Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索执行命令github未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

github-code-reviewGitHub 代码审查

Agent Skill

用于围绕 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request、分支、提交和代码协作流程提供辅助能力。它适合让 Agent 查询项目状态、整理变更、辅助创建或检查协作事项,并把仓库中的信息转成可执行的下一步。使用时需要区分只读查询和写入操作;涉及创建 PR、修改 Issue、推送分支或访问私有仓库时,应确认 token 权限、目标仓库范围和用户授权。

总安装

399

周安装

16

GitHub Stars

8

下载量

129
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:github-code-review(GitHub 代码审查)
来源仓库:https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub
仓库路径:skills/github-code-review
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub --skill github-code-review
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub --skill github-code-review

简介

用于 GitHub 仓库的代码审查与协作流程支持,提升开发效率。

  • 适合辅助分析 PR 内容、检查代码变更、跟踪 Issue 进展。
  • 帮助 Agent 理解代码差异、识别潜在问题并提供改进建议。
  • 操作前请确保具备相应仓库权限,避免越权访问敏感代码。
  • github-code-review 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

GitHub Code Review Skill

Overview

Deploy specialized AI agents for comprehensive code reviews. This skill provides multi-agent review capabilities covering security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, architecture patterns, and code style enforcement.

Quick Start

# Get PR details for review
gh pr view 123 --json files,additions,deletions,title,body

# Get PR diff
gh pr diff 123

# Post review comment
gh pr review 123 --comment --body "Review findings..."

# Approve PR
gh pr review 123 --approve --body "LGTM!"

# Request changes
gh pr review 123 --request-changes --body "Please fix..."

When to Use

  • Automated code review for pull requests
  • Security vulnerability analysis
  • Performance bottleneck detection
  • Architecture pattern validation
  • Style and convention enforcement
  • Multi-agent collaborative review

Review Agents

Security Agent

CheckDescription
SQL injectionDetect SQL injection vulnerabilities
XSSCross-site scripting attack vectors
AuthenticationAuth bypasses and flaws
CryptographicWeak crypto implementations
SecretsExposed credentials or API keys
CORSMisconfiguration issues

Performance Agent

MetricDescription
Algorithm complexityBig-O analysis
Query efficiencyN+1 queries, slow queries
Memory patternsAllocation and leaks
Cache utilizationCaching opportunities
Bundle sizeImpact on bundle size

Style Agent

CheckDescription
Code formattingConsistent formatting
Naming conventionsVariable/function naming
DocumentationComment quality
Test coverageMissing tests
Error handlingProper error patterns

Architecture Agent

PatternDescription
SOLID principlesSingle responsibility, etc.
DRY violationsCode duplication
Coupling metricsComponent dependencies
Layer violationsArchitecture boundaries
Circular dependenciesDependency cycles

Usage Examples

1. Multi-Agent Review System

# Get PR details
PR_DATA=$(gh pr view 123 --json files,additions,deletions,title,body)
PR_DIFF=$(gh pr diff 123)

# Initialize swarm with PR context
npx ruv-swarm github review-init \
  --pr 123 \
  --pr-data "$PR_DATA" \
  --diff "$PR_DIFF" \
  --agents "security,performance,style,architecture" \
  --depth comprehensive

# Post initial review status
gh pr comment 123 --body "Multi-agent code review initiated"

2. Security-Focused Review

# Get changed files
CHANGED_FILES=$(gh pr view 123 --json files --jq '.files[].path')

# Run security review
SECURITY_RESULTS=$(npx ruv-swarm github review-security \
  --pr 123 \
  --files "$CHANGED_FILES" \
  --check "owasp,cve,secrets,permissions" \
  --suggest-fixes)

# Post findings based on severity
if echo "$SECURITY_RESULTS" | grep -q "critical"; then
  gh pr review 123 --request-changes --body "$SECURITY_RESULTS"
  gh pr edit 123 --add-label "security-review-required"
else
  gh pr comment 123 --body "$SECURITY_RESULTS"
fi

3. Initialize Review Swarm

// Initialize code review swarm

// Orchestrate parallel review
    task: "Comprehensive code review covering security, performance, style, and architecture",
    strategy: "parallel",
    priority: "high"
})

4. Post Inline Comments

# Get diff with context
PR_DIFF=$(gh pr diff 123 --color never)
PR_FILES=$(gh pr view 123 --json files)

# Generate review comments
COMMENTS=$(npx ruv-swarm github review-comment \
  --pr 123 \
  --diff "$PR_DIFF" \
  --files "$PR_FILES" \
  --style "constructive" \
  --include-examples \
  --suggest-fixes)

# Post inline comments
echo "$COMMENTS" | jq -c '.[]' | while read -r comment; do
  FILE=$(echo "$comment" | jq -r '.path')
  LINE=$(echo "$comment" | jq -r '.line')
  BODY=$(echo "$comment" | jq -r '.body')

  gh api \
    --method POST \
    /repos/owner/repo/pulls/123/comments \
    -f path="$FILE" \
    -f line="$LINE" \
    -f body="$BODY" \
    -f commit_id="$(gh pr view 123 --json headRefOid -q .headRefOid)"
done

Review Configuration

# .github/review-swarm.yml
version: 1
review:
  auto-trigger: true
  required-agents:
    - security
    - performance
    - style
  optional-agents:
    - architecture
    - accessibility
    - i18n

  thresholds:
    security: block
    performance: warn
    style: suggest

  rules:
    security:
      - no-eval
      - no-hardcoded-secrets
      - proper-auth-checks
    performance:
      - no-n-plus-one
      - efficient-queries
      - proper-caching
    architecture:
      - max-coupling: 5
      - min-cohesion: 0.7
      - follow-patterns

MCP Tool Integration

Swarm Coordination

// Initialize review swarm
    topology: "hierarchical",
    maxAgents: 5,
    strategy: "specialized"
})

// Spawn specialized reviewers
    agents: [
        { type: "reviewer", name: "security-agent", capabilities: ["security-audit"] },
        { type: "reviewer", name: "perf-agent", capabilities: ["performance-analysis"] },
        { type: "reviewer", name: "style-agent", capabilities: ["code-style"] }
    ]
})

Memory for Review State

// Store review findings
    action: "store",
    key: "review/pr-123/findings",
    value: JSON.stringify({
        security: { issues: 2, severity: "medium" },
        performance: { issues: 1, severity: "low" },
        style: { issues: 5, severity: "info" }
    })
})

GitHub Actions Integration

# .github/workflows/auto-review.yml
name: Automated Code Review
on:
  pull_request:
    types: [opened, synchronize]

jobs:
  swarm-review:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
        with:
          fetch-depth: 0

      - name: Setup GitHub CLI
        run: echo "${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}" | gh auth login --with-token

      - name: Run Review Swarm
        run: |
          PR_NUM=${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}
          PR_DATA=$(gh pr view $PR_NUM --json files,title,body,labels)

          REVIEW_OUTPUT=$(npx ruv-swarm github review-all \
            --pr $PR_NUM \
            --pr-data "$PR_DATA" \
            --agents "security,performance,style,architecture")

          echo "$REVIEW_OUTPUT" | gh pr review $PR_NUM --comment -F -

          if echo "$REVIEW_OUTPUT" | grep -q "approved"; then
            gh pr review $PR_NUM --approve
          elif echo "$REVIEW_OUTPUT" | grep -q "changes-requested"; then
            gh pr review $PR_NUM --request-changes -b "See review comments above"
          fi

Comment Templates

Security Issue

**Security Issue: [Type]**

**Severity**: Critical / High / Low

**Description**:
[Clear explanation of the security issue]

**Impact**:
[Potential consequences if not addressed]

**Suggested Fix**:

[Code example of the fix]


**References**:

- [OWASP Guide](https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub/blob/HEAD/.claude/skills/development/github/github-code-review/link)

Performance Issue

**Performance Issue: [Type]**

**Impact**: [Expected performance degradation]

**Current**:

[Current code]


**Suggested**:

[Optimized code]

Best Practices

1. Review Configuration

  • Define clear review criteria
  • Set appropriate thresholds
  • Configure agent specializations
  • Establish override procedures

2. Comment Quality

  • Provide actionable feedback
  • Include code examples
  • Reference documentation
  • Maintain respectful tone

3. Performance

  • Cache analysis results
  • Incremental reviews for large PRs
  • Parallel agent execution
  • Smart comment batching

Version History

  • 1.0.0 (2025-01-02): Initial release - converted from code-review-swarm agent

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

25.07%
按下载量换算32

windsurf

24.37%
按下载量换算31

trae

17.53%
按下载量换算23

OpenCode

13.32%
按下载量换算17

Cursor

7.62%
按下载量换算10

Codex

3.57%
按下载量换算5

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub --skill github-code-review;npx skills add vamseeachanta/workspace-hub --skill "github-code-review" 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills