Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
前端设计需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

typed-service-contracts类型服务合同

Agent Skill

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范、排版、配色、布局和交互体验优化。它适合让 Agent 根据产品场景整理页面结构、生成 UI 方案、检查视觉一致性或改进组件层级。使用时需要结合现有品牌、设计系统和用户任务,不应只堆装饰元素;涉及真实页面改动时,应通过截图或浏览器预览检查文本溢出、对齐和响应式表现。

总安装

988

周安装

42

GitHub Stars

10,065

下载量

346
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:typed-service-contracts(类型服务合同)
来源仓库:https://github.com/google-labs-code/design.md
仓库路径:skills/typed-service-contracts
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/google-labs-code/design.md --skill typed-service-contracts
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/google-labs-code/design.md --skill typed-service-contracts

简介

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范和交互体验优化,适合生成 UI 方案或检查组件层级。

  • 适用于整理页面结构、生成设计方案或改进视觉一致性,需结合品牌与用户任务。
  • 使用时需确认设计系统约束,避免堆砌装饰元素;涉及页面改动应通过预览检查响应式表现。
  • 安装方式:github,命令:npx skills add https://github.com/google-labs-code/design.md --skill typed-service-contracts。
  • 注意权限范围与维护状态,可能触发文件读写或浏览器操作,建议先验证环境兼容性。

SKILL.md

Typed Service Contracts (Spec & Handler Pattern)

This skill defines a Vertical Slice Architecture backed by Design by Contract (DbC) principles. It treats application logic as rigorously defined Units of Work where inputs are parsed (not just validated) and errors are treated as values (Result Pattern) rather than exceptions.

When to use this skill

  • Building CLIs or Libraries: When you need strict boundaries between user input and system logic.
  • Complex Validation: When inputs require transformation (parsing) before being useful (e.g., ensuring a string is a valid file path).
  • High-Reliability Requirements: When you cannot afford unhandled runtime exceptions and need exhaustive error handling.
  • Testing Focus: When you want to separate data validation tests from business logic tests.

Architecture Components

1. The Spec (spec.ts)

The "Contract" or "Port". It defines the *What*. It must contain:

  • Input Schema: A Zod schema that parses raw input into a valid DTO.
  • Output Schema: A Zod schema defining the successful data structure.
  • Error Schema: A discriminated union of specific failure modes (not generic errors).
  • Result Type: A DiscriminatedUnion of Success | Failure.
  • Interface: The capability definition (e.g., interface ConfigureSpec).

2. The Handler (handler.ts)

The "Implementation" or "Adapter". It defines the *How*. It must:

  • Implement the Interface defined in the Spec.
  • Be an "Impure" class that handles side effects (File System, API calls).
  • NEVER throw exceptions. It must catch internal errors and map them to the Result type.

How to use it

Step 1: Define the Contract (spec.ts)

Follow this template to define the boundaries.

import { z } from 'zod';

// 1. VALIDATION HELPERS (Reusable Refinements)
export const SafePathSchema = z.string()
  .min(1)
  .refine(p => !p.includes('..'), "No traversal allowed");

// 2. INPUT (The Command) - "Parse, don't validate"
export const MyTaskInputSchema = z.object({
  path: SafePathSchema,
  force: z.boolean().default(false),
});
export type MyTaskInput = z.infer<typeof MyTaskInputSchema>;

// 3. ERROR CODES (Exhaustive)
export const MyTaskErrorCode = z.enum([
  'FILE_NOT_FOUND',
  'PERMISSION_DENIED',
  'UNKNOWN_ERROR'
]);

// 4. RESULT (The Monad)
export const MyTaskSuccess = z.object({
  success: z.literal(true),
  data: z.string(), // The output payload
});

export const MyTaskFailure = z.object({
  success: z.literal(false),
  error: z.object({
    code: MyTaskErrorCode,
    message: z.string(),
    suggestion: z.string().optional(),
    recoverable: z.boolean(),
  })
});

export type MyTaskResult =
  | z.infer<typeof MyTaskSuccess>
  | z.infer<typeof MyTaskFailure>;

// 5. INTERFACE (The Capability)
export interface MyTaskSpec {
  execute(input: MyTaskInput): Promise<MyTaskResult>;
}

Step 2: Implement the Handler (handler.ts)

Follow this template to implement the logic.

import { MyTaskSpec, MyTaskInput, MyTaskResult } from './spec.js';
import * as fs from 'fs';

export class MyTaskHandler implements MyTaskSpec {
  async execute(input: MyTaskInput): Promise<MyTaskResult> {
    try {
      // 1. Business Logic
      if (!fs.existsSync(input.path)) {
        // 2. Explicit Error Return (No Throwing)
        return {
          success: false,
          error: {
            code: 'FILE_NOT_FOUND',
            message: `Path does not exist: ${input.path}`,
            recoverable: true
          }
        };
      }

      // 3. Success Return
      return {
        success: true,
        data: 'Operation complete'
      };

    } catch (error) {
      // 4. Safety Net: Catch unknown runtime errors
      return {
        success: false,
        error: {
          code: 'UNKNOWN_ERROR',
          message: error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error),
          recoverable: false
        }
      };
    }
  }
}

Step 3: Testing Strategy

Do not write monolithic tests. Split them into Contract Tests and Logic Tests.

A. Contract Tests (Schema)

Test the *Bouncer*. Ensure invalid data is rejected before it reaches the handler.

  • Focus: Edge cases, validation rules, Zod refinements.
  • Style: Data-driven (Table tests).
// spec.test.ts
import { MyTaskInputSchema } from './spec';

const invalidCases = [
  { val: '../etc/passwd', err: 'No traversal allowed' },
  { val: '', err: 'min(1)' },
];

test.each(invalidCases)('validates paths', ({ val, err }) => {
  const result = MyTaskInputSchema.safeParse({ path: val });
  expect(result.success).toBe(false);
});

B. Logic Tests (Handler)

Test the *Chef*. Mock external dependencies (fs, network) and assert the Result Object.

  • Focus: Business logic flow, error mapping, success states.
  • Style: Mocked unit tests or Scenario Runners.
// handler.test.ts
import { MyTaskHandler } from './handler';
import { vi } from 'vitest'; // or jest

test('returns FILE_NOT_FOUND if path missing', async () => {
  // MOCK
  vi.mocked(fs.existsSync).mockReturnValue(false);

  // EXECUTE
  const handler = new MyTaskHandler();
  const result = await handler.execute({ path: '/fake' });

  // ASSERT (Check the Result Object)
  expect(result.success).toBe(false);
  if (!result.success) {
    expect(result.error.code).toBe('FILE_NOT_FOUND');
  }
});

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

39.61%
按下载量换算137

Claude

27.83%
按下载量换算96

Cursor

18.88%
按下载量换算65

Gemini CLI

10.04%
按下载量换算35

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills