Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

go-unit-tests(进行单元测试)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

go-unit-tests 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 53,999。

总安装 517周安装 22GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 181核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:go-unit-tests(进行单元测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/cristiano-pacheco/ai-rules
仓库路径:skills/go-unit-tests
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/cristiano-pacheco/ai-rules --skill go-unit-tests
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/cristiano-pacheco/ai-rules --skill go-unit-tests

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

go-unit-tests 用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免误改逻辑。涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟与生产环境。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/go-unit-tests

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/cristiano-pacheco/ai-rules --skill go-unit-tes…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

go-unit-tests 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/cristiano-pacheco/ai-rules --skill go-unit-tests。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

go-unit-tests 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

go-unit-tests 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

go-unit-tests 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

go-unit-tests 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 517 次,近一周安装 22 次,下载 181 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

go-unit-tests 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
go-unit-tests

进行单元测试 · 本页

517—只读未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Go Unit Tests

Generate comprehensive Go unit tests following testify patterns and the Arrange-Act-Assert methodology.

When to Use

  • Write test suites for structs with dependencies
  • Test standalone functions and value objects
  • Create mock-based unit tests
  • Add unit test coverage to existing code

Before Writing Tests

Identify the following before writing any code:

  1. Pattern — Use a test suite (Pattern 1) for structs with dependencies; use standalone functions (Pattern 2) for simple functions or value objects
  2. Dependencies — Which dependencies need mocks; which can use real instances
  3. Test cases — Happy path, error conditions, and edge cases

Pattern 1: Test Suite (structs with dependencies)

Use suite.Suite from testify when the system under test is a struct with injected dependencies.

Rules:

  • Suite struct holds sut (System Under Test) and mock fields
  • SetupTest() runs before each test — use it to initialize mocks and the sut
  • SetupSuite() + TearDownSuite() run once per suite — use only for expensive setup (e.g. generating RSA keys, creating temp files)
  • Always use _test suffix for the package name
  • For assertions: s.Require().Error/NoError/ErrorIs stops the test immediately on failure; s.Equal/Empty/True/False continues after failure — use Require() for preconditions and error checks, plain assertions for value comparisons
  • Never call .AssertExpectations(s.T()) — mockery v2 auto-registers cleanup when you pass s.T() to the mock constructor, so calling it manually is redundant

Basic suite example:

package service_test

import (
	"testing"

	"github.com/example/project/internal/modules/identity/service"
	"github.com/stretchr/testify/suite"
)

type PasswordHasherServiceTestSuite struct {
	suite.Suite
	sut *service.PasswordHasherService
}

func (s *PasswordHasherServiceTestSuite) SetupTest() {
	s.sut = service.NewPasswordHasherService()
}

func TestPasswordHasherServiceSuite(t *testing.T) {
	suite.Run(t, new(PasswordHasherServiceTestSuite))
}

func (s *PasswordHasherServiceTestSuite) TestHash_ValidPassword_ReturnsHash() {
	// Arrange
	password := "SecureP@ssw0rd"

	// Act
	hash, err := s.sut.Hash(password)

	// Assert
	s.Require().NoError(err)
	s.NotEmpty(hash)
}

func (s *PasswordHasherServiceTestSuite) TestVerify_WrongPassword_ReturnsFalse() {
	// Arrange
	password := "SecureP@ssw0rd"
	hash, err := s.sut.Hash(password)
	s.Require().NoError(err)

	// Act
	ok, err := s.sut.Verify(hash, "WrongPassword1!")

	// Assert
	s.Require().NoError(err)
	s.False(ok)
}

Suite with mocks example:

package user_test

import (
	"context"
	"errors"
	"testing"

	"github.com/example/project/internal/modules/identity/errs"
	"github.com/example/project/internal/modules/identity/usecase/user"
	"github.com/example/project/test/mocks"
	"github.com/stretchr/testify/mock"
	"github.com/stretchr/testify/suite"
)

type UserCreateUseCaseTestSuite struct {
	suite.Suite
	sut                *user.UserCreateUseCase
	userRepoMock       *mocks.MockUserRepository
	passwordHasherMock *mocks.MockPasswordHasher
	useCaseMetricsMock *mocks.MockUseCaseMetrics
}

func (s *UserCreateUseCaseTestSuite) SetupTest() {
	s.userRepoMock = mocks.NewMockUserRepository(s.T())
	s.passwordHasherMock = mocks.NewMockPasswordHasher(s.T())
	s.useCaseMetricsMock = mocks.NewMockUseCaseMetrics(s.T())

	s.sut = user.NewUserCreateUseCase(
		s.userRepoMock,
		s.passwordHasherMock,
		s.useCaseMetricsMock,
	)
}

func TestUserCreateUseCaseSuite(t *testing.T) {
	suite.Run(t, new(UserCreateUseCaseTestSuite))
}

func (s *UserCreateUseCaseTestSuite) TestExecute_ValidInput_CreatesUser() {
	// Arrange
	ctx := context.Background()
	input := user.UserCreateInput{
		Email:    "test@example.com",
		Password: "SecureP@ssw0rd",
	}

	s.userRepoMock.On("FindByEmail", mock.Anything, input.Email).
		Return(model.UserModel{}, errs.ErrRecordNotFound)
	s.passwordHasherMock.On("Hash", input.Password).Return([]byte("hash"), nil)
	s.userRepoMock.On("Create", mock.Anything, mock.AnythingOfType("model.UserModel")).
		Return(model.UserModel{ID: 1, Email: input.Email}, nil)
	s.useCaseMetricsMock.On("ObserveDuration", "user_create", mock.Anything).Maybe()
	s.useCaseMetricsMock.On("IncSuccess", "user_create").Maybe()

	// Act
	output, err := s.sut.Execute(ctx, input)

	// Assert
	s.Require().NoError(err)
	s.Equal(uint64(1), output.ID)
	s.Equal("test@example.com", output.Email)
}

func (s *UserCreateUseCaseTestSuite) TestExecute_DuplicateEmail_ReturnsError() {
	// Arrange
	ctx := context.Background()
	input := user.UserCreateInput{
		Email:    "existing@example.com",
		Password: "SecureP@ssw0rd",
	}

	s.userRepoMock.On("FindByEmail", mock.Anything, input.Email).
		Return(model.UserModel{ID: 1}, nil)
	s.useCaseMetricsMock.On("ObserveDuration", "user_create", mock.Anything).Maybe()
	s.useCaseMetricsMock.On("IncError", "user_create").Maybe()

	// Act
	output, err := s.sut.Execute(ctx, input)

	// Assert
	s.Require().ErrorIs(err, errs.ErrDuplicateEmail)
	s.Equal(uint64(0), output.ID)
}

Suite with one-time setup example:

Use SetupSuite + TearDownSuite when initialization is expensive and safe to share across all tests (e.g. generating RSA keys, creating temp directories).

type JWTServiceTestSuite struct {
	suite.Suite
	sut    *service.JWTService
	keyDir string
}

func (s *JWTServiceTestSuite) SetupSuite() {
	dir, err := os.MkdirTemp("", "jwt_test_keys")
	s.Require().NoError(err)
	s.keyDir = dir
	// ... generate keys, configure sut ...
}

func (s *JWTServiceTestSuite) TearDownSuite() {
	if s.keyDir != "" {
		_ = os.RemoveAll(s.keyDir)
	}
}

Pattern 2: Standalone Functions

Use individual top-level test functions for standalone functions, value objects, validators, or enums. No suite needed.

Rules:

  • One top-level TestFunctionName_Scenario_ExpectedResult per scenario
  • Use require.Error/NoError/ErrorIs for error checks; assert.Equal/Empty/True for value comparisons
  • Use table-driven tests (tests []struct{...} + t.Run) when testing the same function with many similar inputs (e.g. validating multiple valid/invalid values)

Single-scenario example:

package validator_test

import (
	"testing"

	"github.com/example/project/internal/modules/identity/errs"
	"github.com/example/project/internal/modules/identity/validator"
	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
	"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
)

func TestPasswordValidator_ValidPassword_Passes(t *testing.T) {
	// Arrange
	v := validator.NewPasswordValidator()

	// Act
	err := v.Validate("SecureP@ssw0rd")

	// Assert
	require.NoError(t, err)
}

func TestPasswordValidator_TooShort_ReturnsError(t *testing.T) {
	// Arrange
	v := validator.NewPasswordValidator()

	// Act
	err := v.Validate("Ab1!")

	// Assert
	require.Error(t, err)
	assert.ErrorIs(t, err, errs.ErrPasswordPolicyViolation)
}

Table-driven example:

package enum_test

import (
	"testing"

	"github.com/example/project/internal/modules/identity/enum"
	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
	"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
)

func TestNewUserStatusEnum_ValidValues(t *testing.T) {
	tests := []struct {
		name  string
		value string
	}{
		{"pending_verification", enum.UserStatusPendingVerification},
		{"active", enum.UserStatusActive},
		{"locked", enum.UserStatusLocked},
	}
	for _, tt := range tests {
		t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
			// Act
			e, err := enum.NewUserStatusEnum(tt.value)

			// Assert
			require.NoError(t, err)
			assert.Equal(t, tt.value, e.String())
		})
	}
}

func TestNewUserStatusEnum_InvalidValue_ReturnsError(t *testing.T) {
	// Arrange
	invalidValue := "invalid_status"

	// Act
	e, err := enum.NewUserStatusEnum(invalidValue)

	// Assert
	require.ErrorIs(t, err, errs.ErrInvalidUserStatus)
	assert.Equal(t, enum.UserStatusEnum{}, e)
}

Mock Rules

  • Mocks live in test/mocks/ and are generated by mockery v2 or v3 — never write them by hand
  • Import as "github.com/example/project/test/mocks" — no alias needed
  • Always pass s.T() to the mock constructor: mocks.NewMockUserRepository(s.T())
  • Always pass mock.Anything for context.Context parameters
  • Use mock.AnythingOfType("pkg.TypeName") when you need to match by type without checking exact value
  • Use .Maybe() on mock expectations that may or may not be called (e.g. metrics, logging decorators)

Arrange-Act-Assert

Every test must have explicit // Arrange, // Act, // Assert comments. Mock expectations (.On(...)) belong in the Arrange block.

// Arrange
input := "test"
s.repoMock.On("Find", mock.Anything, input).Return(result, nil)

// Act
output, err := s.sut.Execute(ctx, input)

// Assert
s.Require().NoError(err)
s.Equal("expected", output.Name)

Code Style

  • No standalone functions: When a file contains a struct with methods, do not add standalone functions. Use private methods on the struct instead.
  • Never use inline struct literals in assertions — always assign to a variable first
  • Maximum 120 characters per line
  • Test function names must describe what is being tested: TestMethod_Scenario_ExpectedOutcome

Completion

before completeing the tests run make lint to verify that the code follows the project's style guidelines.

When tests are complete, respond with: Tests Done, Oh Yeah!

平台分布

Codex

34.53%
按下载量换算62

Claude

29.84%
按下载量换算54

Cursor

18.74%
按下载量换算34

Gemini CLI

9.6%
按下载量换算17

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills