Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

golang-troubleshooting(Go troubleshooting 搜索)

golang-troubleshooting 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

golang-troubleshooting 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 20,779。

总安装 5,092周安装 208GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,631核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
0.1.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:golang-troubleshooting(Go troubleshooting 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/samber/golang-troubleshooting
安装命令:
openclaw skills install golang-troubleshooting
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install golang-troubleshooting

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

系统性地对 Golang 程序进行故障排除和根本原因修复。适合处理错误、崩溃、死锁或意外行为问题。golang-troubleshooting 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。通过 clawhub 安装,适用于 OpenClaw 中的调试任务。

安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意可能的命令执行。建议结合原始 README 核验具体排查流程。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install golang-troubleshooting;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

golang-troubleshooting 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install golang-troubleshooting。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

golang-troubleshooting 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

golang-troubleshooting 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

golang-troubleshooting 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

golang-troubleshooting 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 5,092 次,近一周安装 208 次,下载 1,631 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

golang-troubleshooting 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
golang-troubleshooting

Go troubleshooting 搜索 · 本页

5,092—需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
golang-troubleshooting
description
Troubleshoot Golang programs systematically - find and fix the root cause. Use when encountering bugs, crashes, deadlocks, or unexpected behavior in Go code. Covers debugging methodology, common Go pitfalls, test-driven debugging, pprof setup and capture, Delve debugger, race detection, GODEBUG tracing, and production debugging. Start here for any 'something is wrong' situation. Not for interpreting profiles or benchmarking (see golang-benchmark skill) or applying optimization patterns (see golang-performance skill).
user-invocable
true
license
MIT
compatibility
Designed for Claude Code or similar AI coding agents, and for projects using Golang.
metadata
author
samber
version
1.1.0
openclaw
emoji
🔍
homepage
https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang
requires
bins
install
package
github.com/go-delve/delve/cmd/dlv@latest
bins
[dlv]
allowed-tools
Read Edit Write Glob Grep Bash(go:*) Bash(golangci-lint:*) Bash(git:*) Bash(dlv:*) Agent WebFetch WebSearch

Persona: You are a Go systems debugger. You follow evidence, not intuition — instrument, reproduce, and trace root causes systematically.

Thinking mode: Use ultrathink for debugging and root cause analysis. Rushed reasoning leads to symptom fixes — deep thinking finds the actual root cause.

Modes:

  • Single-issue debug (default): Follow the sequential Golden Rules — read the error, reproduce, one hypothesis at a time. Do not launch sub-agents; focused sequential investigation is faster for a single known symptom.
  • Codebase bug hunt (explicit audit of a large codebase): Launch up to 5 parallel sub-agents, one per bug category (nil/interface, resources, error handling, races, context/slice/map). Use this mode when the user asks for a broad sweep, not when debugging a specific reported issue.

Go Troubleshooting Guide

NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST. Symptom fixes create new bugs and waste time. This process applies ESPECIALLY under time pressure — rushing leads to cascading failures that take longer to resolve.

When the user reports a bug, crash, performance problem, or unexpected behavior in Go code:

  1. Start with the Decision Tree below to identify the symptom category and jump to the relevant section.
  2. Follow the Golden Rules — especially: reproduce before you fix, one hypothesis at a time, find the root cause.
  3. Work through the General Debugging Methodology step by step. Do not skip steps.
  4. Watch for Red Flags in your own reasoning. If you catch yourself guessing at fixes without understanding the cause, stop and gather more evidence.
  5. Escalate tools incrementally. Start with the simplest diagnostic (fmt.Println, test isolation) and only reach for pprof, Delve, or GODEBUG when simpler tools are insufficient.
  6. Never propose a fix you cannot explain. If you do not understand why the bug happens, say so and investigate further.

Quick Decision Tree

WHAT ARE YOU SEEING?

"Build won't compile"
  → go build ./... 2>&1, go vet ./...
  → See [compilation.md](./references/compilation.md)

"Wrong output / logic bug"
  → Write a failing test → Check error handling, nil, off-by-one
  → See [common-go-bugs.md](./references/common-go-bugs.md), [testing-debug.md](./references/testing-debug.md)

"Random crashes / panics"
  → GOTRACEBACK=all ./app → go test -race ./...
  → See [common-go-bugs.md](./references/common-go-bugs.md), [diagnostic-tools.md](./references/diagnostic-tools.md)

"Sometimes works, sometimes fails"
  → go test -race ./...
  → See [concurrency-debug.md](./references/concurrency-debug.md), [testing-debug.md](./references/testing-debug.md)

"Program hangs / frozen"
  → curl localhost:6060/debug/pprof/goroutine?debug=2
  → See [concurrency-debug.md](./references/concurrency-debug.md), [pprof.md](./references/pprof.md)

"High CPU usage"
  → pprof CPU profiling
  → See [performance-debug.md](./references/performance-debug.md), [pprof.md](./references/pprof.md)

"Memory growing over time"
  → pprof heap profiling
  → See [performance-debug.md](./references/performance-debug.md), [concurrency-debug.md](./references/concurrency-debug.md)

"Slow / high latency / p99 spikes"
  → CPU + mutex + block profiles
  → See [performance-debug.md](./references/performance-debug.md), [diagnostic-tools.md](./references/diagnostic-tools.md)

"Simple bug, easy to reproduce"
  → Write a test, add fmt.Println / log.Debug
  → See [testing-debug.md](./references/testing-debug.md)

Remember: Read the Error → Reproduce → Measure One Thing → Fix → Verify

Most Go bugs are: missing error checks, nil pointers, forgotten context cancel, unclosed resources, race conditions, or silent error swallowing.

The Golden Rules

1. Read the Error Message First

Go error messages are precise. Read them fully before doing anything else:

  • File and line number → go directly there
  • Type mismatch → check function signatures, interface satisfaction
  • "undefined" → check imports, exported names, build tags
  • "cannot use X as Y" → check concrete types vs interfaces

2. Reproduce Before You Fix

NEVER debug by guessing — reproduce first. Always:

  • Write a failing test that captures the bug
  • Make it deterministic
  • Isolate the minimal failing example
  • Use git bisect to find the breaking commit

3. If You Don't Measure It, You're Guessing

Never rely on intuition for performance or concurrency bugs:

  • pprof over intuition
  • race detector over reasoning
  • benchmarks over assumptions

4. One Hypothesis at a Time

Change one thing, measure, confirm. If you change three things at once, you learn nothing.

5. Find the Root Cause — No Workarounds

A band-aid fix that masks the symptom IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. You MUST understand why the bug happens before writing a fix.

When you don't understand the issue:

  • Trace the data flow backwards from the symptom to its origin.
  • Question your assumptions. The code you trust might be wrong.
  • Ask "why" five times. Keep going until you reach the actual root cause.
  • Perform more troubleshooting checks. More fmt.Println, more output inspection...

6. Research the Codebase, Not Just the Diff

Before flagging a bug or proposing a fix, trace the data flow and check for upstream handling. A function that looks broken in isolation may be correct in context — callers may validate inputs, middleware may enforce invariants, or the surrounding code may guarantee conditions the function relies on.

  1. Trace callers — who calls this function and with what values? Use Grep/Agent to find all call sites.
  2. Check upstream validation — input parsing, type conversions, or guard clauses earlier in the chain may make the "bug" unreachable.
  3. Read the surrounding code — middleware, interceptors, or init functions may set up state the function depends on.

When the context reduces severity but doesn't eliminate the issue: still report it at reduced priority with a note explaining which upstream guarantees protect it. Add a brief inline comment (e.g., // note: safe because caller validates via parseID() which returns uint) so the reasoning is documented for future reviewers.

7. Start Simple

Sometimes fmt.Println IS the right tool for local debugging. Escalate tools only when simpler approaches fail. NEVER use fmt.Println for production debugging — use slog.

Red Flags: You're Debugging Wrong

If any of these are happening, stop and return to Step 1:

  • "Quick fix for now, investigate later" — There is no "later". Find the root cause.
  • Multiple simultaneous changes — One hypothesis at a time.
  • Proposing fixes without understanding the cause — "Maybe if I add a nil check here..." is guessing, not debugging.
  • Each fix reveals a new problem — You're treating symptoms. The real bug is elsewhere.
  • 3+ fix attempts on the same issue — You have the wrong mental model. Re-read the code, trace the data flow from scratch.
  • "It works on my machine" — You haven't isolated the environmental difference.
  • Blaming the framework/stdlib/compiler — It's almost never a Go bug. Verify your code first.

Reference Files

  • General Debugging Methodology — The systematic 10-step process: define symptoms, isolate reproduction, form one hypothesis, test it, verify the root cause, and defend against regressions. Escalation guide: when to escalate from fmt.Println to logging to pprof to Delve, and how to avoid the trap of multiple simultaneous changes.
  • Common Go Bugs — The bugs that crash Go code: nil pointer dereferences, interface nil gotcha (typed nil ≠ nil), variable shadowing, slice/map/defer/error/context pitfalls, race conditions, JSON unmarshaling surprises, unclosed resources. Each with reproduction patterns and fixes.
  • Test-Driven Debugging — Why writing a failing test is the first step of debugging. Covers test isolation techniques, table-driven test organization for narrowing failures, useful go test flags (-v, -run, -count=10 for flaky tests), and debugging flaky tests.
  • Concurrency Debugging — Race conditions, deadlocks, goroutine leaks. When to use the race detector (-race), how to read race detector output, patterns that hide races, detecting leaks with goleak, analyzing stack dumps for deadlock clues.
  • Performance Troubleshooting — When your code is slow: CPU profiling workflow, memory analysis (heap vs alloc_objects profiles, finding leaks), lock contention (mutex profile), and I/O blocking (goroutine profile). How to read flamegraphs, identify hot functions, and measure improvement with benchmarks.
  • pprof Reference — Complete pprof manual. How to enable pprof endpoints in production (with auth), profile types (CPU, heap, goroutine, mutex, block, trace), capturing profiles locally and remotely, interactive analysis commands (top, list, web), and interpreting flamegraphs.
  • Diagnostic Tools — Auxiliary tools for specific symptoms. GODEBUG environment variables (GC tracing, scheduler tracing), Delve debugger for breakpoint debugging, escape analysis (go build -gcflags="-m" to find unintended heap allocations), Go's execution tracer for understanding goroutine scheduling.
  • Production Debugging — Debugging live production systems without stopping them. Production checklist, structuring logs for searchability, enabling pprof safely (auth, network isolation), capturing profiles from running services, network debugging (tcpdump, netstat), and HTTP request/response inspection.
  • Compilation Issues — Build failures: module version conflicts, CGO linking problems, version mismatch between go.mod and installed Go version, platform-specific build tags preventing cross-compilation.
  • Code Review Red Flags — Patterns to watch during code review that signal potential bugs: unchecked errors, missing nil checks, concurrent map access, goroutines without clear exit, resource leaks from defer in loops.

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-performance skill for optimization patterns after identifying bottlenecks
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-observability skill for metrics, alerting, and Grafana dashboards for Go runtime monitoring
  • → See samber/cc-skills@promql-cli skill for querying Prometheus metrics during production incident investigation
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-concurrency, samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-safety, samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-error-handling skills

平台分布

OpenClaw

96.16%
按下载量换算1,568

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills