Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

gh-issue-writer(gh 问题作者)

用于围绕 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request、分支、提交和代码协作流程提供辅助能力。它适合让 Agent 查询项目状态、整理变更、辅助创建或检查协作事项,并把仓库中的信息转成可执行的下一步。使用时需要区分只读查询和写入操作;涉及创建 PR、修改 Issue、推送分支或访问私有仓库时,应确认 token 权限、目标仓库范围和用户授权。

gh-issue-writer 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 12,842。

总安装 1,105周安装 47GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 387核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.1

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:gh-issue-writer(gh 问题作者)
来源仓库:https://github.com/djc00p/gh-issue-writer
安装命令:
openclaw skills install gh-issue-writer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install gh-issue-writer

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

gh-issue-writer 用于围绕 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request、分支、提交和代码协作流程提供辅助能力。根据描述、错误或想法起草结构良好的 GitHub 问题,支持错误报告、功能请求、增强功能和任务,可选择提交。

通过 clawhub 安装,命令为 openclaw skills install gh-issue-writer。使用时需要区分只读查询和写入操作;涉及创建 PR、修改 Issue、推送分支或访问私有仓库时,应确认 token 权限、目标仓库范围和用户授权。

适用宿主包括 OpenClaw,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install gh-issue-writer;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

gh-issue-writer 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install gh-issue-writer。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

gh-issue-writer 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

gh-issue-writer 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

gh-issue-writer 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

gh-issue-writer 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,105 次,近一周安装 47 次,下载 387 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

gh-issue-writer 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
gh-issue-writer

gh 问题作者 · 本页

1,105—操作浏览器MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
gh-issue-writer
description
Draft well-structured GitHub issues from a description, error, or idea. Supports bug reports, feature requests, enhancements, and tasks. Optionally submits directly via the GitHub CLI or API. Use when someone says "write a GitHub issue", "open an issue for", "file a bug", "create a feature request", or describes a problem that needs to be tracked.
metadata
{"clawdbot":{"emoji":"🐛","requires":{"bins":["gh","git","curl"]},"primaryEnv":"GH_TOKEN","os":["linux","darwin","win32"]}}

gh-issue-writer

Draft clear, actionable GitHub issues from a brief description, error message, or idea. Covers bug reports, feature requests, enhancements, and tasks.


Step 1 — Understand the Input

Ask (or infer from context):

  1. What type of issue? Bug | Feature Request | Enhancement | Task | Question
  2. What repo? (detect from git remote get-url origin if in a git dir, otherwise ask)
  3. What happened / what's wanted? (the raw description, error, or idea)
  4. Optional: Labels, assignee, milestone, environment details

If the user gives you enough context, proceed without asking — draft and show for confirmation.


Step 2 — Draft the Issue

Use the appropriate template below. Fill every field; omit sections only if genuinely not applicable.

Bug Report

## Description
<!-- Clear, one-paragraph summary of the problem. -->

## Steps to Reproduce
1.
2.
3.

## Expected Behavior
<!-- What should have happened? -->

## Actual Behavior
<!-- What actually happened? Include error messages verbatim. -->

## Environment
- OS:
- Browser / Runtime / Version:
- Relevant config or dependencies:

## Logs / Screenshots
<!-- Paste relevant logs, stack traces, or attach screenshots. -->

## Additional Context
<!-- Anything else that might help: related issues, recent changes, workarounds tried. -->

Feature Request

## Problem / Motivation
<!-- What problem does this solve? Why does it matter? -->

## Proposed Solution
<!-- Describe the feature clearly. What would it look like? How would it work? -->

## Alternatives Considered
<!-- Other approaches you thought about and why you ruled them out. -->

## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ]
- [ ]

## Additional Context
<!-- Mockups, related issues, prior art, links. -->

Enhancement (improvement to existing behavior)

## Current Behavior
<!-- What does it do now? -->

## Desired Behavior
<!-- What should it do instead? -->

## Why This Matters
<!-- Impact: who benefits, how much, how often? -->

## Suggested Implementation
<!-- Optional: any technical ideas or constraints. -->

Task / Chore

## What needs to be done
<!-- Clear, specific description of the work. -->

## Why / Context
<!-- Why is this needed now? What does it unblock? -->

## Definition of Done
- [ ]
- [ ]

Step 3 — Write a Strong Title

Title format by type:

TypePatternExample
BugBug: <what fails> on <where>Bug: 500 on POST /login when payload missing field
FeatureFeature: <capability> for <who/where>Feature: CSV export for admin reports
EnhancementEnhance: <what> — <improvement>Enhance: error messages — add field-level detail
TaskTask: <verb> <thing>Task: upgrade Stripe SDK to v16

Rules:

  • Under 72 characters
  • No vague words ("fix thing", "update stuff")
  • Specific: what + where, not just what

Step 4 — Suggest Labels & Metadata

Recommend labels based on type and content:

SignalSuggested Labels
Bugbug, needs-repro
Featureenhancement, feature-request
High impact / blockingpriority:high
Needs more infoneeds-info
Good for contributorsgood first issue
Securitysecurity
Performanceperformance
Docsdocumentation

Also suggest:

  • Assignee: who owns this area of the codebase?
  • Milestone: which release or sprint does this target?

Step 5 — Present for Review

Show the complete draft:

**Title:** <title>

**Type:** Bug / Feature / Enhancement / Task
**Suggested labels:** bug, priority:high
**Suggested assignee:** (if known)

---
<full issue body>
---

Ask: "Does this look right? I can adjust the title, add details, or submit it directly."


Step 6 — Optional: Submit

Prerequisites for submission: - gh CLI (authenticated via gh auth login) — preferred path - GH_TOKEN env var — required for the curl API fallback - git — used to detect the repo from git remote get-url origin Drafting (Steps 1–5) works without any of these.

If the user says "submit", "create it", "go ahead", or similar:

Via GitHub CLI (preferred)

gh issue create \
  --repo owner/repo \
  --title "<title>" \
  --body "<body>" \
  --label "bug,priority:high" \
  --assignee "@me"

Via GitHub API (fallback if gh isn't available)

curl -s -X POST \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $GH_TOKEN" \
  -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
  https://api.github.com/repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues \
  -d '{
    "title": "<title>",
    "body": "<body>",
    "labels": ["bug"],
    "assignees": []
  }'

On success, output the issue URL. On error, show the response and offer to retry.


Quality Checklist

Before presenting the draft, verify:

  • [ ] Title is specific and under 72 chars
  • [ ] For bugs: repro steps are numbered and minimal
  • [ ] Expected vs actual behavior is clearly separated
  • [ ] Environment section filled (OS, version, runtime)
  • [ ] No vague language ("sometimes", "doesn't work", "weird behavior")
  • [ ] Logs/errors quoted verbatim, not paraphrased
  • [ ] Ends with a clear ask or next step

Tips for Better Issues

Do:

  • Quote error messages exactly — don't summarize them
  • Include the minimal repro — what's the smallest thing that triggers the bug?
  • Link related issues with #<number>
  • Mention what you've already tried

Don't:

  • "Works on my machine" without environment details
  • Multiple unrelated problems in one issue
  • Vague titles like "Login broken" or "Feature request"
  • Screenshot of code instead of pasted text

See Also

  • GitHub's official issue template docs: https://docs.github.com/en/communities/using-templates-to-encourage-useful-issues-and-pull-requests
  • Set up templates: create .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ in your repo

平台分布

OpenClaw

92.07%
按下载量换算356

安全审计

VirusTotal

未展示

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills