.

Once approved, save the complete config as JSON:

# Save config
skills/pain-language-engagers/configs/{client-name}.json

Config JSON structure:

{
  "client_name": "example-client",
  "pain_keywords": ["\"can't find X\"", "\"hiring Y\" problems"],
  "pain_patterns": ["can.t find X", "hiring Y", "manual.*process"],
  "icp_keywords": ["industry-term-1", "industry-term-2"],
  "tech_vendor_keywords": ["software engineer", "competitor-name"],
  "hardcoded_companies": ["https://www.linkedin.com/company/example/"],
  "industry_pages": ["https://www.linkedin.com/company/example/"],
  "broad_topic_patterns": ["industry", "sector", "niche-term"],
  "country_filter": "United States",
  "days_back": 60,
  "max_posts_per_keyword": 50,
  "max_posts_per_company": 100
}

Phase 2: Run LinkedIn Scraping Pipeline

Execute the pipeline script with the saved config:

python3 skills/pain-language-engagers/scripts/pain_language_engagers.py \
  --config skills/pain-language-engagers/configs/{client-name}.json \
  [--test] [--companies "url1,url2"]

Flags:

  • --config (required) — path to the client config JSON
  • --test — limit to 3 keywords, 5 posts per company (for validation)
  • --skip-discovery — skip keyword search, only scrape hardcoded/extra companies
  • --companies "url1,url2" — add extra company URLs to scrape

What the script does:

  1. Keyword search — apimaestro/linkedin-posts-search-scraper-no-cookies for each pain keyword
  2. Post author extraction — People who wrote pain posts = direct leads (free, no API call)
  3. Company page discovery — Extract company pages from keyword results
  4. Company page engager scraping — harvestapi/linkedin-company-posts for each company page, pain-filtered
  5. Profile enrichment — harvestapi/linkedin-profile-scraper for all profiles (gets headline + location)
  6. ICP classification — Using the client-specific ICP/vendor keyword lists from config
  7. Dedup + CSV export

Cost estimate:

  • Keyword search: $0.10 per keyword ($2 for 20 keywords)
  • Company page scraping: $0.002 per post per company ($0.20 per company)
  • Profile enrichment: ~$0.003 per profile
  • Full run with 20 keywords + 10 companies: ~$5-10

Always run with --test first to validate the config produces relevant results before a full run.

Phase 3: Review & Refine

After the script completes, present results to the user:

  • ICP breakdown — counts by tier (Likely / Possible / Unknown / Tech Vendor)
  • Top 15 Likely ICP leads — name, role, company, engagement type
  • Sample of filtered-out leads — so user can catch false negatives
  • Keyword performance — which keywords produced the most leads, which were duds

If the user wants adjustments:

  1. Update the config JSON (add/remove keywords, adjust ICP lists)
  2. Re-run the script
  3. Repeat until the user is satisfied

Common adjustments:

  • Too many Tech Vendor results — add more vendor names to tech_vendor_keywords
  • Missing obvious ICP leads — add more industry terms to icp_keywords
  • Irrelevant posts — refine pain_patterns to be more specific
  • Not enough results — add more keywords or reduce days_back constraint

Phase 4: Output

CSV exported to the current working directory as {client-name}-{date}.csv with columns:

ColumnDescription
NameFull name
LinkedIn Profile URLProfile link
RoleParsed from headline
Company NameParsed from headline
LocationFrom profile enrichment
Source PageWhich company page(s) they engaged on
Post URL(s)Links to the post(s) they engaged with
Engagement TypePost Author, Comment, or Reaction
Comment TextTheir comment (if applicable — personalization gold)
ICP TierLikely ICP, Possible ICP, Unknown, or Tech Vendor
Niche KeywordWhich pain keyword matched

Tools Required

  • Apify API token — set as APIFY_API_TOKEN in .env
  • Apify actors used:

- apimaestro/linkedin-posts-search-scraper-no-cookies (keyword search) - harvestapi/linkedin-company-posts (company page scraping) - harvestapi/linkedin-profile-scraper (profile enrichment)

Example Usage

Trigger phrases:

  • "Find people complaining about [problem] on LinkedIn"
  • "LinkedIn pain-based prospecting for [product]"
  • "Find leads who are discussing [pain point]"
  • "Scrape LinkedIn for [industry] pain posts"
  • "Run the pain-language engagers pipeline for [client]"

With existing config:

python3 skills/pain-language-engagers/scripts/pain_language_engagers.py \
  --config skills/pain-language-engagers/configs/happy-robot.json

Test mode:

python3 skills/pain-language-engagers/scripts/pain_language_engagers.py \
  --config skills/pain-language-engagers/configs/happy-robot.json --test

平台分布

Codex

35.57%
按下载量换算23

Claude

31.76%
按下载量换算21

Cursor

20.38%
按下载量换算13

Gemini CLI

8.88%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills