Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

good-services-service-design(良好的服务 服务设计)

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范、排版、配色、布局和交互体验优化。它适合让 Agent 根据产品场景整理页面结构、生成 UI 方案、检查视觉一致性或改进组件层级。使用时需要结合现有品牌、设计系统和用户任务,不应只堆装饰元素;涉及真实页面改动时,应通过截图或浏览器预览检查文本溢出、对齐和响应式表现。

good-services-service-design 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 50,488。

总安装 612周安装 25GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 198核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:good-services-service-design(良好的服务 服务设计)
来源仓库:https://github.com/tristanmanchester/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/good-services-service-design
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/tristanmanchester/agent-skills --skill good-services-service-design
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/tristanmanchester/agent-skills --skill good-services-service-design

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

good-services-service-design 用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范和交互体验优化。适合整理页面结构、生成 UI 方案或检查视觉一致性。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装并使用该技能。涉及真实页面改动时,应通过截图或浏览器预览检查文本溢出和对齐。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/good-services-service-design

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/tristanmanchester/agent-skills --skill good-se…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

good-services-service-design 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/tristanmanchester/agent-skills --skill good-services-ser…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

good-services-service-design 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

good-services-service-design 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

good-services-service-design 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

good-services-service-design 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 612 次,近一周安装 25 次,下载 198 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

good-services-service-design 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
good-services-service-design

良好的服务 服务设计 · 本页

612—只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Good Services Service Design

This skill helps you design, diagnose, and improve services end-to-end using the *Good Services* model: define the service from the user's perspective, map the steps/tasks across channels and operations, and then assess and improve using the 15 principles of good service design.

A service here means: something that helps someone to do something — defined by the user's goal, not your org chart.

When to use

Use this skill when the user asks for any of the following:

  • “Design a service” / “redesign a service” / “fix our service”
  • “Service audit” / “service review” / “why is our service failing?”
  • “Service blueprint” / “journey map” / “service map”
  • “How do we make this service easier to find / understand / use?”
  • “Apply the Good Services principles” / “the 15 principles”

When NOT to use

  • Pure UI styling/visual design requests (unless tied to a service journey or ops)
  • Marketing/copywriting that isn't part of explaining the service purpose/expectations
  • Narrow technical debugging with no service context (use engineering/debug skills instead)

Operating modes

Choose the lightest mode that fits the user's need.

  1. Quick audit (30–60 min)
  • Output: principles scorecard + top issues + recommended fixes/backlog
  • Best when: user wants fast prioritisation or a “why is this broken?” diagnosis
  1. Full design / improvement plan
  • Output: service definition + journey map + service blueprint + scorecard + prioritised backlog + service standard
  • Best when: user is (re)designing a service or needs cross-team alignment
  1. Workshop facilitation
  • Output: agenda + exercises + artefacts to fill live (templates)
  • Best when: multiple stakeholders need to align on scope, ownership, and priorities

Inputs to collect (progressive)

Start with the minimum and expand only as needed.

Minimum (always ask):

  • What is the service (in one sentence) and what outcome does the user want?
  • Who are the primary users? (2–3 groups is enough)
  • What channels exist today? (web/app/phone/post/in-person/physical)
  • What is the main problem you're trying to solve? (symptoms + suspected causes)

Helpful (ask if doing more than a quick audit):

  • Known constraints (policy/legal/technical/budget/SLAs)
  • Current volume + failure points (drop-offs, call deflection, complaint themes)
  • Any research, analytics, or frontline insights you already have
  • Where support happens today (humans, scripts, escalation routes)

If information is missing, make assumptions explicit and provide a “data needed next” list.


Core workflow

Step 1 — Define the service (user-first)

Goal: anchor on what the user is trying to achieve, and where the service starts/ends.

Use: references/templates/service-definition-canvas.md

Do:

  1. Rewrite the service name as a verb phrase users would search for.
  2. Define start trigger and done condition (what does “complete” mean?).
  3. Identify user groups + accessibility needs.
  4. List channels and key touchpoints.
  5. Capture success measures (user + organisation + societal).

Output: a filled Service Definition Canvas.

Step 2 — Map the journey (steps and tasks)

Goal: describe the service as one continuous set of actions towards the user's goal — across org boundaries and channels.

Use:

  • references/templates/service-map.md (journey map)
  • references/templates/service-blueprint.md (frontstage/backstage/support)

Do:

  1. Break the service into steps (major decision points / moments needing visibility).
  2. Break steps into tasks (individual actions).
  3. Note channel(s) per step/task and any handoffs between teams/orgs.
  4. Capture pain points, drop-offs, and where users seek help.

Output: a journey map (minimum) and blueprint (if ops matter, which they usually do).

Step 3 — Assess against the 15 principles

Goal: identify where the service violates universal good-service needs.

Use:

  • references/templates/principles-scorecard.md
  • references/15-principles.md (detailed guidance + checks)

Do:

  1. Score each principle (0–2) and record evidence.
  2. List the top failure modes and where they appear in the journey.
  3. Highlight cross-cutting root causes (language, data silos, incentives, policy).

Output: completed principles scorecard + summary of top 5 issues.

Step 4 — Design improvements and prioritise

Goal: turn findings into a realistic plan.

Use: references/templates/improvement-backlog.md

Do:

  1. Propose fixes that directly address failures (avoid “nice-to-haves”).
  2. Prefer changes that reduce user effort, clarify purpose/expectations, and remove dead ends.
  3. Prioritise by user impact, risk, frequency, and implementation effort.
  4. Write acceptance criteria in user-outcome language.

Output: prioritised backlog (Now / Next / Later).

Step 5 — Define the service standard and measurement

Goal: make the service operable and improvable over time.

Use: references/templates/service-standard.md

Do:

  1. Define what “good” looks like: promises, service levels, accessibility bar, support model.
  2. Define key measures (not just what’s easy to count).
  3. Make incentives explicit: what behaviours are you encouraging in users and staff?

Output: service standard + measurement plan.

Step 6 — Validate and iterate

Goal: ensure improvements work for real users and real staff.

Do:

  1. List the riskiest assumptions (who/what/when/why/how).
  2. Propose a lightweight validation plan (research, prototype, pilot, operational test).
  3. Plan for change: what user circumstances can change, and how will the service respond?

Output: validation plan + “unknowns / next evidence to collect”.


The 15 principles (as checks)

  1. A good service is easy to find
  2. A good service clearly explains its purpose
  3. A good service sets the expectations a user has of it
  4. A good service enables a user to complete the outcome they set out to do
  5. A good service works in a way that’s familiar
  6. A good service requires no prior knowledge to use
  7. A good service is agnostic to organisational structures
  8. A good service requires as few steps as possible to complete
  9. A good service is consistent throughout
  10. A good service should have no dead ends
  11. A good service is usable by everyone, equally
  12. A good service encourages the right behaviours from users and staff
  13. A good service should respond to change quickly
  14. A good service clearly explains why a decision has been made
  15. A good service makes it easy to get human assistance

(Use references/15-principles.md for practical tests and improvement moves.)


Output format (recommended)

When delivering results, structure the response like this:

  1. Service definition (1–2 paragraphs + canvas)
  2. Journey map (table)
  3. Service blueprint (if relevant)
  4. Principles scorecard (table + top issues)
  5. Prioritised backlog (Now/Next/Later)
  6. Service standard + measures
  7. Validation plan (what to test next)

Keep everything in plain language, using the user's terms (verbs), not internal acronyms.


Quality checklist (before finalising)

  • The service name is a verb users would search for (not an internal noun/acronym).
  • Purpose is clear in the first 10 seconds of the journey.
  • Time/cost/eligibility expectations are set at the right moments.
  • The journey supports the full user outcome (including aftercare and exceptions).
  • Patterns and language are familiar and consistent across channels.
  • No step assumes prior knowledge of your organisation or process.
  • No user is stranded: every “no” has a next step (alternative, referral, appeal, human help).
  • Accessibility is treated as a baseline, not a bolt-on.
  • Metrics and incentives encourage the right behaviours (users + staff + organisation + society).
  • The service can handle change (user details, circumstances, policy, operational variance).

Examples

Example 1 — Quick audit

User: “Can you audit our online appointment booking service? Drop-off is high.” Actions:

  1. Collect minimal context (users, outcome, channels, evidence).
  2. Produce journey map + scorecard (0–2 per principle).
  3. Identify top 5 root causes and propose a Now/Next/Later backlog.

Example 2 — Blueprint + improvement plan

User: “Design an end-to-end ‘cancel my subscription’ service across web + phone.” Actions:

  1. Define service boundaries (start, done, aftercare).
  2. Map journey and blueprint (frontstage/backstage/support).
  3. Check dead ends, expectations, and human assistance.
  4. Produce a service standard (what “good” means) + measures.

Example 3 — Workshop

User: “We need a workshop agenda to align teams around our service redesign.” Actions:

  1. Use references/workshop-agenda.md.
  2. Provide templates to fill and facilitation notes.
  3. End with an agreed backlog and ownership map.

Troubleshooting

The request is too broad (“fix our whole customer experience”)

  • Narrow to one user outcome and define service boundaries.
  • If needed, split into multiple services (each with its own “done”).

The org is siloed / no single owner

  • Run Step 2 (map) explicitly across handoffs.
  • Use Principle 7 guidance to propose shared standards/goals/incentives.

Users keep calling / staff are overwhelmed

  • Check Principle 3 (expectations), 10 (dead ends), and 15 (human help model).
  • Look for incentive problems (Principle 12).

Not enough data

  • Make assumptions explicit.
  • Provide a “minimum evidence to collect next” list: top drop-off steps, complaint themes, frontline pain points, accessibility issues.

平台分布

Codex

34.83%
按下载量换算69

Claude

28.58%
按下载量换算57

Cursor

18.37%
按下载量换算36

Gemini CLI

9.05%
按下载量换算18

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills