github-pr-review-workflow（GitHub PR 审查工作流）

GitHub PR Review Workflow

Complete workflow for reviewing, addressing feedback, and resolving threads in GitHub pull requests using the gh-pr-review extension from agynio/gh-pr-review.

For gh-pr-review documentation, see: https://github.com/agynio/gh-pr-review

Installation

Install gh-pr-review extension (if not already installed):

gh extension install agynio/gh-pr-review

Verify installation:

gh pr-review --help

Workflow Overview

PR Review Request
  ├─ Get PR number/repo context
  ├─ List all review threads
  ├─ Analyze feedback and comments
  ├─ Validate whether each comment applies and explain decisions
  ├─ Implement fixes in code
  ├─ Run tests (unit + lint + typecheck)
  ├─ Reply to all open review threads with explanations
  ├─ Wait up to 5 minutes for follow-up
  ├─ Resolve review threads (or address follow-ups)
  └─ Commit and push changes

Step-by-Step Process

1. Get PR Context

Get current PR details:

# Get PR number
gh pr view --json number

# Get PR title and status
gh pr view --json title,author,state,reviews

# Get repository info (for gh pr-review)
git remote get-url origin

Output: PR number (e.g., <PR_NUMBER>) and repo (e.g., <OWNER/REPO>)

2. List Review Threads

List all review threads (active and outdated):

# From PR root directory
gh pr-review threads list --pr <PR_NUMBER> --repo <OWNER/REPO>

# Example:
gh pr-review threads list --pr <PR_NUMBER> --repo <OWNER/REPO>

Response format:

[
  {
    "threadId": "<THREAD_ID>",
    "isResolved": false,
    "updatedAt": "2026-01-17T22:48:36Z",
    "path": "path/to/file.ts",
    "line": 42,
    "isOutdated": false
  }
]

Key fields:

• threadId: GraphQL node ID for resolving/replying
• isResolved: Current status
• isOutdated: Whether code has changed since comment
• path + line: File location

If all review threads are resolved or none are present, search for normal comments and analyse them:

gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --comments --json author,comments,reviews

3. Read and Analyze Feedback

Get review comments via GitHub API:

# Get all review comments for PR
gh api repos/<OWNER>/<REPO>/pulls/<PR_NUMBER>/comments

# With jq for cleaner output
gh api repos/<OWNER>/<REPO>/pulls/<PR_NUMBER>/comments \
  --jq '.[] | {id,body,author,created_at,line,path}'

Read the specific files mentioned:

# Read the file context to understand feedback
cat <path>
# or use Read tool

Categorize feedback:

• High priority: Security issues, bugs, breaking changes
• Medium priority: Code quality, maintainability, test coverage
• Low priority: Style, documentation, nice-to-haves

Validate applicability before changing code (required):

• Confirm each comment is accurate and relevant to the current code.
• If a suggestion is incorrect, outdated, or doesn’t make sense in this codebase, reply with a detailed explanation of why it was not implemented.
• Do not skip a change simply because it is time-consuming—either implement it or explain clearly why it should not be done.

4. Implement Fixes

Edit the files mentioned in review:

# Use Edit tool or bash
edit <file_path> <oldString> <newString>

Follow repository conventions:

• Check existing patterns in similar files
• Follow AGENTS.md guidelines
• Maintain code style consistency
• Add/update tests for new logic

5. Verify Changes (CRITICAL)

Always run tests before replying:

# Run project tests
bun run test

# Or specific test suites
bun run test:unit
bun run test:unit:watch
bun run test:e2e

Run type checking:

bun run typecheck
# or
tsc --noEmit

Run linting:

bun run lint
# or
eslint

Verify all pass:

• ✓ No TypeScript errors
• ✓ No ESLint warnings/errors
• ✓ All unit tests pass
• ✓ E2E tests pass (if relevant)

6. Commit and Push Changes

Stage and commit changes:

# Check status
git status

# Stage modified files
git add <files>

# Commit with clear message
git commit -m "<type>(<scope>): <description>

# Example:
git commit -m "refactor(emails): centralize from name logic and improve sanitization

- Extract RESEND_FROM_NAME constant to lib/emails/from-address.ts
- Replace duplicated logic in lib/auth.ts and app/actions/contact.ts
- Improve formatFromAddress sanitization (RFC 5322 chars)
- Add test cases for additional sanitization patterns"

Push to remote:

git push

Verify working tree:

git status
# Should show: "nothing to commit, working tree clean"

7. Reply to Review Threads

Reply with explanation of fixes:

gh pr-review comments reply \
  --pr <PR_NUMBER> \
  --repo <OWNER/REPO> \
  --thread-id <THREAD_ID> \
  --body "<your explanation>"

Best practices for replies:

• Acknowledge the feedback
• Explain what was changed
• Reference specific commit(s) if relevant
• Be concise but clear
• Use code fences for code snippets

Example reply:

gh pr-review comments reply \
  --pr <PR_NUMBER> \
  --repo <OWNER/REPO> \
  --thread-id <THREAD_ID> \
  --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
@reviewer Thanks for the feedback! I've addressed your suggestions:

1. Applied the requested refactor in the relevant module
2. Removed duplicated logic in the affected call sites
3. Improved sanitization to match the project’s expectations
4. Added/updated tests for the new behavior

Changes committed in abc1234, all tests pass.
EOF
)"

Note: Use heredoc for multi-line bodies to avoid shell escaping issues. Note: Always start replies with @reviewer (e.g., @gemini-code-assist... or @greptile …) after you push changes. There can be multiple reviewers, so always look for the exact comment from which reviewer the comment is.

If this was a normal comment and not a review (see step 2), you can use this to answer:

gh pr comment <PR_NUMBER> --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
@reviewer … <same as above>
EOF
)"

You can also just react to the comment if appropriate.

Reply to all open threads first:

1. Respond to every open comment with what you did or why it was not done.
2. Only after all replies are posted, proceed to the wait/resolve phase.

8. Wait for Follow-ups and Resolve Threads

After implementing fixes, pushing the commit, and replying to all open comments, wait up to 5 minutes for follow-ups:

# Wait for a minute for reviewer response
sleep 60

# Re-check for new replies or new threads
gh pr-review threads list --pr <PR_NUMBER> --repo <OWNER/REPO>

Do this step up to 5 times to wait for up to 5 minutes.

If there is a follow-up hint, address it (steps 3-7) and then resolve.

If there is a confirmation, resolve the thread:

gh pr-review threads resolve \
  --pr <PR_NUMBER> \
  --repo <OWNER/REPO> \
  --thread-id <THREAD_ID>

Response:

{
  "thread_node_id": "PRRT_kwDOQkQlKs5p24lu",
  "is_resolved": true
}

Batch resolve multiple threads:

# Resolve outdated threads first
gh pr-review threads resolve --pr <PR_NUMBER> --repo <OWNER/REPO> --thread-id <THREAD_ID_OUTDATED_1>
gh pr-review threads resolve --pr <PR_NUMBER> --repo <OWNER/REPO> --thread-id <THREAD_ID_OUTDATED_2>

# Then resolve active threads after replying
gh pr-review threads resolve --pr <PR_NUMBER> --repo <OWNER/REPO> --thread-id <THREAD_ID_ACTIVE>

Strategy:

1. Resolve outdated threads (isOutdated: true) - no reply needed
2. Reply to active threads explaining fixes (or non-changes)
3. Wait up to 5 minutes for a response
4. Resolve active threads after confirmation or no response

9. Verify All Threads Resolved

Final check:

gh pr-review threads list --pr <PR_NUMBER> --repo <OWNER/REPO>

Expected output: All threads show isResolved: true

Complete Example Workflow

# 1. Get PR context
gh pr view --json number
git remote get-url origin

# 2. List review threads
gh pr-review threads list --pr <PR_NUMBER> --repo <OWNER/REPO>

# 3. Read comments and files
gh api repos/<OWNER>/<REPO>/pulls/<PR_NUMBER>/comments --jq '.[] | {id,body,path,line}'
cat path/to/file.ts

# 4. Implement fixes
edit path/to/file.ts <oldString> <newString>

# 5. Run tests
bun run test:unit -- tests/path/to/file.test.ts
bun run typecheck
bun run lint

# 6. Commit and push
git add lib/emails/from-address.ts
git commit -m "fix: address PR review feedback"
git push

# 7. Reply to threads
gh pr-review comments reply --pr <PR_NUMBER> --repo <OWNER/REPO> \
  --thread-id <THREAD_ID> --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
@reviewer Thanks for review! I've addressed all feedback:
1. Centralized logic
2. Improved sanitization
3. Added tests

Changes in abc1234.
EOF
)"

# 8. Wait then resolve threads
sleep 300
gh pr-review threads list --pr <PR_NUMBER> --repo <OWNER/REPO>
gh pr-review threads resolve --pr <PR_NUMBER> --repo <OWNER/REPO> \
  --thread-id <THREAD_ID>

# 9. Verify
gh pr-review threads list --pr <PR_NUMBER> --repo <OWNER/REPO>
git status

gh-pr-review Commands Reference

Common flags:

• --pr <number>: Pull request number
• -R, --repo <owner/repo>: Repository identifier
• --thread-id <id>: GraphQL thread node ID

Troubleshooting

Best Practices

Before replying:

• ✓ Read all review comments carefully
• ✓ Understand the intent (suggestion vs. blocker)
• ✓ Check if similar issues exist elsewhere

When implementing fixes:

• ✓ Follow existing code patterns
• ✓ Update/add tests for changes
• ✓ Run full test suite
• ✓ Check lint and type errors

When replying:

• ✓ Be polite and appreciative
• ✓ Explain what was changed
• ✓ Reference specific files/lines
• ✓ Keep it concise

Before resolving:

• ✓ Ensure all issues are addressed
• ✓ Verify tests pass
• ✓ Commit changes to branch

Resources

• gh-pr-review GitHub
• GitHub GraphQL API: Pull Requests
• gh CLI Documentation