Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

go-concurrency-web(去并发网络)

go-concurrency-web 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

go-concurrency-web 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 20,599。

总安装 5,163周安装 213GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,687核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
2.3.1

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:go-concurrency-web(去并发网络)
来源仓库:https://github.com/anderskev/go-concurrency-web
安装命令:
openclaw skills install go-concurrency-web
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install go-concurrency-web

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

go-concurrency-web 提供高并发 Web 应用的开发模式,涵盖工作池、速率限制和竞争检测。适合在 OpenClaw 中构建高性能服务端应用或处理批量任务时使用。通过 clawhub 安装,需根据实际场景调整线程池大小与资源分配策略。使用前应确保对 Goroutine 生命周期有充分控制,防止内存泄漏。

不建议在生产环境中直接使用未经压力测试的并发模型。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install go-concurrency-web;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

go-concurrency-web 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install go-concurrency-web。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

go-concurrency-web 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

go-concurrency-web 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

go-concurrency-web 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

go-concurrency-web 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 5,163 次,近一周安装 213 次,下载 1,687 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

go-concurrency-web 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
go-concurrency-web

去并发网络 · 本页

5,163—接触敏感数据MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
go-concurrency-web
description
Go concurrency patterns for high-throughput web applications including worker pools, rate limiting, race detection, and safe shared state management. Use when implementing background task processing, rate limiters, or concurrent request handling.

Go Concurrency for Web Applications

Quick Reference

TopicReference
Worker Pools & errgroupreferences/worker-pools.md
Rate Limitingreferences/rate-limiting.md
Race Detection & Fixesreferences/race-detection.md

Core Rules

  1. Goroutines are cheap but not free — each goroutine consumes ~2-8 KB of stack. Unbounded spawning under load leads to OOM.
  2. Always have a shutdown path — every goroutine you start must have a way to exit. Use context.Context, channel closing, or sync.WaitGroup.
  3. Prefer channels for communication — use channels to coordinate work between goroutines and signal completion.
  4. Use mutexes for state protection — when goroutines share mutable state, protect it with sync.Mutex, sync.RWMutex, or sync/atomic.
  5. Never spawn raw goroutines in HTTP handlers — use worker pools, errgroup, or other bounded concurrency primitives.

Gates (check before merge or review)

Use these sequenced checks for objective pass/fail; do not replace them with “I verified mentally.”

  1. Race detector

- Run go test -race ./... on packages that changed concurrent code, or go build -race for binaries under test. - Pass: exit code 0. If you report “no races,” attach or cite CI output / saved terminal transcript—do not assert cleanliness without that artifact.

  1. Bounded background work from HTTP

- Inspect handlers and middleware that start work beyond the request goroutine. - Pass: every such path uses a bounded primitive (worker pool, buffered channel with documented capacity, errgroup with an explicit concurrency cap)—not unbounded go per incoming request.

  1. Graceful teardown

- For processes that start long-lived goroutines, trace from shutdown signal (or test defer) to Wait() / channel close / context cancel for each goroutine family. - Pass: you can point to the call chain or a test that proves shutdown completes without hang (no orphan goroutines).

Worker Pool Pattern

Use worker pools for background tasks dispatched from HTTP handlers. This bounds concurrency and provides graceful shutdown.

// Worker pool for background tasks (e.g., sending emails)
type WorkerPool struct {
    jobs   chan Job
    wg     sync.WaitGroup
    logger *slog.Logger
}

type Job struct {
    ID      string
    Execute func(ctx context.Context) error
}

func NewWorkerPool(numWorkers int, queueSize int, logger *slog.Logger) *WorkerPool {
    wp := &WorkerPool{
        jobs:   make(chan Job, queueSize),
        logger: logger,
    }

    for i := 0; i < numWorkers; i++ {
        wp.wg.Add(1)
        go wp.worker(i)
    }

    return wp
}

func (wp *WorkerPool) worker(id int) {
    defer wp.wg.Done()
    for job := range wp.jobs {
        wp.logger.Info("processing job", "worker", id, "job_id", job.ID)
        if err := job.Execute(context.Background()); err != nil {
            wp.logger.Error("job failed", "worker", id, "job_id", job.ID, "err", err)
        }
    }
}

func (wp *WorkerPool) Submit(job Job) {
    wp.jobs <- job
}

func (wp *WorkerPool) Shutdown() {
    close(wp.jobs)
    wp.wg.Wait()
}

Usage in HTTP Handler

func (s *Server) handleCreateUser(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    user, err := s.userService.Create(r.Context(), decodeUser(r))
    if err != nil {
        handleError(w, r, err)
        return
    }

    // Dispatch background task — never spawn raw goroutines in handlers
    s.workers.Submit(Job{
        ID: "welcome-email-" + user.ID,
        Execute: func(ctx context.Context) error {
            return s.emailService.SendWelcome(ctx, user)
        },
    })

    writeJSON(w, http.StatusCreated, user)
}

See references/worker-pools.md for sizing guidance, backpressure, error handling, retry patterns, and errgroup as a simpler alternative.

Rate Limiting

Use golang.org/x/time/rate for token bucket rate limiting. Apply as middleware for global limits or per-IP/per-user limits.

Key points:

  • Global rate limiting protects overall service capacity
  • Per-IP rate limiting prevents individual clients from monopolizing resources
  • Always return 429 Too Many Requests with a Retry-After header

See references/rate-limiting.md for middleware implementation, per-IP limiting, stale limiter cleanup, and API key-based limiting.

Race Detection

Run the race detector in development and CI:

go test -race ./...
go build -race -o myserver ./cmd/server

The race detector catches concurrent reads and writes to shared memory. It does not catch logical races (e.g., TOCTOU bugs) or deadlocks.

See references/race-detection.md for common web handler races, fixing strategies, and CI integration.

Handler Safety

Every incoming HTTP request runs in its own goroutine. Any shared mutable state on the server struct is a potential data race.

// BAD — shared state without protection
type Server struct {
    requestCount int // data race!
}

func (s *Server) handleRequest(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    s.requestCount++ // concurrent writes = race condition
}

// GOOD — use atomic or mutex
type Server struct {
    requestCount atomic.Int64
}

func (s *Server) handleRequest(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    s.requestCount.Add(1)
}

// GOOD — use mutex for complex state
type Server struct {
    mu    sync.RWMutex
    cache map[string]*CachedItem
}

func (s *Server) handleGetCached(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    s.mu.RLock()
    item, ok := s.cache[r.PathValue("key")]
    s.mu.RUnlock()
    // ...
}

Rules for Handler Safety

  • Request-scoped data is safe — r.Context(), request body, URL params are isolated per request.
  • Server struct fields are shared — any field on *Server accessed by handlers needs synchronization.
  • Database connections are safe — *sql.DB manages its own connection pool with internal locking.
  • Maps are not safe — use sync.Map or protect with a mutex.
  • Slices are not safe — concurrent append or read/write requires a mutex.

Anti-Patterns

Unbounded goroutine spawning

// BAD — no limit on concurrent goroutines
func (s *Server) handleWebhook(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    go func() {
        // What if 10,000 requests arrive at once?
        s.processWebhook(r.Context(), decodeWebhook(r))
    }()
    w.WriteHeader(http.StatusAccepted)
}

// GOOD — use a worker pool
func (s *Server) handleWebhook(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    webhook := decodeWebhook(r)
    s.workers.Submit(Job{
        ID:      "webhook-" + webhook.ID,
        Execute: func(ctx context.Context) error {
            return s.processWebhook(ctx, webhook)
        },
    })
    w.WriteHeader(http.StatusAccepted)
}

Forgetting to propagate context

// BAD — loses cancellation signal
func (s *Server) handleSearch(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    results, err := s.search(context.Background(), r.URL.Query().Get("q"))
    // ...
}

// GOOD — use request context
func (s *Server) handleSearch(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    results, err := s.search(r.Context(), r.URL.Query().Get("q"))
    // ...
}

Goroutine leak from missing channel receiver

// BAD — goroutine blocks forever if nobody reads the channel
func fetchWithTimeout(ctx context.Context, url string) (*Response, error) {
    ch := make(chan *Response)
    go func() {
        resp, _ := http.Get(url) // blocks forever if ctx cancels
        ch <- resp               // stuck here if nobody reads
    }()
    select {
    case resp := <-ch:
        return resp, nil
    case <-ctx.Done():
        return nil, ctx.Err() // goroutine leaked!
    }
}

// GOOD — use buffered channel so goroutine can exit
func fetchWithTimeout(ctx context.Context, url string) (*Response, error) {
    ch := make(chan *Response, 1) // buffered — goroutine can always send
    go func() {
        resp, _ := http.Get(url)
        ch <- resp
    }()
    select {
    case resp := <-ch:
        return resp, nil
    case <-ctx.Done():
        return nil, ctx.Err()
    }
}

Using time.Sleep for coordination

// BAD — sleeping to wait for goroutines
go doWork()
time.Sleep(5 * time.Second) // hoping it finishes

// GOOD — use sync primitives
var wg sync.WaitGroup
wg.Add(1)
go func() {
    defer wg.Done()
    doWork()
}()
wg.Wait()

平台分布

OpenClaw

94.29%
按下载量换算1,591

安全审计

VirusTotal

未展示

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills