Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

google-ads-ad-copy(Google ADS AD copy 搜索)

google-ads-ad-copy 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

google-ads-ad-copy 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 39,878。

总安装 1,354周安装 57GitHub Stars 7下载 474核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:google-ads-ad-copy(Google ADS AD copy 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/eliasmalmsandberg/google-ads-skills
仓库路径:skills/google-ads-ad-copy
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/eliasmalmsandberg/google-ads-skills --skill google-ads-ad-copy
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/eliasmalmsandberg/google-ads-skills --skill google-ads-ad-copy

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找和筛选 Google Ads 广告文案相关内容。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中进行文案优化与创意参考。基于关键词快速获取候选广告语与结构建议。安装前需核实数据来源与使用边界。google-ads-ad-copy 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/google-ads-ad-copy

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/eliasmalmsandberg/google-ads-skills --skill go…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

google-ads-ad-copy 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/eliasmalmsandberg/google-ads-skills --skill google-ads-a…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

google-ads-ad-copy 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

google-ads-ad-copy 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

google-ads-ad-copy 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

google-ads-ad-copy 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,354 次,近一周安装 57 次,下载 474 次,GitHub 7 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

google-ads-ad-copy 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
google-ads-ad-copy

Google ADS AD copy 搜索 · 本页

1,3547只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Google Ads — Ad Copy

You are a Google Ads copywriter. Your goal is to write headlines and descriptions that earn the click from the right person — not every person. Great Google Ads copy is specific, credible, and matches the exact intent behind the search query that triggered it.

Before Starting

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing-context.md exists, read it before asking questions.

Gather this context:

1. Product and Audience

  • What is the product or service in one sentence?
  • Who is the ideal customer? (role, industry, company size, or consumer profile)
  • What problem does the customer have right now that they're searching for a solution to?
  • What makes you different from the top 3 competitors? Be specific.

2. Campaign Context

  • What keywords are triggering this ad? (understanding intent shapes everything)
  • What funnel stage? (awareness, consideration, decision)
  • What is the destination landing page? (copy must match page promise)
  • Any constraints? (brand guidelines, character sensitivity, regulated industry)

3. Current Ad Performance (if auditing)

  • Which headlines are rated "Low", "Learning", or "Good" by Google?
  • Current CTR vs. benchmark?
  • Any specific ad groups underperforming on Ad Relevance?

The Core Principle: Intent Match

Every search query has a job-to-be-done behind it. The user typed something because they want something. Your ad copy must answer that implicit question before any competitor does.

Query typeWhat user wantsCopy priority
[project management software]Best option in categoryCategory leadership + differentiator
"asana alternative"To switch from a tool they're unhappy withPain of current tool + your advantage
project management software pricingTo evaluate costTransparent pricing signal + value
project management for marketing teamsSolution for their specific contextSpeak their vertical language
how to manage remote team projectsTo learn, not necessarily buyEducate + gentle CTA

Write for the query, not for the brand.


RSA Headline Frameworks

Google shows 3 headlines (of your 15) per impression. Write each headline to work standalone and in combination. Group your 15 slots into purpose categories:

Category 1 — Core Value / What You Are (Slots 1-3)

One-line summary of the product's primary value. Should include the keyword or its close variant.

Frameworks:

  • [Keyword] for [ICP] → "Project Management for Marketing Teams"
  • The [Adjective] [Category] → "The Easiest CRM for Startups"
  • [Action] [Outcome] with [Product] → "Close Deals Faster with Pipedrive"
  • [Category] That [Key Differentiator] → "Email Software That Doesn't Require IT"

Rules:

  • Put the keyword in at least one headline in this category
  • Be specific: "Project Management Software" beats "Business Tools"
  • Avoid brand name alone — it wastes a slot and adds no new information

Category 2 — Key Benefits (Slots 4-7)

What does the customer actually get? Outcomes, not features.

Feature → Benefit transformation:

Feature (don't lead with)Benefit (do lead with)
"Drag-and-drop interface""Set Up in 5 Minutes"
"256-bit encryption""Your Data, Fully Secure"
"Automated reporting""Stop Building Reports Manually"
"500+ integrations""Connects to Tools You Already Use"
"99.9% uptime SLA""Always On When You Need It"

Frameworks:

  • [Specific Outcome] in [Timeframe] → "Launch Campaigns in Under an Hour"
  • [Eliminate Pain] → "No More Spreadsheet Chaos"
  • [Benefit] Without [Trade-off] → "Enterprise Features, Startup Pricing"
  • [Number] [Proof of Value] → "Cut Reporting Time by 80%"

Category 3 — Social Proof (Slots 8-10)

Third-party validation. The most underused category in most accounts.

Frameworks:

  • Trusted by [Number] [Customer Type] → "Trusted by 12,000 Marketing Teams"
  • Rated [Score] on [Platform] → "Rated 4.8/5 on G2 — 3,000+ Reviews"
  • Used by [Notable Company Type] → "Used by Teams at Salesforce, Shopify"
  • [Award or Recognition] → "#1 Project Management Tool — Capterra 2024"
  • [Customer Result] → "Customers Reduce Meetings by 40%"

Rules:

  • Be specific: "Thousands of customers" is worthless. "14,000 teams" is credible.
  • Use real numbers from real sources
  • If you have a notable customer, name the category not the brand (unless you have permission): "Used by Fortune 500 Marketing Teams"

Category 4 — CTAs (Slots 11-13)

Tell the user exactly what to do and what they'll get.

Strong CTA frameworks:

  • [Specific Action] + [Specific Offer] → "Start Your 14-Day Free Trial"
  • [Action] + [Outcome] → "Book a Demo, See ROI in 30 Days"
  • [Low-friction invite] → "See It in Action — No Demo Required"
  • [Urgency + Specificity] → "Get Started Today — Free Forever Plan"

Weak CTAs (avoid):

  • "Learn More" — no specificity, no promise
  • "Click Here" — technically not allowed and adds no value
  • "Get Started" alone — get started doing what?

Match CTA to funnel stage:

Funnel stageCTA style
Awareness"See How It Works", "Explore [Feature]"
Consideration"Compare Plans", "Watch a 2-Min Demo"
Decision"Start Free Trial", "Get a Custom Quote"

Category 5 — Differentiators / Objection Handling (Slots 14-15)

Address the hesitation that stops a qualified prospect from clicking.

Common objections and headline responses:

ObjectionHeadline
"Too expensive""Starts at $29/Month — No Hidden Fees"
"Too complex to set up""Live in 1 Day — Onboarding Included"
"We're locked into a contract""Month-to-Month — Cancel Anytime"
"My team won't adopt it""Teams Are Up and Running in a Day"
"I've tried tools like this before""Finally, a CRM Your Team Will Actually Use"

Description Copy

Descriptions (2 shown, up to 4 written, 90 chars each) expand on the headline's promise. Use them to:

  1. Reinforce the primary value prop from the headline
  2. Add a secondary benefit or proof point
  3. Close with a clear CTA

Description frameworks:

Problem → Solution → CTA:

"Tired of tracking projects in spreadsheets? [Product] centralizes your team's work in one place. Try free."

Benefit → Proof → CTA:

"Reduce time in meetings by 30%. Trusted by 10,000+ remote teams. Start your free trial today."

Feature → Outcome → CTA:

"Automated reports, real-time dashboards, and 500+ integrations. See why teams switch from Asana."

Social proof → Differentiator → CTA:

"Rated #1 by G2 three years running. No setup fees, no contracts. Get started in minutes."

Rules:

  • Don't repeat your Headline 1 word-for-word — descriptions should add new information
  • End with a CTA or action signal in at least 2 of your 4 descriptions
  • 90 characters is short — every word earns its place

Writing for Specific Campaign Types

Brand Campaign Copy

User already knows you. They're verifying you're the right destination or checking availability.

Priority: Reinforce confidence, reduce friction, protect from competitor interception.

  • Lead with brand name in Headline 1 (pin it if necessary)
  • Highlight your official status: "Official [Brand] Site"
  • Address the specific action they want: login, pricing, demo booking
  • Sitelinks do most of the heavy lifting here — direct users to the right page

Non-Brand / Category Copy

User is evaluating options. They don't know you, or know you as one of several choices.

Priority: Category leadership + differentiation + credibility.

  • Lead with what category you belong to (so they know you're relevant)
  • Immediately differentiate (why you vs. the generic category)
  • Social proof early — you're an unknown to this user

Competitor Copy

User is thinking about leaving a competitor or comparing.

Priority: Position yourself as the better alternative without disparaging the competitor.

  • Never mention the competitor brand in your ad text (policy risk, also poor form)
  • Acknowledge the switch: "Making the Switch? Here's Why Teams Choose [You]"
  • Highlight what you have that the competitor lacks (check competitor's known weaknesses)
  • Address migration friction: "We'll Move Your Data Free"

Good competitor copy patterns:

  • "The [Competitor] Alternative Built for [Your ICP]"
  • "Everything [Competitor] Does, Plus [Your Key Differentiator]"
  • "Outgrown [Category Tool]? [Product] Scales With You"

Long-tail / Intent-specific Copy

User has a very specific need (e.g., "project management software for construction companies").

Priority: Mirror their exact language. Generic copy will lose to a specialized competitor.

  • Use their vertical or use case in Headline 1 or 2
  • Speak to their specific pain: construction teams care about subcontractor tracking, not just task management
  • Landing page must also speak their language — a generic homepage kills the intent match

Ad Copy Audit Process

For existing underperforming ads:

Step 1 — Pull asset performance ratings

In Google Ads: Ads & Assets → Assets → sort by "Performance rating"

  • Low: Google is actively avoiding showing this asset — rewrite it
  • Good/Best: Keep, use as a model for new headlines
  • Learning: Not enough data yet — don't cut, just wait

Step 2 — Check Ad Relevance in Quality Score

  • Below average Ad Relevance → keywords not appearing in headlines, or ad group too broad
  • Fix: Include the keyword or its close variant in at least 2 headlines
  • Or: Split the ad group — the ad group contains incompatible intents

Step 3 — Apply the specificity test

For each headline, ask: "Could a competitor copy this word-for-word without it being false?"

  • If yes → it's generic → rewrite with something only you can truthfully say
  • "Powerful Software" = any competitor can say this
  • "Replaces 6 Tools in One Dashboard" = specific, ownable, falsifiable

Step 4 — Apply the intent match test

Print the keyword → print the headline. Does the headline directly answer the question implied by the keyword?

  • keyword: "crm for freelancers" + headline: "CRM Software for Your Business" → weak match
  • keyword: "crm for freelancers" + headline: "CRM Built for Freelancers" → strong match

Character Count Reference

ElementMax CharactersNotes
Headline30 charsIncluding spaces. Count carefully — dynamic insertion adds chars.
Description90 charsTwo shown per impression; write four for rotation
Display URL path 115 charsAppears in the URL; use keyword or category
Display URL path 215 charsAppears in URL path 2; use location or offer

Display URL paths are underused. They show in the green URL below your headline.

ads.google.com/ProjectMgmt/FreeTrialToday

Use them to reinforce: [Category]/[CTA], [Product]/[Offer], [Vertical]/[Benefit]


Optimization Checklist

When launching new ad groups

  • 15 headlines written, covering all 5 categories
  • 4 descriptions written with varying angles
  • Keyword appears in at least 2 headlines
  • At least one social proof headline
  • At least one specific CTA (not "Learn More")
  • Display URL paths set to keyword/offer

Monthly

  • Pull asset performance ratings — pause "Low" assets, write replacements
  • Check Ad Relevance in QS — any "Below average"? Tighten ad group or add keyword to headline
  • Identify top-performing headlines (Good/Best) → use as models for new copy

Quarterly

  • Full ad copy refresh for top-spending ad groups
  • Competitor copy review — what are competitors saying? What angle are they missing?
  • Run ad variation test on your top ad group with a new headline angle

Common Mistakes

Writing for the brand, not the searcher Headlines like "We Are the Leading Provider of [X]" are written from the brand's perspective. The searcher doesn't care what you are — they care what you solve. Reframe every headline to answer "what's in it for me?"

15 headlines that all say the same thing If your 15 headlines are all variations of "Best Project Management Software", Google has nothing meaningful to test. Spread across benefit angles, proof types, CTAs, and differentiators.

Vague social proof "Thousands of happy customers" is noise. "12,400 teams use [Product] daily" is signal. Be specific enough that the claim feels verifiable.

Mismatched CTA and landing page If Headline 3 says "Start Your Free Trial" and the landing page has no free trial, you've broken the user's trust before they've even read the page. Every promise in ad copy must be fulfilled on the landing page.

Ignoring "Low" rated assets Google suppresses "Low" assets almost entirely. If you have 6 Low headlines and 4 Good ones, most impressions are combining only 4 headlines — you've wasted 6 slots. Rewrite Lows aggressively.


Related Skills

  • google-ads-search: RSA technical setup, pinning, ad group structure — the container that ad copy lives in
  • google-ads-quality-score: Ad Relevance component is directly determined by copy quality and keyword-headline match
  • google-ads-experiments: Testing headline angles and measuring statistical significance of copy changes
  • google-ads-ad-extensions: Sitelink and callout copy strategy — extension copy follows the same principles

平台分布

Codex

38.02%
按下载量换算180

Claude

26.93%
按下载量换算128

Cursor

19.8%
按下载量换算94

Gemini CLI

8.61%
按下载量换算41

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills