Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

go-architecture(去架构)

go-architecture 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

go-architecture 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 71,089。

总安装 196周安装 8GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 63核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:go-architecture(去架构)
来源仓库:https://github.com/direktly/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/go-architecture
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/direktly/agent-skills --skill go-architecture
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/direktly/agent-skills --skill go-architecture

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在关键词搜索或任务场景下快速定位候选结果。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需确认权限范围。使用前建议核验是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。go-architecture 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/go-architecture

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/direktly/agent-skills --skill go-architecture;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

go-architecture 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/direktly/agent-skills --skill go-architecture。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

go-architecture 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

go-architecture 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

go-architecture 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

go-architecture 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 196 次,近一周安装 8 次,下载 63 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

go-architecture 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
go-architecture

去架构 · 本页

196—调用外部服务MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Go Architecture Design

This guide explains the DDD and CQRS principles demonstrated in this codebase, presented in a way that allows engineers to apply these patterns to any industry or business domain.

Table of Contents

  1. Domain-Driven Design Overview
  2. Architecture Layers
  3. Domain Layer Principles
  4. Application Layer Patterns
  5. Infrastructure Layer Design
  6. CQRS Implementation
  7. Idempotency Pattern
  8. Best Practices
  9. Applying These Principles

Domain-Driven Design Overview

Domain-Driven Design (DDD) is a software development approach that:

  • Places the business domain at the heart of the software
  • Creates a shared language between developers and domain experts
  • Isolates business logic from technical concerns
  • Enables scalable and maintainable architectures

Core Concepts

  1. Ubiquitous Language: Use the same terminology in code that domain experts use
  2. Bounded Contexts: Define clear boundaries where specific domain models apply
  3. Entities: Objects with unique identity that persist over time
  4. Value Objects: Immutable objects defined by their attributes
  5. Aggregates: Clusters of entities and value objects with defined boundaries
  6. Repositories: Abstractions for data persistence

Architecture Layers

This implementation follows the Onion Architecture pattern with clear separation of concerns:

┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│         Interface Layer             │ ← External APIs, Controllers
├─────────────────────────────────────┤
│       Application Layer             │ ← Use Cases, Commands, Queries
├─────────────────────────────────────┤
│         Domain Layer                │ ← Business Logic, Entities
├─────────────────────────────────────┤
│     Infrastructure Layer            │ ← Database, External Services
└─────────────────────────────────────┘

Layer Dependencies

  • Inner layers know nothing about outer layers
  • Domain layer has zero dependencies on other layers
  • Infrastructure implements interfaces defined by domain
  • Application layer orchestrates between domain and infrastructure

Domain Layer Principles

1. Entity Design

type Entity struct {
    ID        uuid.UUID    // Always use unique identifiers
    CreatedAt time.Time    // Set by domain, not database
    UpdatedAt time.Time    // Updated on modifications
    // Business attributes
}

Key Principles:

  • Entities have identity that persists across time
  • Factory methods (NewEntity) ensure valid initial state
  • Business rules are enforced through methods
  • Validation happens at creation and modification

2. Validation Pattern

// Private validation method
func (e *Entity) validate() error {
    // Business rule validations
    if e.BusinessAttribute == "" {
        return errors.New("business rule violation")
    }
    return nil
}

// Public modification method with validation
func (e *Entity) UpdateAttribute(value string) error {
    // Validate BEFORE modifying state
    if value == "" {
        return errors.New("business rule violation")
    }

    // Only modify if validation passes
    e.BusinessAttribute = value
    e.UpdatedAt = time.Now()
    return nil
}

3. Validated Entity Pattern

type ValidatedEntity struct {
    Entity
    isValidated bool
}

func NewValidatedEntity(entity *Entity) (*ValidatedEntity, error) {
    if err := entity.validate(); err != nil {
        return nil, err
    }
    return &ValidatedEntity{
        Entity:      *entity,
        isValidated: true,
    }, nil
}

Purpose: Ensures only valid entities can be persisted

4. Repository Interfaces

type EntityRepository interface {
    Create(entity *ValidatedEntity) (*Entity, error)
    FindByID(id uuid.UUID) (*Entity, error)
    FindAll() ([]*Entity, error)
    Update(entity *ValidatedEntity) (*Entity, error)
    Delete(id uuid.UUID) error
}

Key Points:

  • Domain defines interfaces, infrastructure implements them
  • Methods accept validated entities for writes
  • Read methods return regular entities (not validated)
  • Always return fresh data after writes

Application Layer Patterns

1. Service Structure

type EntityService struct {
    repo            repositories.EntityRepository
    idempotencyRepo repositories.IdempotencyRepository
}

Services orchestrate:

  • Command execution
  • Query handling
  • Transaction boundaries
  • Cross-aggregate operations

2. Use Case Implementation

  • Each use case is a method on the service
  • Clear input (commands) and output (results)
  • Handles idempotency
  • Coordinates between repositories

Infrastructure Layer Design

1. Repository Implementation

type SqlcEntityRepository struct {
    queries *db.Queries
}

func (repo *SqlcEntityRepository) Create(entity *ValidatedEntity) (*Entity, error) {
    ctx := context.Background()
    dbEntity, err := repo.queries.CreateEntity(ctx, db.CreateEntityParams{
        ID:        entity.ID,
        Name:      entity.Name,
        CreatedAt: timestamptzFromTime(entity.CreatedAt),
        UpdatedAt: timestamptzFromTime(entity.UpdatedAt),
    })
    if err != nil {
        return nil, err
    }
    // Always read after write
    return repo.FindByID(dbEntity.ID)
}

2. Mapping Pattern

// Domain to Database
func toDBModel(entity *ValidatedEntity) *DBModel {
    // Map domain entity to database model
}

// Database to Domain
func fromDBModel(dbModel *DBModel) *Entity {
    // Map database model to domain entity
}

Purpose: Keep domain models pure and database concerns isolated

CQRS Implementation

Command Pattern

Commands modify state and are task-oriented:

type CreateEntityCommand struct {
    IdempotencyKey string
    // Business attributes
}

type CreateEntityCommandResult struct {
    Result *EntityResult
}

Query Pattern

Queries retrieve data without side effects:

// For queries with parameters
type GetEntityByIDQuery struct {
    ID uuid.UUID
}

type GetEntityByIDQueryResult struct {
    Result *EntityResult
}

// For simple parameterless queries, use direct method calls
func (s *EntityService) FindAllEntities() (*EntityQueryListResult, error) {
    // Simple queries don't need query objects
}

// For complex queries with filters/parameters, use query objects
func (s *EntityService) FindEntitiesByCategory(query *GetEntitiesByCategoryQuery) (*EntityQueryListResult, error) {
    // Complex queries benefit from query objects
}

Query Object Guidelines:

  • Use query objects for queries with parameters or complex filters
  • Simple parameterless queries (like FindAll) can use direct method calls
  • This avoids unnecessary empty struct instantiation

Benefits of CQRS

  1. Optimized Read/Write Models: Different models for different purposes
  2. Scalability: Scale reads and writes independently
  3. Performance: Optimize queries without affecting write logic
  4. Clarity: Clear separation of intentions

Idempotency Pattern

Implementation

// Check for existing execution
if command.IdempotencyKey != "" {
    existing, err := idempotencyRepo.FindByKey(ctx, command.IdempotencyKey)
    if existing != nil {
        return cachedResponse, nil
    }
}

// Execute business logic
result := executeBusinessLogic()

// Store result for future requests
if command.IdempotencyKey != "" {
    record := NewIdempotencyRecord(command.IdempotencyKey, request)
    record.SetResponse(response, statusCode)
    idempotencyRepo.Create(ctx, record)
}

Benefits

  • Prevents duplicate operations
  • Handles network failures gracefully
  • Ensures consistency in distributed systems

Best Practices

1. Domain Layer Purity

  • No framework dependencies
  • No infrastructure concerns
  • Business logic only
  • Self-contained validation

2. Factory Methods

func NewEntity(businessAttribute string) *Entity {
    return &Entity{
        ID:                uuid.New(),
        CreatedAt:         time.Now(),
        UpdatedAt:         time.Now(),
        BusinessAttribute: businessAttribute,
    }
}

3. Read After Write

Always return fresh data from the database after modifications to ensure consistency.

4. Historical Data Compatibility

  • Don't validate on read operations
  • Allow loading of data created with old business rules
  • Validate only on write operations

5. Soft Delete Pattern

Implement soft deletes at the infrastructure layer without polluting domain entities:

Domain Layer (Pure):

type Entity struct {
    ID        uuid.UUID
    Name      string
    CreatedAt time.Time
    UpdatedAt time.Time
    // No DeletedAt field - keep domain pure
}

Infrastructure Layer (Database):

-- Database table includes deleted_at
CREATE TABLE entities (
    id UUID PRIMARY KEY,
    name TEXT NOT NULL,
    created_at TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE NOT NULL,
    updated_at TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE NOT NULL,
    deleted_at TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE  -- Only in database
);

-- Delete operation becomes an UPDATE
-- name: DeleteEntity :exec
UPDATE entities SET deleted_at = NOW() WHERE id = $1;

-- All SELECT queries filter out soft-deleted records
-- name: GetEntityByID :one
SELECT id, name, created_at, updated_at
FROM entities
WHERE id = $1 AND deleted_at IS NULL;

Benefits:

  • Domain entities remain focused on business logic
  • Soft delete is an infrastructure concern, not a business rule
  • Data recovery is possible without domain knowledge
  • Audit trails are maintained at the database level
  • Foreign key relationships remain intact

Implementation Guidelines:

  1. Add deleted_at column only in database schema
  2. Update DELETE operations to set deleted_at = NOW()
  3. Add WHERE deleted_at IS NULL to all SELECT queries
  4. Repository implementations remain unchanged
  5. Domain layer is completely unaware of soft delete mechanism

Applying These Principles

Step 1: Identify Your Domain

  1. Work with domain experts to understand the business
  2. Identify key entities and their relationships
  3. Define business rules and invariants
  4. Create a ubiquitous language

Step 2: Design Your Entities

// Example for an e-commerce domain
type Order struct {
    ID         uuid.UUID
    CreatedAt  time.Time
    UpdatedAt  time.Time
    CustomerID uuid.UUID
    Items      []OrderItem
    Status     OrderStatus
    Total      Money
}

func NewOrder(customerID uuid.UUID) *Order {
    return &Order{
        ID:         uuid.New(),
        CreatedAt:  time.Now(),
        UpdatedAt:  time.Now(),
        CustomerID: customerID,
        Status:     OrderStatusPending,
        Items:      []OrderItem{},
    }
}

func (o *Order) AddItem(product Product, quantity int) error {
    // Business logic for adding items
    // Validate quantity, calculate prices, etc.
}

Step 3: Define Repository Interfaces

type OrderRepository interface {
    Create(order *ValidatedOrder) (*Order, error)
    FindByID(id uuid.UUID) (*Order, error)
    FindByCustomerID(customerID uuid.UUID) ([]*Order, error)
    Update(order *ValidatedOrder) (*Order, error)
}

Step 4: Implement CQRS

Commands:

type PlaceOrderCommand struct {
    IdempotencyKey string
    CustomerID     uuid.UUID
    Items          []OrderItemRequest
}

Queries:

type GetCustomerOrdersQuery struct {
    CustomerID uuid.UUID
    Status     *OrderStatus // Optional filterfunc NewEntity(businessAttribute string) *Entity {
        return &Entity{
            ID:                uuid.New(),
            CreatedAt:         time.Now(),
            UpdatedAt:         time.Now(),
            BusinessAttribute: businessAttribute,
        }
    }
}

Step 5: Create Application Services

type OrderService struct {
    orderRepo       repositories.OrderRepository
    productRepo     repositories.ProductRepository
    idempotencyRepo repositories.IdempotencyRepository
}

func (s *OrderService) PlaceOrder(cmd *PlaceOrderCommand) (*PlaceOrderResult, error) {
    // Implement idempotency check
    // Validate products exist
    // Create order
    // Calculate totals
    // Save order
    // Return result
}

Industry-Agnostic Guidelines

  1. Healthcare: Patient (Entity), Appointment (Entity), Diagnosis (Value Object)
  2. Finance: Account (Entity), Transaction (Entity), Money (Value Object)
  3. Education: Student (Entity), Course (Entity), Grade (Value Object)
  4. Logistics: Shipment (Entity), Package (Entity), Address (Value Object)

The patterns remain the same; only the domain concepts change.

Conclusion

These DDD and CQRS principles provide a robust foundation for building maintainable, scalable applications regardless of your business domain. The key is to:

  1. Keep domain logic pure and isolated
  2. Use CQRS to separate read and write concerns
  3. Implement proper validation and factory patterns
  4. Handle idempotency for distributed systems
  5. Follow the dependency rules between layers

By applying these principles, you create software that clearly expresses business requirements while remaining flexible for future changes.

平台分布

windsurf

32.82%
按下载量换算21

OpenCode

22.66%
按下载量换算14

Codex

18.01%
按下载量换算11

Claude Code

11.6%
按下载量换算7

Antigravity

7.97%
按下载量换算5

Gemini CLI

3.94%
按下载量换算2

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills